Search

This study assessed the healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and cost burden of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and acute suicidal ideation or behavior (SIB; MDSI) versus those with MDD without SIB and those without MDD.Adults were selected from the MarketScan® Databases (10/2015-02/2020). The MDSI cohort received an MDD diagnosis within 6 months of a claim for acute SIB (index date). The index date was a random MDD claim in the MDD without SIB cohort and a random date in the non-MDD cohort. Patients had continuous eligibility ≥12 months pre- and ≥1 month post-index. HRU and costs were compared during 1- and 12-month post-index periods between MDSI and control cohorts matched 1:1 on demographics.The MDSI cohort included 73,242 patients (mean age 35 years, 60.6% female, 37.2% Medicaid coverage). At 1 month post-index, the MDSI cohort versus the MDD without SIB/non-MDD cohorts had 12.8/67.2 times more inpatient admissions and 3.3/8.9 times more emergency department visits; they had 2.9 times more outpatient visits versus the non-MDD cohort (all p 0.001). The MDSI cohort had incremental mean healthcare costs of $5255 and $6674 per-patient-month versus the MDD without SIB and non-MDD cohorts (all p 0.001); inpatient costs drove up to 89.5% of incremental costs. At 12 months post-index, HRU and costs remained higher in MDSI versus control cohorts.SIB are underreported in claims; unobserved confounders may cause bias.MDSI is associated with substantial excess healthcare costs driven by inpatient costs, concentrated in the first month post-index, and persisting during the following year.

To gain a better understanding of the characteristics of patients with a hospital encounter for major depressive disorder (MDD) and evaluate associated hospital resource utilization, hospital charges and costs, and hospital re-encounters.Adult patients with a hospital encounter (i.e. emergency department [ED] visit only or inpatient admission) with MDD as the primary discharge diagnosis (index event) during July 2018‒March 2019 were selected from the Premier Healthcare Database. Patient characteristics, hospital resource utilization, and hospital charges and costs were evaluated during index events. During a 12-month follow-up, hospital re-encounters (MDD-related and all-cause ED visit only or inpatient readmissions) were examined.The study population included 77,178 patients with an index hospital encounter (ED visit only: 49.9%; inpatient admission: 50.1%) for MDD. The most common secondary mental health-related diagnosis was suicidal ideation/behavior, which was recorded in 51.8% of patients. The mean age was 38.2 years, 53.0% were female, and 72.1% were Caucasian. Among patients with an ED visit only, the mean index hospital charges and costs were $3,608 and $639, respectively. Among those with inpatient admissions, the mean length of stay was 4.9 days, and the mean index hospital charges and costs were $17,107 and $6,095, respectively. During the 12-month follow-up, 13.3% of patients in the overall study population had an MDD-related hospital re-encounter (primary or secondary discharge diagnosis code indicating MDD); nearly one-third (31.3%) occurred within 30 days post-discharge. During the follow-up, 28.1% had an all-cause hospital re-encounter with 29.7% having occurred within 30 days post-discharge.Due to constraints of the Premier Healthcare Database, healthcare resource utilization and costs outside of the hospital could not be evaluated.Patients with a hospital encounter for MDD are relatively young, commonly have suicidal ideation/behavior, utilize substantial hospital resources, and have a high risk for a hospital re-encounter in the 30 days post-discharge.

Introduction Pre-existing conditions relevant for adverse events (AE) and the potential for drug–drug interactions (DDIs) may limit safe pharmacotherapeutic augmentation options for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This concern may be heightened among patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), who often have comorbid medical disorders. Methods Adults with MDD and ≥ 1 antidepressant claim within the first observed major depressive episode were identified in the MarketScan® Databases. Those initiating a new regimen after two regimens at adequate dose and duration were considered to have TRD. The index date was defined at TRD onset or on a random antidepressant claim among patients with non-TRD MDD. Pre-existing conditions 12 months pre-index and potential DDIs 3 months pre/post-index associated with specific non-antidepressant augmentation therapies, including atypical antipsychotics (APs), buspirone, psychostimulants, anticonvulsants, thyroid hormone, and lithium were compared between 1:1 matched TRD and non-TRD MDD cohorts. Results Overall, 3414 patients with TRD and non-TRD MDD (mean age 39.7 years, 69% female) were matched. Relative to non-TRD MDD, patients with TRD had 33% higher likelihood of ≥ 1 pre-existing condition relevant for AEs listed in product labels of non-antidepressant augmentation therapies (p

Background and Objective Suicidal ideation or behavior are core symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD). This study aimed to understand heterogeneity among patients with MDD and acute suicidal ideation or behavior. Methods Adults with a diagnosis of MDD on the same day or 6 months before a claim for suicidal ideation or behavior (index date) were identified in the MarketScan® Databases (10/01/2014–04/30/2019). A mathematical algorithm was used to cluster patients on characteristics of care measured pre-index. Patient care pathways were described by cluster during the 12-month pre-index period and up to 12 months post-index. Results Among 38,876 patients with MDD and acute suicidal ideation or behavior, three clusters were identified. Across clusters, pre-index exposure to mental healthcare was revealed as a key differentiator: Cluster 1 (N = 16,025) was least exposed, Cluster 2 (N = 5640) moderately exposed, and Cluster 3 (N = 17,211) most exposed. Patients whose MDD diagnosis was first observed during their index event comprised 86.0% and 72.8% of Clusters 1 and 2, respectively; in Cluster 3, all patients had an MDD diagnosis pre-index. Within 30 days post-index, in Clusters 1, 2, and 3, respectively, 79.3%, 85.2%, and 88.2% used mental health services, including outpatient visits for MDD. Within 12 months post-index, 61.5%, 91.5%, and 84.6% had one or more antidepressant claim, respectively. Per-patient index event costs averaged $5614, $6645, and $5853, respectively. Conclusions Patients with MDD and acute suicidal ideation or behavior least exposed to the healthcare system pre-index similarly received the least care post-index. An opportunity exists to optimize treatment and follow-up with mental health services. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-021-01042-5.

Introduction Previous evidence demonstrated that patients with schizophrenia consumed substantial healthcare resources in an integrated healthcare system. This study evaluated the impact of initiating once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among patients with schizophrenia treated in a US integrated healthcare system. Methods This retrospective study used electronic medical records from Atrium Health. Adults with at least two diagnoses of schizophrenia who received an initial PP1M dose between September 2009 and April 2019 (the corresponding date defined the index date) and at least one subsequent dose within 90 days were included. Additionally, patients were required to have received active care (at least one healthcare visit every 6 months) during 12-month pre- and post-index periods and at least one oral antipsychotic prescription during the 12-month pre-index period. Inpatient, emergency room (ER), and outpatient visits were compared over 12-month pre- versus post-index periods within the same cohort using McNemar’s and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Findings were reported for all patients and separately in patients with at least one schizophrenia relapse (schizophrenia-related inpatient or ER visit) during the 12-month pre-index period. Results The study cohort included 210 patients (mean age 34.2 years, 69.5% male, 39.1% had Medicaid). From the 12-month pre- to post-index period, the proportion of patients with visits and mean number of visits reduced for all-cause inpatient (67.6% to 22.4%, 1.2 to 0.4), 30-day readmission (12.4% to 2.4%, 0.2 to 0.1), and ER (68.6% to 45.7%, 2.3 to 1.2) visits, whereas the mean number of outpatient visits increased (8.7 to 11.6) (all P

Patients with schizophrenia often struggle with medication adherence and may benefit from the use of a long-acting injectable antipsychotic, including once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M), which was previously demonstrated to improve outcomes compared with oral antipsychotics. This study assessed the impact of initiating PP1M therapy on medication adherence, health care resource use (HRU), and costs among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia and a prior schizophrenia relapse.A 6-state Medicaid database (from quarter 1 of 2009 to quarter 1 of 2018) was used to identify adults with ≥2 schizophrenia diagnoses who started PP1M therapy on or after January 1, 2010. The index date was the first PP1M claim. Patients had ≥12 months of continuous Medicaid enrollment before and after the index date, ≥1 oral antipsychotic claim in the 12 months before the index date, and ≥1 relapse (proxied as a schizophrenia-related inpatient admission or emergency department [ED] visit) during the 12 months before the index date. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare adherence to antipsychotics (proportion of days covered ≥80%), HRU, and costs (reported in 2018 US dollars) in the 12 months after versus before the index date. Sensitivity analyses were conducted (1) accounting for the minimum and cumulative price inflation Medicaid rebates for pharmacy costs of branded psychiatric medications, (2) among patients with ≥2, ≥3, and ≥4 prior schizophrenia-related inpatient admissions or ED visits, (3) among patients not adherent to antipsychotic treatment before the index date, and (4) among patients switching to PP1M directly from oral risperidone or paliperidone.A total of 1725 patients met the study inclusion criteria (mean age, 39.5 years; 43% female). After versus before the index date, patients were 93% more likely to be adherent to antipsychotic treatment (P 0.01). The likelihood of inpatient admissions and ED visits decreased by 89% and 49% (all P 0.01) after initiating PP1M therapy. The number of inpatient days decreased by 31% (P 0.01) and the number of ED visits by 16% (P = 0.03). Pharmacy costs increased by $514 per-patient-per-month (PPPM), whereas medical costs, driven by inpatient costs, decreased by $391 PPPM (all P 0.01). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar trends. Notably, total health care cost savings of $231 PPPM were observed after accounting for the cumulative Medicaid rebate for costs of branded psychiatric medications (P 0.01).In Medicaid beneficiaries with relapsed schizophrenia, transitioning from oral antipsychotics to PP1M was associated with improved adherence to antipsychotics and decreased use of inpatient and ED services. Increased pharmacy costs after the initiation of PP1M were offset by decreased medical costs. After applying the cumulative Medicaid rebate, including the price inflation rebate for costs of branded psychiatric medications, initiation of PP1M therapy resulted in statistically significant health care cost savings.

To compare adherence, rates of subsequent schizophrenia-related relapses, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare costs among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia who initiated once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) versus a new oral atypical antipsychotic (OAA) following a recent schizophrenia-related relapse.Six-state Medicaid data (01/2009-03/2018) were used to identify adults with schizophrenia initiated on PP1M or OAA (index date) within 30 days following a schizophrenia-related relapse (defined as a schizophrenia-related inpatient or emergency room visit). Patients were required to have 12 months of continuous eligibility before (baseline) and after (observation) the index date. Differences in baseline characteristics between PP1M and OAA patients were accounted for using 1:3 matching.After matching, characteristics were well-balanced between PP1M (Among patients with a recent schizophrenia-related relapse, PP1M was associated with a lower risk of subsequent relapse while remaining a cost neutral therapeutic option compared to OAAs.

Antipsychotics with reduced dosing frequency may improve adherence and clinical outcomes for patients with schizophrenia. This study compared treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and costs between Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia treated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) and those who transitioned to once-every-three-months paliperidone palmitate (PP3M).Adults with schizophrenia were identified in a four-state Medicaid database (18 May 2014 to 31 March 2019). The index date was the first PP3M claim (PP3M cohort), or a random PP1M claim (PP1M cohort), following ≥4 months of continuous PP1M treatment among patients with ≥12 months of continuous Medicaid enrollment pre- and post-index. Adherence (proportion of days covered by the index treatment ≥80%), persistence (no gap90/30 days in the PP3M/PP1M supply), HRU, and costs were compared during the 12-month post-index period between cohorts matched 1:1.Among 2374 patients identified, 374 remained in each cohort after matching (mean age 42 years; 30.5% female). Compared to the PP1M cohort, the PP3M cohort was 2.39 times more likely to be adherent (Medicaid beneficiaries who transitioned to PP3M had higher adherence and persistence, and a reduced likelihood of hospitalization relative to those who continued treatment with PP1M. The results suggest potential clinical value to transitioning eligible patients to PP3M.

Background: Esketamine nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant is approved in adults with major depressive disorder with acute suicidal ideation or behavior (MDSI). Methods: A budget impact analysis from a US payer perspective was performed with a hypothetical 1-million-member plan, using pharmacy and medical costs associated with adding esketamine plus an oral antidepressant to usual care. Results: Estimated annual total healthcare costs of managing patients with MDSI increased from $32,988,247 without esketamine to $34,161,188 in Year 3 with esketamine (primarily due to medical costs). The per-member-per-month incremental costs were $0.02, $0.06 and $0.10 in Years 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion: Incorporation of esketamine results in a modest estimated impact on the annual budget over a 3-year time horizon.

This study aimed to characterize patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) initiating esketamine or conventional therapies.Adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) were selected from the IBM MarketScan Databases. A claims-based algorithm identified patients with evidence of TRD, defined as initiation of a new antidepressant therapy after 2 different antidepressant trials of adequate dose and duration during the most recent major depressive episode. Patients receiving treatment on/after March 5, 2019 (esketamine approval date for TRD), were classified to the esketamine cohort if they newly initiated esketamine (index date) or to the TRD conventional therapies cohorts if they newly initiated electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or pharmacologic therapies (index date was the therapy initiation date, prioritizing ECT, then TMS, then pharmacologic antidepressant therapies). Patient characteristics in the 6 months before therapy initiation were described.The esketamine cohort included 246 patients (mean age, 46.5 years; 63.0% female), and the TRD conventional therapies cohorts included 104,164 patients (mean age, 46.9 years; 74.8% female; 0.4% initiated ECT, 1.2% initiated TMS). During the 6 months preindex, in the esketamine and TRD conventional therapies cohorts, 77.6% and 41.4% received psychotherapy and 82.9% and 34.2% had a psychiatrist visit, respectively. Most patients had outpatient care for MDD in the esketamine (91.9%) and TRD conventional therapies (63.6%) cohorts; 57.3% and 21.0% received care at specialized mental health care settings. MDD was classified as "severe" among 81.3% and 35.1% of patients in the esketamine and TRD conventional therapies cohorts . Preindex mental health-related (MHR) inpatient admissions and emergency department visits were identified in 12.2% and 16.3% of the esketamine cohort and in 8.2% and 10.3% of the TRD conventional therapies cohort. Before therapy initiation, 34.6% and 17.6% of the esketamine and TRD conventional therapies cohorts received ≥3 unique antidepressants. Suicidal ideation or behavior was observed in 8.5% and 3.6% of the esketamine and TRD conventional therapies cohorts pretherapy initiation. Mean monthly all-cause health care costs in the esketamine cohort were $2532 (58.2% MHR); in the TRD conventional therapies cohorts, costs were $1873 (32.4% MHR).Among patients with TRD, those initiating esketamine relative to conventional therapies displayed higher MDD severity, used more MHR inpatient/emergency department services and antidepressant treatments, and incurred higher health care costs 6 months pretherapy initiation. These findings suggest potential benefits of identifying and treating patients with TRD earlier with more effective treatments and should inform payers in consideration of esketamine coverage.

There is limited literature on treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and costs among patients who transition from once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) to once-every-3-month paliperidone palmitate (PP3M) in a real-world setting. Hence, this study compared treatment patterns, HRU, and costs 12-month pre- and post-PP3M transition among Veteran’s Health Administration (VHA) patients with schizophrenia. Patients with schizophrenia (aged ≥ 18 years) who initiated PP1M and transitioned per on-label criteria to PP3M (no treatment gap of > 45 days in PP1M during the 4 months prior, same dose strength of the last two PP1M claims, and appropriate dose conversion from last PP1M to first PP3M claim) from January 2015 to March 2017 were included from the VHA database. The first transition date to PP3M was identified as the index date. Patients were required to have 12-month pre- and post-PP3M continuous health plan eligibility. Outcomes were compared using the Wilcoxon-signed rank and McNemar’s test, appropriately. The study included 122 patients [mean (SD) age: 54 (13.7) years]. Pre- and post-PP3M transition, 64.8% and 61.5% of patients were adherent (proportion of days covered ≥ 80%) to PP1M and PP3M, respectively. Comparison of HRU outcomes pre- and post-PP3M transition exhibited lower all-cause outpatient (37.5 vs. 31.1, p

Aims: Among patients with schizophrenia, poor adherence and persistence with oral atypical antipsychotics (OAA) often results in relapse and hospitalization. Second-generation antipsychotic...

Little is known about the burden of schizophrenia among United States veterans early after diagnosis. This retrospective study describes treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs among veterans with a recent schizophrenia diagnosis.Adults with a schizophrenia diagnosis recorded between 1 April 2014 and 31 December 2017 and no history of schizophrenia over the preceding 12 months were identified from a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) database. Continuous enrollment in the VHA was required for ≥ 12 months before and after the index date when the first schizophrenia diagnosis code was identified. Baseline characteristics and follow-up treatment patterns, HRU and costs were examined descriptively.The study population (20,389 patients) had a high baseline mental health comorbidity burden. Despite a schizophrenia diagnosis, 32.1% of patients received no antipsychotic medication during the follow-up period. Among those with ≥ 1 antipsychotic prescription fill, 64.0% received ≥ 1 oral antipsychotic (OAP) therapy and 11.6% received ≥ 1 long-acting injectable (LAI). A delay was observed between diagnosis and treatment for both OAPs (39.0 ± 67.2 days) and LAIs (69.4 ± 96.2 days). Adherence to therapy (defined as proportion of days covered ≥ 80%) was greater with LAIs (34.5%) vs OAPs (27.3%). Inpatient stays were reported for 33.8% of patients during the 12-month follow-up period, and 5.5% of patients had readmissions. All-cause inpatient stay costs with 12-month follow-up equaled $7999 per patient per year.These data indicate that pharmacotherapy after a recent diagnosis of schizophrenia in the VHA system is suboptimal, and that these patients face a considerable burden in terms of hospitalization, other HRU, and healthcare costs.

BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia struggle with disease relapses and uncontrolled symptoms, which can either result in or be a result of non-adherence to antipsychotics (APs). The economic burden of such patients is hypothesized to be substantial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic burden of recently relapsed schizophrenia or of uncontrolled symptoms of schizophrenia with non-adherence to APs in Medicaid beneficiaries. METHODS: Adults with ≥ 2 schizophrenia diagnoses and controls without schizophrenia were identified in Medicaid data (1997Q1-2018Q1) from Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, and Wisconsin. The index date was the last observed schizophrenia diagnosis (cohort with schizophrenia) or the last service claim (control cohort) with ≥ 12 months of continuous Medicaid enrollment before and after it. Cohorts were matched 1:1 using propensity scores. After matching, two subgroups were identified among adults with schizophrenia: (1) patients with schizophrenia and a recent relapse (≥ 1 schizophrenia-related inpatient or emergency department claim ≤ 60 days before or on the index date) and (2) patients with uncontrolled symptoms of schizophrenia (≥ 2 schizophrenia-related hospitalizations) and non-adherence to APs (proportion of days covered < 80%) in the 12-month pre-index period. Previously matched controls were then subset to patients in each subgroup and their matched pairs without schizophrenia, thus maintaining the 1:1 matching ratio. Healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs ($2018 USD) in the 12-month post-index (observation) period were compared between matched pairs using adjusted regression models. RESULTS: Among 158,763 patients with schizophrenia, 18,771 (11.8%) had a recent relapse (mean age 50.5 years; 48.6% female, 51.4% male) and 13,697 (8.6%) were not adherent to APs and had uncontrolled symptoms of schizophrenia (mean age 47.1 years; 48.0% female, 52.0% male). During the observation period, patients with recently relapsed schizophrenia and those non-adherent to APs with uncontrolled symptoms of schizophrenia had significantly higher HRU relative to their controls without schizophrenia. Patients with recently relapsed schizophrenia had mean total healthcare costs $21,862 higher relative to their controls ($37,424 vs $15,563), driven by $8,486 higher mean long-term care costs (all P < 0.001). Patients non-adherent to APs with uncontrolled symptoms of schizophrenia had adjusted mean total healthcare costs $20,787 higher relative to their controls ($38,337 vs $15,241), driven by $8,019 higher adjusted mean inpatient costs (all P < 0.001). Additional total healthcare costs incurred by patients with recently relapsed schizophrenia and those of patients non-adherent to APs with uncontrolled symptoms of schizophrenia exceeded by 55.2% and 47.6%, respectively, incremental total healthcare costs incurred by all patients with schizophrenia ($14,087). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recently relapsed schizophrenia and those non-adherent to AP therapy with uncontrolled symptoms of schizophrenia incurred higher HRU and costs relative to patients without schizophrenia. Additional healthcare costs of these subgroups of patients with schizophrenia appeared higher than in the overall population with schizophrenia. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. The sponsor was involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript preparation, and publication decisions. Pilon, Lafeuille, Zhdanava, Cote-Sergent, Rossi, and Lefebvre are employees of Analysis Group, Inc., a consulting company that has provided paid consulting services to Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, which funded the development and conduct of this study and manuscript. Patel, Joshi, and Lin are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC and stockholders of Johnson & Johnson. Part of the material in this manuscript has been presented at the US Psych Congress, October 3-6, 2019, San Diego, CA, and at the Virtual ISPOR Meeting, May 18-20, 2020.

Objective Estimates of prevalence and burden of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) vary widely in the literature. This study evaluated the prevalence and burden of TRD and the share of TRD in the burden of medication-treated major depressive disorder (MDD) using the most commonly accepted definition of TRD and a novel bottom-up approach. Methods Prevalence and health care burden of TRD were estimated by synthetizing inputs across 4 similarly designed claims studies in adults covered by Medicare, Medicaid, commercial plans, and the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Productivity (absenteeism and presenteeism) and unemployment burden were estimated based on inputs from a study conducted with data from the Kantar National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS; 2017). A targeted literature search for additional inputs was performed. A cost model was developed to estimate the burden of TRD and medication-treated DSM-5-defined MDD in the United States. Study outcomes were the 12-month prevalence of TRD and the annual health care, productivity, and unemployment burden of TRD and medication-treated MDD in the United States. Results The estimated 12-month prevalence of medication-treated MDD in the United States was 8.9 million adults, and 2.8 million (30.9%) had TRD. The total annual burden of medication-treated MDD among the US population was $92.7 billion, with $43.8 billion (47.2%) attributable to TRD. The share of TRD was 56.6% ($25.8 billion) of the health care burden, 47.7% ($8.7 billion) of the unemployment burden, and 32.2% ($9.3 billion) of the productivity burden of medication-treated MDD. Conclusions TRD is associated with disproportionate health care costs and unemployment, suggesting potentially large economic and societal gains with effective management.

Objectives To create and validate a model to predict depression symptom severity among patients with treatment‐resistant depression (TRD) using commonly recorded variables within medical claims databases. Methods Adults with TRD (here defined as > 2 antidepressant treatments in an episode, suggestive of nonresponse) and ≥ 1 Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)‐9 record on or after the index TRD date were identified (2013–2018) in Decision Resource Group's Real World Data Repository, which links an electronic health record database to a medical claims database. A total of 116 clinical/demographic variables were utilized as predictors of the study outcome of depression symptom severity, which was measured by PHQ‐9 total score category (score: 0–9 = none to mild, 10–14 = moderate, 15–27 = moderately severe to severe). A random forest approach was applied to develop and validate the predictive model. Results Among 5,356 PHQ‐9 scores in the study population, the mean (standard deviation) PHQ‐9 score was 10.1 (7.2). The model yielded an accuracy of 62.7%. For each predicted depression symptom severity category, the mean observed scores (8.0, 12.2, and 16.2) fell within the appropriate range. Conclusions While there is room for improvement in its accuracy, the use of a machine learning tool that predicts depression symptom severity of patients with TRD can potentially have wide population‐level applications. Healthcare systems and payers can build upon this groundwork and use the variables identified and the predictive modeling approach to create an algorithm specific to their population., In this study, we created and validated a machine learning model using commonly recorded variables within a medical claims database to predict depression symptom severity of patients with TRD based on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)‐9 scores available within an electronic health record (EHR) database. The model was found to predict depression symptom severity category from the three possible severity category choices with an overall accuracy of 62.7%. Of the 116 clinical and demographic variables evaluated in our study, six were found to be the most important predictors. To our knowledge, this is the first study which attempts to predict depression symptom severity of patients with TRD using clinical and demographic characteristics in a medical claims database.

Little is known about the economic burden of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in patients with physical conditions.To assess health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs, work loss days, and related costs in patients with TRD and physical conditions versus patients with the same conditions and non-TRD major depressive disorder (MDD) or without MDD.Adults aged65 years with MDD treated with antidepressants were identified in the OptumHealth Care Solutions database (July 2009-March 2017). Patients who received a diagnosis of MDD and initiated a third antidepressant regimen (index date) after 2 regimens of adequate dose and duration were defined as having TRD. Patients with non-TRD MDD and without MDD were assigned a random index date. Patients with6 months of continuous health plan eligibility pre- or post-index; a diagnosis of psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder/mania, dementia, and developmental disorders; and/or no baseline physical conditions (cardiovascular, metabolic, and respiratory disease or cancer) were excluded. Patients with TRD were matched 1:1 to each of the non-TRD MDD and non-MDD cohorts based on propensity scores. Per patient per year HRU, costs, and work loss outcomes were compared up to 24 months post-index date using negative binominal and ordinary least square regressions.A total of 2,317 patients with TRD (mean age, 47.6 years; 63.1%, female; mean follow-up, 19.7 months) had ≥ 1 co-occurring key physical condition (cardiovascular, 52.5%; metabolic, 48.2%; respiratory, 16.4%; and cancer, 9.5%). Relative to non-TRD MDD and non-MDD cohorts, respectively, patients with TRD had 46% and 235% more inpatient admissions, 28% and 128% more emergency department visits, and 53% and 155% more outpatient visits (allIn patients with physical conditions, those with TRD had higher HRU and health care costs, work loss days, and associated costs compared with non-TRD MDD and non-MDD cohorts.This study was sponsored by Janssen Scientific Affairs (JSA), which was involved in all aspects of the research, including the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the report for publication. Joshi and Daly are employed by JSA. Zhdanava, Pilon, Rossi, Morrison, and Lefebvre are employees of Analysis Group, which received funding from JSA for conducting this study and has received consulting fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals and GSK, unrelated to this study. Kuvadia is employed by Integrated Resources, which has provided research services to JSA unrelated to this study; Joshi reports past employment by and stock ownership in JohnsonJohnson; Nelson reports advisory board, data and safety monitoring board, and consulting fees from Assurex, Eisai, FSV-7, JSA, Lundbeck, Otsuka, and Sunovion and royalties from UpToDate, unrelated to this study. This work was presented at AMCP Nexus 2019, held in National Harbor, MD, from October 29 to November 1, 2019.

Aim: To compare adherence, healthcare utilization and costs among real world, Medicare-eligible patients with schizophrenia using long-acting injectable paliperidone palmitate (PP) versus oral atypical antipsychotics. Patients & methods: Historical cohort study used Medicare Advantage claims data. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for baseline differences. 12-month adherence, healthcare utilization and costs were compared. Results: Patients using PP were more adherent (proportion of days covered ≥0.8; 48.1 vs 32.6%; p Conclusion: Compared with patients using oral atypical antipsychotics, PP had lower hospitalizations and medical costs with greater medication adherence accompanied by higher pharmacy costs.

Aim: Compare medication utilization, costs and healthcare resource use in schizophrenia patients with substance-related disorders initiated on once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) or an oral atypical antipsychotic (OAA). Materials & methods: Data from six Medicaid states (07/2009–03/2015) were used to compare outcomes between PP1M and OAA patients. Results: PP1M patients had higher 12-month antipsychotic adherence and persistence than OAA patients. PP1M patients had lower medical (mean monthly cost difference [MMCD] = US$-191, p = 0.020), higher pharmacy (MMCD = US$250, p Conclusion: PP1M was associated with higher antipsychotic adherence and persistence, and similar total costs versus OAA.

To assess the burden of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) among privately insured patients with anxiety disorder and/or substance use disorders (SUD). Adults p p N = 310/cohort), patients with TRD had more work loss days (54) and higher work loss-related costs ($13,674) vs patients with non-TRD MDD (32 days; $7131) and without MDD (17 days; $4798; all p In patients with an anxiety disorder and/or SUD, TRD was associated with higher HRU, healthcare costs, work loss days and work loss-related costs.

This retrospective longitudinal cohort study aimed to compare treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and costs in patients with schizophrenia treated with second-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectables (SGA-LAIs): biweekly risperidone LAI versus once-monthly paliperidone palmitate.Patients who initiated risperidone LAI or paliperidone palmitate between 1 July 2007 and 31 December 2012 (index date) were identified from the Truven MarketScan Commercial, Medicare Supplemental, and Medicaid Multi-State insurance databases. Outcomes were assessed 12 months after the index date. Propensity score matching (1:1) based on patients' demographics and comorbidities was conducted. Outcome differences between the two cohorts were evaluated using t-tests for continuous variables, chi-square tests for categorical variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for count and cost variables. Regression models estimated the difference in medication use and adherence, likelihood of HRU, number of HRU events, and healthcare costs when comparing risperidone LAI versus paliperidone palmitate, while further adjusting for patient characteristics and pre-index HRU.Patient characteristics were well balanced between the two cohorts (n = 499 each). Significantly lower discontinuation rates (36.5% vs. 53.3%; p 0.001) and longer days of LAI coverage (233.6 vs. 131.7 days; p 0.001) were observed in the paliperidone palmitate cohort versus the risperidone LAI cohort, respectively. Patients treated with paliperidone palmitate were 12.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.0-17.8) and 11.7 (95% CI: 8.0-17.4) times more likely to be adherent based on medication possession ratio and proportion of days covered, respectively (p 0.001). Patients treated with paliperidone palmitate had reduced likelihood of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.72 [0.55-0.95]), fewer emergency department (ED) visits (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]: 0.67 [0.61-0.73]) and reduced length of inpatient stay (aIRR: 0.86 [0.82-0.90]), which resulted in lower monthly inpatient hospitalization costs (-$77.58; p = 0.038) and ED visits (-$9.77; p = 0.021) relative to risperidone LAI.Pharmacy costs were derived from health plan payment in the claims data and do not account for any discounts or rebates. This may have overestimated the branded drug costs in this analysis.These findings highlight the value of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia.

This study assessed real-world treatment patterns and antipsychotic (AP) medication adherence among commercially insured US patients with schizoaffective disorder (SCA). Continuously insured adults aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of SCA from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2012, were identified from the Clinformatics Data Mart database. Patients were categorized into 2 cohorts: incident or prevalent SCA. Demographics and clinical characteristics were evaluated during the baseline period. Use of psychiatric medications and adherence to AP medications were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up period after index diagnosis of SCA. Of the overall study population (N = 2713; mean age, 40.2 y; 52.7% female), 1961 patients (72.3%) (mean age, 38.7 y; 51.3% female) had incident SCA, and 752 patients (27.7%) (mean age, 43.9 y; 56.5% female) had prevalent SCA. Antipsychotics were used by 74.8% of patients in the overall study population during the follow-up period. The most commonly prescribed oral AP was risperidone (23.9%), followed by quetiapine (21.4%) and aripiprazole (20.4%). Use of any long-acting injectable APs in the overall study population during the follow-up period was less than 3%. A total of 49.0% and 38.0% of the overall study population had medication possession ratios and proportion of days covered for APs of 80% or greater, respectively. Overall use of long-acting injectable APs for the treatment of SCA is low, and adherence to AP medications, measured by both medication possession ratio and proportion of days covered, is suboptimal among patients with SCA in the real-world setting.

Among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), those with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have a higher economic burden. However, the healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs may vary by severity status in TRD patients. This study quantified the incremental economic burden of severity status in TRD patients.In a US database of privately insured employees and dependents (07/01/2009-03/31/2015), a claims-based algorithm identified adult TRD patients who were stratified into mild, moderate, and severe cohorts based on the information in the last observed MDD ICD-9-CM code. HRU and costs of moderate and severe cohorts were compared to those of the mild cohort during the 2-year follow-up after the first antidepressant claim.Among 6411 TRD patients, 455 (7.1%) were identified as mild, 2153 (33.6%) as moderate, and 1455 (22.7%) as severe. Moderate and severe patients compared to mild had 45% and 150% more inpatient admissions, 65% and 164% more inpatient days, 18% and 54% more emergency department visits and 8% and 10% more outpatient visits per-patient-per-year (PPPY), respectively (all-cause; all p 0.05). Mean all-cause direct total healthcare costs were $12,123, $16,885, and $18,911 PPPY in mild, moderate, and severe patients, respectively. The all-cause total healthcare cost differences adjusted for baseline characteristics amounted to $3455 in moderate and $5150 in severe versus mild patients, respectively (PPPY; all p 0.05).Not all TRD patients had a severity specifier; the severity specifier was not cross-validated against a depression scale.Increased severity status is associated with incremental economic burden in TRD patients.

Objectives: To compare comorbidity-related outcomes, adherence to antipsychotics (APs), healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and costs pre- and post-transition to once-every-3-months paliperidone palmitate (PP3M) in commercially-insured patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Adults with ≥1 claim for PP3M, ≥2 schizophrenia diagnoses, and adequate treatment with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M; i.e. no gap of >45 days in PP1M coverage for ≥4 months, same PP1M dosage for the last two PP1M claims, and appropriate PP1M to PP3M dosing conversion) were selected from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (May 2014–February 2018). Generalized estimating equation models adjusted for repeated measurements were used to compare patient characteristics, adherence to APs, HRU, and costs during the 6-month period pre- vs post-transition to PP3M. Results: Of 152 included patients, the mean age was 41.0 years and 36.2% were females. Post-PP3M transition, patients were less likely to have a claim with a diagnosis for substance-related and addictive disorders (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57), psychoses (OR = 0.57), diabetes without chronic complication (OR = 0.72), and drug abuse (OR = 0.64; all p p = .007), compared to the period pre-PP3M transition. There was no significant difference in HRU pre- vs post-transition. All-cause total (mean monthly cost difference [MMCD] = $242), pre-rebate pharmacy (MMCD = $65), and medical costs (MMCD = $176) remained similar pre- vs post-transition (all p > .05). Conclusions: Transitioning to PP3M was associated with an improvement in adherence and in comorbidity-related outcomes related to substance-related and addictive disorders, psychoses, diabetes without chronic complication, and drug abuse. These findings suggest PP3M may enhance comorbidity-related outcomes and adherence while remaining cost neutral.

This study evaluated the biopsychosocial characteristics of adults undergoing substance abuse evaluation with potential schizophrenia/psychotic disorder, or possible schizophrenia/psychosis-like symptoms, compared with those with no schizophrenia/psychosis-like symptoms. A cross-sectional, observational study examined 170,201 adults, aged 18 to 30, who completed the Addiction Severity Index-Multimedia Version (ASI-MV). Approximately 10% were classified as having possible schizophrenia/psychosis-like symptoms or potential schizophrenia/psychotic disorder. These patients were more likely to exhibit moderate to extreme severity on employment, medical, legal, substance use, social, and psychiatric status than nonsymptomatic patients. The potential schizophrenia or psychotic disorder cohort was also more likely to have ever experienced physical abuse (odds ratio [OR] = 4.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.12-4.48) and/or sexual abuse (OR = 4.32, 95% CI = 4.15-4.51) versus the no schizophrenia/psychosis-like symptoms cohort. Findings support a recommendation for routine screening for mental health issues, particularly schizophrenia/psychosis-like symptoms, for adults entering substance use disorder treatment settings. This may increase the likelihood of appropriate and earlier intervention.

The aim of this article was to describe and compare treatment patterns, health care resource utilization (HRU), and health care costs before and after transition in veterans with schizophrenia who were transitioned from paliperidone palmitate given once monthly (PP1M) to paliperidone palmitate given every 3 months (PP3M) according to prescribing-information guidelines.This retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted using electronic health records data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Veterans were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18years or older, had ≥1 dispensation of PP3M, were enrolled with VHA benefits for ≥24 months prior to transition to PP3M, had ≥1 schizophrenia diagnosis, were transitioned to PP3M according to prescribing-information guidelines (operationalized as no gap in PP1M treatment of45days during the 4 months prior to PP3M transition, with the same dosage in the last 2 PP1M dispensations), and had appropriate dose conversion. Treatment patterns, HRU, and costs 6 months pre and post PP3M transition were described and compared using the McNemar test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test.Of the 277 veterans identified, the majority were men (92.8%); the median age was 56.5years. Among 197 veterans who had at least 6 months of follow-up pre and post PP3M transition, oral antipsychotic use was significantly decreased (from 49.7% to 43.1%; P = 0.0326). Additionally, the mean number of days spent in an inpatient setting (41.4vs 21.6; P = 0.0164), the mean number of outpatient visits per patient (31.0vs 25.6; P0.0001), and the mean total health care costs ($27,745vs $23,772; P = 0.0050) were significantly decreased.After transitioning to PP3M treatment, veterans had significantly reduced use of oral antipsychotics, HRU, and costs. Although generalizability may be limited due to the veteran population and to those who transitioned according to PP3M prescribing guidelines, future studies in other patient populations may be used to extend these conclusions.

OBJECTIVE To compare treatment patterns and Medicaid spending between schizophrenia patients initiating once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) and oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs) within four comorbid populations: cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, hypertension and obesity. METHODS Five-state Medicaid data identified comorbid adults with schizophrenia initiating PP1M or OAAs (index) from September 2009 balanced with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Chi-squared and t-tests compared index antipsychotic (AP) exposure (no gap >90 days) duration, AP polypharmacy, and index AP adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%) and persistence (no gap ≥60 days) at 12 months post-index. Linear models with a non-parametric bootstrap procedure compared costs. RESULTS PP1M patients consistently had longer index AP exposure (e.g. CVD: 244 vs. 189 days; p

Schizophrenia is a serious public health problem that affects ∼1% of the US population.To examine treatment patterns and evaluate healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among young adults (18-35 years) with schizophrenia who were early in the disease.Patients aged 18-64 years with ≥2 schizophrenia diagnoses in the identification period (January 1, 2012-September 30, 2015) and continuous enrollment for ≥12 months pre- and post-index date were identified from the OptumInsight Clinformatics DataMart. Demographics, clinical characteristics, HRU, costs, and treatment patterns were compared between schizophrenia and non-schizophrenia "controls" cohorts and between young (18-35 years) and older adults (36-64 years) with schizophrenia.Among 9,889 schizophrenia patients, 23.70% were young adults (aged 18-35), had higher all-cause per-patient-per-year (PPPY) costs ($22,338 vs $7,332; p .0001), higher inpatient costs ($8,857 vs $1,289; p .0001), and longer inpatient length-of-stay (LOS) (5.0 vs 0.4 days, p .0001; adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 12.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.5-14.3) than controls. Among young adults with schizophrenia, there were more mental-health-related and fewer non-mental-health-related diagnoses compared to older adults with schizophrenia; 63.40% were male. Young adults with schizophrenia incurred higher inpatient costs ($15,692 vs $10,274; p .0001) and longer inpatient LOS (9.6 vs 5.9 days, p .0001; aIRR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.4-1.8) compared to older adults with schizophrenia. A substantial proportion of patients were treated with oral antipsychotics vs long-acting injectables in both cohorts (young adults: 98.72% vs 9.71%; older adults: 98.10% vs 13.31%).Claims data are collected for payment and not research. The presence of a prescription claim does not indicate medication was consumed or taken as prescribed.The economic burden for schizophrenia patients is substantial, especially among young adults. Based on this analysis, further research is warranted to better understand the association between adherent treatment patterns earlier in the disease and long-term health outcomes among patients with schizophrenia.

Since May 2015, adult patients with schizophrenia adequately treated with once monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) may be transitioned to once-every-three-months paliperidone palmitate (PP3M). This study aims to describe baseline characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with schizophrenia initiated on PP3M in a real-world setting.Pharmacy and medical claims from May 2014 to September 2016 for adult patients with schizophrenia initiated on PP3M (index date) in the Symphony Health Solutions database were analyzed. The cohort consisting of all patients and the one restricted to those transitioning from PP1M as per prescribing guideline recommendations were considered. Baseline characteristics were assessed during the 12 month baseline period. PP1M treatment patterns, proportion of days covered (PDC) by mental-health-related medications, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) patterns were evaluated for each baseline quarter. PP3M treatment patterns were assessed post-index.Among the 1545 adult patients initiated on PP3M who formed the first cohort, 68.8% transitioned from PP1M based on prescribing guidelines and on an adaptation of the strict clinical trial protocol for PP1M to PP3M transition, forming the second cohort. In both cohorts, the proportion of patients with a PDC ≥80% for antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, and mood stabilizers increased while the proportion of patients with ≥1 emergency room, inpatient, or outpatient visit decreased in baseline quarters closer to PP3M initiation. Among patients with ≥4 months of follow-up after the first dose, 85-88% had a second dose. Similarly, among those with ≥4 months of follow-up after the second dose, 87-90% received a third dose.Patients initiated on PP3M demonstrated decreased HRU and increased adherence in quarters closer to PP3M initiation, and were persistent on their PP3M treatment.

Background Once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic that may increase adherence rates, reduce hospitalizations, and lower medical costs compared to oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs) among schizophrenia patients. However, the impact of PP1M in recently diagnosed patients remains unknown. The present study compared adherence, healthcare resource utilization and Medicaid spending between schizophrenia patients initiating PP1M versus OAA, among patients recently diagnosed (defined using ages 18–25 years as a proxy) and among the overall population. Methods Medicaid data from five states (09/2008–03/2015) were used to identify adults with schizophrenia initiated on PP1M or OAAs (index date) on or after 09/2009. Outcomes were compared between PP1M and OAA groups following inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Univariate linear and Poisson regression models with nonparametric bootstrap procedures were used to compare the 12-month healthcare resource utilization and costs using rate ratios (RRs) and mean monthly cost differences (MMCDs), respectively. Results Overall, patients initiated on PP1M (N = 2053) were younger (mean age: 41 vs. 44 years) and had more baseline antipsychotic use (88% vs. 62%) compared to OAA patients (N = 22,247). IPTW resulted in balanced baseline characteristics. Among recently diagnosed patients, PP1M was associated with better adherence (PDC ≥ 80%: 29% vs. 21%, P

Almost half of all patients diagnosed with schizophrenia have a history of substance abuse (SA). However, data on treatment of schizophrenia with paliperidone palmitate (PP) among patients with comorbid SA are limited. The objective of this study was to compare all-cause and SA-related health care resource utilization and costs in veterans with schizophrenia and co-occurring SA who were treated with PP versus oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs).Veterans Health Administration electronic health record data were used to conduct a retrospective longitudinal study in veterans with schizophrenia who initiated PP or OAA between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2016, had ≥12 months of enrollment before treatment initiation (baseline), were diagnosed with SA, and had ≥1 Global Assessment of Functioning score during baseline. Differences in baseline characteristics were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Adjusted cost differences and incidence rate ratios (IRR) for the association between PP versus OAA and all-cause and SA-related health care costs and health care resource utilization in the 12 months after treatment initiation were estimated with corresponding 95% CIs using weighted linear and Poisson regression models, respectively.Of 6872 veterans in the study, 1684 (25%) and 5188 (75%) were treated with PP and OAA, respectively. After adjustment, PP was associated with fewer all-cause inpatient (IRR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.90), mental health-related inpatient (IRR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.91), and long-term care stays (IRR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.64), but more frequent mental health intensive case management visits (IRR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.49 to 1.53) compared with OAA (all P0.001). Similarly, PP was associated with significantly lower rates of SA-related inpatient stays (IRR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.83), mental health stays (IRR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.88), long-term care stays (IRR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.32), and outpatient visits (IRR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.79) than OAA (all P0.001). Relative to OAA, patients treated with PP also had lower mean annual all-cause (cost difference = -$10,473; 95% CI, -$17,827 to -$3491) and SA-related (cost difference = -$8457; 95% CI, -$12,710 to -$3638) medical costs (all P0.001).PP was associated with significant total medical cost savings resulting from fewer hospitalizations and lower rates of SA-related health care resource utilization compared with OAA in patients with schizophrenia and comorbid SA. Thus, PP appears to be a valuable treatment option for patients in this subpopulation.

Background Nonadherence to antipsychotic treatment increases the likelihood of relapse and progressive symptomatology in patients with schizophrenia. Atypical long-acting injectables, including paliperidone palmitate (PP), may increase adherence and improve symptoms. This study compared and assessed predictors of treatment patterns and symptom remission among schizophrenia patients treated with PP versus atypical oral antipsychotic therapy (OAT) in community behavioral health organizations (CBHOs). Methods This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated 763 patients with schizophrenia and new (PP-N; N = 174) or continuing (PP-C; N = 308) users of PP, or new users of OAT (N = 281) at enrollment in the REACH-OUT study (2010–2013). Treatment outcomes assessed at 1 year were discontinuation, and adherence, measured by proportion of days covered (PDC) or medication possession ratio (MPR). Remission status was assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Symptoms of Remission (SCI-SR). A machine learning platform, Reverse Engineering and Forward Simulation (REFS™), was used to identify predictors of study outcomes. Multivariate Cox and generalized linear regressions estimated the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Among PP-N users, 27% discontinued their initial treatment regimen versus 51% (p

While atypical long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) offer the potential for increased adherence, access to medication poses challenges that may hinder their use. Janssen Connect * *Janssen Connect is a registered trade name of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA. (JC), a comprehensive information and assistance program, was designed to help patients who received a Janssen LAI initiate and maintain treatment after their health care professional (HCP) determined that the medication was the most clinically appropriate option. We conducted a formative and impact evaluation on early medication adherence of patients enrolled in JC and prescribed paliperidone palmitate.Using the program administrative files (December 2010-April 2014), 9354 patients whose HCP ordered paliperidone palmitate were included. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and request of JC program offerings were reported overall, and compared between patients requesting the injection center versus those who did not. Medication adherence based on the first 6 months of treatment while in the program and defined as achieving ≥80% proportion of days covered (PDC) was measured for patients receiving ≥2 paliperidone palmitate injections (n = 2659). Logistic models evaluated the association between requests for injection centers on medication adherence.Mean age of program enrollees was 40.6 (standard deviation = 13.9 years), 59.3% were men, and 42.5% were Medicare covered. While in the program, 79.9% did not experience a medication gap of ≥7 weeks and 87.0% achieved adherence. Injection center request was associated with medication adherence (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) ≤5 months: 0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.02-0.05; ≥6 months: aOR: 4.16; 95% CI: 2.72-6.36).The data sources used were designed for program implementation and not for research purposes.The high percentage of patients requesting injection center support and medication shipment in addition to other insurance-related program offerings signals the need for and value of a comprehensive support program for patients seeking LAI therapy. Providing patients with the option of alternative and more conveniently located injection centers may help them start and maintain their treatment.

Second-generation long-acting injectable therapies (SGA-LAIs) may reduce health care resource utilization (HRU) and health care costs compared with daily oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs) in patients with schizophrenia due to reduced dosing frequency, delivery/monitoring by a health care provider, and improved adherence. The aim of the present study was to compare treatment patterns, HRU, and Medicaid spending in patients with schizophrenia initiated on SGA-LAIs (overall and according to agent) versus OAAs.Medicaid claims data (2010-2015) from 6 states were used to identify adult schizophrenia patients initiated on SGA-LAIs or OAAs. Treatment patterns (proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥80% and persistence [no gap ≥30, 60, or 90 days] to index treatment), HRU, and costs were evaluated over 12 months and compared by using multivariable logistic, Poisson, and ordinary least squares regression models, respectively. P values for HRU and cost outcomes were obtained from a nonparametric bootstrap procedure. Costs (2015 US dollars) reflect the Medicaid payer's perspective before any rebate.Overall, 3307 and 21,355 patients initiated SGA-LAIs and OAAs, respectively (paliperidone palmitate LAI [PP-LAI; n = 2182], risperidone LAI [n = 968], aripiprazole LAI [n = 108], and olanzapine LAI [n = 49]). During follow-up and compared with OAA patients, SGA-LAI patients were more likely to reach PDC ≥80% (odds ratio [OR], 1.28; P0.001) and be persistent (eg, no gap ≥60 days; OR, 1.45; P0.001) to the index treatment. Relative to OAA patients, SGA-LAI patients had fewer long-term care days (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.75; P0.001) and home care visits (IRR, 0.75; P0.001) but more mental health institute (IRR, 1.16; P0.001) and 1-day mental health institute (IRR, 1.16; P0.001) admissions. Moreover, PP-LAI patients had fewer inpatient days (IRR, 0.78; P = 0.004) versus OAA patients. SGA-LAI patients had lower medical costs (mean monthly cost difference [MMCD], -$168; P0.001) than OAA patients, offsetting more than one half of the higher pharmacy costs (MMCD, $271; P0.001). Compared with OAAs, only PP-LAI was associated with significant medical cost savings (MMCD, -$225; P0.001).Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia initiated on SGA-LAIs had better adherence and persistence to therapy over 12 months than patients initiated on OAAs. SGA-LAIs, particularly PP-LAI, were associated with lower medical costs that successfully offset more than one half of the higher pharmacy costs relative to OAA.