Search

In studies of oral contraceptive oral contraceptive use and risk of venous thromboembolism, bias related to heightened diagnostic suspicion and preferential referral of oral contraceptive users has been an issue. The aim of our study was to determine the presence and potential impact of diagnostic suspicion and referral bias.We conducted a case/non-case study in 21 regional study centers in Germany and, in parallel, a conventional case-control study using the same cases but randomly selected population controls from the same areas. Women with symptoms compatible with venous thromboembolism were included in the study between 1994 and 1999, and classified as cases or non-cases (first reference group) according to the diagnostic work-up (case/non-case study). A second reference group consisted ofpopulation controls (conventional case-control study as an internal comparison for the case/non-case study): 606 cases, 462 non-cases and 2942 population controls aged 15-49 years. Adjusted unconditional regression analyses were performed.Adjusted odds ratios for venous thromboembolism in oral contraceptive users were systematically higher in the classical case-control study compared to the case/non-case approach (using the same cases) across all subgroup analyses (e.g. for idiopathic cases, the odds ratio was 67% higher in the case-control study: 4.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.27-5.74) versus 2.60 (95% CI 1.75-3.88)). We found a significantly increasing trend of oral contraceptive use in four categories of increasingly sophisticated diagnostic tests that were applied to 1067 women with a suspicion of venous thromboembolism, irrespective of the outcome. Stratified analysis showed the diagnostic level to be a confounder.In our population-based study with the possibility of internal comparison, we found clear evidence that diagnostic suspicion and referral bias does play an important role in case-control studies of venous thromboembolism risk among oral contraceptive users. This underlines the importance of making an effort to avoid this bias when designing a new study.

The Aging Males' Symptoms (AMS) scale was designed and standardized as self-administered scale (a) to assess symptoms of aging (independent from those which are disease-related) among groups of males under different conditions, (b) to evaluate the severity of symptoms over time, and (c) to measure changes pre- and post-androgen replacement therapy. It is a short and easy to apply instrument, it has a very simple evaluation scheme, and was internationally well accepted (translated into over 20 languages). Methodological test characteristics are: a) reliability measures: (internal consistency and test-retest stability) were found to be good across countries, b) validity: the internal structure of the AMS in healthy and androgen deficient males and across countries was sufficiently similar to conclude that the scale really measures the same phenomenon across all age groups. The comparison of the AMS with the two established screening instruments for androgen deficiency showed sufficiently good compatibility. Consequently, a screening tool for hypogonadism was developed, consisting of the AMS scale, body mass index (BMI) and age. The test characteristics of this screening tool (sensitivity and specificity) are promising. Clinicians often consider validity as utility for outcome measurement. The AMS scale showed a convincing ability to measure treatment effects on quality of life across the full range of severity of complaints before therapy. The distribution of complaints of testosterone deficient men before therapy almost returned to normal values after 12 weeks of testosterone treatment.

There is no doubt, oral contraceptives are a safe, reversible and commonly used method of contraception. Ever use is about 80 % in developed countries and current use of OCs about 40 %. Almost all information about prevalence of OC use came from cross-sectional studies and did not distinguish between high- and low-dose OCs. This paper deals with the prevalence of OC use as it was observed during lifetime of a large cohort of German women by calendar year and estrogen content.The prevalence of OC use between 1980 to 1999 was analysed on occasion of an interim analysis of the German cohort study on women's health. This analysis is based on more than 10 000 women with about 390 000 women-years of observation.The proportion of women under the age of 50, that ever used OCs, increased steeply from 1980, i. e. from 62 % (1980) to about 90 % from 1996 onward. The proportion of current users in a given calendar year rose from 44 % (1980) to 49 % (1991-95) and dropped after the "pill crisis 1995". The percentage of current users who used high-estrogen-dose OCs dropped from 32 % (1980) to 5 % (1999). In contrast, the percentage of users of low-dose OCs of the 2nd generation steeply increased as was the percentage of users of the 3rd generation pills, however the latter dropped after 1995.The high acceptance of oral contraceptives despite many "pill crises" underlines the continuously high appreciation of their efficacy on the one hand, but underscores also the high responsibility of physicians and industry concerning surveillance or reduction of discussed side effects.

The association of occupational variables and hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is discussed with particular reference to women, as little research has been undertaken on their behalf. This paper reports the results of an international case-control study concerning women and involves 317 cases of HCC and 1789 controls. Working in the chemical industry was shown to have only a marginally significant risk associated with HCC: adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval 2.37 (1.04-5.41). Other non-significantly elevated ORs were observed in the pharmaceutical, plastics, PVC-producing, farming and butchery industries. Little consistency was found among the risk estimates for HCC, based on three different analytical approaches. None of the analyses showed a linear trend of risk with increasing duration of exposure. However, the numbers of exposed cases and controls were small for many of the occupations and therefore the study power and precision were low. We failed to find important and consistent evidence for a relationship between HCC in women and occupational variables. However, even weak evidence of occupational risk warrants careful consideration in future studies.

The risk of cardiovascular disease associated with progestogen-only pills has rarely been studied so far.In the Transnational case-control study we were looking for a potential cardiovascular disease risk with oral progestogen-only pills in women aged 16-44 years. A total of 1058 cases of myocardial infarction, thromboembolic cerebrovascular accident or venous thromboembolism, and 3808 controls unaffected by these diseases, were enrolled. The group of women who had either used oral progestogen-only pills or no oral contraceptives included 394 cardiovascular disease cases (123 cases of myocardial infarction, 90 cases of thromboembolic cerebrovascular accident and 181 cases of venous thromboembolism) and 2366 controls.The adjusted (matched) odds ratio (OR) for all cardiovascular diseases combined for women using progestogen-only pills compared with non-users of oral contraceptives was 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-1.58). The adjusted ORs for myocardial infarction, thromboembolic cerebrovascular accidents and venous thromboembolism for users of progestogen-only pills were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.31-2.91), 1.60 (95% CI, 0.24-0.72) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.28-1.66), respectively. Hence, there was no significant increase in cardiovascular disease risk associated with progestogen-only pill use. The association between cardiovascular disease and established risk factors (smoking and hypertension) was confirmed.Although limited by the small number of exposed cases, our data suggest that there is no convincing evidence for an increased risk of cardiovascular disease associated with progestogen-only pill use.

To analyze the association between oral contraceptive use and the risk of benign liver tumors.Two parallel case-control studies on hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia. Collaborative study of 15 German liver centers. Cases defined by histology and compared with population controls.Fifty-one hepatocellular adenoma and 143 focal nodular hyperplasia cases (women) were recruited between 1990 and 1997, and compared to 240 population controls with a recent abdominal imaging test. The frequency age-matched odds ratio was 1.25 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-4.22) and 1.96 (95% CI, 0.85-4.57) for hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia, respectively. For hepatocellular adenoma, there was neither a significantly increased risk with longer duration of oral contraceptive use, nor an association with time since first or last use. For focal nodular hyperplasia, however, a slightly increased odds ratio was found with longer duration of use and more recent last use.There is little evidence for an increased risk for hepatocellular adenoma in women using modern oral contraceptives. If there is a risk not detected by the limited study size, hepatocellular adenoma is an extremely rare, and focal nodular hyperplasia a rare, adverse effect potentially associated with long-term oral contraceptive use and likely to be without public health importance.