Search

On February 22, 2013, the FDA licensed ado-trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla; Genentech, Inc.) for use as a single agent for the treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who previously received trastuzumab and a taxane, separately or in combination. The clinical basis for licensure was a phase III trial in 991 patients with HER2-positive MBC that randomly allocated patients to receive ado-trastuzumab emtansine (n = 495) or lapatinib in combination with capecitabine (n = 496). The coprimary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) based on tumor assessments by an independent review committee and overall survival (OS). Statistically significant improvements in PFS and OS were observed in patients receiving ado-trastuzumab emtansine compared with patients receiving lapatinib plus capecitabine [difference in PFS medians of 3.2 months, HR, 0.65 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.55–0.77), P < 0.0001 and difference in OS medians of 5.8 months, HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55–0.85), P = 0.0006]. The most common adverse reactions in patients receiving ado-trastuzumab emtansine were fatigue, nausea, musculoskeletal pain, thrombocytopenia, headache, increased aminotransferase levels, and constipation. Other significant adverse reactions included hepatobiliary disorders and left ventricular dysfunction. Given the PFS and OS results, the benefit–risk profile was considered favorable. Clin Cancer Res; 20(17); 4436–41. ©2014 AACR.

Exposure-response (E-R) analyses for ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, Kadcyla) were performed using data from a randomized, active control (lapatinib plus capecitabine) trial in patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses stratified by T-DM1 trough concentration on day 21 of cycle 1 (Cmin,C1D21) were performed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). E-R analyses indicated that after adjusting for baseline risk factors, higher T-DM1 exposure is associated with improved efficacy. T-DM1-treated patients with Cmin,C1D21 lower than the median value had values of OS and PFS comparable to those of the active control arm. The percentage of patients who received T-DM1 dose adjustments was similar across the exposure range and was lower than that of the active control arm. Our findings suggest that there may be an opportunity to optimize Kadcyla dose in the patient subgroup with low T-DM1 exposure for improved efficacy with acceptable tolerability.

Purpose: To analyze final long-term survival and clinical outcomes from the randomized phase III study of sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients after imatinib failure; to assess correlative angiogenesis biomarkers with patient outcomes. Experimental Design: Blinded sunitinib or placebo was given daily on a 4-week-on/2-week-off treatment schedule. Placebo-assigned patients could cross over to sunitinib at disease progression/study unblinding. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using conventional statistical methods and the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) method to explore cross-over impact. Circulating levels of angiogenesis biomarkers were analyzed. Results: In total, 243 patients were randomized to receive sunitinib and 118 to placebo, 103 of whom crossed over to open-label sunitinib. Conventional statistical analysis showed that OS converged in the sunitinib and placebo arms (median 72.7 vs. 64.9 weeks; HR, 0.876; P=0.306) as expected, given the cross-over design. RPSFT analysis estimated median OS for placebo of 39.0 weeks (HR, 0.505, 95% CI, 0.262-1.134; P = 0.306). No new safety concerns emerged with extended sunitinib treatment. No consistent associations were found between the pharmacodynamics of angiogenesis-related plasma proteins during sunitinib treatment and clinical outcome. Conclusions: The cross-over design provided evidence of sunitinib clinical benefit based on prolonged time to tumor progression during the double-blind phase of this trial. As expected, following cross-over, there was no statistical difference in OS. RPSFT analysis modeled the absence of cross-over, estimating a substantial sunitinib OS benefit relative to placebo. Long-term sunitinib treatment was tolerated without new adverse events. ©2012 AACR., This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. (New York, NY). Additional funding was provided by the Virginia and Daniel K. Ludwig Trust for Cancer Research, the Rubenstein Foundation, the Katz Foundation, the Quick Family Fund for Cancer Research, the Ronald O. Perelman Fund for Cancer Research at Dana-Farber, the Stutman GIST Cancer Research Fund, Paul's Posse, and Leslie's Links (G.D. Demetri); and grant no. FIS PI 081156 from the Spanish National Health Service (L. Paz-Ares).