Search

Key Messages: The majority of dialysis patients and clinicians favor early advance care planning in our sample. Yet, there is a disconnect: only 11% of patients discussed future care with their clinicians. Our findings indicate Japanese dialysis patients and clinicians support proactive advance care planning at or before dialysis initiation., Background: Little is known about the optimal timing of discussions about advance care planning among dialysis patients and clinicians engaged in dialysis care. We aimed to explore the preferred timing for advance care planning and assess actual participation in advance care planning among dialysis patients and their clinicians., Methods: A scenario-based survey on Japanese patients aged ≥65 years on dialysis and clinicians involved in their dialysis care was performed. Participants were asked if they would feel prepared to engage in advance care planning with their clinicians, offering a choice among four hypothetical stages within the illness trajectory, extending from the initiation of dialysis to a later phase characterized by the patient's extreme frailty., Results: Overall, 181 patients and 128 clinicians participated in the study. Among these, 131 (72%) patients, and 84 (66%) clinicians indicated that they would prefer to initiate advance care planning around the time of dialysis initiation. Only 20 patients (11%) indicated that they had participated in advance care planning with at least one clinician, including 11 (6%) who indicated that they had discussed their preferences around life-sustaining treatments and 8 (4%) who had discussed their preferences around dialysis continuation., Conclusions: While fewer than 11% of patients undergoing dialysis and their clinicians enrolled in our study had participated in advance care planning, most indicated that they would be comfortable initiating the discussion around the time of dialysis initiation. These findings suggest untapped opportunities to engage patients in advance care planning early in the course of their dialysis., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Nephrology.)

Context: A conceptual framework for advance care planning is lacking in societies like Japan's valuing family-centered decision-making., Objectives: A consensus definition of advance care planning with action guideline adapted to Japanese society., Methods: We conducted a multidisciplinary modified Delphi study 2020-2022. Thirty physicians, 10 healthcare and bioethics researchers, six nurses, three patient care managers, three medical social workers, three law experts, and a chaplain evaluated, in 7 rounds (including two web-based surveys where the consensus level was defined as ratings by ≥70% of panelists of 7-9 on a nine-point Likert scale), brief sentences delineating the definition, scope, subjects, and action guideline for advance care planning in Japan., Results: The resulting 29-item set attained the target consensus level, with 72%-96% of item ratings 7-9. Advance care planning was defined as "an individual's thinking about and discussing with their family and other people close to them, with the support as necessary of healthcare providers who have established a trusting relationship with them, preparations for the future, including the way of life and medical treatment and care that they wish to have in the future." This definition/action guideline specifically included support for individuals hesitant to express opinions to develop and express preparations for the future., Conclusion: Adaptation of advance care planning to Japanese culture by consciously enhancing and supporting individuals' autonomous decision-making may facilitate its spread and establishment in Japan and other societies with family-centered decision-making cultures., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The relationship between advance care planning and religious beliefs, which are important for palliative care, is controversial in Western countries and has not been verified in Asian countries., Aim: To investigate the association between advance care planning discussions and religious beliefs in Japan., Design: A nationwide survey conducted in 2016 using a quota sampling method to obtain a representative sample of Japan's general population., Setting/participants: We analyzed responses from 3167 adults aged 20-84 years (mean age ± standard deviation, 50.9 ± 16.8 years). The outcome was measured by asking whether the respondents had ever discussed advance care planning, and the main exposure by whether they had any religious beliefs or affiliations, and if so, their degree of devoutness. We analyzed religious beliefs, affiliations, and devoutness in relation to the occurrence of discussions using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for possible sociodemographic covariates., Results: Compared with respondents without, those with religious beliefs had significantly higher odds of having had discussions (adjusted odds ratio: 1.45, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-1.73). The devoutness of religious belief was proportional to the propensity of the occurrence of discussions ( p for trend < 0.001). In addition, Buddhists and Christians had higher odds of having had discussions than did nonbelievers., Conclusion: The results suggest that holding religious beliefs, especially in Japanese Buddhism and Christianity, facilitates advance care planning discussions among Japanese adults, and thus, may help health-care providers identify those prioritized for facilitating engagement in advance care planning, especially in palliative and spiritual care settings.

Background: Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients., Objective: To identify healthcare providers' willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan., Design: A mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories., Participants: The study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan., Main Measures: Percentages of physicians' and nurses' willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients' illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified., Key Results: From 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses (p < 0.001) accepted discussion before illness. Less than one-third of physicians considered advance care planning a "wise precaution," while about two-thirds of nurses did. Additionally, more than half of both physicians and nurses preferred to postpone advance care planning until the patient's imminent death., Conclusions: Physicians are less willing than nurses to begin advance care planning discussions before patients' health has deteriorated though most prefer to wait until the patients are close to death. Healthcare providers' attitudes toward advance care planning will need to be addressed to improve rates of completion in Japan., (© 2021. Society of General Internal Medicine.)

Objectives: This study aimed to reveal the features of older adults' advance care planning (ACP) discussions by identifying psychosocial factors related to their discussions in Japan, where people value family-centered decision making. Methods: A qualitative study using in-depth interviews was conducted with 39 participants (aged ≥65 years) recruited from the outpatient department of a community hospital in Fukushima, Japan. Data were analyzed using the grounded theory approach. Results: Through experiences of family caregiving, participants became aware of their own feelings about the end of life. Equal relationship with family members was important for lowering the threshold for having discussions. Some participants and their families in the same generation reached agreements on ACP; however, they were willing to yield to children's decision making despite these discussions. Discussions: These findings provide insights into the psychosocial factors in relation to ACP discussions and support for the role of ACP discussions in the family-centered decision-making culture.

Context: Advance care planning (ACP) is vital for end-of-life care management. Experiences as informal family caregivers might act as a catalyst to promote ACP., Objectives: We investigated the association between ACP discussions and caregiving experiences., Methods: A nationwide survey in Japan was conducted in December 2016 using a quota sampling method to select a sample representative of the general Japanese population. The responses of 3167 individuals aged 20-84 years (mean age: 50.9 ± 16.8) were analyzed. The outcome was measured by asking if respondents had ever engaged in ACP discussions. The exposure was measured by asking whether and for how long respondents had experience as informal caregivers for family members. We analyzed informal caregiving experience related to the occurrence of ACP discussions using multivariable logistic regression models that adjusted for possible covariates., Results: Respondents with informal caregiving experience had significantly higher odds of having ACP discussions than those without caregiving experience (adjusted odds ratio: 1.93, 95% CI = 1.63, 2.29). Stronger effects were identified in younger adults (aged 20-65 years) and those with a higher education level (education duration > 12 years) than in older adults (aged ≥65 years) and those with a lower education level, respectively., Conclusion: Experiences as informal caregivers for family members may facilitate ACP discussions among Japanese adults, especially younger adults with higher educational attainment. Our findings may help health-care providers screen those at risk for inadequate ACP discussions, and informal caregiving experience should be considered when health-care providers initiate discussions of end-of-life care., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although advance care planning discussions are increasingly accepted worldwide, their ideal timing is uncertain and cultural factors may pertain., Aim: To evaluate timing and factors affecting initiation of advance care planning discussions for adult patients in Japan and Taiwan., Design: Mixed-methods questionnaire survey to quantitatively determine percentages of patients willing to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of illness trajectory ranging from healthy to undeniably ill, and to identify qualitative perceptions underlying preferred timing., Setting/participants: Patients aged 40-75 years visiting outpatient departments at four Japanese and two Taiwanese hospitals were randomly recruited., Results: Overall (of 700 respondents), 72% (of 365) in Japan and 84% (of 335) in Taiwan ( p  < 0.001) accepted discussion before illness. In Japan, factors associated with willingness before illness were younger age and rejection of life-sustaining treatments; in Taiwan, older age, stronger social support, and rejection of life-sustaining treatments. Four main categories of attitudes were extracted: the most common welcomed discussion as a wise precaution, responses in this first category outnumbered preference for postponement of discussion until imminent end of life, acceptance of the universal inevitability of death, and preference for discussion at healthcare providers' initiative., Conclusion: The majority of patients are willing to begin discussion before their health is severely compromised; about one out of five patients are unwilling to begin until clearly facing death. To promote advance care planning, healthcare providers must be mindful of patients' preferences and factors associated with acceptance and reluctance to initiate advance care planning.

Background: Older adults' discussions with family, or with physicians, or with both, about advance care planning (ACP) are increasingly regarded as important for the management of end-of-life care, and yet the factors that induce older adults to engage in ACP discussions are poorly understood. For example, in older adults, is stronger connectedness with family and friends (stronger "networks") associated with ACP discussions? By facilitating, or by impeding ACP discussions? We sought to evaluate the associations between ACP discussions and social networks in Japanese older adults., Methods: In July 2016 we conducted a cross-sectional survey on 355 community-dwelling patients aged ≥65 years visiting community hospital clinics in Fukushima, Japan. We used the Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6, the shortest available LSNS scale) to assess social networks and recorded two components of social network structure, marital status (dichotomized as "married" vs. "single / other") and living status ("living with others" vs. "living alone"). One item asked if patients had had ACP discussions. We analyzed the LSNS-6 social network and marital and living status data in relation to the occurrence of ACP discussions using multiple logistic regression models with adjustments for possible confounding factors., Results: Respondents' social network was "limited" in 16% of cases; 61% had had ACP discussions. Respondents with a limited social network had a significantly lower tendency to have had ACP discussions than respondents with an "adequate" social network (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.66; P < 0.001). Marital status and living status were not significantly associated with ACP discussion., Conclusions: Among Japanese older adults, weaker social networks may be associated with a lower tendency to discuss ACP. Our findings may help practitioners to quickly screen populations at risk for inadequate ACP discussion by using the LSNS-6., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is becoming increasingly important in the primary care setting because of its positive impact on the end-of-life care., Objective: We aimed to investigate the relationship between patient experience of primary care and ACP., Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 28 primary care clinics in Japan. We assessed patient experience of primary care using a Japanese version of Primary Care Assessment Tool (JPCAT), which comprises six domains: first contact, longitudinality, coordination, comprehensiveness (services available), comprehensiveness (services provided) and community orientation. The primary outcome measures were ACP discussion between patients and primary care providers and completion of advance directives (AD). We used a generalized linear mixed model to adjust clustering within clinics and individual covariates., Results: Data were analysed for 535 primary care patients. After adjustment for patients' sociodemographic and health characteristics, the JPCAT total score was found to be significantly associated with ACP discussion [odds ratio (OR) per 1 SD increase = 4.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.53-7.47] but not with completion of AD (OR per 1 SD increase = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.94-2.12). All domains of JPCAT, which represent attributes of primary care, had positive associations with ACP discussion. First contact and comprehensiveness (services provided) domain scores were significantly associated with completion of AD., Conclusions: We found that better patient experience of primary care was strongly associated with ACP discussion. Our findings reinforce the significance of patient experience in primary care as part of quality end-of-life care., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients. Objective: To identify healthcare providers' willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan. Design: A mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories. Participants: The study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan. Main Measures: Percentages of physicians' and nurses' willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients' illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified. Key Results: From 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses (p < 0.001) accepted discussion before illness. Less than one-third of physicians considered advance care planning a "wise precaution," while about two-thirds of nurses did. Additionally, more than half of both physicians and nurses preferred to postpone advance care planning until the patient's imminent death. Conclusions: Physicians are less willing than nurses to begin advance care planning discussions before patients' health has deteriorated though most prefer to wait until the patients are close to death. Healthcare providers' attitudes toward advance care planning will need to be addressed to improve rates of completion in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is becoming increasingly important in the primary care setting because of its positive impact on the end-of-life care.Objective: We aimed to investigate the relationship between patient experience of primary care and ACP.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 28 primary care clinics in Japan. We assessed patient experience of primary care using a Japanese version of Primary Care Assessment Tool (JPCAT), which comprises six domains: first contact, longitudinality, coordination, comprehensiveness (services available), comprehensiveness (services provided) and community orientation. The primary outcome measures were ACP discussion between patients and primary care providers and completion of advance directives (AD). We used a generalized linear mixed model to adjust clustering within clinics and individual covariates.Results: Data were analysed for 535 primary care patients. After adjustment for patients' sociodemographic and health characteristics, the JPCAT total score was found to be significantly associated with ACP discussion [odds ratio (OR) per 1 SD increase = 4.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.53-7.47] but not with completion of AD (OR per 1 SD increase = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.94-2.12). All domains of JPCAT, which represent attributes of primary care, had positive associations with ACP discussion. First contact and comprehensiveness (services provided) domain scores were significantly associated with completion of AD.Conclusions: We found that better patient experience of primary care was strongly associated with ACP discussion. Our findings reinforce the significance of patient experience in primary care as part of quality end-of-life care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]