Search

Introduction: We aimed to compare the safety of lenvatinib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with Child-Pugh A (CP-A) and Child-Pugh B (CP-B) and to determine the adverse events (AEs) that cause dose reduction/interruption of treatment in patients with CP-B. Methods: Sixty-six patients with lenvatinib as a first-line treatment for HCC at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) between April 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed the treatment duration, AEs, and reasons for dose reduction/interruption associated with lenvatinib treatment in patients with CP-A and CP-B HCC. Results: The CP-B group had significantly more cases of grade ≥ 2 fatigue and anorexia than the CP-A group (p = 0.045 and p = 0.042, respectively). Regarding AEs that caused dose reduction/interruption of treatment, the CP-A group had significantly more cases of proteinuria than the CP-B group (p = 0.015), whereas the CP-B group had significantly more cases of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) than the CP-A group (p = 0.013). Conclusion: Patients with CP-B have greater difficulty than patients with CP-A in continuing treatment with repeated dose reductions/interruption of treatment due to intolerable grade ≥ 2 AEs (fatigue and anorexia). HFS is more likely to cause dose reduction/interruption of treatment in CP-B than in CP-A unresectable HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Weekly paclitaxel (PTX), irinotecan (CPT-11) and ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (Ram + PTX) are currently recommended as the standard second-line or later chemotherapies for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of using Ram + PTX vs. PTX or CPT-11. Furthermore, we investigated the safety and treatment continuity of Ram + PTX in Japan. Methods Expected costs were calculated based on data from patients with advanced and recurrent gastric cancer who were treated with PTX, CPT-11 and Ram + PTX. A literature review was performed to obtain clinical information so that the probability of the efficacy of each chemotherapy could be calculated. The cost-effectiveness ratio of each chemotherapy agent was calculated by dividing the expected cost by the median survival time (MST). Results The cost-effectiveness ratio per month was JPY 85,395.8/MST for the PTX regimen, JPY 132,735.4/MST for the CPT-11 regimen and JPY 657,175.4/MST for the Ram + PTX regimen (p < 0.001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per month of the Ram + PTX regimen to the PTX regimen was JPY 2,780,432.4/MST. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the Ram + PTX regimen to the CPT-11 regimen was JPY 2,185,179.0/MST. With regard to the reasons for discontinuation of treatment, the Ram + PTX regimen had only one case of being discontinued owing to adverse events, and had a profile similar to that of the PTX and CPT-11 regimens. Conclusion These findings show that the Ram + PTX regimen is less cost-effective compared to both the PTX and CPT-11 regimen, but the Ram + PTX regimen is a well-tolerated regimen with sufficient efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lenvatinib (LEN), a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a standard therapeutic agent for hepatocellular carcinoma, but the high incidence of adverse events (AEs) related to LEN treatment often necessitates treatment discontinuation. The present study aimed to clarify the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of modified LEN dosing methods, such as alternate-day dosing, necessitated by AEs of LEN. A total of 66 patients who received LEN at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) between April 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. These patients were divided into those who completed treatment with the standard administration method (standard LEN, n=48) and those who changed from the standard administration method to a modified administration method in the middle of treatment [modified LEN (weekends off/alternate days), n=18]. The treatment duration and reasons for discontinuation of LEN treatment were analysed. The discontinuation rate due to AEs in the modified LEN group (1 patient) was less compared with that in the standard LEN group (16 patients) (P=0.022). The median treatment duration for patients in the standard LEN (n=48), modified LEN (weekends off, n=6) and modified LEN (alternate days, n=12) groups was 71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 55–134], 483 (95% CI: 193–644) and 222 (95% CI: 98–303) days, respectively (P=0.044). Modification of the administration method ensured fewer AE-related treatment discontinuations. However, weekends off dosing showed a longer treatment duration compared with standard dosing, whereas alternate day dosing showed no difference from standard dosing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]