Search

A numerical study has been made of boundary layer effects on the flowfield about flow-through nacelles. A viscous-inviscid interacting computational model for investigating the problem was constructed by coupling a three-dimensional explicit Euler solution procedure with a compressible, 'lag-entrainment' integral boundary layer solution technique. Solutions obtained with the interacting model for long-duct turbofan engine nacelles at a free stream Mach number of 0.8 and an angle of attack of 0 deg are compared with experimental data. The numerical experiments have revealed insight into the boundary layer effects on the interactions between the internal and external flows.

A wind tunnel investigation was conducted to determine the aerodynamic interference associated with the installation of a long duct, flow-through nacelle on a straight unswept untapered supercritical wing. Experimental data was obtained for the verification of computational prediction techniques. The model was tested in the 16-Foot Transonic Tunnel at Mach numbers from 0.20 to 0.875 and at angles of attack from about 0 deg to 5 deg. The results of the investigation show that strong viscous and compressibility effects are present at the transonic Mach numbers. Numerical comparisons show that linear theory is adequate for subsonic Mach number flow prediction, but is inadequate for prediction of the extreme flow conditions that exist at the transonic Mach numbers.

A three-dimensional Euler-equation computational technique has been developed to solve for the transonic flow past flow-through nacelles. The technique employs an approximately-factored alternating-direction implicit numerical algorithm and a radiation treatment of the outflow boundary. Studies are presented which show that the radiation treatment gives better numerical convergence than the condition of specifying the pressure at the outflow boundary. Calculations made with the technique are presented for a long-duct turbofan engine nacelle at a Mach number of 0.80 and angles of attack of 0 deg and 4 deg. Good agreement is shown between the computational results and wind-tunnel data. Problem areas are identified and recommendations are made for further numerical studies.

The effect of varying the jet exhaust's ratio of specific heats, gas constant, and temperature on airplane afterbody drag was investigated. Jet exhaust simulation parameters were evaluated also. Subsonic and transonic tests were made using a single nacelle model with afterbodies having boattail angles of 10 deg and 20 deg. Besides air, three other jet exhaust gases were investigated. The ratios of specific heats, gas constants, and total temperatures of the four exhaust gases ranged from 1.40 to 1.26, 287 to 376 J/kg-K, and 300 to 1013 K, respectively. For steep boattail angles, and transonic speeds and typical turbojet pressure ratios, the current data indicate that the use of air to simulate a dry turbojet exhaust can result in an overprediction of afterbody drag as high as 17 percent of the dry turbojet value.

Afterbody drag predictions for jet aircraft are usually made experimentally with the jet exhaust flow simulated. The physical gas properties of the fluid used for the model jet exhaust can affect the accuracy of simulation of the airplane's jet exhaust plume. The effect of the accuracy of this simulation on afterbody drag was investigated by wind-tunnel tests with single engine model. In addition to unheated air as the exhaust gas, the decomposition products of three different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide were utilized. The air jet simulation consistently resulted in higher boattail drag than hydrogen peroxide simulation. The differences in drag for the various exhaust gases are attributed to different plume shapes and entrainment properties of the gases. The largest differences in drag due to exhaust gas properties were obtained for the combination of high transonic Mach numbers and high boattail angles. For these conditions, the current data indicate that the use of air to simulate a nonafterburning turbojet exhaust can result in an increase in afterbody amounting to 20 percent of the nonafterburning turbojet value.

Jet exhaust, nozzle installation, and model support interference effects on the longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of a twin-engine fighter model were determined. Realistic jet exhaust nozzle configurations and a reference configuration with a simulated vertical-tail support were tested. Free-stream Mach number was varied from 0.6 to 1.2, and model angle of attack from 0 deg to 9 deg. The jet exhaust affected drag more than it affected lift and pitching moment. The largest effects occurred at a Mach number of 0.9 and for the afterburning mode of exhaust nozzle operation. The combined differences between the aerodynamic characteristics of the realistic and reference configurations (which were due to afterbody and nozzle contours, jet operation, and simulated reference support interference) were considerably different from those for the jet interference alone.

Jet effects on boattail axial force of conical afterbodies at subsonic and transonic speeds

Effect of geometry of conical afterbodies on base drag at subsonic and transonic speeds

A parametric investigation has been conducted to determine the jet effects on the boattail drag of nozzles with truncated conical afterbodies. The boattail drag for nozzle configurations with boattail angles of 3 deg, 5 deg, and 10 deg and ratios of boattail length to maximum diameter of 1.0, 0.8, and 0.6 was compared for the jet-off condition and for a wide range of jet pressure ratios. A nozzle configuration with a circular-arc boattail was tested also. The tests were run at Mach numbers of 1.83 and 2.20 with the model at an angle of attack of 0 deg.