Search

The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) afatinib improves survival in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation. We analysed the outcome between EGFR mutation subtypes in a large afatinib-treated cohort in which 516 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving afatinib as front-line treatment. EGFR uncommon mutations include exon 20 insertion, de novo T790M of high or low allele frequency (dT790M HAF /dT790M LAF ), non-T790M compound mutation and others, where EGFR exon 20 insertion and dT790M HAF were defined as type-I and the rest as type-II uncommon mutation. Four hundred and sixty-one (89.3%) and 55 (10.7%) patients were common and uncommon mutation, respectively. Exon 20 insertion and dT790M HAF patients demonstrated a significantly shortened progression-free survival (PFS) (2.6 and 4.1 months) compared to EGFR common mutation, dT790M LAF and other uncommon mutation patients (15.1, 27.0 and 18.4 months; P = 3 × 10 -8 ). Type-I uncommon mutation was an independent predictor of PFS (HR 4.46 [95% CI, 2.60-7.64]; P < .001) and OS (HR 2.56 [95% CI, 1.37-4.75]; P = .003). EGFR L858R patients demonstrated a significantly higher CNS progression (cause-specific HR, 3.16; 95% CI 1.24-8.08; P = .016), and type-I uncommon mutation patients exhibited a significantly higher systemic progression (cause-specific HR, 4.95; 95% CI 2.30-10.60; P = 4.3 × 10 -5 ). Tendencies of higher CNS and lower systemic progression were observed in type-II uncommon mutation patients. A PFS ≥ 12 months (OR 2.38 [95% CI, 1.18-4.89]; P = .016) and uncommon EGFR mutation (OR 0.08 [95% CI, 0.01-0.48]; P = .021) were independent predictors of secondary T790M. Afatinib-treated NSCLC patients presented an EGFR genotype-specific pattern of disease progression and outcome., (© 2021 UICC.)

Background: This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of afatinib in patients with sarcopenia, an important prognostic factor for treatment efficacy and toxicity in patients with cancer. Methods: The clinical features of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with frontline afatinib between 2014 and 2018 at a medical center in Taiwan were retrospectively reviewed. Sarcopenia was evaluated based on the total cross‐sectional area of skeletal muscles assessed by computed tomography (CT) imaging at the L3 level. Baseline characteristics, response rates, survival rates, and adverse events (AEs) were compared between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic patients. Results: A total of 176 patients evaluated for sarcopenia by CT and treated with afatinib were enrolled in the current study. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with good performance status, low body mass index (BMI), low body surface area (BSA), and low total mass area (TMA). Sarcopenia did not influence the response rate (69.2% vs. 72.0%, p = 0.299), progression‐free survival (median 15.9 vs. 14.9 months, p = 0.791), or overall survival (median 26.5 vs. 27.2 months, p = 0.441). However, BSA ≤ 1.7 and the 40 mg afatinib dose were associated with dose reduction. TMA was the only independent factor for afatinib discontinuation due to AEs. Conclusion: Sarcopenia was not associated with treatment efficacy or toxicity among patients with NSCLC harboring common mutations treated with afatinib, indicating sarcopenic patients should not be excluded from afatinib treatment. Other factors, such as BSA and TMA, were associated with dose reduction and afatinib discontinuation, respectively, which may require additional evaluations in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) are the standard treatment for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR‐TKIs and prognostic factors for patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations, which account for 10% of EGFR mutations. Methods: A total of 230 treatment‐naive patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations treated with first‐line EGFR‐TKIs between 2011 and 2018 at four hospitals (belonging to four institutions, Linkou, Kaohsiung, Keelung, and Chiayi, of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital) in Taiwan were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinicopathological characteristics, adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential prognostic factors for PFS. Results: Overall, patients who received afatinib (n = 62) had better PFS (median: 6.4 vs. 5.9 months, p = 0.022) and OS (median: 13.4 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.008) than those who received gefitinib/erlotinib (n = 124), although no significant differences were observed for ORR (46.8% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.137) or DCR (59.7% vs. 58.9%, p = 0.916). Patients who received afatinib showed significantly higher ORR (58.3% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.027) but not DCR compared with gefitinib/erlotinib for major uncommon mutations. Afatinib trended toward better PFS and OS for major uncommon mutations and compound mutations. No EGFR‐TKIs were effective for most NSCLC patients with exon 20 insertions. Performance status, metastasis of the liver and pleura, and dose reduction were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Conclusion: Afatinib demonstrated better survival outcomes than gefitinib/erlotinib for NSCLC patients harboring major EGFR uncommon mutations and compound mutations. Performance status and metastatic sites may be useful for predicting PFS for major uncommon mutations and compound mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although bevacizumab in combination with afatinib or erlotinib is an effective and safe first-line therapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there are very few clinical data comparing afatinib and erlotinib combined with bevacizumab. We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis for the comparison of two combination therapies. Methods: Between May 2015 and October 2020, data of 135 stage IIIB/IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving first-line afatinib or erlotinib combined with bevacizumab combination therapy in Linkou, Keelung, Chiayi, and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed. Results: In all, 67 patients received afatinib plus bevacizumab, and 68 patients received erlotinib plus bevacizumab. Afatinib combined with bevacizumab had an objective response rate (ORR) of 82.1% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 97.0%, and the ORR and DCR were 83.8 and 95.6%, respectively, in the erlotinib combined with bevacizumab group (p = 0.798 and p = 1.000). The median progression-free survival was 20.7 and 20.3 months for the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.891–1.953; p = 0.167). The overall survival was 41.9 and 51.0 months for the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and erlotinib plus bevacizumab group, respectively (HR = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.829–2.436; p = 0.201). The secondary EGFR-T790M mutation rates after disease progression were 44% in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and 58.8% in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group (p = 0.165). Skin toxicity was the most frequent treatment-related adverse event (AE) in both treatment groups. Diarrhea, an AE, occurred significantly more frequently in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group than in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Afatinib combined with bevacizumab was equally as effective as erlotinib combined with bevacizumab for untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Prospective clinical studies that explore bevacizumab combined with afatinib or erlotinib for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC are warranted. Graphic abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to evaluate possible treatment strategies for patients with de novo T790M mutation‐positive (T790M+) non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with de novo T790M+ NSCLC and treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) between 2011 and 2018 at a regional hospital in Taiwan were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinicopathological characteristics and subsequent treatment information were collected, and potential prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: All tumors with T790M mutations coexisted with sensitizing mutations. Through the last follow‐up in May 2021, afatinib and osimertinib demonstrated better progression‐free survival (PFS, p < 0.01) and overall survival (OS, p < 0.01) than gefitinib and erlotinib. Additionally, patients with low T790M ratios had better PFS than those with high T790M ratios, implying that the proportion of T790M+ tumors determined the response to EGFR‐TKIs. Multivariate analysis confirmed that both EGFR‐TKI treatment (osimertinib hazard ratio [HR] 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01–0.30; afatinib HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02–0.39) and a low T790M ratio (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12–0.69) were independently favorable prognostic factors for patients with de novo T790M+ NSCLC. Median PFS was 6.1 (95% CI 4.4–7.8) months. In addition, patients treated with first‐generation (1G)/second‐generation (2G) EGFR‐TKIs followed by osimertinib (n = 8) demonstrated the best OS compared with patients treated with frontline osimertinib (n = 5) or 1G/2G EGFR‐TKIs without osimertinib (n = 28, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Sequential TKIs may represent an alternative option for de novo T790M mutation, particularly frontline afatinib and tumors with low T790M ratios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are limited comparisons of first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in large, real-world cohorts of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC (N = 612) with common EGFR mutations receiving first-line gefitinib/erlotinib and afatinib were grouped and propensity-score matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutations were analyzed. Results: The gefitinib/erlotinib and afatinib groups each contained 206 patients after matching. Compared with gefitinib/erlotinib, patients receiving afatinib achieved longer median PFS (16.3 versus 14.2 months; log-rank test p = 0.020) and had a lower risk of progression [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57–0.94); p = 0.017]. Median OS (37.3 versus 34.2 months; log-rank test p = 0.500) and reduction in risk of death [HR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.65–1.23); p = 0.476] did not differ significantly between groups. T790M positivity was significantly higher in the gefitinib/erlotinib than afatinib group (70.9% versus 44.6%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that afatinib was independently associated with lower T790M positivity [odds ratio (OR) 0.27 (95% CI, 0.14–0.53); p < 0.001], whereas ⩾12 months PFS after EGFR-TKI treatment [OR 3.00 (95% CI, 1.56–5.98); p = 0.001] and brain metastasis [OR 2.12 (95% CI, 1.08–4.26); p = 0.030] were associated with higher T790M positivity. Sequential third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment was administered to 63 patients, in whom median OS after the second–third-generation and first–third-generation EGFR-TKI sequences were 38.8 and 29.1 months, respectively. Conclusion: Compared with gefitinib/erlotinib, afatinib had a higher treatment efficacy and a lower secondary T790M positivity in a large, real-world cohort of Asian patients with EGFR -mutated NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Brain metastases are observable in 20-40% of non-small cell lung cancer patients, but standard treatments for such metastases may be intolerable to some. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were found to be effective against mutant-EGFR lung adenocarcinomas, but data regarding their effectiveness, especially for the second-generation EGFR-TKI afatinib, is limited. This study compared key outcomes for afatanib monotherapy versus afatinib combined with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in treatment-naïve lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR mutations.Methods: A retrospective review of 28 brain metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients treated between June 2014 and December 2016 was conducted; 17 were treated with WBRT and maintenance afatinib therapy, while 11 received afatinib monotherapy.Results: The patients were predominantly female (n = 17, 60.7%) and non-smokers (78.6%). Almost all the patients (89.3%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. The EGFR mutation type consisted of the del19 mutation in 57.1% of the patients (n = 16), while L858R mutations were found in 42.9% (n = 12). The mean number of brain metastases (6.1 ± 5.0) was higher among the patients treated with afatinib monotherapy, while the mean size of the largest brain metastasis (19.0 ± 10.5mm) was greater in the afatinib combined with WBRT group. The objective response rates for the afatinib monotherapy and combination therapy groups were 81.8% and 88.2%, respectively. However, the monotherapy group exhibited a significantly higher complete response rate for intracranial lesions (63.6% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.02), and there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in overall survival or time to treatment failure.Conclusion: Afatinib can provide therapeutic efficacy and a good response rate in treatment-naïve mutant-EGFR lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases regardless of whether or not they also receive radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: No comprehensive and simple prognostic model based on pretreatment factors exists for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). A total of 11 independent prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis, including performance status, morphology, mutation, stage, EGFR-TKIs, and metastasis to liver, brain, bone, pleura, adrenal gland, and distant lymph nodes. We established a nomogram based on independent pretreatment factors and used it to stratify EGFRm+ NSCLC patients undergoing EGFR-TKI treatment into five different risk groups for survival using recursive partitioning analysis. The performance of this nomogram was good and feasible, providing clinicians and patients with additional information for evaluating therapeutic options. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the standard treatment for EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to create a novel nomogram to help physicians suggest the optimal treatment for patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC. Records of 2190 patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC cancer who were treated with EGFR-TKIs (including gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib) at the branches of a hospital group between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinicopathological characteristics, clinical tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential prognostic factors to create a nomogram for risk stratification. Univariate analysis identified 14 prognostic factors, and multivariate analysis confirmed the pretreatment independent factors, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, morphology, mutation, stage, EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib), and metastasis to liver, brain, bone, pleura, adrenal gland, and distant lymph nodes. Based on these factors, a novel nomogram was created and used to stratify the patients into five different risk groups for PFS and OS using recursive partitioning analysis. This risk stratification can provide additional information to clinicians and patients when determining the optimal therapeutic options for EGFRm+ NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Previous studies of first-generation EGFR-TKI erlotinib and bevacizumab combination have demonstrated superior treatment efficacy compared to erlotinib monotherapy for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Whether this combination benefit can also be observed in second-generation EGFR-TKI afatinib-treated patients remains unclear. The study presented a real-world cohort of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation treated by afatinib plus bevacizumab or single-agent afatinib. After balancing the key characteristics between the two treatment groups, the result showcased a similar therapeutic efficacy of afatinib plus bevacizumab compared to afatinib monotherapy. The incidence of drug-resistant mutation was also similar between the two groups. This study provided a clinical practice-based evidence that the additional benefit of bevacizumab is likely moderate in afatinib-treated patients. Background: Treatment outcome between afatinib alone or with bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation remains insufficiently reported. Methods: A total of 405 advanced NSCLC patients with sensitizing-EGFR mutation receiving first-line single-agent afatinib or with bevacizumab were grouped and propensity score-matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutation were analyzed. Results: In the original cohort, 367 (90.6%) patients received afatinib treatment alone and 38 (9.4%) patients received afatinib plus bevacizumab. Patients who received bevacizumab combination were significantly younger (54.6 ± 10.9 vs. 63.9 ± 11.5; p < 0.001) compared to the afatinib alone group. After propensity score matching, the afatinib alone and afatinib plus bevacizumab groups contained 118 and 34 patients, respectively. A non-significantly higher objective response was noted in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group (82.4% vs. 67.8%; p = 0.133). In the propensity score-matched cohort, a bevacizumab add-on offered no increased PFS (16.1 vs. 15.0 months; p = 0.500), risk reduction of progression (HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.52–1.40]; p = 0.528), OS benefit (32.1 vs. 42.0 months; p = 0.700), nor risk reduction of death (HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.42–1.74] p = 0.660) compared to the single-agent afatinib. The secondary T790M rate in afatinib plus bevacizumab and afatinib alone groups was similar (56.3% vs. 49.4%, p = 0.794). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that EGFR L858R (OR 0.51 [95% CI, 0.26–0.97]; p = 0.044), EGFR uncommon mutation (OR 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02–0.64]; p = 0.021), and PFS longer than 12 months (OR 2.71 [95% CI, 1.39–5.41]; p = 0.004) were independent predictors of secondary T790M positivity. Conclusion: Bevacizumab treatment showed moderate efficacy in real-world, afatinib-treated NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The efficacy of afatinib in combination with bevacizumab in untreated advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma is currently unclear. We sought to investigate the efficacy of this combination through a multicenter observational analysis. Data for 57 patients with advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma who received afatinib combined with bevacizumab as first-line therapy at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals in Linkou and Kaohsiung and Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital from May 2015 to July 2019 were analyzed. The objective response rate and disease control rate of afatinib combined with bevacizumab therapy were 87.7% and 100%, respectively. In all patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 23.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) (17.56–29.17)) and 45.9 (95% CI (39.50–53.60)) months, respectively. No statistical significance between exon 19 deletion and L858R mutations was noted in PFS or OS. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (98.2%) and dermatitis (96.5%), and most AEs were grade 2 or lower and manageable. The combination of afatinib and bevacizumab is an effective therapy for untreated advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma with acceptable safety. Future prospective studies focusing on this combination for untreated advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]