Search

Background Guidelines for fall prevention in older adults recommend mobility screening for fall risk assessment; however, there is no consensus on which test to use and at what cutoff. This study aimed to determine the accuracy and optimal cut-off values of commonly used mobility tests for predicting falls in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Methods Mobility tests at baseline included the Timed Up and Go (TUG), Single Leg Stance (SLS), chair-rise and gait speed. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 65 years and meeting first-level fall screening criteria (i.e. history of a fall or mobility problem) at baseline. Accuracy of fall prediction at 18-months for each test was measured by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Results Of 1,121 participants that met inclusion criteria (mean age 75.2 ± 5.9 years; 66.6% women), 218 (19.4%) reported ≥one fall at 18 months. None of the tests achieved acceptable accuracy for identifying individuals with ≥one fall at follow-up. Among women 65–74 and 75–85 years, the TUG identified recurrent fallers (≥two falls) with optimal cut-off scores of 14.1 and 12.9 s (both AUCs 0.70), respectively. Among men 65–74 years, only the SLS showed acceptable accuracy (AUC 0.85) for identifying recurrent fallers with an optimal cutoff of 3.6 s. Conclusions Our findings indicate that commonly used mobility tests do not have sufficient discriminability to identify fallers in a population-based sample of community-dwelling older adults. The TUG and SLS can identify recurrent fallers; however, their accuracy and cut-off values vary by age and sex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome (MCR), which is a pre-dementia stage. • MCR has been associated with incident Vascular Dementia and Alzheimer Disease. • MCR is associated with cardiovascular diseases and risk factors in both younger and older Canadian individuals. Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome (MCR) is a pre-dementia syndrome. The aim of this study was to examine whether there is: 1) an association between MCR and cardiovascular diseases and risk factors (CVDRF) in the Canadian population, and 2) a specific MCR-related CVDRF profile (i.e., cardiovascular diseases (CVD) versus cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) versus both) when comparing different age groups. A total of 29,569 participants free of dementia were recruited in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Participants were categorized into groups by their age and MCR status (with MCR versus without MCR). Overweight/obese, smoking, waist to hip circumference ratio (WHCR), systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure levels were CVRF. Diabetes type I and II, hypertension, heart disease and attack, peripheral vascular disease, angina, stroke and rhythmic disease were CVD. A higher prevalence of CVRF in MCR was shown in the youngest age groups (i.e., 45–54 and 55–64) compared to the other age groups. MCR was positively associated with CVDRF, except in the oldest age group (i.e., ≥75). In this group, the only significant association with CVRF was with diastolic blood pressure, which was negatively associated with MCR. Diabetes and hypertension were not associated with MCR. MCR is associated with CVDRF in both younger and older individuals. A stronger association was present for CVRF factors in younger adults and for CVD in older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]