1. Prediction of survival odds in COVID-19 by zinc, age and selenoprotein P as composite biomarker
- Author
-
Alireza Ranjbar, Julian Seelig, Waldemar B. Minich, Linda Seibert, Lutz Schomburg, Qian Sun, Asan Cherkezov, Manuel Bachmann, Raban Arved Heller, Joachim Diegmann, Julian Hackler, Maximilian Pilz, Petra Seemann, and Arash Moghaddam
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Gastroenterology ,Biochemistry ,Disease-Free Survival ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Micronutrient ,lcsh:QH301-705.5 ,Aged ,media_common ,Aged, 80 and over ,Inflammation ,lcsh:R5-920 ,Receiver operating characteristic ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,Selenoprotein P ,Convalescence ,Organic Chemistry ,Age Factors ,Area under the curve ,COVID-19 ,Biomarker ,Middle Aged ,European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition ,Survival Rate ,P-Selectin ,Zinc ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,030104 developmental biology ,lcsh:Biology (General) ,Cohort ,Trace element ,Biomarker (medicine) ,Female ,lcsh:Medicine (General) ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Research Paper - Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infections cause the current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and challenge the immune system with ongoing inflammation. Several redox-relevant micronutrients are known to contribute to an adequate immune response, including the essential trace elements zinc (Zn) and selenium (Se). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that COVID-19 patients are characterised by Zn deficiency and that Zn status provides prognostic information. Serum Zn was determined in serum samples (n = 171) collected consecutively from patients surviving COVID-19 (n = 29) or non-survivors (n = 6). Data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study were used for comparison. Zn concentrations in patient samples were low as compared to healthy subjects (mean ± SD; 717.4 ± 246.2 vs 975.7 ± 294.0 μg/L, P
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF