Search

Real time 3D echocardiography has an established incremental diagnostic value over 2D imaging, especially during transesophageal evaluation of native and prosthetic heart valves. A 66 years old male patient, with an history of previous cardiac surgery for mitral annuloplasty and recurrent fever, came to the attention of our echo lab with an indication for transesophageal echocardiography after previous inconclusive transthoracic echocardiograms. Real time 3D echocardiography and 3D color doppler imaging resulted of outmost importance to clarify the presence of annular ring dehiscence, previously not well defined from 2D echocardiography imaging.

OBJECTIVES Blunt thoracic aortic injury can be treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with excellent short and mid-term outcomes. However, few data are available about the long-term results. Our goal was to report our single-centre, 20-year experience using TEVAR to treat blunt thoracic aortic injury. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database to identify all patients treated with TEVAR for traumatic lesions of the aortic isthmus. We identified 35 patients since 1998. Patients' charts were analysed for preoperative characteristics, intraoperative variables and short-term outcomes. Information about the long-term follow-up was collected by analysing cross-sectional images and via phone calls. Follow-up was 100% complete. Rates of survival and of freedom from aortic redo were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients were men (82%). The median age was 42 years (range 22-79 years) and the mean injury severity score was 38 (±13). The endovascular procedure was successfully carried out in all patients. The left subclavian artery was intentionally overstented in 11 patients (31%). Two patients died perioperatively (5.7%). The estimated survival was 92% and 87% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, with no aorta-related deaths. The estimated freedom from aortic redo was 96% and 91% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data corroborate the excellent results of the endovascular treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injury when follow-up is extended to 20 years. New-generation devices, which are more comfortable and have smaller diameters, may further improve the results of TEVAR in treating traumatic aortic injury. Surveillance with cross-sectional imaging remains mandatory.

Background The effects of fat microembolization due to cardiopulmonary bypass are well known in cardiac surgery. Our aim is to evaluate the use of the RemoweLL device (Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) during elective aortic valve replacement in elderly patients (>70 years old) to rate its biochemical and clinical effects. The RemoweLL device is an oxygenator-integrated reservoir which combines two strategies for fat emboli and leucocytes removal: filtration and supernatant elimination. Methods Forty-four elderly patients were enrolled and assigned randomly to a Group A (standard device) and a Group B (RemoweLL). Biochemical effects were evaluated by blood samples, which were tested for white blood cells, neutrophils, protein SP-100 and interleukin 6 besides standard lab tests. Our clinical endpoints were any type of neurological, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal or renal complications, and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Statistical analysis was carried out with chi square test for non-parametric data; t test and analysis of variance for repeated measures were used for parametric data. Results Group B showed lower levels of white blood cells, neutrophils, interleukin 6 and protein SP-100 immediately and 24 hours after the operation. Group B also showed a lower amount of neurocognitive type II dysfunction even if the length of stay in the ICU did not change. Conclusions The RemoweLL system is safe and effective in reducing inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass and it could be a useful tool in minimizing negative effects of cardiopulmonary bypass; however, it does not seem to have any effect on elderly patients’ hospital stay.

The 2-stage elephant trunk procedure is widely used to treat extensive disease of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta. The 2nd stage of the procedure can be accomplished with both a standard surgical procedure and a retrograde transfemoral endovascular approach using the dangling graft as proximal landing zone. However, in some patients, severe disease of iliofemoral vessels can prevent standard retrograde thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In such cases, an alternative route to gain endovascular access must be used. Herein, we report a case of anterograde cardiac transapical approach for TEVAR as a 2nd stage of an elephant trunk procedure.

Treatment of thoracic aortic rupture poses a substantial challenge for the aortic surgeon. The advent of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) revolutionized the treatment of this heterogeneous group of diseases. Some patients suitable for TEVAR, however, present severe peripheral vascular diseases that can prevent standard retrograde delivery of the stent graft through the femoral artery. In this report, we present a case series of 5 patients with thoracic aortic rupture successfully treated with cardiac transapical TEVAR.

Objective: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) are suitable alternatives to conventional surgery. The aim of this study is to compare early outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI and SU-AVR.Methods: Data were analyzed on patients who underwent TAVI and patients who underwent SU-AVR. Two matched cohorts (TAVI vs SU-AVR) were created using propensity scores; all analyses were repeated for transapical TAVI and transfemoral TAVI, separately. Outcomes were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria.Results: A total of 2177 patients were included in the analysis: 1885 (86.6%) treated with TAVI; 292 (13.4%) treated with SU-AVR. Mortality in unmatched TAVI and SU-AVR patients was 7.1% and 2.1%, respectively, at 30 days, and 12.9% and 4.6%, respectively, at 1 year. No differences were found in 30-day mortality in the 214 matched patient pairs (3.7% vs 2.3%; P = .4), but patients treated with TAVI showed a lower incidence of device success (85.9% vs 98.6%; P < .001) and pacemaker implantation (2.8% vs 9.4%; P = .005), and a higher incidence of any paravalvular leakage (PVL).Conclusions: SU-AVR is associated with better device success and a lower incidence of PVL, compared with TAVI. Nevertheless, patients treated with SU-AVR were more likely to receive a permanent pacemaker. SU-AVR and TAVI provide good results in patients who have severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Given the multiple therapeutic options available, patients may receive the treatment that is most appropriate for their clinical and anatomical characteristics.

4. Spotnitz W, Burks S. Use of tissue sealants in cardiac surgery. In: Franco K, Verrier E, editors. Advanced therapy in cardiac surgery. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker; 2003. p. 9-10. 5. Coselli JS, Bavaria JE, Fehrenbacher J, Stowe CL, Macheers SK, Gundry SR. Prospective randomized study of a protein-based tissue adhesive used as a hemostatic and structural adjunct in cardiac and vascular anastomotic repair procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197: 243-52; discussion 252-3. 6. Hewitt CW, Marra SW, Kann BR, Tran HS, Puc MM, Chrzanowski FA, et al. BioGlue surgical adhesive for thoracic aortic repair during coagulopathy: efficacy and histopathology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 71:1609-12. 7. Raanani E, Latter DA, Errett LE, Bonneau DB, Leclerc Y, Salasidis

We describe an unusual presentation of a large saccular aneurysm of the ascending aorta, mimicking an acute coronary syndrome. The compression of the aneurysm on the left main coronary artery was probably the cause of these confusing symptoms. Our experience confirms the fundamental role of modern cardiac imaging techniques in the differential diagnosis of these unusual cases and in the planning of the correct surgical procedure.

The aim of this study was to examine perioperative mortality and morbidity and midterm results in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft and mitral valve annuloplasty with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy. Sixty-one patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve annuloplasty between January 1998 and December 2003. Patients eligible for revascularization that presented a mild or more severe mitral valve regurgitation at echocardiography (effective regurgitant orifice0.2 cm(2)) were considered for annuloplasty with a Cosgrove ring. New York Heart Association class (NYHA) III/IV was present in 40 patients (66%) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III-IV in 19 (31%). A previous acute myocardial infarction was reported in 48 patients (79%). The mean number of graft anastomoses was 2.5 +/- 0.7 and the left internal mammary artery was used in 49 patients (80%). In-hospital mortality was 4.9% (3 patients), due to unsuccessful weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, multiple organ failure, and stroke, respectively. Left ventricle ejection fraction improved from 28.9% +/- 5.2% preoperatively to 35.4% +/- 8.1% at follow-up (P = 0.0001) and a significant reduction in NYHA III/IV was detected: from 40 patients preoperatively (66%) to 14 (31%) at follow-up (P = 0.031). Midterm cardiac-related mortality rate was 3.4%. In our experience combined coronary artery bypass grafting and ring annuloplasty for ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy can be performed with acceptable risks for in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Midterm results show a good survival rate and a durable functional improvement in this subset of patients.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) still plays a fundamental role in the management of acute coronary syndromes. The aim of this study is to report the experience of our center in the treatment of patients with acute coronary sindromes without persistent ST elevation urgently operated on with CABG, and to discuss surgical problems related. Two-hundred and six patients were urgently operated on for CABG for acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation from January 2001 to February 2003. The majority of them had three vessel coronary disease (72%) and left main stem disease occurred in 20% of the patients. Mean LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) was 54 +/- 12% whereas 9% of the patients had a LVEF40%. Twenty-one patients (10%) received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors and 35 (17%) received intravenous heparin therapy before surgery. Mean interval time between the onset of symptoms and surgery was 16 +/- 10 days (range 4-50). In-hospital mortality was 2% (4 patients). Perioperative AMI (acute myocardial infarction) occurred in 4% (8 patients) and a transient low cardiac output syndrome in 27 patients (13%). Bleeding requiring surgery occurred in 1% of the patients. Transient respiratory insufficiency was present in 12 patients (6%) and acute renal failure in 8 patients (4%). Mean I.C.U. time was 2.4 days (1-17). Urgent CABG for acute coronary syndromes shows a low risk for in-hospital mortality and morbidity. In acute patients arterial grafts are not detrimental for the outcome, but are recommended in the absence of contraindications to improve long-term results. In spite of recent developments in cardioplegic cardiac arrest, optimal myocardial protection against perioperative myocardial infarction still remains a challenge.

Background Posttraumatic aortic rupture is a potentially lethal injury. Endovascular procedure has recently proved to be a valid option. Timing of the treatment, however, is still a debated issue. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of immediate stent-graft repair of acute posttraumatic aortic injury. Methods From 1998 to 2005, 15 patients (11 men and 4 women, mean age 42.3 years) with blunt aortic injury were treated with immediate stent-graft positioning. In patients with clinical and radiologic signs of impending rupture, endovascular treatment was performed in an emergency setting (11 cases). In the 4 remaining patients the aortic lesion was treated after clinical management. When present, immediate life-threatening nonaortic lesions were treated before endovascular stenting (6 cases). In 1 case emergency laparotomy and endovascular procedure were performed simultaneously. Stent positioning was monitored by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in all cases. Results Endovascular procedure was successful in 100% of the patients. Two patients died perioperatively as a consequence of a multiorgan failure. Both patients were in American Society of Anesthetists class V and were in severe intractable hemorrhagic shock before the procedure. Computed tomography scan performed before discharge showed correct positioning of the stent graft and absence of endoleaks in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 29 months (range 1-79) all patients were alive but 1, who died of unrelated cause, and no intervention-related complication had occurred. Conclusions Immediate stent-graft repair of posttraumatic aortic injury is a feasible and safe procedure. It allows us to minimize the surgical risks and to treat stable and unstable lesions even when associated lesions would contraindicate traditional surgical intervention.