Search

Background: Little is known about the comparative risk of death with atypical or conventional antipsychotics (APs) among persons with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease (CCD). Research design and methods: A cohort study was conducted using five Italian claims databases. New atypical AP users with CCD aged ≥65 (reference) were matched to new conventional AP users. Mortality per 100 person-years (PYs) and hazard ratios (HR), estimated using Cox models, were reported. Incidence and risk of death were estimated for persons having drug–drug interactions. Outcome occurrence was evaluated 180 days after AP initiation. Results: Overall 24,711 and 27,051 elderly new conventional and atypical AP users were identified. The mortality rate was 51.3 and 38.5 deaths per 100 PYs for conventional and atypical AP users. Mortality risk was 1.33 (95%CI: 1.27–1.39) for conventional APs. There was no increased mortality risk with single drug–drug interactions (DDIs) vs. no DDI. AP users with ≥1 DDI had a 29% higher mortality risk compared to no DDI in the first 90 days of treatment (HR: 1.29 (95% CI: 1.00–1.67)). Conclusions: Conventional APs had a higher risk of death than atypical APs among elderly persons with CCD. Having ≥1 DDI was associated with an increased risk of death.

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between adherence to statin therapy and the risk of exacerbation among elderly individuals affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease. Methods: Using the healthcare utilisation databases of five Italian territorial units accounting for nearly 35% of the Italian population, we recruited a cohort of 6263 elderly persons (i.e. aged 65 years or older) with co-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease who initiated statin therapy. Exposure was adherence to statins measured by the proportion of days of follow-up covered. Outcome was the first hospital admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease occurring in the period of observation. A proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals for the exposure–outcome association, after adjusting for several covariates. A set of sensitivity analyses was performed to account for sources of systematic uncertainty. Results: During an average follow-up of about 4 years, 1307 cohort members experienced the outcome. Compared with patients with low adherence (proportion of days of follow-up covered ≤ 40%), those with intermediate (proportion of days of follow-up covered 41–80%) and high (proportion of days of follow-up covered > 80%) adherence exhibited a lower risk of exacerbation of 16% (95% confidence interval 3–27) and 23% (95% confidence interval 10–34). Conclusions: In a real-world setting, we observed evidence that adherence to statin therapy markedly reduced the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations in elderly patients with co-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease. Given the limited and controversial evidence from trials, more randomised controlled trials are urgently needed to better examine the potential benefits of statins as adjunct therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Objectives To describe NSAID utilization for musculoskeletal conditions in a large cohort of Italian elderly with cerebro/cardiovascular disease, a population in which NSAIDs should be generally avoided due to the prothrombotic potential. Methods Administrative data from five Italian geographic areas were analyzed. Patients aged ≥ 65 with a cerebro/cardiovascular event recorded between 2008 and 2011 (cohort entry) were selected. Prescription NSAIDs reimbursed for musculoskeletal conditions and dispensed during 1 year follow-up were retrieved to describe (i) prevalence of use, (ii) average amount of defined daily doses of NSAIDs claimed by users per day of follow-up, and (iii) distribution of the received daily dose (RDD) among patients with ≥ 2 dispensings. Among new users, i.e., patients without NSAID dispensings during 2 years before cohort entry, the first dispensed NSAID molecule was observed. Results Overall, 511,989 patients were selected. Across the five geographic areas, prevalence of use ranged from 48 to 21% and average consumption ranged between 30 and 67 DDD/1000 users/day. Around 10% of patients in the overall cohort had a RDD > 1. Nimesulide (9.6%) and diclofenac (7.5%) had the highest prevalence of use. The most consumed NSAIDs were nimesulide and coxibs with 10.6 and 7.5 DDD/1000 users/day, respectively. Among new users recruited in 2011, 30% had diclofenac or a coxibs as the first prescription. Conclusions NSAID use was common in the study cohort, particularly in central-southern areas. In contrast with current recommendations, coxibs and diclofenac were among the most prescribed active principles, even in new users. Interventions to promote appropriateness of use are warranted. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-018-2411-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background and Objectives: Antihypertensive treatment with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is consolidated in clinical practice; however, different studies observed increased risks of acute events for short-acting CCBs. This study aimed to provide real-world evidence on risks of acute cardiovascular (CV) events, hospitalizations and mortality among users of different CCB classes in secondary CV prevention. Methods: Three case–control studies were nested in a cohort of Italian elderly hypertensive CV-compromised CCBs users. Cases were subjects with CV events (n = 25,204), all-cause hospitalizations (n = 19,237), or all-cause mortality (n = 17,996) during the follow-up. Up to four controls were matched for each case. Current or past exposition to CCBs at index date was defined based on molecule, formulation and daily doses of the last CCB delivery. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using conditional logistic regression models. Results: Compared to past users, current CCB users had significant reductions in risks of CV events [OR 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84–0.91)], hospitalization [0.90 (0.88–0.93)] and mortality [0.48 (0.47–0.49)]. Current users of long-acting dihydropyridines (DHPs) had the lowest risk [OR 0.87 (0.84–0.90), 0.86 (0.83–0.90), 0.55 (0.54–0.56) for acute CV events, hospitalizations and mortality], whereas current users of short-acting CCBs had an increased risk of acute CV events [OR 1.77 (1.13–2.78) for short-acting DHPs; 1.19 (1.07–1.31) for short-acting non-DHPs] and hospitalizations [OR 1.84 (0.96–3.51) and 1.23 (1.08–1.42)]. Conclusions: The already-existing warning on short-acting CCBs should be potentiated, addressing clinicians towards the choice of long-acting formulations.

Purpose: Conflicting findings were observed from clinical trials and observational studies evaluating the association between the use of statins and the risk of fracture. A case–control study nested into a cohort of elderly patients on treatment with statins for cardiovascular secondary prevention was performed on this issue. Methods: The cohort was formed by 13 875 individuals aged ≥65 years from several Italian health units receiving statins after hospital discharge for cardiovascular outcomes. From this cohort, 964 patients who experienced fracture were identified (i.e., cases). Up to five controls were randomly selected for each case from the underlying cohort. Conditional logistic regression was used to model the risk of fracture associated with adherence to statins, which was measured from the proportion of days covered (PDC) by treatment. A set of sensitivity analyses was performed in order to account for sources of systematic uncertainty. Results: Compared with patients with low adherence (PDC ≤ 40%), those on intermediate (PDC 41–80%) and high (PDC > 80%) adherence exhibited a risk reduction of 21% (95% confidence interval 6% to 23%) and 25% (7% to 40%). Similar effects were observed among patients younger and older than 80 years, as well as among men, while there was no evidence that adherence to statins affected the risk of fracture among women. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the associations were consistent and robust. Conclusions: Use of statins for secondary cardiovascular prevention is associated with fracture risk reduction in elderly people. Further studies are required to better clarify the statin–fracture association in postmenopausal women. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Background and Objective: Conflicting findings from studies evaluating the association between use of antidepressant drugs and mortality have been reported. We tested the hypothesis that better adherence to antidepressant therapy may reduce mortality. Methods: The cohort included 29,845 individuals aged ≥ 65 years from several Italian health units who were newly treated with antidepressant drugs after hospital discharge with a diagnosis for cardiovascular disease during 2008–2010. These individuals were observed from the first prescription until the end of data availability (i.e. 2012–2014, depending on the local database). During this period, information on (1) prescription of antidepressants and other medications and (2) death from any cause (outcome) was recorded. Proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate the association between better adherence to antidepressants (defined as proportion of days covered ≥ 75%) and outcome, by adjusting and stratifying for several covariates. Results: Patients with better adherence to antidepressants had a reduced mortality of 9% (95% CI 3–14). Patients who did not use other medicaments during follow-up had reduced mortality associated with better adherence to antidepressants of 21% (− 1–38), 14% (7–20), 20% (13–26) and 13% (7–19) for no users of antihypertensive agents, lipid-lowering agents, other cardiovascular drugs and antidiabetics, respectively. Conclusions: Better adherence to antidepressants is associated with reduced all-cause mortality, mainly in patients who did not use other pharmacological treatments. Behavioural changes to enhance adherence among the elderly with cardiovascular disease might offer important benefits in reducing their mortality.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the possible relation between use of antidepressant (AD) drugs, that is, tricyclic ADs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and atypical ADs (AAs), and the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular (CV) events among older patients with previous CV diseases. Methods A nested case-control study was carried out among patients aged 65 years and older from 5 Italian health care territorial units who were discharged for CV disease during 2008 to 2010. The cohort was composed by 344,747 individuals, and of these, 97,739 (28%) experienced hospital admission for CV events (myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, stroke, heart failure) during follow-up (until 2014) and were included as cases. Up to 5 controls were randomly selected and matched to each. A conditional logistic regression was fitted to estimate the risk of CV events associated with ADs past or current use. A within-patient comparison was performed by the case-crossover design to account the effect of depression. Findings Current users of SSRIs and AAs were at increased risk of CV events with odds ratios of 1.25 (95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.29) and 1.31 (1.25-1.37), respectively. An increased risk of arrhythmia and stroke was associated with current use of SSRIs and AAs, whereas an increased risk of heart failure was detected with current use of any ADs. The results were confirmed by the case-crossover approach. Implications Evidence that AD use is associated with an increased risk of CV events in accordance with specific mechanisms of action among older people with CV disease was added by this study.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to estimate the proportion of bleedings that occurred among warfarin users attributable to the concomitant use of other medications. A general approach for measuring the impact of the prescriptive inappropriateness on drug adverse outcomes at the population level is described. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted to obtain summary relative risks of bleeding associated with concurrent use of warfarin and other medications compared to warfarin use alone. A population-based investigation was performed, in an Italian cohort of cardiopathic patients aged 65years or older, to estimate the prevalence of concurrent users of warfarin and other medicaments. The population attributable fraction was computed by combining data on summary relative risks and prevalence of concurrent users. Results: Concomitant use of warfarin and cotrimoxazole, amiodarone, quinolones, macrolides, platelet aggregation inhibitors, SSRIs, NSAIDs, and lipid-lowering agents was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. The corresponding attributable fractions were 3% (95% CI 2 to 4%), 21% (1 to 41%), 21% (17 to 25%), 9% (8 to 10%), 14% (12 to 16%), 6% (5 to 8%), 10% (1 to 20%), and 8% (0 to 18%), respectively. Conclusions: More than half of bleeding events occurring among frail elderly using warfarin are attributable to a concomitant use of warfarin with certain drugs. Because some of these drugs appear to be essential for the treatment/prevention of cardiovascular conditions, and their concomitant use with warfarin could be acceptable in some cases, proper INR-monitoring and warfarin dose adjustments are requested.