Search

Aims Stable angina is the most common presentation of heart disease and has a good prognosis. With declining coronary artery disease (CAD), rates a diagnostic approach balancing costs and benefits is a challenge, particularly in women. This study describes the real-life diagnostic workup in a large hospital to explore whether the diagnostic approach may be improved. Methods and results We identified 4028 patients free of CAD, referred for and assessed with non-invasive (NIT) or invasive test for stable suspected CAD in 2012-15. In both the sexes, the majority (>85%) presented with chest pain as primary symptom. Women had more non-angina (60.2 vs. 54.5%) and less typical angina (8.2 vs. 11.8%, P

Aims We hypothesized that the modified Diamond–Forrester (D-F) prediction model overestimates probability of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to update the prediction model based on pre-test information and assess the model’s performance in predicting prognosis in an unselected, contemporary population suspected of angina. Methods and results We included 3903 consecutive patients free of CAD and heart failure and suspected of angina, who were referred to a single centre for assessment in 2012–15. Obstructive CAD was defined from invasive angiography as lesion requiring revascularization, >70% stenosis or fractional flow reserve Conclusion The pre-test probability model recommended in current ESC guidelines substantially overestimates likelihood of CAD when applied to a contemporary, unselected, all-comer population. We provide an updated prediction model that identifies subgroups with low likelihood of obstructive CAD and good prognosis in which non-invasive testing may safely be deferred.

Background Although ST-segment deviation has been evaluated and used during many years both on continuous electrocardiographic Holter monitoring and during exercise stress testing, considerable controversy still remains concerning the prevalence and diagnostic significance of fortuitously discovered ST-segment deviation in asymptomatic healthy persons. Methods and Results The occurrence of ST-segment deviation was studied in a population of 63 clinically healthy male subjects 51 to 75 years of age, with the use of 24-hour Holter monitoring and exercise stress testing. The subjects were recruited from the Copenhagen City Heart Study and were without cardiovascular risk factors, chronic diseases, or medication and without cardiovascular events during 5 to 12 years before and 3 to 5 years after admission. The specificity, that is, the probability of displaying a negative test result in healthy subjects without disease, was 1.0 when using as criterion for significant ST-segment deviation a horizontal or descending ST-segment depression of >0.20 mV or ST-segment elevation ≥0.15 mV during Holter monitoring, and acceptable, for example, 0.95, when using as criterion a horizontal or descending ST-segment depression of ≥0.15 mV during Holter monitoring or at the exercise test, respectively. Furthermore, the specificity was 0.95 when a horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression of 0.1 mV was displayed in both the Holter and exercise electrocardiographic recording system. Conclusions Thus in asymptomatic persons, the usual criterion for significant ST-segment depression of 0.1 mV can be applied when occurring in both electrocardiographic recording systems. However, if one test alone is used, the criterion of significant ST-segment depression should be 0.15 mV. Absence of ST-segment deviation during Holter monitoring and exercise stress testing, indicated with a specificity of 1.0 or 0.95 according to choice of criterion, implies that the person is in a healthy state. (Am Heart J 1999;137:1070-4.)

To evaluate the efficacy of anipamil, a phenylalkylamine calcium antagonist, in treatment of stable angina pectoris, we performed a randomized, double blind placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Inclusion criteria were (a) stable angina pectoris for at least 2 months, (b) an exercise test with > or = 0.1-mV horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression limited by angina, and (c) at least 10 attacks of angina pectoris in a single-blind 3-week run-in period. Nineteen patients were randomized to enter the study. In 3-week periods, they received either anipamil 80 mg once daily (o.d.), anipamil 160 mg o.d., or placebo. At the end of each period, an exercise test was performed. The number of angina pectoris attacks was significantly reduced during treatment with anipamil 80 mg (p < 0.05) and anipamil 160 mg (p < 0.001) as compared with placebo. Glycerol nitrate consumption was significantly reduced during treatment with anipamil 80 mg (p < 0.01) and 160 mg (p < 0.001) as compared with placebo. During exercise testing, the load (W) at start of angina was significantly increased during treatment with anipamil 80 mg (p < 0.01) and 160 mg (p < 0.05) as compared with placebo. Heart rate (HR) at 0.1 mV ST-segment depression was increased during treatment with anipamil 80 mg (p < 0.001). Few adverse events were reported.

The purpose of this study was to examine the 24-hour antiischemic efficacy of once-a-day anipamil compared to placebo in the treatment of patients with stable angina. The study was designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study with an initial 3 week single-blind placebo period. The patients received anipamil 80 mg once daily, anipamil 160 mg once daily, and placebo in a randomized order. At the end of each treatment period the patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory ECG recording. Nineteen patients were included, all with typical stable angina pectoris for at least 2 months, exercise test withor = 0.10 mV horizontal or down-sloping ST-segment depression and limited by angina pectoris, and at least 10 attacks of angina pectoris in the initial single-blind placebo period. During the placebo period, a total duration of transient myocardial ischemiaor = 0.10 mV during the 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring period was 2263 minutes, 75% of which were asymptomatic. Anipamil 80 mg and 160 mg significantly reduced the duration of episodes to 712 minutes (p0.001), with 87% asymptomatic, and to 913 minutes (p0.001), with 92% asymptomatic, respectively. In conclusion, anipamil given once a day is an effective 24-hour antiischemic drug in the treatment of transient myocardial ischemia.