1. 10-Minute Delayed Recall from the Modified Mini-Mental State Test Predicts Alzheimer's Disease Pathology
- Author
-
Helena C. Chui, Chris Zarow, Ae Young Lee, Scott A. Lyness, and Evelyn L. Teng
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Pathology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Mental Status Schedule ,Autopsy ,Disease ,Logistic regression ,Article ,Alzheimer Disease ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Reaction Time ,medicine ,Humans ,Dementia ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,Mental Disorders ,General Neuroscience ,Brain ,Retrospective cohort study ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Clinical Psychology ,Logistic Models ,ROC Curve ,Predictive value of tests ,Mental Recall ,Female ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,Alzheimer's disease ,Psychology - Abstract
We compared the sensitivity and specificity of two delayed recall scores from the Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) test with consensus clinical diagnosis to differentiate cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) versus non-AD pathologies. At a memory disorders clinic, 117 cognitively impaired patients were administered a baseline 3MS test and received a contemporaneous consensus clinical diagnosis. Their brains were examined after death about 5 years later. Using logistic regression with forward selection to predict pathologically defined AD versus non-AD, 10-min delayed recall entered first (p = 0.001), followed by clinical diagnosis (p = 0.02); 1-min delayed recall did not enter. 10-min delayed recall scores ≤4 (score range = 0-9) were 87% sensitive and 47% specific in predicting AD pathology; consensus clinical diagnosis was 82% sensitive and 45% specific. For the 57 patients whose initial Mini-Mental State Examination scores were ≥19 (the median), 3MS 10-min delayed recall scores ≤4 showed some loss of sensitivity (80%) but a substantial gain in specificity (77%). In conclusion, 10-min delayed recall score on the brief 3MS test distinguished between AD versus non-AD pathology about 5 years before death at least as well as consensus clinical diagnosis that requires much more comprehensive information and complex deliberation.
- Published
- 2014