Search

The BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB) and the Spatz Adjustable Balloon System (ABS) are in fact recommended for weight reduction as a bridge to bariatric surgery. We retrospected studied patients with body mass index (BMI) and age ranges of 37–46 and 70–80 years, respectively, who had undergone BIB from January 2010 to July 2012 and prospected studied patients who had undergone Spatz balloon from July 2012 to August 2014. The aim of this study is to compare BIB and Spatz in terms of weight loss, complications, and maintenance of weight after removal. For both procedures, the median weight loss was 20 ± 3 kg, median BMI at the end of the therapy was 32 ± 2, and no severe complication occurred.

Ethical and medico-legal issues reviews of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) placement in elderly patients is an important topic of international medical literature. PEG is often inappropriately placed in patients with not spontaneous oral feeding intake, cause of unrealistic expectations. We performed a critical review of the literature for placement of PEG in geriatric patients.A literature review was performed about the positioning of the PEG in geriatric patients with dementia and severe anorexia. This assessment has served to develop an algorithm that would be able to provide adequate indications for PEG placement in this patient population.We obtained appropriate indications about PEG placement, below: 1) Esophageal obstructions (like esophageal or neck cancer) 2) neurological deficits correlated dysphagia (like ictus sequelae) 3) refusal to swallow without concomitant terminal illness (like protracted pseudo dementia caused by severe depression) 4) chronic gastric decompression in patients with benign/malignant obstruction who do not wish or can't have a nasogastric tube placed.When compared with controls matched for age, elderly patients with cognitive impairment who have feeding gastrostomy do not demonstrate improved survival.Anorexia, Dementia, Elderly, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy.I problemi etici e medico-legali del posizionamento della gastrostomia endoscopica percutanea (PEG) nei pazienti anziani sono un argomento importante della letteratura medica internazionale. PEG è spesso posizionato in modo inappropriato in pazienti con assunzione di cibo orale non spontanea, causa di aspettative non realistiche. Abbiamo pertanto eseguito una revisione critica della letteratura sul tela dell’adozione della PEG nei pazienti geriatrici. La revisione della letteratura è stata eseguita concentrandoci sul posizionamento del PEG in pazienti geriatrici con demenza e grave anoressia. Questa analisi è servita a sviluppare un algoritmo che sarebbe in grado di fornire indicazioni adeguate per il posizionamento di PEG in questa popolazione di pazienti. Le indicazioni derivate da questo studio circa l’appropriatezza del posizionamento di PEG, riguardano: 1) ostruzioni esofagee (come il cancro esofageo o al collo); 2) deficit neurologico correlato disfagia (come sequele ictus); 3) rifiuto di deglutire senza malattia terminale concomitante (come pseudo demenza protratto causato da depressione grave); 4) decompressione gastrica cronica in pazienti con ostruzione benigna / maligna che non desiderano o non possono avere una sonda nasogastrica posizionata. In conclusione, se confrontati con i controlli corrispondenti all’età, i pazienti anziani con disabilità cognitiva alimentati con la gastrostomia non hanno dimostrato una migliore sopravvivenza.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) appears to be safe and effective as open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for benign or borderline malignant lesion. However, studies comparing LDP with ODP in elderly patients are limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of these two several approaches in elderly patients. A retrospective analysis was carried out by comparing laparoscopic (n = 7) and open (n = 15) distal pancreatectomy in elderly patients performed at the University of Naples “Federico II” and University of Perugia between January 2012 and December 2015. Demographic data, operative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Demographic and tumor characteristics of laparoscopic and ODP were similar. There were also no significant differences in operating room time. Patients undergoing LDP had lower blood loss, first flatus time, diet start time and postoperative hospital stay. There were no significant differences in complication rates or 90-day mortality. LDP is safe and feasible as ODP in selected elderly patients.

Background : Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is still now a controversial technique, which remains the subject of a number of prospective randomised trials. Although questions remain regarding its long-term durability, objective evidence exists which demonstrates its reduced physiological impact compared with conventional open repair, especially for older population and for the concomitant treatment of aortic abdominal aneurysm (AAA) and abdominal neoplas, such as colo-rectal cancer (CRC). In these patients it may reduce the high perioperative mortality. Patients and methods : Abdominal aortic aneurysm and colo-rectal neoplasm are occasionally discovered concurrently. Simultaneous operative treatment may be in these cases an effective management strategy, alternative to a staged procedure. The medical record of three consecutive patients undergoing mini-invasive colectomy for cancer and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were reviewed. Data collected included mode of presentation, preoperative evaluation, colo-rectal pathology and in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Long term follow-up was obtained through office records and telephone contact. Results : In one patient a asymptomatic colo-rectal mass was identified in the course of CT-scan evaluation for AAA; in the other two patients AAA was discovered during CT-scan oncological evaluation for symptomatic CRC. All patients underwent successfully concomitant repair of AAA and CRC by means of EVAR procedure and mini-invasive colo-rectal resection. Pathology revealed adenocarcinomas in all three cases. Perioperative follow-up revealed minor postoperative complications. Two years follow-up showed no cases of graft infection, and no interference of vascular procedure on oncological course of the colo-rectal malignancies.

Fast-track program has been applied in several surgical fields. However, currently many surgical patients are elderly over 70 years of age, and discussion about the application of such protocols for elderly patients is inadequate.The present study was designed to consider the safety and feasibility of application of a fast-track program after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. A total of 76 elderly patients with colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection were randomly assigned to receive either the fast-track care program (n = 40) or the conventional perioperative care protocol (control group, n = 36). The fast track protocol included no preoperative mechanical bowel irrigation, immediate oral alimentation and earlier postoperative ambulation exercise. The length of postoperative hospital stay, the length of time to regain bowel function and the rate of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.The length of time to regain bowel function, including the passage of flatus [32 (24-40) h vs 42 (32-52) h], and to start a liquid diet (13 [10-16] h v/s 43 [36-50] h) were significantly shorter in patients receiving the fast track care protocol compared with those receiving the conventional care protocol. A shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay was recorded in patients receiving the fast-track program than in those receiving conventional care [6 (5-7) days v/s 9.5 (7-12) days]. A reduced percentage of patients who developed general complications was also observed in the fast-track group (5.0% v/s 18%).Fast-track after laparoscopic colorectal surgery can be safely applied in carefully selected elderly patients older than age 70 years. The fast-track recovery program resulted in a more rapid postoperative recovery, earlier discharge from hospital and fewer general complications compared with a conventional postoperative protocol.