Search

Purpose: To compare the incidence and severity of acute and chronic hematologic toxicity (HT) in patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for curative treatment of cervical cancer and to ascertain the dosimetric parameters of two techniques associated with acute and chronic HT. Materials and Methods: A total of 127 patients with cervical cancer receiving concomitant pelvic radiotherapy (RT) and cisplatin were evaluated. Pelvic bone marrow (BM) was contoured for each patient and divided into five sub-regions: lumbosacrum (LS), ilium (IL), lower pelvis (LP), pelvis (P), and whole pelvis (WP). The volume of each BM region receiving 10,20,30, and 40 Gy was calculated (V10, -V20, -V30, and -V40). The lowest level of hemoglobin, leukocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts were obtained during chemoradiotherapy and six months after RT. The nadir values were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). Results: Grade 2 or greater acute anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia was observed in 2%, 41.5%, 12%,and 0% in 3DCRT group and in 27%, 53%, 24.5%, and 4.5% in IMRT group, respectively. Grade 2 or greater chronic anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was observed in 11%, 10%, 6%, and 0% in 3DCRT group and in 11%, 9%, 4.5%, and 0% in IMRT group, respectively. LS-V30,40; IL-V10,20,30,40; LP-V10,20,40; P-V10,20,30,40, and TP-V10,20,30,40 were significantly reduced with IMRT planning compared to 3DCRT planning. Logistic regression analysis of potential predictors showed that none of the dosimetric parameters were significant for predicting acute and chronic HT. Conclusion: The present findings showed that IMRT planning reduced irradiated BM volumes compared to 3DCRT planning. However, no difference between the two techniques was observed in terms of acute and chronic HT. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

To identify the prognostic factors for biochemical outcome in patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without androgen deprivation (AD) and to investigate the impact of percent positive prostate core biopsies (PCB%).From 1998 through 2003, 333 patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were treated in two institutions with definitive EBRT to a median dose of 72 Gy and 80% of them received short- or long-term AD. Biochemical failure was defined using ASTRO criteria with 3 consecutive rises in prostate specific antigen (PSA).Median follow up was 36 months. Gleason score, initial PSA, risk grouping, PCB%, AD and total duration of AD were found to be significant predictors for biochemical outcome in univariate analysis. Independent predictors for PSA failure on multivariate analysis were PCB% and duration of AD. Among 3 risk groups, in the intermediate risk group the biochemical control was significantly better in patients with67% positive core biopsies. In the subgroup analysis of patients who received a prostatic doseor= 70.2 Gy, and patients with no hormonal or short-term hormonal manipulation the 5-year biochemical outcome was significantly reduced in patients withor= 67% positive core biopsies. These significant differences did not exist in patients receiving70.2 Gy and long-term hormonal therapy.Our results suggest that high PCB% could be a predictor of biochemical relapse, especially in the intermediate risk group. The role of PCB% in prostate cancer should be investigated in further trials.

Background: This study analyzed prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of primary thyroid lymphoma. Patients and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected for 87 patients (53 stage I and 34 stage II) with median age 65 years. Fifty-two patients were treated with single modality (31 with chemotherapy alone and 21 with radiotherapy alone) and 35 with combined modality treatment. Median follow-up was 51 months. Results: Sixty patients had aggressive lymphoma and 27 had indolent lymphoma. The 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 74% and 71%, respectively, and the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 68% and 64%. Univariate analysis revealed that age, tumor size, stage, lymph node involvement, B symptoms, and treatment modality were prognostic factors for OS, DFS, and local control (LC). Patients with thyroiditis had significantly better LC rates. In multivariate analysis, OS was influenced by age, B symptoms, lymph node involvement, and tumor size, whereas DFS and LC were influenced by B symptoms and tumor size. Compared with single modality treatment, patients treated with combined modality had better 5-year OS, DFS, and LC. Conclusions: Combined modality leads to an excellent prognosis for patients with aggressive lymphoma but does not improve OS and LC in patients with indolent lymphoma.