Search

A distinct renal tumor has recently been described as "high-grade oncocytic renal tumor" and "sporadic renal cell carcinoma with eosinophilic and vacuolated cytoplasm". The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) consensus proposed a unifying name "eosinophilic vacuolated tumor" (EVT) for this emerging entity. In this multi-institutional study, we evaluated 19 EVTs, particularly their molecular features and mutation profile, using next-generation sequencing. All cases were sporadic and none of the patients had a tuberous sclerosis complex. There were 8 men and 11 women, with a mean age of 47 years (median 50; range 15-72 years). Average tumor size was 4.3 cm (median 3.8 cm; range 1.5-11.5 cm). All patients with available follow-up data (18/19) were alive and without evidence of disease recurrence or progression during the follow-up, ranging from 12 to 198 months (mean 56.3, median 41.5 months). The tumors were well circumscribed, but lacked a well-formed capsule, had nested to solid growth, focal tubular architecture, and showed ubiquitous, large intracytoplasmic vacuoles, round to oval nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. Immunohistochemically, cathepsin K, CD117, CD10, and antimitochondrial antigen were expressed in all cases. Other positive stains included: PAX8, AE1/AE3 and CK18. CK7 was typically restricted only to rare scattered cells. Vimentin, HMB45, melan-A, and TFE3 were negative in all cases. All tumors showed retained SDHB. All cases (19/19) showed non-overlapping mutations of the mTOR pathway genes: TSC1 (4), TSC2 (7), and MTOR (8); one case with MTOR mutation showed a coexistent RICTOR missense mutation. Low mutational rates were found in all samples (ranged from 0 to 6 mutations/Mbp). Microsatellite instability and copy number variations were not found in any of the 17 analyzable cases. EVT represents an emerging renal entity that shows a characteristic and readily identifiable morphology, consistent immunohistochemical profile, indolent behavior, and mutations in either TSC1, TSC2, or MTOR genes.

The morphologic diversity of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is well-known. Aside from typical morphology, pigmented adenomatoid, multicystic and papillary patterns have been described. Ten cases of CHRCC composed of small cell population in various percentages were analysed, using morphologic parameters, immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing. Patients were five males and five females, with age ranging from 40 to 78years. The size of tumors ranged from 2.2 cm to 11 cm (mean 5.17 cm). Small cell component comprised 10 to 80% of the tumor volume, while the remaining was formed by cells with classic ChRCC morphology. The immunohistochemical profile of the small cell component was consistent with typical ChRCC immunophenotype, with CD117 and CK7 positivity. Neuroendocrine markers were negative. Mutations of 13 genes were found: DCIER1, FGFR3, JAK3, SUFO, FAM46C, FANCG, MET, PLCG2, APC, POLE, EPICAM, MUTYH and AR. However, only the PLCG2 mutation is considered pathogenic.The small cell variant of ChRCC further highlights and expand upon existing morphologic heterogeneity spectrum. Recognition of small cell variant of CHRCC is not problematic in tumors, where the "classic" CHRCC component is present. However, in limited material (i.e., core biopsy), this may present a diagnostic challenge. Based on the limited follow-up data available, it appears that the small cell tumor component had no impact on prognosis, since there was no aggressive behavior documented. Awareness of this unusual pattern and applying additional sections to find classic morphology of ChRCC, as well as excluding neuroendocrine nature by immunohistochemistry, may help resolve difficult cases.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is well known for intratumor heterogeneity. An accurate mapping of the tumor is crucial for assessing prognosis, and perhaps this can be linked to potential success/failure of targeted therapies. We assembled a cohort of 7 CCRCCs with prominent vasculature and microvascular hyperplasia (ccRCCPV), resembling those seen in high grade gliomas. A control group of classic CCRCC with no variant morphologies was also included. Both groups were analyzed for clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features. No statistically significant differences in mRNA expression of studied genes between the two groups were found. Using NGS panel Trusight Oncology 500 (TSO500), only one clinically significant gene mutation, VHL c.263G > A, p. (Trp88Ter), was found. TMB (Tumor Mutation Burden) and MSI (MicroSatellite Instability) were low, and no copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in the study cohort. Prominent microvascular hyperplasia in CCRCC is a rare phenomenon. From molecular genetic point of view, these tumors do not appear to be different from classic CCRCC. Prognostically, they also demonstrated similar clinical behaviors.

Aim: To describe a group of distinct low-grade oncocytic renal tumours that demonstrate CD117 negative/cytokeratin (CK) 7-positive immunoprofile. Methods and results: We identified 28 such tumours from four large renal tumour archives. We performed immunohistochemistry for: CK7, CD117, PAX8, CD10, AMACR, e-cadherin, CK20, CA9, AE1/AE3, vimentin, BerEP4, MOC31, CK5/6, p63, HMB45, melan A, CD15 and FH. In 14 cases we performed array CGH, with a successful result in nine cases. Median patient age was 66 years (range 49-78 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.8. Median tumour size was 3 cm (range 1.1-13.5 cm). All were single tumours, solid and tan-brown, without a syndromic association. On microscopy, all cases showed solid and compact nested growth. There were frequent areas of oedematous stroma with loosely arranged cells. The tumour cells had oncocytic cytoplasm with uniformly round to oval nuclei, but without significant irregularities, and showed only focal perinuclear halos. Negative CD117 and positive CK7 reactivity were present in all cases (in two cases there was focal and very weak CD117 reactivity). Uniform reactivity was found for PAX8, AE1/AE3, e-cadherin, BerEP4 and MOC31. Negative stains included CA9, CK20, vimentin, CK5/6, p63, HMB45, Melan A and CD15. CD10 and AMACR were either negative or focally positive ; FH was retained. On array CGH, there were frequent deletions at 19p13.3 (seven of nine), 1p36.33 (five of nine) and 19q13.11 (four of nine) ; disomic status was found in two of nine cases. On follow-up (mean 31.8 months, range 1- 118), all patients were alive with no disease progression. Conclusion: Low-grade oncocytic tumours that are CD117-negative/CK7-positive demonstrate consistent and readily recognisable morphology, immunoprofile and indolent behaviour.

NKX3.1 is considered a reliable immunohistochemical marker of prostatic origin with high specificity and sensitivity. However, NKX3.1 positivity has been described in other neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues, such as mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, sex-cord stromal tumors, rete testis adenocarcinoma, lobular and ductal carcinoma of the breast, salivary glands, peribronchial submucosal glands, and Sertoli cells. We analyzed expression of two antibodies (mono and polyclonal) of NKX3.1 in a total of 63 non-neoplastic seminal vesicles. We used 52 resection materials (12 seminal vesicles without prostatic adenocarcinoma, 26 seminal vesicles with prostatic adenocarcinoma infiltration, and 14 cases of seminal vesicles infiltrated by urothelial carcinoma) and 11 prostatic core needle biopsies with incidentally sampled fragment of seminal vesicles. In all cases, tissues from seminal vesicles were completely negative for NKX3.1, despite using polyclonal and monoclonal NKX3.1 antibodies, and regardless of the detection system utilized (diaminobenzidine (DAB) versus alkaline phosphatase (AF)). However, prostatic adenocarcinoma was negative in several cases (n = 6), when AF detection system was used. Reaction with DAB was strong and robust in all cases. Based on our data, we can recommend NKX3.1 as a negative immunohistochemical marker of seminal vesicles.

Although typically arranged in solid alveolar fashion, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may also show several other architectural growth patterns. We include in this series 8 chromophobe RCC cases with prominent papillary growth, a pattern very rarely reported or only mentioned as a feature of chromophobe RCC, which is lacking wider recognition The differential diagnosis of such cases significantly varies from the typical chromophobe RCC with its usual morphology, particularly its distinction from papillary RCC and other relevant and clinically important entities. Of 972 chromophobe RCCs in our files, we identified 8 chromophobe RCCs with papillary growth. We performed immunohistochemistry and array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation (aCGH) to investigate for possible chromosomal aberrations. Patients were 3 males and 5 females with age ranging from 30 to 84 years (mean 57.5, median 60 years). Tumor size was variable and ranged from 2 to 14 cm (mean 7.5, median 6.6 cm). Follow-up was available for 7 of 8 patients, ranging from 1 to 61 months (mean 20.1, median 12 months). Six patients were alive with no signs of aggressive behavior, and one died of the disease. Histologically, all cases were composed of dual cell population consisting of variable proportions of leaf-like cells with pale cytoplasm and eosinophilic cells. The extent of papillary component ranged from 15 to 100% of the tumor volume (mean 51%, median 50%). Sarcomatoid differentiation was identified only in the case with fatal outcome. Immunohistochemically, all tumors were positive for CK7, CD117 and Hale's Colloidal Iron. PAX8 was positive in 5 of 8 cases, TFE3 was focally positive 3 of 8 tumors, and Cathepsin K was focally positive in 2 of 8 tumors. All cases were negative for vimentin, AMACR and HMB45. Fumarate hydratase staining was retained in all tested cases. The proliferative activity was low (up to 1% in 7, up to 5% in one case). Three cases were successfully analyzed by aCGH and all showed a variable copy number variation profile with multiple chromosomal gains and losses. Conclusions Chromophobe RCC demonstrating papillary architecture is an exceptionally rare carcinoma. The diagnosis can be challenging, although the cytologic features are consistent with the classic chromophobe RCC. Given the prognostic and therapeutic implications of accurately diagnosis other RCCs with papillary architecture (i.e., Xp11.2 translocation RCC, FH-deficient RCC), it is crucial to differentiate these cases from chromophobe RCC with papillary architecture. Based on this limited series, the presence of papillary architecture does not appear to have negative prognostic impact. However, its wider recognition may allow in depth studies on additional examples of this rare morphologic variant.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) is well known for its intratumoral heterogeneity. Paneth- like cells (PLC) have been reported in variable organs (i.e., hepatobiliary, genitourinary, and female genital tract). In genitourinary system, it is possible to find PLCs in epididymis, urinary bladder and prostate. The objective of this study was to assess PLC in CRCCs 13 CRCCs with prominent PLC (CRCCPLC) were selected out of 1378 CRCCs in our registry. The tumors were analyzed using morphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular genetic methods. CRCCPLCs were mostly of low histologic grade (12/13). Immunohistochemical profile was compatible with classic CRCC. PLC constituted 10 to-70% of the tumor volume (mean 17.7%, median 10%). PLCs did not express neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin, synaptophysin, CD56, INSM-1). Ultrastructurally, PLCs were filled by membrane bounded vesicles of various sizes and were compatible with secretory type of cells. VHL mutation was found in 9/9 cases, and LOH3p was found in 6/8 analyzable cases. Conclusions: PLC morphology can variably be present in "classic" CRCC, even in a substantial proportion. Ultrastructurally, PLCs have all attributes of secretory cells. Preliminary follow up data showed that these tumors may not be associated with aggressive clinical behavior.

So-called oncocytic papillary renal cell carcinoma (OPRCC) is a poorly defined variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Since its first description, several studies were published with conflicting results, and thus precise definition is lacking. A cohort of 39 PRCCs composed of oncocytic cells were analyzed. Cases were divided into 3 groups based on copy number variation (CNV) pattern. The first group consisted of 23 cases with CNV equal to renal oncocytoma. The second group consisted of 7 cases with polysomy of chromosomes 7 and 17 and the last group of 9 cases included those with variable CNV. Epidemiologic, morphologic and immunohistochemical features varied among the groups. There were not any particular histomorphologic features correlating with any of the genetic subgroups. Further, a combination of morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular-genetic features did not allow to precisely predict biologic behavior. Owing to variable CNV pattern in OPRCC, strict adherence to morphology and immunohistochemical profile is recommended, particularly in limited samples (i.e., core biopsy). Applying CNV pattern as a part of a diagnostic algorithm can be potentially misleading. OPRCC is a highly variable group of tumors, which might be misdiagnosed as renal oncocytoma. Using the term OPRCC as a distinct diagnostic entity is, thanks to its high heterogeneity, questionable.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is currently a well-studied type of RCC. In addition to PRCC type 1, there are a number of other subtypes and variants of PRCCs which have been reported. We describe a series of 6 PRCCs with papillary, micropapillary and/or tubulopapillary architecture and prominent spindle cell stroma, resembling stroma in mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney (MESTK) or sarcomatoid RCC. Clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular features were analyzed. All patients were males with an age range of 44–98 years (mean 65.3, median 65.5 years). Tumor size ranged from 2.4–11.4 cm (mean 5.8, median 4.5 cm). Follow-up data were available for 4 patients, ranging from 3 to 96 months (mean 42.75, median 36 months). Epithelial cells were mostly cylindrical with eosinophilic cytoplasm, showing nuclear grade 2 and 3 (ISUP/WHO). In all cases, loose to compact prominent stroma composed of spindle cells, without malignant mesenchymal heterologous elements was detected. No atypical mitoses were found, while typical mitoses were rare in both epithelial and stromal components. Epithelial cells were positive for CK7, AMACR, and vimentin in all cases, while negative for TFE3, HMB45, desmin, CD34, and actin. The stroma was positive for vimentin, actin and focally for CD34, while negative for CK7, AMACR, TFE3, HMB45, and desmin. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were completely negative. FH and SDHB expression was retained in all analyzable cases. Proliferative index was barely detectable in stromal component and low in epithelial component, ranging 0 to 5% positive stained cells/high power field. Copy number variation was variable with no distinct pattern. No mutations in CDKN2A, BAP1, MET were detected. PRCC with MESTK-like features is a distinct variant of PRCC mimicking MESTK. Our findings add to the body of literature on ever expanding variants of PRCCs. Both epithelial and stromal components lacked true Mullerian features, which was also proven by immunohistochemistry.

AIMS Primary renal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour (NET) (hereafter referred to as renal NET) is rare, with ~100 cases having been reported in the literature. There are also limited data on the molecular-genetic background of primary renal NETs. METHODS AND RESULTS We analysed 11 renal NETs by using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify characteristic genetic aberrations. All tumours were positive for synaptophysin, and also expressed insulinoma-associated protein 1 (10/11), chromogranin-A (8/11), and CD56 (3/11). Cytoplasmic positivity of CD99 was present in eight of 11 cases, and strong nuclear expression of α-thalassaemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) was retained in all 11 cases. Molecular-genetic analysis of aberration of VHL gave negative results in all cases. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 3p21 was found in three of nine analysable cases. NGS was successful in nine cases, showing a total of 56 variants being left after the updated filtering process, representing an average of five variants per sample. All analysable cases were negative for ATRX and DAXX (death-domain associated protein X) mutations. The most frequently mutated genes were CDH1 and TET2, with three mutations in two cases. Mutations in AKT3, ROS1, PIK3R2, BCR and MYC were found in two cases. The remaining 41 genes were found to be mutated only in individual cases. In four cases, the mutations affected a subset of genes related to angiogenesis. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the mutation profile of primary renal NETs is variable, and none of the studied genes or affected pathways seems to be specific for renal NET.

Emperipolesis has recently been described as a constant feature of "biphasic squamoid" papillary renal cell carcinoma (BPRCC). We also noticed this in some high-grade (HG) RCC, which promoted the present study to estimate the incidence of emperipolesis in RCCs and to describe them in further detail. 14 cases of HGRCC showing emperipolesis were retrieved from our registry. Microscopic examination of filed slides was supplemented with immunohistochemical and molecular-genetic analyses using paraffin embedded tissue. 12 of 14 patients were males with a mean age of 58.6 years (range 41-72 years). Tumor size ranged from 6-16.5 cm (mean of 8.8 cm). Follow up data were available for 8/14 patients (range 0.5-10 years). Metastases were documented in 6 cases. All tumors showed solid-alveolar growth patterns with focal pseudopapillary features, and were composed of large cells with bizarre nuclei and eosinophilic rhabdoid-like cytoplasm. Emperipolesis was a constant and prominent feature in large bizarre cells. All cases were positive for OSCAR, CANH 9, vimentin, cyclin D1, INI-1, and myoD1, while negative for melanocytic markers, CK 7, myoglobin, cathepsin K, and TFE3. VHL gene abnormalities were found in 6/9 analyzable cases, of which 2 demonstrated polysomy of chromosomes 7, 17. Emperipolesis is a rare histomorphologic feature which can be seen not only in BPRCCs but also in highgrade CCRCCs. All RCC cases with prominent emperipolesis fulfilled both morphologic and immunohistochemical diagnostic criteria of high-grade CCRCC. The majority of patients with available follow up information developed metastases.

Bowel obstruction is a common condition in acute surgery. Among the patients, those with a history of cancer consist a particular group. Difficulties in preoperative diagnosis - whether obstruction is benign or malignant and limited treatment options in patients with reoccurrence or dissemination of the cancer are typical for this group. The aim of the study was to analyze causes of bowel obstruction in patients with history of radical treatment due to malignancy.Patients with symptoms of bowel obstruction and history of radical treatment for malignancy who were operated in 2nd and 3rd Department of General Surgery JUCM between 2000 and 2014 were included into the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on type of mechanical bowel obstruction (group 1 - adhesions, group 2 - malignant process).128 patients were included into the study - group 1: 67 (52.3%) and group 2: 61 (47.7%). In the second group bowel obstruction was caused by reoccurrence in 25 patients (40.98%) and dissemination in 36 (59.02%). The mean time between onset of the symptoms of bowel obstruction and the end of treatment for the cancer was 3.7 and 4.4 years, respectively in group 1 and 2 (p0.05). Median time between onset of the symptoms and admission to Emergency Department was significantly longer in patients with malignant bowel obstruction compared to those with adhesions (11.6 ±17.8 days vs 5.1 ± 6.9 days, p=0.01). Considering type of surgery due to bowel obstruction, in first group in most patients (69.2%) bowel resection was not necessary and in the second group creation of jejuno-, ileo- or colostomy was the most common procedure. Morbidity was significantly higher in second group (45.9% vs 28.26%, p0.05) but there was no difference in mortality (26% vs 24%, p0.05). In both groups the most common localization of primary malignancy was colon.In analyzed group of patients frequency of bowel obstruction caused by adhesions and malignancy was similar. However, in patients with bowel obstruction caused by malignancy morbidity was significantly higher and duration of symptoms was longer. There was no diagnostic procedure which would allow to differentiate the cause of bowel obstruction preoperatively and the diagnosis was made during the operation.