Search

OBJECTIVES: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is increasingly treated with targeted therapies, but little is known about real‐life mCRC treatment in older adults. The aims were to describe the real‐life first‐line treatment modalities in older adult mCRC patients, to identify factors associated with treatment modalities, and to evaluate survival with regard to treatment modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of mCRC patients aged 65 years and older at diagnosis was identified between 2009 and 2013 using French national healthcare insurance system claims data. Treatment modalities were: treatment with one or more anticancer medication vs best supportive care and, among treated patients, treatment with targeted therapy vs conventional chemotherapy alone. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with treatment by anticancer medication and by targeted therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the independent effect of treatment modalities on overall survival while adjusting for baseline covariates identified with logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 503 patients were included with a median age of 78 years (54% were men). Of these, 299 (59%) were treated with anticancer medications. Among treated patients, 131 (44%) received targeted therapy. In multivariate analysis, age 75 years or older, renal failure, malnutrition, and five or more concomitant medications were associated with a lower likelihood of treatment with anticancer medications. Among treated patients, age 75 years or older, history of cancer, lymph node metastases, and a single metastatic site were associated with a lower likelihood of treatment with targeted therapy. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models found that treatment with any anticancer medication tended to be associated with a lower risk of death; treatment with targeted therapy was not significantly associated. CONCLUSION: A more appropriate prescription of anticancer medications in the older adult will require the definition of more explicit criteria to avoid undertreatment. The real benefit of targeted therapies vs conventional chemotherapy alone needs to be confirmed in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:913–919, 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been modified since the launching of targeted therapies. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common in elderly patients; their representation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is thus crucial. This study aimed to evaluate and quantify the inclusion of elderly/frail patients in RCTs of targeted therapies in mCRC. A systematic review using Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Database and ISI Web of Science was performed to identify all phase II/III RCTs of bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, regorafenib and aflibercept in mCRC until January 2015. Two reviewers independently performed studies selection, and data extraction. The protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42015016163). Among 1,369, identified publications, 54 RCTs were selected. Nine RCTs (17%) excluded elderly patients; median age of the included population was < 65 years old in 50 RCTs (93%). Twenty RCTs (37%) excluded frail patients, and many RCTs excluded patients with uncontrolled hypertension or heart failure, patients treated with specific drugs (mainly anticoagulants), and patients with inadequate creatinine clearance. Elderly/frail patients are underrepresented in RCTs studying targeted therapies in mCRC, and those elderly patients included in RCTs do not reflect well the general elderly population with mCRC because of the exclusion criteria. RCTs results concerning targeted therapies can be inferred only to relatively healthy elderly subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is frequent among elderly patients. However, in the era of new targeted therapies, little is known about real-life mCRC treatment in this population. This study aimed to describe elderly mCRC patients and the current real-life treatment practices. mCRC patients aged ≥65 years were identified using the registry of multidisciplinary team meetings, mandatory for all cancer patients, held between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2014 at the Bordeaux University Hospital. Data were collected from medical records using a standardized questionnaire. Treatment type was defined as follows: at least one anticancer medication administered vs. best supportive care (BSC). A total of 78 patients were included; median age was 74 years and the M/F sex ratio 1.6. Eleven patients (14.1%) were referred to a geriatric oncology consultation. One patient died before treatment initiation, 28 (35.9%) had BSC, and 49 (62.8%) were treated with anticancer medications: 20 (25.6%) had chemotherapy combined with a targeted therapy, and 28 (35.9%) chemotherapy alone (one missing data for treatment). Compared to patients treated with anticancer medications, BSC patients were older ( P < 0.0001) and had more often metachronous metastases ( P = 0.01), more comorbidities ( P = 0.05), and a greater number of concomitant medications ( P = 0.004). This study is one of the rare investigations providing insight to treatment practices in all elderly mCRC patients, not just those who receive anticancer medications. Our results suggest that efforts must be pursued to better integrate geriatric oncology in daily clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Therapeutical options for older multiple myeloma patients have been improved with the advent of new drugs, yet there is a lack of observational data for such patients. To address this issue, an age-stratified analysis of the VESUVE cohort of bortezomib users was performed. Among the 779 patients included in the analysis, 358 (46%) were aged ≤ 65 years, 282 (36%) were between 65–75 years and 139 (18%) were more than 75 years old. There were few significant differences in treatment parameters across age groups; notably, older patients received a lower dose of bortezomib and more frequently experienced general or administration site conditions, metabolism or nutrition disorders and cardiac disorders. Overall best response rate and progression-free survival were similar across age groups. Taken together, these results indicate that older patients do benefit from bortezomib and that tailored treatment in real-life clinical practice does not compromise effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Effectiveness of bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients has been investigated in observational studies, mainly associated with oxaliplatin-based regimens. Here, using the ETNA cohort in which the majority of patients received bevacizumab + FOLFIRI, the effectiveness of this combination in elderly patients is explored. Materials and Methods Patients initiating first-line therapy with bevacizumab between January 2006 and December 2007 were identified in 28 French centres and followed for 24 months. Vital status was collected over 36 months. In the present analysis those who received FOLFIRI were retained (85% of those included), and patients were stratified by age (< 70/≥70 years). The Kaplan–Meier method estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and Cox models were used to assess the independent effect of age on survival outcomes. Results Among the 351 patients who received bevacizumab + FOLFIRI, 33.9% were aged ≥ 70 years, 66.1% < 70 years. Respectively 15.1% and 9.5% of patients had ECOG-PS ≥ 2; 49.6% and 40.1% used ‘stop-and-go’ treatment scheduling; and 56.3% and 44.4% experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. Overall response rate was 58.8% and 62.5%. Median [95% confidence interval, CI] OS was respectively 24.1 [20.4; 26.2] and 28.5 [25.0; 31.0] months; age ≥ 70 years and ECOG-PS ≥ 2 were significantly associated with death. Median PFS [95% CI] was respectively 10.9 [9.4; 12.6] and 9.8 [9.2; 11.2] months; hepatic metastases was associated with progression, and age ≥ 70 years was associated with progression after 14 months of follow-up but not before. Conclusions The present study adds to the literature on the safe and beneficial effect of bevacizumab in the elderly receiving FOLFIRI regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the validity of chronic drug exposure presumed from cross-sectional interviews taking reimbursement data as reference. Study Design and Setting: The study concerned 2,985 elderly persons of the French Three-City cohort (1) who were interviewed on current drug use 2 and 4 years after inclusion and (2) whose reimbursement data were obtained from the main health care insurance system. Validity (sensitivity, Se; specificity, Sp; positive predictive value, PPV; negative predictive value, NPV) of chronic exposure presumed from follow-up interviews was investigated taking two exposure definitions from reimbursements as reference for the period between interviews: at least 80% coverage with and without a maximal time between reimbursements of 60 days. Results: Using 80% coverage as reference, validity of interview data was substantial for cardiovascular and antithrombotic drugs (Se, 85.3–95.4%; Sp, 67.1–97.6%; PPV, 65.9–86.6%; NPV, 93.3–99.3%). For benzodiazepines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or analgesics, validity was low especially owing to PPVs (15.8–51.4%). Conclusion: Using reported use at cross-sectional interviews as a proxy for chronic exposure between interviews was valid for drugs used regularly but not so for drugs used more irregularly. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]