Search

Objective: Although many nursing home residents with dementia show agitation, hardly any literature is published about very frequent agitation. The WAALBED-III study focuses on the 2-week prevalence and correlates of very frequent agitation in these residents.Design: Cross-sectional study using combined data of four studies.Setting: One hundred nineteen dementia special care units in twenty-six nursing homes in The Netherlands.Participants: Two thousand seventy-four residents with dementia.Measurements: We operationally defined very frequent agitation as having a score of 6 (several times a day) or 7 (several times an hour) on at least five items of the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) combined with a CMAI total score above the 90th percentile. To assess the association of demographic and behavioral characteristics with very frequent agitation, we performed a multivariate multilevel logistic regression analysis.Results: The 2-week prevalence of very frequent agitation was 7.4% (95% CI: 6.374-8.634). Correlates for very frequent agitation were age (OR: 0.967, 95% CI: 0.942-0.992), dementia severity (GDS 6 = OR: 3.636, 95% CI: 1.929-6.875; GDS 7 = OR: 2.951, 95% CI: 1.321-6.588), delusions (OR: 2.480, 95% CI: 1.555-3.956), anxiety (OR: 1.904, 95% CI: 1.259-2.881), euphoria (OR: 3.712, 95% CI: 2.171-6.337) and irritability (OR: 4.411, 95% CI: 2.854-6.816).Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the first to report prevalence data and correlates about nursing home residents with very frequent agitation. We found several correlated factors for very frequent agitation. Still, further research is needed for a better understanding of the behavior of this group, and to identify good treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A problematic and disturbing behavior which can develop in people with dementia, is vocally disruptive behavior (VDB). To date, the study of VDB is underdeveloped and with only a limited knowledge base. Medications commonly used in VDB have limited benefits and specific risks in patients with dementia. This report details the case of a patient with frontotemporal dementia with VDB, which responded very well by providing a lollipop. Subsequently, we pose theory-based hypotheses in order to try to explain the beneficial effect of this intervention. This may contribute to a better understanding of VDB and possible treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: To establish the construct validity of the Dutch version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI-D) in institutionalized patients with dementia. Methods: The CMAI-D was administered to a large sample of 1,437 patients with moderate to severe dementia, receiving nursing home or outreaching nursing home care. Exploratory factor analysis was used to examine the behavioral dimensions underlying CMAI-D observations. Results: A restricted 3-factor solution showed 3 factors, i.e. physical aggression, physically nonaggressive behavior and verbally agitated behavior, with prevalences of 62, 67 and 62%, respectively. An unrestricted factor solution revealed 3 additional behavioral dimensions: hiding/hoarding, vocal agitation and a factor of miscellaneous items (i.e. repetitious mannerisms, spitting), which occurred in 30, 28 and 35% of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: The 3-factor solution of physical aggression, physically nonaggressive behavior and verbally agitated behavior corroborates earlier findings in other patient samples and therefore establishes the construct validity in institutionalized patients with severe dementia. The robustness of these findings across different care settings suggests that agitated behaviors have a common basis. In addition, unrestricted factor analysis showed 3 other important independent behavioral symptoms in dementia, but they are in fact too small to be used as a subscale. These findings might add to the taxonomy of agitation and aggression in dementia. Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]