Search

The farming industry constantly seeks the automation of different processes involved in agricultural production, such as sowing, harvesting and weed control. The use of mobile autonomous robots to perform those tasks is of great interest. Arable lands present hard challenges for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) systems, key for mobile robotics, given the visual difficulty due to the highly repetitive scene and the crop leaves movement caused by the wind. In recent years, several Visual‐Inertial Odometry (VIO) and SLAM systems have been developed. They have proved to be robust and capable of achieving high accuracy in indoor and outdoor urban environments. However, they were not properly assessed in agricultural fields. In this study we assess the most relevant state‐of‐the‐art VIO systems in terms of accuracy and processing time on arable lands to better understand how they behave on these environments. In particular, the evaluation is carried out on a collection of sensor data recorded by our wheeled robot in a soybean field, which was publicly released as the Rosario data set. The evaluation shows that the highly repetitive appearance of the environment, the strong vibration produced by the rough terrain and the movement of the leaves caused by the wind, expose the limitations of the current state‐of‐the‐art VIO and SLAM systems. We analyze the systems failures and highlight the observed drawbacks, including initialization failures, tracking loss and sensitivity to Inertial Measurement Unit saturation. Finally, we conclude that even though certain systems like ORB‐SLAM3 and stereo Multi‐State Constraint Kalman Filter show good results with respect to others, more improvements should be done to make them reliable in agricultural fields for certain applications such as soil tillage of crop rows and pesticide spraying. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]