Search

Objective: To provide an update of guidelines from the Spanish AIDS Study Group (GESIDA) and the National AIDS Plan (PNS) committee on the prevention of opportunistic infections in adult and adolescent HIV-infected patients., Methods: These consensus recommendations have been produced by a group of experts from GESIDA and/or the PNS after reviewing the earlier document and the scientific advances in this field in the last years. The system used by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the United States Public Health Service has been used to classify the strength and quality of the data., Results: This document provides a detailed review of the measures for the prevention of infections caused by viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites in the context of HIV infection. Recommendations are given for preventing exposure and for primary and secondary prophylaxis for each group of pathogens. In addition, criteria are established for the withdrawal of prophylaxis in patients who respond well to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)., Conclusions: HAART is the best strategy for the prevention of opportunistic infections in HIV-positive patients. Nevertheless, prophylaxis is still necessary in countries with limited economic resources, in highly immunodepressed patients until HAART achieves beneficial effects, in patients who refuse to take or who cannot take HAART, in those in whom HAART is not effective, and in the small group of infected patients with inadequate recovery of CD4+ T lymphocyte counts despite good inhibition of HIV replication.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific antibody responses in HIV-1 infected individuals either with or without HCMV end-organ disease were examined to determine the whether development of HCMV disease was associated with a particular deficit in the antibody response. Antiwhole HCMV, anti-glycoprotein B (gB), and neutralizing antibody levels were higher in HIV-1 infected individuals than in healthy immunocompetent subjects, particularly in patients with AIDS either with or without HCMV-associated disease. Irrespective of location and spread of HCMV disease, patients who had received anti-HCMV therapy prior to sampling exhibited significantly higher anti-gB and neutralizing antibody titers than those who remained untreated. Likewise, patients with HCMV disease who were antigenemic or viremic had significantly lower anti-gB and neutralizing antibody titers than those who tested negative in either assay. Patients with untreated HCMV disease had significantly lower antibody titers than AIDS patients without disease. Analysis of the IgG subclass antibody responses to gB revealed no significant differences among HIV-1 infected individuals. These results suggest that levels of detectable anti-gB and HCMV neutralizing antibodies are inversely related to systemic viral load. Thus, antibodies with such specificities may be relevant in preventing the establishment of HCMV-associated disease or in modulating its progression.

Toxoplasmic encephalitis is associated with high mortality and morbidity and still presents a notable incidence in our setting. Neither the clinical symptoms nor radiological features are diagnostic of this disease; however, because of its frequency and clinical importance, specific treatment is begun whenever toxoplasmosis is suspected. In patients with negative serology, or who are receiving adequate prophylaxis, or who do not respond to 2 weeks of treatment, or who present radiological lesions suggestive of another illness, diagnosis should not be delayed, and brain biopsy should be considered as soon as possible. In these cases, SPECT with 201TI (sensitivity and specificity over 90-95% for lymphoma) and/or the PCR technique to detect T. gondii (sensitivity 50-65% and specificity 95-100%) or Epstein-Barr virus (sensitivity 70-80% and specificity 95% for lymphoma) can be very useful. The treatment of choice is pyrimethamine (100 mg the first day followed by 50 mg/day) and sulphadiazine (1-1.5 g/6 h) during 6-8 weeks. If the patient is allergic to sulfadiazine and cannot be desensitized the regimen of choice is pyrimethamine and clindamycin (600 mg/6 h), with similar efficacy. Clinical experience with other therapeutic alternatives is limited. Pyrimethamine can be associated with clarithromycin (0.5-1 g/12 h), azithromycin (1-1.5 g/day) atovaquone (750 mg/6 h), dapsone (100 mg/day) or doxycyclin (200 mg/12 h). Cotrimoxazole or clindamycin can be administered intravenously to patients who cannot receive enteral treatment. The toxicity of these therapeutic regimens is significant and treatment has to be suspended in 10-40% of cases. The interactions that can be produced with other drugs used to treat HIV-infected patients are generally of little clinical relevance.