Search

The northern-high-latitude permafrost contains almost twice the carbon content of the atmosphere, and it is widely considered to be a non-linear and tipping element in the earth's climate system under global warming. Solar geoengineering is a means of mitigating temperature rise and reduces some of the associated climate impacts by increasing the planetary albedo; the permafrost thaw is expected to be moderated under slower temperature rise. We analyze the permafrost response as simulated by five fully coupled earth system models (ESMs) and one offline land surface model under four future scenarios; two solar geoengineering scenarios (G6solar and G6sulfur) based on the high-emission scenario (ssp585) restore the global temperature from the ssp585 levels to the moderate-mitigation scenario (ssp245) levels via solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol injection. G6solar and G6sulfur can slow the northern-high-latitude permafrost degradation but cannot restore the permafrost states from ssp585 to those under ssp245. G6solar and G6sulfur tend to produce a deeper active layer than ssp245 and expose more thawed soil organic carbon (SOC) due to robust residual high-latitude warming, especially over northern Eurasia. G6solar and G6sulfur preserve more SOC of 4.6 ± 4.6 and 3.4 ± 4.8 Pg C (coupled ESM simulations) or 16.4 ± 4.7 and 12.3 ± 7.9 Pg C (offline land surface model simulations), respectively, than ssp585 in the northern near-surface permafrost region. The turnover times of SOC decline slower under G6solar and G6sulfur than ssp585 but faster than ssp245. The permafrost carbon–climate feedback is expected to be weaker under solar geoengineering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The process of solar radiative transfer at the land surface is important to energy, water, and carbon balance, especially for vegetated areas. Currently the most commonly used two-stream model considers the plant functional types (PFTs) within a grid to be independent of each other and their leaves to be horizontally homogeneous. This assumption is unrealistic in most cases. To consider canopy three-dimensional (3D) structural effects, a new framework of 3D canopy radiative transfer model was developed and validated by numerical simulations and shows a good agreement. A comparison with the two-stream model in the offline Community Land Model (CLM4.0) shows that an increase of canopy absorption mainly happens with sparse vegetation or with multilayer canopies with a large sun zenith angle θsun and is due to increases of the ground and sky shadows and of the optical pathlength because of the shadow overlapping between bushes and canopy layers. A decrease of canopy absorption occurs in densely vegetated areas with small θsun. For a one-layer canopy, these decreases are due to crown shape effects that enhance the transmission through the canopy edge. For a multilayer canopy, aside from these shape effects, transmission is also increased by the decreased ground shadow due to the shadow overlapping between layers. Ground absorption usually changes with opposite sign as that of the canopy absorption. Somewhat lower albedos are found over most vegetated areas throughout the year. The 3D model also affects the calculation of the fraction of sunlit leaves and their corresponding absorption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]