Search

Background: The information content of a continuous variable exceeds that of its categorical counterpart. The parameterization of a model may diminish the benefit of using a continuous variable. We explored the use of continuous versus discrete environment in variance components based analyses examining gene x environment interaction in the electrophysiological phenotypes from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism., Results: The parameterization using the continuous environment produced a greater number of significant gene x environment interactions and lower AICs (Akaike's information criterion). In these cases, the genetic variance increased with increasing cigarette pack-years, the continuous environment of interest. This did not, however, result in enhanced LOD scores when linkage analyses incorporated the gene x continuous environment interaction., Conclusion: Alternative parameterizations may better represent the functional relationship between the continuous environment and the genetic variance.

We discuss analyses of Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 data from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) as well as from a simulated complex disease, Kofendrerd personality disorder (KPD), with both genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Both data sets included numerous related phenotypes in addition to disease definitions. All analyses either chose from the given selection of phenotypes or defined new ones, including traits that may not have been related to alcoholism or KPD. Some contributors evaluated the genetic components of the trait. Many investigated genome-wide linkage and/or association, using microsatellites and/or single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip data. Here we will focus on methodological issues that the investigators faced. Their results depended on phenotype selection, whether continuous or discrete, the covariates included, and ethnicity of the study population. For SNP chip data, members of our group detected no difference in results for Affymetrix or Illumina chips, although higher marker density for association studies appeared to be advantageous. Overall, there were some observations that different chromosomal segments, i.e., physical locations on the p-arm, q-arm, or middle segment, might lead to possible differences in type I error rates. This finding and others highlight the importance of empirical determination of P-values to determine significance.