Search

Background: The Rush Immunotherapy (RIT) protocol is a valid alternative in order to reach the maintenance phase early. However, there are scarce studies in the literature that have evaluated the safety and the efficacy of an ant RIT process in children., Objective: To evaluate the safety and the efficacy of an ant RIT protocol and to identify the risk factors for systemic reactions (SRs) during an RIT procedure in children., Method: A retrospective review was conducted for those children who were receiving an ant RIT procedure. The 3-day RIT protocol consisted of hourly subcutaneous injections in order to achieve a 0.5 ml maintenance dose of a 1:100 weight/ volume (wt/vol) of the Solenopsis invicta whole body extract. The safety for an RIT procedure was monitored by using the World Allergy Organization Subcutaneous Immunology Systemic Reaction Grading System. The efficacy was assessed by the reactions after a field ant re-sting., Result: A total of 20 children who were receiving an ant RIT therapy were reviewed. The mean age was 9.5±3.07 years. There were 6 systemic reactions (SRs) from 324 injections during the RIT procedure (1.85%). All of the systemic reactions were Grade 1-2. There were no associations of SRs regarding age, gender, an atopic history, or the levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE) sensitization to the ants. Among the 14 patients who experienced a field ant re-sting, 4 (28.5%) patients developed Grade 3 SRs. These Grade 3 reactions were resolved after an increase of the maintenance dose to 0.5 ml of a 1:50 wt/vol. There was a significant difference in the mean age of those children who had ant re-sting systemic reactions and those who had no reactions (6.75±0.95 year vs. 10.8±3.29, p=0.036)., Conclusion: Rush immunotherapy with ant in children is safe and it has a low occurrence of severe systemic reactions. It is an alternative treatment for those patients requiring a rapid protection.

Background: β-lactoglobulin (BLG), a major allergen in cow milk (CM) can be detected in human breast-milk (BM) and is associated with exacerbation of symptoms in breastfed infants with cow milk protein allergy (CMPA). Currently, it is not known how long lactating mothers who consume dairy products need to withhold breastfeeding., Objective: To elucidate the kinetics of BLG in BM after maternal ingestion of a single dose of CM., Methods: Nineteen lactating mothers, four of whom had infants with CMPA, were instructed to avoid CM for 7 days before ingesting a single dose of CM and to continue to withhold CM thereafter throughout the study period. BLG was measured by ELISA in BM from 15 mothers of healthy infants before and at 3, 6 and 24 h, and 3 and 7 days after CM ingestion. Four pairs of mothers and CMPA infants were enrolled for BM challenge after the mothers had ingested CM., Results: After CM ingestion, the level of BLG in BM increased significantly from 0.58 ng/ml (0.58 g/L) (IQR 0.38-0.88) to a peak level of 1.23 ng/ml (IQR 1.03-2.29), p < 0.001. The BLG level on day 3 (1.15 ng/ml, IQR 0.89-1.45) and day 7 (1.08 ng/ml (IQR 0.86-1.25) after CM ingestion was significantly higher than baseline (p = 0.01 and p = 0.001, respectively). BLG was detected in all BM samples from the four mothers of CMPA infants after CM ingestion, and the level was not different from that in the mothers of the 15 healthy infants. Three of the four CMPA infants developed symptoms such as maculopapular rash and hypersecretion in the airways after BM challenge., Conclusions: BLG can be detected in BM up to 7 days after CM ingestion. Lactating mothers should suspend breastfeeding to CMPA infants more than 7 days after CM ingestion.

Three preterm infants with cow milk protein allergy (CMPA) presented with feeding intolerance, sepsis-like episodes and persistent moderate-to-severe eosinophilia. After eliminating cow milk, the clinical symptoms improved significantly. CMPA can cause common manifestations in sick preterm infants such as feeding intolerance and eosinophilia.

Background: Nasal provocation tests (NPTs) are indicated in confirming the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis if the clinical history, skin tests or sIgE are inconclusive. NPTs are time- consuming, technically difficult and expensive to perform. Consequently, conjunctival provocation tests (CPTs), which are easier, cheaper and safer should be considered as an alternative method. No recent study has compared CPTs with NPTs in allergic rhinitis children., Objective: To compare CPTs with NPTs in allergic rhinitis children with house dust mite sensitization, Methods: Fifty-five children with allergic rhinitis were included. Thirty-six children had positive skin prick tests (SPTs) to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp). NPTs were performed by spraying 0.1 ml of Dp extract with concentrations of 50, 200 and 500 AU/ml to each nostril at 15 minute interval. The clinical symptom scores, anterior rhinomanometry results and nasal peak flow testing were performed to assess the responses. For CPTs, 0.1 ml of the same concentration of allergen extract was droppedinto one eye and the control solution was dropped into the other. The responses were assessed by clinical symptom scores. The tests were stopped when the subject reported a positive response, or continued to the maximum concentration., Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of CPT compared with NPT are 97.1% (84.7-99.9), 90.5% (69.6-98.8), 94.3% (80.8-99.3), 95% (75.1-99.9) and 94.5 (84.9-98.9), respectively in all patients. Among individual allergic rhinitis subjects the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV are 100%., Conclusions: CPT can be an alternative test for NPT in allergic rhinitis children with house dust mite sensitization, even if they do not have conjunctival symptoms.