Search

Green hydrogen, proposed as a sustainable alternative for conventional fuels, has gained utmost importance due to its reduced carbon footprint and potential application in maintaining balance between energy generation and demand. Utilization of hydrogen-based systems are challenged by cost effective storage methods. Bio-hydrogen storage technologies using cryogenic and adsorptive methods are discussed in this review paper, along with their operating conditions and storage capacities. An analysis of operational challenges and recent advancements in hydrogen storage techniques is presented. With a storage pressure of 70 MP, cryogenic hydrogen is almost twice as dense as compressed hydrogen. Technical challenges such as material cost and explosion risk can be addressed by hydrogen adsorption on activated carbon active sites. Maximum hydrogen storage capacity are reported by activated carbon obtained from Chitosan (6.77 wt%), Bamboo (6.6 wt%) and African palm shell (6.5 wt%) at 77 K and 4–20 Mpa. Further, nanotechnology approaches are presented in detail for increasing hydrogen storage capacity in pristine Si and Mg. The future perspectives in terms of technological, and economic aspects are discussed. • Detailed review on hydrogen storage methods is presented. • Role of cryogenics and adsorptive media are discussed. • The comparative performance of various methods is tabulated. • Existing research gap and future perspectives are analyzed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dihydrogen, commonly named 'hydrogen', is a carbon–neutral and renewable fuel meeting environmental regulations in transportation and industrial production. Hydrogen is currently employed in fuel cells, hydrogen vehicles, and as an efficient energy carrier due to its high energy capacity of 121 kJ per g. Here we review hydrogen production by steam reforming of alcohols including methanol, ethanol, propanol, glycerol and butanol, with focus on catalysts, mechanisms, and analytical methods to characterize deposited carbon. In general, Ru- and Rh-based catalysts show efficient performance with almost 100% feedstock conversion and up to 89% of hydrogen yield, while Ni and Co catalysts exhibit lower ethanol conversion in the range of 40–100% depending on operating conditions. Nevertheless, Ni and Co catalysts have been mainly chosen as active metals for alcohols steam reforming due to their lower cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]