1. Quality of Life and Utility Measurement in a Large Clinical Trial Sample of Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: Determinants and Level of Changes Observed.
- Author
-
Lacey L, Bobula J, Rüdell K, Alvir J, and Leibman C
- Subjects
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease diagnosis, Alzheimer Disease psychology, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Caregivers psychology, Cognition drug effects, Disability Evaluation, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Nootropic Agents adverse effects, Predictive Value of Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Alzheimer Disease drug therapy, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Geriatric Assessment, Nootropic Agents therapeutic use, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires
- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the performance (in terms of responsiveness to change, associations with other criterion standards, and indicators of Alzheimer's disease [AD] severity) of a quality-of-life measure (Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease [QOL-AD]) and a health utility measure (Health Utilities Index Mark 3 [HUI-3]) from two recently completed clinical trials of a new drug for AD., Methods: Change from baseline scores was calculated, and treatment effects were analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures. Three separate models were then estimated to examine the association between the quality-of-life/utility end points and the clinical and other health outcome end points measured during the trials, including cognition, function, behavior, and dependence., Results: The performance of the two measures differed. Subject-assessed QOL-AD was found to be weakly associated with clinical measures of cognition, and with caregiver reports of function, behavior, and dependence, and showed little movement over time and did not appear to differ by baseline AD severity. Proxy-assessed QOL-AD scores were consistently lower than subject-assessed scores, and the level of decline in QOL-AD was greater using proxy-assessed QOL-AD. Proxy-assessed HUI-3 scores were more strongly associated with clinical measures of cognition, function, behavior, and dependence than the subject- and proxy-assessed QOL-AD scores. Larger proportionate changes over 78 weeks were observed with HUI-3 scores and greater separation in HUI-3 scores by baseline severity., Conclusions: Subject-assessed QOL-AD is less likely than proxy-assessed QOL-AD to respond to changes in clinical measures used to track progression in clinical trials of subjects with mild to moderate AD. Proxy-assessed HUI-3 assessments were more in line with other outcome assessments and could therefore be better outcome measures to evaluate clinical progression in mild to moderate AD., (Copyright © 2015 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) more...
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF