14 results on '"Thies, William"'
Search Results
2. 2014 Report on the Milestones for the US National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease.
- Author
-
Fargo KN, Aisen P, Albert M, Au R, Corrada MM, DeKosky S, Drachman D, Fillit H, Gitlin L, Haas M, Herrup K, Kawas C, Khachaturian AS, Khachaturian ZS, Klunk W, Knopman D, Kukull WA, Lamb B, Logsdon RG, Maruff P, Mesulam M, Mobley W, Mohs R, Morgan D, Nixon RA, Paul S, Petersen R, Plassman B, Potter W, Reiman E, Reisberg B, Sano M, Schindler R, Schneider LS, Snyder PJ, Sperling RA, Yaffe K, Bain LJ, Thies WH, and Carrillo MC
- Subjects
- Alzheimer Disease epidemiology, Alzheimer Disease physiopathology, Animals, Biological Ontologies, Biomarkers metabolism, Drug Discovery, Humans, Patient Selection, Public-Private Sector Partnerships, Translational Research, Biomedical methods, United States, United States Dept. of Health and Human Services, Voluntary Health Agencies, Alzheimer Disease prevention & control, Alzheimer Disease therapy, Health Policy
- Abstract
With increasing numbers of people with Alzheimer's and other dementias across the globe, many countries have developed national plans to deal with the resulting challenges. In the United States, the National Alzheimer's Project Act, signed into law in 2011, required the creation of such a plan with annual updates thereafter. Pursuant to this, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released the National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease in 2012, including an ambitious research goal of preventing and effectively treating Alzheimer's disease by 2025. To guide investments, activities, and the measurement of progress toward achieving this 2025 goal, in its first annual plan update (2013) HHS also incorporated into the plan a set of short, medium and long-term milestones. HHS further committed to updating these milestones on an ongoing basis to account for progress and setbacks, and emerging opportunities and obstacles. To assist HHS as it updates these milestones, the Alzheimer's Association convened a National Plan Milestone Workgroup consisting of scientific experts representing all areas of Alzheimer's and dementia research. The workgroup evaluated each milestone and made recommendations to ensure that they collectively constitute an adequate work plan for reaching the goal of preventing and effectively treating Alzheimer's by 2025. This report presents these Workgroup recommendations., (Copyright © 2014 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Imaging markers for Alzheimer disease: which vs how.
- Author
-
Frisoni GB, Bocchetta M, Chételat G, Rabinovici GD, de Leon MJ, Kaye J, Reiman EM, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Black SE, Brooks DJ, Carrillo MC, Fox NC, Herholz K, Nordberg A, Jack CR Jr, Jagust WJ, Johnson KA, Rowe CC, Sperling RA, Thies W, Wahlund LO, Weiner MW, Pasqualetti P, and Decarli C
- Subjects
- Alzheimer Disease diagnostic imaging, Biomarkers metabolism, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Radiography, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon methods, Alzheimer Disease diagnosis, Alzheimer Disease metabolism
- Abstract
Revised diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer disease (AD) acknowledge a key role of imaging biomarkers for early diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy depends on which marker (i.e., amyloid imaging, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG]-PET, SPECT, MRI) as well as how it is measured ("metric": visual, manual, semiautomated, or automated segmentation/computation). We evaluated diagnostic accuracy of marker vs metric in separating AD from healthy and prognostic accuracy to predict progression in mild cognitive impairment. The outcome measure was positive (negative) likelihood ratio, LR+ (LR-), defined as the ratio between the probability of positive (negative) test outcome in patients and the probability of positive (negative) test outcome in healthy controls. Diagnostic LR+ of markers was between 4.4 and 9.4 and LR- between 0.25 and 0.08, whereas prognostic LR+ and LR- were between 1.7 and 7.5, and 0.50 and 0.11, respectively. Within metrics, LRs varied up to 100-fold: LR+ from approximately 1 to 100; LR- from approximately 1.00 to 0.01. Markers accounted for 11% and 18% of diagnostic and prognostic variance of LR+ and 16% and 24% of LR-. Across all markers, metrics accounted for an equal or larger amount of variance than markers: 13% and 62% of diagnostic and prognostic variance of LR+, and 29% and 18% of LR-. Within markers, the largest proportion of diagnostic LR+ and LR- variability was within ¹⁸F-FDG-PET and MRI metrics, respectively. Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of imaging AD biomarkers is at least as dependent on how the biomarker is measured as on the biomarker itself. Standard operating procedures are key to biomarker use in the clinical routine and drug trials.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Alzheimer's Association recommendations for operationalizing the detection of cognitive impairment during the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit in a primary care setting.
- Author
-
Cordell CB, Borson S, Boustani M, Chodosh J, Reuben D, Verghese J, Thies W, and Fried LB
- Subjects
- Humans, Medicare, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Primary Health Care standards, Risk Assessment standards, United States, Algorithms, Alzheimer Disease diagnosis, Cognition Disorders diagnosis, Early Diagnosis, Primary Health Care methods, Risk Assessment methods
- Abstract
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act added a new Medicare benefit, the Annual Wellness Visit (AWV), effective January 1, 2011. The AWV requires an assessment to detect cognitive impairment. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) elected not to recommend a specific assessment tool because there is no single, universally accepted screen that satisfies all needs in the detection of cognitive impairment. To provide primary care physicians with guidance on cognitive assessment during the AWV, and when referral or further testing is needed, the Alzheimer's Association convened a group of experts to develop recommendations. The resulting Alzheimer's Association Medicare Annual Wellness Visit Algorithm for Assessment of Cognition includes review of patient Health Risk Assessment (HRA) information, patient observation, unstructured queries during the AWV, and use of structured cognitive assessment tools for both patients and informants. Widespread implementation of this algorithm could be the first step in reducing the prevalence of missed or delayed dementia diagnosis, thus allowing for better healthcare management and more favorable outcomes for affected patients and their families and caregivers., (Copyright © 2013 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: a report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer's Association.
- Author
-
Johnson KA, Minoshima S, Bohnen NI, Donohoe KJ, Foster NL, Herscovitch P, Karlawish JH, Rowe CC, Carrillo MC, Hartley DM, Hedrick S, Pappas V, and Thies WH
- Subjects
- Humans, Nuclear Medicine standards, Positron-Emission Tomography, Alzheimer Disease diagnostic imaging, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Brain diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) of brain amyloid b is a technology that is becoming more available, but its clinical utility in medical practice requires careful definition. To provide guidance to dementia care practitioners, patients, and caregivers, the Alzheimer's Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened the Amyloid Imaging Taskforce (AIT). The AIT considered a broad range of specific clinical scenarios in which amyloid PET could potentially be used appropriately. Peer-reviewed, published literature was searched to ascertain available evidence relevant to these scenarios, and the AIT developed a consensus of expert opinion. Although empirical evidence of impact on clinical outcomes is not yet available, a set of specific appropriate use criteria (AUC) were agreed on that define the types of patients and clinical circumstances in which amyloid PET could be used. Both appropriate and inappropriate uses were considered and formulated,and are reported and discussed here. Because both dementia care and amyloid PET technology are in active development, these AUC will require periodic reassessment. Future research directions are also outlined, including diagnostic utility and patient-centered outcomes., ((c)2013 The Alzheimer’s Association. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. The draft "National Plan" to address Alzheimer's disease - National Alzheimer's Project Act (NAPA).
- Author
-
Khachaturian ZS, Khachaturian AS, and Thies W
- Subjects
- Humans, United States, Alzheimer Disease therapy, Biomedical Research, Public Policy legislation & jurisprudence
- Abstract
This perspective updates the status of the "National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease" and the recommendations of the NAPA Advisory Council's Sub-committee on Research. Here, we identify some of the critical issues the future reiterations of the National Plan should consider during implementation phase of the plan. The Journal invites the scientific community to contribute additional ideas and suggestions towards a national research initiative., (Copyright © 2012 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: recommendations from the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable Workgroup.
- Author
-
Sperling RA, Jack CR Jr, Black SE, Frosch MP, Greenberg SM, Hyman BT, Scheltens P, Carrillo MC, Thies W, Bednar MM, Black RS, Brashear HR, Grundman M, Siemers ER, Feldman HH, and Schindler RJ
- Subjects
- Amyloid immunology, Animals, Brain Edema etiology, Brain Edema metabolism, Brain Edema pathology, Cerebral Hemorrhage etiology, Cerebral Hemorrhage metabolism, Cerebral Hemorrhage pathology, Clinical Trials as Topic standards, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Alzheimer Disease complications, Alzheimer Disease pathology, Alzheimer Disease therapy, Amyloid metabolism, Clinical Trials as Topic methods, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Societies, Medical organization & administration
- Abstract
Amyloid imaging related abnormalities (ARIA) have now been reported in clinical trials with multiple therapeutic avenues to lower amyloid-β burden in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In response to concerns raised by the Food and Drug Administration, the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened a working group to review the publicly available trial data, attempts at developing animal models, and the literature on the natural history and pathology of related conditions. The spectrum of ARIA includes signal hyperintensities on fluid attenuation inversion recoverysequences thought to represent "vasogenic edema" and/or sulcal effusion (ARIA-E), as well as signal hypointensities on GRE/T2* thought to represent hemosiderin deposits (ARIA-H), including microhemorrhage and superficial siderosis. The etiology of ARIA remains unclear but the prevailing data support vascular amyloid as a common pathophysiological mechanism leading to increased vascular permeability. The workgroup proposes recommendations for the detection and monitoring of ARIA in ongoing AD clinical trials, as well as directions for future research., (Copyright © 2011 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Stopping a thief and killer: Alzheimer's disease crisis demands greater commitment to research.
- Author
-
Thies W
- Subjects
- Humans, Alzheimer Disease economics, Research Support as Topic
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. A roadmap for the prevention of dementia II: Leon Thal Symposium 2008.
- Author
-
Khachaturian ZS, Snyder PJ, Doody R, Aisen P, Comer M, Dwyer J, Frank RA, Holzapfel A, Khachaturian AS, Korczyn AD, Roses A, Simpkins JW, Schneider LS, Albert MS, Egge R, Deves A, Ferris S, Greenberg BD, Johnson C, Kukull WA, Poirier J, Schenk D, Thies W, Gauthier S, Gilman S, Bernick C, Cummings JL, Fillit H, Grundman M, Kaye J, Mucke L, Reisberg B, Sano M, Pickeral O, Petersen RC, Mohs RC, Carrillo M, Corey-Bloom JP, Foster NL, Jacobsen S, Lee V, Potter WZ, Sabbagh MN, Salmon D, Trojanowski JQ, Wexler N, and Bain LJ
- Subjects
- Academies and Institutes, Aged, Alzheimer Disease diagnosis, Clinical Trials as Topic economics, Clinical Trials as Topic legislation & jurisprudence, Drug Design, Drug Industry economics, Drug Industry legislation & jurisprudence, Drug Industry standards, Federal Government, Health Policy economics, Health Policy trends, Humans, Interdisciplinary Communication, National Health Programs economics, National Health Programs legislation & jurisprudence, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Registries standards, Research Design, United States, Alzheimer Disease physiopathology, Alzheimer Disease therapy, Clinical Trials as Topic standards, Health Policy legislation & jurisprudence, National Health Programs standards
- Abstract
This document proposes an array of recommendations for a National Plan of Action to accelerate the discovery and development of therapies to delay or prevent the onset of disabling symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. A number of key scientific and public-policy needs identified in this document will be incorporated by the Alzheimer Study Group into a broader National Alzheimer's Strategic Plan, which will be presented to the 111th Congress and the Obama administration in March 2009. The Alzheimer's Strategic Plan is expected to include additional recommendations for governance, family support, healthcare, and delivery of social services.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. 2014 Report on the Milestones for the US National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease
- Author
-
Workgroup, Alzheimer's Association National Plan Milestone, Fargo, Keith N, Aisen, Paul, Albert, Marilyn, Au, Rhoda, Corrada, Maria M, DeKosky, Steven, Drachman, David, Fillit, Howard, Gitlin, Laura, Haas, Magali, Herrup, Karl, Kawas, Claudia, Khachaturian, Ara S, Khachaturian, Zaven S, Klunk, William, Knopman, David, Kukull, Walter A, Lamb, Bruce, Logsdon, Rebecca G, Maruff, Paul, Mesulam, Marsel, Mobley, William, Mohs, Richard, Morgan, David, Nixon, Ralph A, Paul, Steven, Petersen, Ronald, Plassman, Brenda, Potter, William, Reiman, Eric, Reisberg, Barry, Sano, Mary, Schindler, Rachel, Schneider, Lon S, Snyder, Peter J, Sperling, Reisa A, Yaffe, Kristine, Bain, Lisa J, Thies, William H, and Carrillo, Maria C
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Biological Psychology ,Clinical Sciences ,Neurosciences ,Psychology ,Dementia ,Clinical Research ,Acquired Cognitive Impairment ,Aging ,Brain Disorders ,Alzheimer's Disease ,Alzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) ,Neurodegenerative ,Neurological ,Alzheimer Disease ,Animals ,Biological Ontologies ,Biomarkers ,Drug Discovery ,Health Policy ,Humans ,Patient Selection ,Public-Private Sector Partnerships ,Translational Research ,Biomedical ,United States ,United States Dept. of Health and Human Services ,Voluntary Health Agencies ,Policy ,National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease ,Milestones ,Alzheimer's Association National Plan Milestone Workgroup ,Geriatrics ,Clinical sciences ,Biological psychology - Abstract
With increasing numbers of people with Alzheimer's and other dementias across the globe, many countries have developed national plans to deal with the resulting challenges. In the United States, the National Alzheimer's Project Act, signed into law in 2011, required the creation of such a plan with annual updates thereafter. Pursuant to this, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released the National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease in 2012, including an ambitious research goal of preventing and effectively treating Alzheimer's disease by 2025. To guide investments, activities, and the measurement of progress toward achieving this 2025 goal, in its first annual plan update (2013) HHS also incorporated into the plan a set of short, medium and long-term milestones. HHS further committed to updating these milestones on an ongoing basis to account for progress and setbacks, and emerging opportunities and obstacles. To assist HHS as it updates these milestones, the Alzheimer's Association convened a National Plan Milestone Workgroup consisting of scientific experts representing all areas of Alzheimer's and dementia research. The workgroup evaluated each milestone and made recommendations to ensure that they collectively constitute an adequate work plan for reaching the goal of preventing and effectively treating Alzheimer's by 2025. This report presents these Workgroup recommendations.
- Published
- 2014
11. 2014 Report on the Milestones for the US National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease.
- Author
-
Alzheimer's Association National Plan Milestone Workgroup, Fargo, Keith N, Aisen, Paul, Albert, Marilyn, Au, Rhoda, Corrada, Maria M, DeKosky, Steven, Drachman, David, Fillit, Howard, Gitlin, Laura, Haas, Magali, Herrup, Karl, Kawas, Claudia, Khachaturian, Ara S, Khachaturian, Zaven S, Klunk, William, Knopman, David, Kukull, Walter A, Lamb, Bruce, Logsdon, Rebecca G, Maruff, Paul, Mesulam, Marsel, Mobley, William, Mohs, Richard, Morgan, David, Nixon, Ralph A, Paul, Steven, Petersen, Ronald, Plassman, Brenda, Potter, William, Reiman, Eric, Reisberg, Barry, Sano, Mary, Schindler, Rachel, Schneider, Lon S, Snyder, Peter J, Sperling, Reisa A, Yaffe, Kristine, Bain, Lisa J, Thies, William H, and Carrillo, Maria C
- Subjects
Alzheimer's Association National Plan Milestone Workgroup ,Animals ,Humans ,Alzheimer Disease ,Patient Selection ,United States Dept. of Health and Human Services ,Health Policy ,Voluntary Health Agencies ,United States ,Drug Discovery ,Public-Private Sector Partnerships ,Translational Medical Research ,Biological Ontologies ,Biomarkers ,Milestones ,National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease ,Policy ,Neurodegenerative ,Acquired Cognitive Impairment ,Neurosciences ,Alzheimer's Disease ,Prevention ,Aging ,Dementia ,Brain Disorders ,Alzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) ,Neurological ,Geriatrics ,Clinical Sciences - Abstract
With increasing numbers of people with Alzheimer's and other dementias across the globe, many countries have developed national plans to deal with the resulting challenges. In the United States, the National Alzheimer's Project Act, signed into law in 2011, required the creation of such a plan with annual updates thereafter. Pursuant to this, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released the National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease in 2012, including an ambitious research goal of preventing and effectively treating Alzheimer's disease by 2025. To guide investments, activities, and the measurement of progress toward achieving this 2025 goal, in its first annual plan update (2013) HHS also incorporated into the plan a set of short, medium and long-term milestones. HHS further committed to updating these milestones on an ongoing basis to account for progress and setbacks, and emerging opportunities and obstacles. To assist HHS as it updates these milestones, the Alzheimer's Association convened a National Plan Milestone Workgroup consisting of scientific experts representing all areas of Alzheimer's and dementia research. The workgroup evaluated each milestone and made recommendations to ensure that they collectively constitute an adequate work plan for reaching the goal of preventing and effectively treating Alzheimer's by 2025. This report presents these Workgroup recommendations.
- Published
- 2014
12. Imaging markers for Alzheimer disease: which vs how
- Author
-
Frisoni, Giovanni B, Bocchetta, Martina, Chételat, Gael, Rabinovici, Gil D, de Leon, Mony J, Kaye, Jeffrey, Reiman, Eric M, Scheltens, Philip, Barkhof, Frederik, Black, Sandra E, Brooks, David J, Carrillo, Maria C, Fox, Nick C, Herholz, Karl, Nordberg, Agneta, Jack, Clifford R, Jagust, William J, Johnson, Keith A, Rowe, Christopher C, Sperling, Reisa A, Thies, William, Wahlund, Lars-Olof, Weiner, Michael W, Pasqualetti, Patrizio, Decarli, Charles, and ISTAART's NeuroImaging Professional Interest Area
- Subjects
Aging ,Clinical Sciences ,Neurodegenerative ,Alzheimer's Disease ,Alzheimer Disease ,Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ,Clinical Research ,Acquired Cognitive Impairment ,Humans ,Tomography ,screening and diagnosis ,Neurology & Neurosurgery ,Neurosciences ,Alzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Brain Disorders ,4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies ,Radiography ,Detection ,ISTAART's NeuroImaging Professional Interest Area ,Biomedical Imaging ,Dementia ,Cognitive Sciences ,Emission-Computed ,Biomarkers ,Single-Photon ,4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies - Abstract
Revised diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer disease (AD) acknowledge a key role of imaging biomarkers for early diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy depends on which marker (i.e., amyloid imaging, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG]-PET, SPECT, MRI) as well as how it is measured ("metric": visual, manual, semiautomated, or automated segmentation/computation). We evaluated diagnostic accuracy of marker vs metric in separating AD from healthy and prognostic accuracy to predict progression in mild cognitive impairment. The outcome measure was positive (negative) likelihood ratio, LR+ (LR-), defined as the ratio between the probability of positive (negative) test outcome in patients and the probability of positive (negative) test outcome in healthy controls. Diagnostic LR+ of markers was between 4.4 and 9.4 and LR- between 0.25 and 0.08, whereas prognostic LR+ and LR- were between 1.7 and 7.5, and 0.50 and 0.11, respectively. Within metrics, LRs varied up to 100-fold: LR+ from approximately 1 to 100; LR- from approximately 1.00 to 0.01. Markers accounted for 11% and 18% of diagnostic and prognostic variance of LR+ and 16% and 24% of LR-. Across all markers, metrics accounted for an equal or larger amount of variance than markers: 13% and 62% of diagnostic and prognostic variance of LR+, and 29% and 18% of LR-. Within markers, the largest proportion of diagnostic LR+ and LR- variability was within ¹⁸F-FDG-PET and MRI metrics, respectively. Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of imaging AD biomarkers is at least as dependent on how the biomarker is measured as on the biomarker itself. Standard operating procedures are key to biomarker use in the clinical routine and drug trials.
- Published
- 2013
13. Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: a report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer's Association
- Author
-
Johnson, Keith A., Minoshima, Satoshi, Bohnen, Nicolaas I., Donohoe, Kevin J., Foster, Norman L., Herscovitch, Peter, Karlawish, Jason H., Rowe, Christopher C., Carrillo, Maria C., Hartley, Dean M., Hedrick, Saima, Mitchell, Kristi, Pappas, Virginia, and Thies, William H.
- Subjects
Amyloid ,Epidemiology ,Advisory Committees ,MEDLINE ,Appropriate Use Criteria ,Article ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,Developmental Neuroscience ,Alzheimer Disease ,medicine ,Dementia ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Cognitive Dysfunction ,Carbon Radioisotopes ,Societies, Medical ,Amyloid beta-Peptides ,Evidence-Based Medicine ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Health Policy ,Brain ,Evidence-based medicine ,medicine.disease ,Biomarker (cell) ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Positron emission tomography ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,Neurology (clinical) ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,Alzheimer's disease ,Molecular imaging ,Nuclear Medicine ,Radiopharmaceuticals ,Nuclear medicine ,business - Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) of brain amyloid b is a technology that is becoming more available, but its clinical utility in medical practice requires careful definition. To provide guidance to dementia care practitioners, patients, and caregivers, the Alzheimer’s Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging convened the Amyloid Imaging Taskforce (AIT). The AIT considered a broad range of specific clinical scenarios in which amyloid PET could potentially be used appropriately. Peer-reviewed, published literature was searched to ascertain available evidence relevant to these scenarios, and the AIT developed a consensus of expert opinion. Although empirical evidence of impact on clinical outcomes is not yet available, a set of specific appropriate usecriteria(AUC)wereagreedonthatdefinethetypesofpatientsandclinicalcircumstancesinwhich amyloid PET could be used. Both appropriate and inappropriate uses were considered and formulated, and are reported and discussed here. Because both dementia care and amyloid PET technology are in active development, these AUC will require periodic reassessment. Future research directions are also outlined, including diagnostic utility and patient-centered outcomes. 2013 The Alzheimer’s Association. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2013
14. Introduction to Revised Criteria for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease: National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer Association Workgroups
- Author
-
Jack, Clifford R., Albert, Marilyn, Knopman, David S., McKhann, Guy M., Sperling, Reisa A., Carillo, Maria, Thies, William, and Phelps, Creighton H.
- Subjects
Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic ,Health Planning Guidelines ,Alzheimer Disease ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,National Institute on Aging (U.S.) ,Humans ,Article ,Biomarkers ,Societies, Medical ,United States - Abstract
Criteria for the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) were established in 1984. A broad consensus now exists that these criteria should be revised to incorporate state-of-the-art scientific knowledge.The National Institute on Aging (NIA) and the Alzheimer's Association sponsored a series of advisory round table meetings in 2009 whose purpose was to establish a process for revising diagnostic and research criteria for AD. The recommendation from these advisory meetings was that three separate work groups should be formed with each assigned the task of formulating diagnostic criteria for one phase of the disease: the dementia phase; the symptomatic, pre-dementia phase; and the asymptomatic, preclinical phase of AD.Two notable differences from the AD criteria published in 1984 are incorporation of biomarkers of the underlying disease state and formalization of different stages of disease in the diagnostic criteria. There was a broad consensus within all three workgroups that much additional work is needed to validate the application of biomarkers for diagnostic purposes. In the revised NIA-Alzheimer's Association criteria, a semantic and conceptual distinction is made between AD pathophysiological processes and clinically observable syndromes that result, whereas this distinction was blurred in the 1984 criteria.The new criteria for AD are presented in three documents. The core clinical criteria of the recommendations regarding AD dementia and MCI due to AD are intended to guide diagnosis in the clinical setting. However, the recommendations of the preclinical AD workgroup are intended purely for research purposes.
- Published
- 2011
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.