Search

Introduction: Occlusion after infra-inguinal bypass surgery for peripheral artery disease is a major complication with potentially devastating consequences. In this descriptive analysis, we sought to describe the natural history and explore factors associated with long-term major amputation-free survival following occlusion of a first-time infra-inguinal bypass., Methods: Using a prospective database from a tertiary care vascular center, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with peripheral artery disease who underwent a first-time infra-inguinal bypass and subsequently suffered a graft occlusion (1997-2021). The primary outcome was longitudinal rate of major amputation-free survival after bypass occlusion. Cox proportional hazard models were used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to explore predictors of outcomes., Results: Of the 1318 first-time infra-inguinal bypass surgeries performed over the study period, 255 bypasses occluded and were included in our analysis. Mean age was 66.7 (12.6) years, 40.4% were female, and indication for index bypass was chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) in 89.8% (n = 229). 48.2% (n = 123) of index bypass conduits used great saphenous vein, 29.0% (n = 74) prosthetic graft, and 22.8% (n = 58) an alternative conduit. Median (interquartile range) time to bypass occlusion was 6.8 (2.3-19.0) months, and patients were followed for median of 4.3 (1.7-8.1) years after bypass occlusion. Following occlusion, 38.04% underwent no revascularization, 32.94% graft salvage procedure, 25.1% new bypass, and 3.92% native artery recanalization. Major amputation-free survival following occlusion was 56.9% (50.6%-62.8%) at 1 y, 37.1% (31%-43.3%) at 5 y, and 17.2% (11.9%-23.2%) at 10 y. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with lower amputation-free survival were older age, female sex, advanced cardiorenal comorbidities, CLTI at index procedure, CLTI at time of occlusion, and distal index bypass outflow. Initial treatment after occlusion with both a new surgical bypass (HR 0.44, CI: 0.29-0.67) or a graft salvage procedure (HR 0.56, CI: 0.38-0.82) showed improved amputation-free survival. One-year rate of major amputation or death were 59.8% (50.0%-69.6%) for those who underwent no revascularization, 37.9% (28.7%-49.0%) for graft salvage, and 26.7% (17.6%-39.5%) for new bypass., Conclusions: Long-term major amputation-free survival is low after occlusion of a first-time infra-inguinal bypass. While several nonmodifiable risk factors were associated with lower amputation-free survival, treatment after graft occlusion with either a new bypass or a graft salvage procedure may improve longitudinal outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Despite patent vein bypass grafts, some patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) receive major amputations. We analyzed the predictive factors leading to major amputation in the presence of patent lower extremity bypass (LEB) grafts., Methods: Data from the Project of Ex-Vivo vein graft Engineering via Transfection III (PREVENT III), a large prospective randomized trial of 1404 patients who underwent LEB with vein graft for CLI, were queried for outcomes. The primary outcome was major amputation with patent (PMA) LEB compared with patients with patent LEB who achieved limb salvage (PLS). The population excluded those who received amputation for occluded grafts. A Cox proportional hazard model identified independent predictors., Results: Of 1404 LEB patients, 162 (11.5%) had major amputation: 89 (6.3%) with patent and 73 (5.2%) with occluded LEB. For PMA, 21 of 89 (23.6%) developed critical stenosis and 11 of 21 (52.4%) were revised. For PLS, 460 of 1242 (37.0%) developed critical stenosis and 351 of 460 (76.3%) were revised. Predictive patient factors included having preoperative gangrene (vs rest pain; hazard ratio [HR], 3.504; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.533-8.007; P = .0029), diabetes (HR, 1.800; 95% CI, 1.006-3.219; P = .0477), black (vs white) race (HR, 1.779; 95% CI, 1.051-3.011; P = .0321), baseline creatinine clearance <25 mL/min (vs >65 mL/min; HR, 1.759; 95% CI, 1.016-3.048; P = .0439), prior history of coronary artery bypass grafting (HR, 1.702; 95% CI, 1.080-2.683; P = .0221), and lower baseline activity quality of life score (HR, 1.401; 95% CI, 1.105-1.778; P = .0054). Postoperative wound factors included gangrenous changes (HR, 5.830; 95% CI, 1.647-20.635; P = .0063), surgical wound necrosis (HR, 5.319; 95% CI, 1.478-19.146; P = .0105), deep (vs superficial) wound infection (HR, 3.815; 95% CI, 1.220-11.927; P = .0213), and wound healing abnormally (HR, 3.754; 95% CI, 1.061-13.278; P = .0402). Associated postoperative consequences leading to PMA included having recurrent CLI symptoms (HR, 2.915; 95% CI, 1.816-4.681; P < .0001), a severe (vs mild) adverse event (HR, 2.751; 95% CI, 1.391-5.443; P = .0036), fewer percutaneous revisions (HR, 2.425; 95% CI, 1.573-3.740; P < .0001), discharge on low-molecular-weight heparin (HR, 2.087; 95% CI, 1.309-3.326; P = .0020), and decreasing days to critical stenosis/occlusion/revision/amputation (HR, 1.010; 95% CI, 1.007-1.012; P < .0001)., Conclusions: Whereas a patent vein graft is important to all vascular surgeons, additional factors should be considered in trying to attain limb salvage for patients with CLI. These factors include intervening surgically before CLI has progressed to a state of gangrene or limited activity and optimizing nutrition, diabetes control, cardiac conditions, and activity level. Revision offers hope for clinical improvement but may be delayed when there is no graft lesion identified. The absence of a graft lesion to revise may also portend amputation despite a patent graft because of nongraft-related factors such as infection. Finally, the experience of a severe (vs mild) adverse event may also result in limb loss despite a patent graft. Systematic efforts to reduce severe adverse events among patients may also lead to increased limb salvage., (Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Major lower extremity (MLE) amputation is a common procedure that results in a profound change in a patient's life. We sought to determine the association between social support and outcomes after amputation. We hypothesized that patients with greater social support will have better post amputation outcomes., Methods: From November 2011 to May 2013, we conducted a cross-sectional, observational, multicenter study. Social integration was measured by the social integration subset of the Short Form Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Systemic social support was assessed by comparing a United States and Tanzanian population. Walking function was measured using the 6-minute walk test and quality of life (QoL) was measured using the EuroQol-5D., Results: We recruited 102 MLE amputees. Sixty-three patients were enrolled in the United States with a mean age of 58.0. Forty-two (67%) were male. Patients with low social integration were more likely to be unable to ambulate (no walk 39% vs slow walk 23% vs fast walk 10%; P = .01) and those with high social integration were more likely to be fast walkers (no walk 10% vs slow walk 59% vs fast walk 74%; P = .01). This relationship persisted in a multivariable analysis. Increasing social integration scores were also positively associated with increasing QoL scores in a multivariable analysis (β, .002; standard error, 0.0008; P = .02). In comparing the United States population with the Tanzanian cohort (39 subjects), there were no differences between functional or QoL outcomes in the systemic social support analysis., Conclusions: In the United States population, increased social integration is associated with both improved function and QoL outcomes among MLE amputees. Systemic social support, as measured by comparing the United States population with a Tanzanian population, was not associated with improved function or QoL outcomes. In the United States, steps should be taken to identify and aid amputees with poor social integration., (Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: When judging the success or failure of major lower extremity (MLE) amputation, the assessment of appropriate functional and quality of life (QOL) outcomes is paramount. The heterogeneity of the scales and tests in the current literature is confusing and makes it difficult to compare results. We provide a primer for outcome assessment after amputation and assess the need for the additional development of novel instruments., Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for all studies using functional and QOL instruments after MLE amputation. Assessment instruments were divided into functional and QOL categories. Within each category, they were subdivided into global and amputation-specific instruments. An overall assessment of instrument quality was obtained., Results: The initial search revealed 746 potential studies. After a review of abstracts, 102 were selected for full review, and 40 studies were then included in this review. From the studies, 21 different assessment instruments were used 63 times. There were 14 (67%) functional measures and 7 (33%) QOL measures identified. Five (36%) of the functional instruments and 3 (43%) of the QOL measures were specific for MLE amputees. Sixteen instruments were used >1 time, but only 5 instruments were used >3 times. An additional 5 instruments were included that were deemed important by expert opinion. The 26 assessment instruments were rated. Fourteen of the best-rated instruments were then described., Conclusions: The heterogeneity of instruments used to measure both functional and QOL outcomes make it difficult to compare MLE amputation outcome studies. Future researchers should seek to use high-quality instruments. Clinical and research societies should endorse the best validated instruments for future use in order to strengthen overall research in the field., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) often undergo revascularization before amputation. The exact relationship between multiple procedures and increased risk of amputation is unclear. We sought to determine the increased risk of amputation for each additional revascularization., Methods: The 2007-2009 California State Inpatient Database (SID) was used to identify a cohort of CLI patients undergoing revascularization and conduct a time-to-event analysis for patients undergoing one or more revascularization procedures. One-year estimates were generated with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. The Wei-Lin-Weissfeld (WLW) marginal proportional hazards model was used to assess independent effects of number of revascularization procedures on amputation and death., Results: A total of 11,190 patients with CLI underwent revascularization between July 2007 and December 2009. Their mean age was 71.0 years (interquartile range 62-80 years) and 6255 (55.9%) were male. Over half the subjects (55.2%) were smokers and there was a high burden of comorbidities in the cohort. One-year estimates of amputation by number of revascularizations (1: 23.3%; 2: 27.1%; 3: 30.3%; 4: 26.7%; 5(+): 28.6%; P < 0.001) and death (1: 18.7%; 2: 21.1%; 3: 26.3%; 4: 23.6%; 5+: 32.1%; P = 0.012) increased significantly as procedures increased. In the WLW model for amputation, the hazard increased significantly for patients with 2 revascularization versus 1 (HR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.09-1.37; P = 0.001) and 3 revascularizations versus 2 (HR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.10-1.62; P = 0.004). In the multivariable WLW models for death, the increase in revascularization procedures for 2 compared with 1 (HR = 1.18; 95% CI 1.04-1.34; P = 0.010) was significant., Conclusions: The risk of amputation increases with each additional revascularization procedure. These findings hold true for both percutaneous transluminal angioplasty only and lower extremity bypass only subsets. In addition, increased revascularization procedures appear to result in an increased risk of death. We advocate for continued communication between clinicians and patients on the true risks and benefits of additional revascularization procedures., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Much has been made of obesity's health impact, largely founded on data regarding patient weight and circulating adipose-derived mediator levels. Paradoxically, a "healthy obese" state exists, but substantial knowledge gaps also exist regarding human adipose-phenotype determinants. Surgical major amputation (AMP) patients are the "sickest-of-the-sick." Conversely, elective knee replacement (TKR) is reserved for patients who expect continued health and longevity. To delineate human adipose biology variability and clinical determinants, we studied fresh subcutaneous adipose from AMP patients, using TKR patients as controls. We hypothesized that AMP patients would display a pro-inflammatory adipokine signature, and that certain clinical conditions (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, high BMI, uremia) would independently drive elevated adipose inflammation., Methods: AMP (n = 29) and TKR (n = 20) adipose tissue samples and clinical data were collected prospectively, and protein was isolated and analyzed for 8 adipose-related mediators. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon's rank sum test, Fisher's exact test, and multiple linear regression modeling of clinical parameter predictors of mediator expression., Results: Interleukin-(IL)-6, IL-8, leptin, resistin, and PAI-1 were differentially expressed (up to 200-fold) between AMP/TKR cohorts. Key clinical parameters that associated with protein levels of adipose phenotype included age, gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, renal disease, and warfarin, statin, and insulin use. BMI failed to be predictive., Conclusions: AMP patients display adiposopathy with a pro-inflammatory adipose phenotypic signature compared with TKR controls. BMI fails to predict phenotype, yet other clinical conditions, such as age, hyperlipidemia, and renal insufficiency, do drive adipokine expression. Understanding human adipose phenotypic determinants stands as a fundamental priority when future studies dissect the interplay between adipose biology and surgical diseases/outcomes., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Major amputation is associated with increased short-term healthcare resource utilization (RU), early mortality, and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities. Our objective is to study patient-specific and SES-related predictors of long-term RU and survival after amputation., Methods: This retrospective analysis identified 364 adult patients who underwent index major amputation for critical limb ischemia from January 1995 through December 2000 at two tertiary centers with outcomes through December 2010. Age, gender, SES (race, income, insurance, and marital status), comorbidities (congestive heart failure [CHF], diabetes, diabetes with complications, and renal failure [RF]), subsequent procedures, cumulative length of stay (cLOS), and mortality were analyzed. Bivariate and multivariate Poisson regression for subsequent procedures and cLOS and Cox proportional hazard modeling for all-cause mortality were undertaken., Results: During a mean follow-up of 3.25 years, amputation patients had mean cLOS of 71.2 days per person-year (median, 17.6), 19.5 readmissions per person-year (median, 2.1), 0.57 amputation-related procedures (median, 0), and 0.31 cardiovascular procedures (median, 0). Below-knee amputation as the index procedure was performed in 70% of patients, and 25% had additional amputation procedures. Of readmissions at ≤ 30 days, 52% were amputation-related. Overall mortality during follow-up was 86.9%; 37 patients (10.2%) died within 30 days. Among patients surviving >30 days, multivariate Poisson regression demonstrated that younger age (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.98), public insurance (IRR, 1.63), CHF (IRR, 1.60), and RF (IRR, 2.12) were associated with increased cLOS. Diabetes with complications (IRR, 1.90) and RF (IRR, 2.47) affected subsequent amputation procedures. CHF (IRR, 1.83) and RF (IRR, 3.67) were associated with a greater number of cardiovascular procedures. Cox proportional hazard modeling indicated older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04), CHF (HR, 2.26), and RF (HR, 2.60) were risk factors for decreased survival. Factors associated with SES were not significantly related to the outcomes., Conclusions: This study found that RU is high for amputees, and increased RU persists beyond the perioperative period. Results were similar across SES indices, suggesting higher SES may not be protective against poor outcomes when limb salvage is no longer attainable. These findings support the hypothesis that SES disparities may be more modifiable during earlier stages of care for critical limb ischemia., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Mosby, Inc.)

Background: Major amputation is often selected over infrainguinal bypass in patients with severe systemic comorbidities because it is assumed to have lower perioperative risks, yet this assumption is unproven and largely unexamined., Methods: The 2005 to 2008 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database was used to identify all patients undergoing either infrainguinal bypass or major amputation using procedural codes. Patients with systemic or local infections were excluded. A subset of high-risk patients were then defined as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 4 or 5, or ASA class 3 with renal failure, dyspnea at rest, ventilator dependence, recent congestive heart failure, or recent myocardial infarct. Propensity score matching was used to obtain two high-risk patient groups matched for preoperative characteristics., Results: No significant differences in demographic, preoperative, or anesthetic variables were found between the matched, high-risk amputation or bypass groups (792 and 780 patients, respectively). Bypass was associated with a lower 30-day postoperative mortality than amputation (6.54% vs 9.97%; P = .0147). Amputation was associated with higher rates of pulmonary embolism (0.9% vs 0% for amputation vs bypass groups, respectively; P = .009) and urinary tract infection (5.2% vs 2.7%; P = .01), while bypass was associated with higher rates of return to the operating room (14.1% vs 27.6%; P < .001) and a trend toward higher postoperative transfusion requirements (0.9% vs 2.1%; P = .054). The postoperative time to discharge did not differ between the two groups., Conclusion: The decision to perform an infrainguinal bypass or amputation should depend on well-established predictors of graft patency and functional success rather than presumptions about different perioperative risks between the two procedures., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.)

Objective: Disparities in limb salvage procedures may be driven by socioeconomic status (SES) and access to high-volume hospitals. We sought to identify SES factors associated with major amputation in the setting of critical limb ischemia (CLI)., Methods: The 2003-2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for discharges containing lower extremity revascularization (LER) or major amputation and chronic CLI (N = 958,120). The Elixhauser method was used to adjust for comorbidities. Significant predictors in bivariate logistic regression were entered into a multivariate logistic regression for the dependent variable of amputation vs LER., Results: Overall, 24.2% of CLI patients underwent amputation. Significant differences were seen between both groups in bivariate and multivariate analysis of SES factors, including race, income, and insurance status. Lower-income patients were more likely to be treated at low-LER-volume institutions (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; P < .001). Patients at higher-LER-volume centers (OR, 15.16; P <.001) admitted electively (OR, 2.19; P < .001) and evaluated with diagnostic imaging (OR, 10.63; P < .001) were more likely to receive LER., Conclusions: After controlling for comorbidities, minority patients, those with lower SES, and patients with Medicaid were more likely receive amputation for CLI in low-volume hospitals. Addressing SES and hospital factors may reduce amputation rates for CLI., (Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)