Search

Methane production from solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) of empty fruit bunches (EFB) using recycling solid-anaerobic digested (S-AD) sludge and liquid-anaerobic digested (L-AD) sludge as inoculum was investigated under thermophilic (55 °C) and mesophilic conditions (40 °C). The methane production rate of L-AD sludge (2.98–3.27 L-CH4 L−1 reactor d −1) was 1–2 times higher than recycling S-AD sludge (1.36 L-CH4 L−1 reactor d −1) as inoculum. Methane production of L-AD and S-AD sludge inoculum was 53.5–54.1 and 31.2–39.0 m3 CH4 tonne-1 EFB, respectively. The SS-AD of EFB with L-AD and S-AD sludge under thermophilic condition had specific methane activity of 34–96 times higher than the mesophilic condition. Clostridium sp., Methanosaeta sp., and Methanoculleus sp. were responsible for the SS-AD of EFB with L-AD sludge inoculum. The L-AD sludge was suitable inoculum for SS-AD of EFB in terms of methane production rate, cellulose degradation efficiency, biogas production, and microbial activity.

A sudden pH drops always inhibits the anaerobic digestion (AD) reactor for biogas production from palm oil mill effluent (POME). The pH adjustment of POME by oil palm ash addition and the biogas effluent recycling effect on the preventing of pH drop and change of the archaea community was investigated. The pH adjustment of POME to 7.5 increased the methane yield two times more than raw POME (pH 4.3). The optimal dose for pH adjustment by oil palm ash addition was 5% w/v with a methane yield of 440 mL-CH4/gVS. The optimal dose for pH adjustment by biogas effluent recycling was 20% v/v with a methane yield of 351 mL-CH4/gVS. Methane production from POME in a continuous reactor with pH adjustment by 5% w/v oil palm ash and 20% v/v biogas effluent recycling was 19.1 ± 0.25 and 13.8 ± 0.3 m3 CH4/m3-POME, respectively. The pH adjustment by oil palm ash enhanced methane production for the long-term operation with the stability of pH, alkalinity, and archaea community. Oil palm ash increased the number of Methanosarcina mazei and Methanothermobacter defluvii. Oil palm ash is a cost-effective alkali material as a source of buffer and trace metals for preventing the pH drop and the increased methanogen population in the AD process.

Background Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a suitable process for treating high moisture MSW with biogas and biofertilizer production. However, the low stability of AD performance and low methane production results from high moisture MSW due to the fast acidify of carbohydrate fermentation. The effects of organic loading and incineration fly ash addition as a pH adjustment on methane production from high moisture MSW in the single-stage AD and two-stage AD processes were investigated. Results Suitable initial organic loading of the single-stage AD process was 17 gVS L−1 at incineration fly ash (IFA) addition of 0.5% with methane yield of 287 mL CH4 g−1 VS. Suitable initial organic loading of the two-stage AD process was 43 gVS L−1 at IFA addition of 1% with hydrogen and methane yield of 47.4 ml H2 g−1 VS and 363 mL CH4 g−1 VS, respectively. The highest hydrogen and methane production of 8.7 m3 H2 ton−1 of high moisture MSW and 66.6 m3 CH4 ton−1 of high moisture MSW was achieved at organic loading of 43 gVS L−1 at IFA addition of 1% by two-stage AD process. Biogas production by the two-stage AD process enabled 18.5% higher energy recovery than single-stage AD. The 1% addition of IFA into high moisture MSW was useful for controlling pH of the two-stage AD process with enhanced biogas production between 87–92% when compared to without IFA addition. Electricity production and energy recovery from MSW using the coupled incineration with biogas production by two-stage AD process were 9,874 MJ ton−1 MSW and 89%, respectively. Conclusions The two-stage AD process with IFA addition for pH adjustment could improve biogas production from high moisture MSW, as well as reduce lag phase and enhance biodegradability efficiency. The coupled incineration process with biogas production using the two-stage AD process was suitable for the management of MSW with low area requirement, low greenhouse gas emissions, and high energy recovery.

Empty fruit bunches (EFB) have low biodegradability and restrict their commercial utilization in biogas plants. Integration of straw mushroom (Volvariella volvacea) cultivation as a function of bio-pretreatment on EFB to improve biodegradability and methane production by solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) was investigated. The mushroom yield was 47.3 kg·tonne−1 EFB with remaining weight in spent mushroom-EFB (S-mEFB) of 82%. The cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin of EFB were degraded by 3.3%, 21.3%, and 17.6%, respectively, with an increased surface area of S-mEFB. The biodegradability of S-mEFB (62.7%) was 2 times higher than raw EFB (33.5%) with the highest methane yield and production of 281 mL CH4·g−1 VS and 50.6 m3·tonne−1 S-mEFB, respectively. The co-digestion of S-mEFB with 5% v/w POME had highest methane yield of 405 mL CH4·g−1 VS with biodegradability of 90.8%. Integrating straw mushroom cultivation with SS-AD is a promising strategy for achieving an environmentally friendly and economically feasible process.

This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of acidogenic phase as the pretreatment method of filter cake (FC) before being co-digested with biogas effluent (BE), and anaerobic sludge (AS) for methane production. The effects of separation of acidogenic and methanogenic phases on the improvement of the methane production process from a co-digestion of FC with BE, and AS were also investigated. FC was pretreated through acidogenic phase anaerobic digestion (AD) using a different substrate to inoculum ratios (SIRs) and substrate concentrations. The optimum conditions for acidogenic phase AD of FC were SIRs of 4:1 and substrate concentration of 15.0% total solid (TS). Resultantly, the maximum volatile fatty acids (VFA) yield of 0.17 g-VFAs/g-VS (volatile solids) was obtained. The major VFA components were butyric and acetic acid. The acidogenic phase of FC was semi-continuously conducted in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) at various hydraulic retention time (HRT). The highest concentration and yield of VFAs of 7.29 g/L and 0.39 g-VFAs/g-VS, respectively, were observed at HRT of 5 d. The major VFAs observed were butyric acid (48.8%), and acetic acid (36.8%). Subsequently, the proportions of pretreated FC, BE, and AS to produce methane were optimized in batch experiments. The highest methane yield (MY) of 195.9 mL-CH4/g-VS was achieved at the proportions of pretreated FC and BE of 37.75 and 22.25 g-VS/L, respectively, without the addition of AS. The optimum substrate proportion was further used to determine the MY in a 10 L CSTR with the various HRT. The maximum MY of 130.5 mL-CH4/g-VS was achieved at an HRT of 20 d which produced an EY of 4.7 kJ/g-VS. Analysis of microbial community by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing on an illumination platform indicated that genera Rummeliibacillus, Lactobacillus, and Bacillus were the dominant bacteria found in the acidogenic phase. Methanoculleus and Methanosarcina were found to be the most dominant genera in methane fermentation. Results suggested that acidogenic phase digestion can be used as an alternative method for FC pretreatment to improve methane production. Furthermore, the separation of acidogenic and methanogenic phases improves the process stability.

Background: Biohydrogen effluent contains a high concentration of volatile fatty acid (VFA) mainly as butyric, acetic, lactic and propionic acids. The presence of various VFAs (mixture VFAs) and their cooperative effects on two-stage biohythane production need to be further studied. The effect of VFA concentrations in biohydrogen effluent of palm oil mill effluent (POME) on methane yield in methane stage of biohythane production was investigated. Results: The methane yield obtained in low VFA loading (0.9 and 1.8 g/L) was 15–20% times greater than that of high VFA loading (3.6 and 4.7 g/L). Butyric acid at high concentrations (8 g/L) has the individual significantly negative effect the methane production process ( P P Geobacillus sp., Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum , Methanoculleus thermophilus and Methanothermobacter delfuvii resulting in low methane yield. Conclusion: Preventing the high concentration of butyric acid, and propionic acid in the hydrogenic effluent could enhance methane production in two-stage anaerobic digestion for biohythane production. Normal 0 false false false ES-CL X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabla normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:107%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:ES-CL;} Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE TH

Valorization of biodiesel-derived crude glycerol and its hydrolysis product (ethanol) as a co-substrate supplemented to palm oil mill effluent (POME) to enhance biogas production efficiency under mesophilic anaerobic digestion was investigated. Based on our previous studies, the concentrations of each co-substrate were varied in the range of 1–5% v⋅v−1. The optimum concentrations of crude glycerol and ethanol were 1% and 5% v/v, respectively. They could increase both methane production (nearly 2 fold) and methane yield (1.98–2.09 fold based on volatile solids (VS) and 1.6–1.87 fold based on COD). However, they exhibited oppositely in the methane production rate; the 1% crude glycerol was 38% lower while 5% ethanol exhibited a 67% higher methane production rate than the control (POME). The results clearly indicated that the methane production rate from 5% ethanol was 2.7 times higher than that from the 1% crude glycerol. Microbial community analysis revealed that the dominant bacteria in both co-substrates biogas production process were Sandarakinotalea sp., Lachnobacterium sp., Blautia sp., Marinobacter sp., Anaerotruncus sp., Clostridium sp., Enterobacter sp., and Acinetobacter sp. The Blautia sp. was dominant in the presence of 1% crude glycerol than 5% ethanol. The archaea communities were dominated by hydrogenotrophic methanogen (Methanoregula sp. and Methanoculleus sp.) and acetoclastic methanogen (Methanosarcina sp. and Methanospirillum sp.). Therefore, ethanol was a better co-substrate than crude glycerol. Nevertheless, biogas production from POME with crude glycerol as co-substrate was anticipated to strongly increase by enhancing the growth (or bioaugmentation) of Blautia sp. and Methanosarcina sp.