Search

Background: Acute pain is common in children and young adults with cancer and sickle cell disease. Current training curricula fail to adequately impart skills for pain management. We sought to develop and validate an education and assessment tool to address the safe effective use of opioids for pain management by pediatrics trainees., Methods: The first version of the tool contained 10 case-based, multiple-choice questions. It was pilot tested within a medium-sized pediatric residency program using preintervention and postintervention surveys to assess residents' knowledge and comfort related to prescribing opioids. Content validation was performed through an expert panel of physicians. Internal reliability was tested by administering the tool to learners and practitioners with varying levels of training., Results: Comfort with choosing and converting between opioids increased significantly in pilot testing (P=0.005). Mean objective knowledge scores increased from 51% to 85.9% (P<0.001). The revised tool showed internal reliability within each group (Cronbach alpha 0.71 to 0.78) and significant differences in mean scores between groups (F ratio=9.45, P=0.0002)., Conclusions: This tool demonstrates validity and internal reliability. Its use was associated with short-term educational gains and it garnered overall favorable feedback from users. Further testing is needed to assess the duration of these gains., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Deficits in knowledge and comfort related to pain management have been demonstrated in adult hematology/oncology fellows. No such evaluation has been undertaken in pediatric hematology/oncology (PHO) trainees., Procedure: An IRB-approved survey was administered to PHO fellows throughout the United States (US) to assess comfort with opioid dosing, attitudes related to the use of opioids, and knowledge of basic concepts including weight-based dosing, incomplete cross-tolerance, and management of side effects., Results: Email addresses were obtained for 132 fellows from 37 programs. Seventy-eight (59%) fellows participated. No significant difference was demonstrated between training level and comfort with dosing opioids in an opioid-naive patient, though a smaller proportion of first-year fellows (65%) reported comfort compared to more senior fellows (85.2% of second-year fellows, 80.6% of third- and fourth-year fellows). First-year fellows correctly answered a mean of 5.05 ± 0.43 out of 10 objective knowledge questions; second-year fellows answered 5.74 ± 0.35 correctly, and third- and fourth-year fellows 5.58 ± 0.30. The majority of respondents chose an appropriate dose of intravenous morphine based on weight (92%), and identified a low-dose naloxone drip as an appropriate intervention for opioid-induced pruritis (91%). However, the remainder of the questions had a correct response rate of 15-68%., Conclusion: This study characterizes PHO fellows' knowledge and comfort with prescribing opioids. Despite high levels of reported comfort, PHO fellows in all levels of training demonstrated knowledge gaps. PHO fellows may benefit from further education in pain management., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)