Search

Unsupervised methods, such as principal component analysis, have gained popularity and wide-spread acceptance in the chemometrics and applied statistics communities. Unsupervised random forest is an additional method capable of discovering underlying patterns in the data. However, the number of applications of unsupervised random forest in chemometrics has been limited. One possible cause for this is the belief that random forest can only be used in a supervised analysis setting. This tutorial introduces the basic concepts of unsupervised random forest and illustrates several applications in chemometrics through worked examples. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In metabolomics, identification of complex diseases is often based on application of (multivariate) statistical techniques to the data. Commonly, each disease requires its own specific diagnostic model, separating healthy and diseased individuals, which is not very practical in a diagnostic setting. Additionally, for orphan diseases such models cannot be constructed due to a lack of available data. An alternative approach adapted from industrial process control is proposed in this study: statistical health monitoring (SHM). In SHM the metabolic profile of an individual is compared to that of healthy people in a multivariate manner. Abnormal metabolite concentrations, or abnormal patterns of concentrations, are indicated by the method. Subsequently, this biomarker can be used for diagnosis. A tremendous advantage here is that only data of healthy people is required to construct the model. The method is applicable in current–population based –clinical practice as well as in personalized health applications. In this study, SHM was successfully applied for diagnosis of several orphan diseases as well as detection of metabotypic abnormalities related to diet and drug intake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] Pre-processing can make or break data analysis. [•] Selection of appropriate pre-processing strategies is crucial. [•] Three types of selection approaches seem commonly used. [•] All approaches have serious drawbacks and can provide misleading results. [•] Objective approaches to quality parameters are required for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]