Search

Three hundred and fifty-three asthmatic patients who remained symptomatic despite treatment with budesonide 800-1200 microg day(-1) (or equivalent) were randomized to a new combination therapy comprising salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propionate 250 microg (Seretide, Advair, Viani 50/250 microg) twice daily or budesonide 800 microg twice daily for 24 weeks. Patients kept daily records of their morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), daytime and night-time symptom scores and daytime and night-time use of rescue salbutamol. Mean morning PEF increased by 451 min(-1) (baseline 361 l min(-1)) in the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) group and by 19 l min(-1) (baseline 358 l min(-1)) in the budesonide group over the 24 weeks. The adjusted mean morning PEF over weeks 1 to 24 was significantly greater in the SFC group, despite the > three-fold lower corticosteroid dose (406 vs. 380 l min(-1); P < 0.001). A significantly greater improvement in evening PEF was also seen in the SFC group (adjusted mean 416 vs. 398 l min(-1); P<0.001). SFC also provided significantly better control of daytime symptoms and a significantly greater reduction in the requirement for rescue salbutamol compared with budesonide. These results demonstrate that SFC 50/250 microg twice daily is superior to budesonide 800 microg twice daily in the management of patients with moderate to severe asthma who are symptomatic on their existing dose of corticosteroid.

This multi-national, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate 500 microg twice daily propelled either by the non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant, hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a, or the CFC propellants 11 and 12 used in the established pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI). The study period was 12 months and involved 412 subjects with moderate to severe asthma (HFA 134a pMDI: n = 203; CFC pMDI: n = 209). For the first 3 months, subjects kept a daily record card and attended the clinic every 4 weeks. Thereafter, they kept daily diaries for 2 weeks before each clinic assessment, which were performed at the end of 6, 9 and 12 months. Mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased during the first week in both treatment groups. By the end of week 12 the adjusted mean increase from baseline in morning PEF was 21 and 23 l min(-1) in the HFA 134a and CFC pMDI groups, respectively, and this increase was maintained throughout the 12-month study period. Similar improvements were detected in other diary card parameters and in clinic lung function measurements. The two groups were shown to be clinically equivalent in terms of all efficacy variables and there were no differences in tolerability. There were few reports of low serum cortisol levels during the 12-month study period, and serum cortisol levels were similar at baseline and after 12 weeks and 12 months of treatment in the two groups. In conclusion, the new HFA 134a fluticasone propionate pMDI is as effective and safe as the established CFC fluticasone propionate pMDI when used at a dosage of 1 mg day(-1).

In this 4-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study, the dose-effect relationship of four doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (50, 100, 200, and 400 micrograms twice daily) was investigated and compared with beclomethasone dipropionate, 200 micrograms twice daily. A total of 672 patients with moderate asthma currently receiving 1,000 micrograms/d or less of an inhaled steroid were recruited. The study demonstrated a significant dose-related improvement in lung function with fluticasone propionate. Linear dose-related increases were observed in morning (increase per doubling dose was 4.3 L/min; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.8, 6.8 L/min; p = 0.001) and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (increase per doubling dose was 3.0 L/min; 95 percent CI, 0.5, 5.5 L/min; p = 0.017), clinic lung function (at 4 weeks, increase in percent predicted PEFR per doubling dose = 1.1 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.2, 2.1 percent; p = 0.022; increase in percent predicted FEV1 per doubling dose = 1.1 percent; 95 percent CI, 0.3, 1.9 percent; p = 0.10:increase in percent predicted FVC per doubling dose = 1.3 percent, 95 percent CI, 0.5, 2.1 percent; p = 0.001), and the percentage of symptom-free days over days 1 to 14 of treatment (increase per doubling dose = 1.9, 95 percent CI, 0.0, 3.9; p = 0.048). There was also a dose-related reduction in extra bronchodilator usage (days 1 to 14 p = 0.002; days 15 to 28 p = 0.01). In addition, there was a significant decrease in diurnal variation with increasing doses of fluticasone propionate (decrease per doubling dose = 2.0 L/min, 95 percent CI, 0.4; p = 0.024). The number of asthma exacerbations was also reduced as the dose of fluticasone propionate increased. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated, adverse events were few, and there was a similar incidence in all groups. Furthermore, there was no evidence of any hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis suppression. The data from the study were consistent with other clinical studies that have shown fluticasone propionate to be more potent than beclomethasone dipropionate in terms of improvement in lung function. In conclusion, this study provided evidence of a dose-related improvement in asthma control for fluticasone propionate in the dose range 100 to 800 micrograms daily, in patients with moderate asthma.

Five hundred and eighty-five patients with moderate asthma, currently receiving 400-1000 micrograms day-1 of an inhaled corticosteroid, were treated for 6 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study with either 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate as a dry powder via a Diskhaler inhaler, 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate via a pressurized inhaler or 1000 micrograms day-1 beclomethasone dipropionate via a pressurized inhaler. For all three treatment groups, mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) increased within 1 week of the start of treatment. There were also improvements in clinic lung function, daytime and night-time asthma symptoms and a reduction in daytime and night-time rescue bronchodilator medication in all three groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two formulations of fluticasone propionate in any of the efficacy parameters. Fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler was significantly more effective than beclomethasone dipropionate over the 6 week study period in reducing diurnal variation (mean difference--4 l min-1, 95% CI--8 to 0 l min-1: P = 0.03). Fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler produced a statistically significant improvement in night-time symptoms when compared to beclomethasone dipropionate whereas, beclomethasone dipropionate 1000 micrograms day-1 was statistically significantly more effective than both formulations of fluticasone propionate in improving daytime symptoms (P < 0.05). However, these statistical differences must be viewed together with the fact that very few patients recorded a score of 2 or more for both daytime or night-time symptoms. There was a similarly low incidence of adverse events with all three treatments with no evidence of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA)-axis suppression. The results of the 6-week comparative study showed that 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate whether administered via pressurized inhaler or Diskhaler is as effective and as safe as 1000 micrograms day-1 beclomethasone dipropionate administered via a pressurized inhaler in the treatment of moderate asthma. Over 12 months fluticasone propionate 500 micrograms day-1 via a pressurized inhaler was at least as effective and as well tolerated as beclomethasone dipropionate 1000 micrograms day-1.