1. Volatile organic compound profiles in outlet air from extracorporeal life-support devices differ from breath profiles in critically ill patients
- Author
-
Andreas Redel, Alois Philipp, Michael Gruber, Paul Brinkman, Marcus J. Schultz, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Jan Hendrik Leopold, Hans-Gerd Janssen, Lieuwe D. J. Bos, Thomas Bein, APH - Methodology, Medical Informatics, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Intensive Care Medicine, AII - Inflammatory diseases, APH - Aging & Later Life, Graduate School, ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias, ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, ACS - Pulmonary hypertension & thrombosis, and ACS - Microcirculation
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Air sampling ,Critical Care ,Population ,lcsh:Medicine ,Extracorporeal ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,law ,Medicine ,Volatile organic compound ,education ,030304 developmental biology ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,0303 health sciences ,education.field_of_study ,Critically ill ,business.industry ,lcsh:R ,Extracorporeal circulation ,Original Articles ,Intensive care unit ,030228 respiratory system ,chemistry ,Anesthesia ,Life support ,business - Abstract
Introduction It is highly uncertain whether volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath of critically ill intensive care unit patients are formed in the lung locally, in the air compartment or lung tissue, or elsewhere in the body and transported to the lung via the bloodstream. We compared VOC mixtures in exhaled breath and in air coming from extracorporeal support devices in critically ill patients to address this issue. Methods First, we investigated whether it was safe to connect an electronic nose (eNose) or a gas sampling pump to extracorporeal support membranes. Then, breath and air from extracorporeal support devices were collected simultaneously for continuous monitoring of VOC mixtures using an eNose. In addition, samples for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis were taken daily at the two measurement sites. Results 10 critically ill patients were monitored for a median (interquartile range) duration of 73 (72–113) h; in total, we had 887 h of air sampling. The eNose signals of breath correlated moderately with signals of air from the extracorporeal support devices (R2=0.25–0.44). After GC-MS analysis, 96 VOCs were found both in breath and air from the extracorporeal support devices; of these, 29 (30%) showed a significant correlation (p, Systemically produced VOCs in exhaled breath and extracorporeal circulation correlate well. About one in three VOCs do not correlate and are found in higher concentrations in breath, suggesting pulmonary production of these VOCs. http://ow.ly/cbjt30nMXY5
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF