Search

The Clinical Practice Committee of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine endorses the Living WHO guideline on therapeutics and COVID-19. This trustworthy continuously updated guideline serves as a highly useful decision aid for Nordic anaesthesiologists caring for patients with COVID-19. Funding Agencies|Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

The Clinical Practice Committee of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine endorses the clinical practice guideline Regional anaesthesia in patients on antithrombotic drugs – a joint ESAIC/ESRA guideline. This clinical practice guideline serves as a useful decision aid for Nordic anaesthesiologists providing regional anaesthesia to adult patients on antithrombotic drugs. publishedVersion Non

The Clinical Practice Committee of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine endorses the clinical practice guideline Transfusion strategies in bleeding critically ill adults: a clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. This trustworthy clinical practice guideline serves as a useful decision aid for Nordic anaesthesiologists caring for critically ill patients with bleeding. Funding Agencies|Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

The Clinical Practice Committee of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine endorses the clinical practice guideline Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. The guideline serves as a useful bedside decision aid for clinicians managing adults with suspected and confirmed septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. BACKGROUND Sepsis and septic shock remain a leading global cause of mortality and morbidity.1-3 Anaesthesiologists and intensivists are regularly involved in the identification, resuscitation and management of adults with sepsis and septic shock. In November 2021, the Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 was published.4 The Clinical Practice Committee (CPC) of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI) decided to appraise this guideline for possible endorsement to guide Scandinavian anaesthesiologists and intensivists in the identification, resuscitation, and management of adults with sepsis and septic shock. METHODS The SSAI CPC assessed the guideline using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool,5 as per the outlined process for endorsement of non-SSAI guidelines.6 RESULTS Five SSAI CPC members completed the appraisal. One member co-authored the guideline and was excluded from the evaluation, as per the SSAI endorsement process.6 The individual domain totals were: 1) scope and purpose 89%; 2) stakeholder involvement 92%; 3) rigor of development 81%; 4) clarity of presentation 89%; 5) applicability 73%; 6) editorial independence 85%; 7) overall assessment 87% (Figure 1).

Background The Clinical Practice Committee of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine endorses the clinical practice guideline Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children. The guideline can serve as a useful decision aid for clinicians managing children with suspected and confirmed septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Funding Agencies|SSAI

The Clinical Practice Committee of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine endorses the clinical practice guideline New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients-consensus and evidence based. The guideline can serve as a useful decision aid for clinicians caring for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. However, it is important to acknowledge that the overall certainty of evidence supporting the guideline recommendations was low, implying that further research is likely to have an important impact on the confidence in the estimate of effect. Funding Agencies|Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

We investigated the national early warning scores (NEWSs) and related outcomes of patients in a tertiary referral center's multidisciplinary emergency department (ED). Patients were further categorized into three groups: triaged directly to intensive care unit (EDICU), triaged to general ward with later ICU admission (EDwardICU) and triaged to general ward (EDward). NEWSs and subsequent outcomes among these sub groups were compared.We conducted a prospective one-month cohort study in Tampere University Hospital's ED, Finland. ED-NEWSs were obtained for all adult patients without treatment limitations, and control (ward) NEWSs were further obtained for the EDwardICU and EDward patients.Cohort consisted of 1,354 patients with a median ED-NEWS of 2, and higher ED-NEWS was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.42; AUROC 0.75, 0.64‒0.86, p 0.001) and 30-day mortality (OR 1.27, 1.17-1.39; AUROC 0.78, 0.71‒0.84, p 0.001) irrespective of age and comorbidity. There were 64 patients in EDICU group, 12 patients in EDwardICU group and 1,278 patients in EDward group with median ED-NEWSs of 7, 3 and 2 (p 0.001), respectively. After the first 24 h in wards, median NEWSs of the EDwardICU patients had substantially increased as compared with EDward patients (6 vs. 2, p 0.001). There were no statistical differences in last NEWS before ICU admission between the EDICU and EDwardICU patients (7 vs. 8, p = 0.534), or in ICU severity-of-illness scores or patient outcomes.ED-NEWS is independently associated with in-hospital and 30-day mortality with acceptable discrimination capability. Direct and late ICU admissions occurred with comparable NEWSs at admission.

The Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Clinical Practice Committee endorses the recent DASAIM/DSIT guideline for prevention of rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury. However, we emphasize the low quality of evidence with only weak recommendations for all interventions, highlighting that further research is very likely to have an important impact on the confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimates.

Clinical practice guidelines from other organizations or societies with assumed clinical and contextualized relevance for Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI) members, may trigger a formal evaluation by The Clinical Practice Committee (CPC) for possible SSAI endorsement. This avoids unnecessary duplicate processes and minimizes resource-waste. Identified guidelines are assessed for endorsement using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. The SSAI CPC utilizes the AGREE II online coordinated group appraisal platform to assess the methodological rigor and transparency in which the guideline was developed. The results of the assessment, including the decision to endorse or not, are presented to the SSAI Board for sanctioning. This document briefly outlines the process for evaluation of non-SSAI guidelines by the CPC for possible SSAI endorsement.

Assessing adequacy of anesthesia requires evaluation of its components: hypnosis, analgesia, and neuromuscular transmission. In order to do this, many methods have been developed that process signals representing different modalities. Assessment of hypnosis requires cortical measures of the central nervous system (CNS); methods that assess analgesia concentrate on subcortical and spinal levels of the CNS; and neuromuscular transmission is a peripheral phenomenon. This article presents an overview of the current state of methods available for measuring each of these components. We conclude that, whereas important gains have been made in the area of assessment of hypnosis, mainly owing to the advancement of methods using EEG and auditory evoked potentials, and whereas neuromuscular transmission can be objectively monitored using motor nerve stimulation, assessment of analgesia still contains many challenges.

BACKGROUND Dispatching Emergency Medical Services to treat patients with deteriorating health in nursing homes and primary care facilities is common in Finland. We examined the cardiac arrest patients to describe this phenomenon. We had a special interest in patients for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation was considered futile. METHODS We conducted an observational study between 1 June 2013 and 31 May 2014 in the Pirkanmaa area. We included cases in which Emergency Medical Services participated in the treatment of cardiac arrest patients in nursing homes and primary care facilities. RESULTS Emergency Medical Services attended to a total of 355 cardiac arrest patients, and 65 patients (18%) met the inclusion criteria. The included patients were generally older than 65 years, but otherwise heterogeneous. Nineteen patients (29%) had a valid do-not-attempt-resuscitation order, but paramedics were not informed about it in 10 (53%) of those cases. Eight (12%) of the 65 patients survived to hospital admission and 3 (5%) survived to hospital discharge with a neurologically favourable outcome. Two patients were alive 90 days after the cardiac arrest; both were younger than 70 years of age and had ventricular fibrillation as primary rhythm. There were no survivors in nursing homes. CONCLUSIONS The do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders were often unavailable during a cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempt. Although resuscitation attempts were futile for patients in nursing homes, some patients in primary care facilities demonstrated a favourable outcome after cardiac arrest. Emergency Medical Services seem to be able to recognise potential survivors and focus resources on their treatment.

Although anesthetic monitoring has rapidly developed over the past few years, accidental awareness during general anesthesia still remains a significant clinical problem. It occurs in one out of thousand surgical patients. In addition to conventional clinical signs, the adequacy of anesthesia can be assessed for instance by monitoring the changes occurring in the electroencephalogram (EEG). The EEG effects of different anesthetics are, however, highly varied, and attempts to develop an unequivocal neurophysiological measure or quantity for human consciousness or unconsciousness have so far been unsuccessful.

To study the effect of midazolam premedication on the recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anesthesia induced with propofol in pediatric outpatients.Sixty children, one to three years, presenting for ambulatory adenoidectomy were randomly assigned , in a double-blind fashion, to receive either 0.5 mg x kg(-1) midazolam (Group M) or placebo (Group P) p.o. 30 min before anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with 10 microg x kg(-1) atropine, 10 microg x kg(-1) alfentanil, and 3-4 mg x kg(-1) propofol i.v.. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with 0.2 mg x kg(-1) mivacurium. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen (FiO2 0.3) and sevoflurane with controlled ventilation. Recovery characteristics were compared using the modified Aldrete scoring system, the Pain/Discomfort scale and measuring specific recovery end-points (emergence, full Aldrete score, discharge). A postoperative questionnaire was used to evaluate the children's well-being at home until 24 hr after discharge.Emergence from anesthesia (22 +/- 9 vs 16 +/- 6 min (mean +/- SD), P = 0.005) and achieving full Aldrete scores (30 +/- 11 vs 24 +/- 16 min, P = 0.006) were delayed in patients receiving midazolam. Children in the placebo group were given postoperative analgesia sooner than those in the midazolam group (18 +/- 11 vs 23 +/- 8 min, P = 0.009). More children premedicated with midazolam suffered from arousal distress (20% vs 3%, P = 0.04) and scored higher on the Pain/Discomfort scale (P = 0.004) at 20 min after arrival in the recovery room. Discharge was not affected by premedication and well-being at home was similar in the groups.Oral premedication with midazolam delays early recovery but not discharge after ambulatory sevoflurane anesthesia induced with propofol in children one to three years. Midazolam did not improve the quality of recovery.

Sevoflurane is a volatile anesthetic which is reported to cause epileptiform EEG changes together with undesired symptoms such as convulsions. In this paper, an algorithm for the automatic detection of these EEG changes is presented which could enable safer induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane by informing the clinicians about the epileptiform EEG. EEG was recorded from 60 healthy female patients during sevoflurane anesthesia. A neurophysiologist classified the EEG waveforms. Each anesthesia period lasted 6 minutes. 48 signal features were extracted from the raw EEG. 5-sec segments of EEG were classified based on the extracted features using a decision tree with a logistic regression based decisions and the classification results were compared to the neurophysiologist's classifications. Awake EEG was recognized with 69% / 96% (sensitivity / specificity), Burst suppression with 56% / 98%, Epileptiform EEG with 83% / 87 %, normal slow anesthesia EEG with 86% / 64 %, slow anesthesia EEG with monophasic pattern with 65% / 80 %, and slow anesthesia EEG with monophasic pattern and spikes with 54% / 84%.