Search

Background Satisfactory brain relaxation is essential in neurosurgery. Desflurane anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have different effects on cerebral hemodynamics, potentially contributing to discrepant brain relaxation. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of desflurane and TIVA on brain relaxation in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors. Methods In this randomized, controlled study, we enrolled patients aged 18–60 years, with ASA I–III, who were scheduled to undergo elective craniotomy for supratentorial tumors. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive desflurane anesthesia or TIVA. The primary outcome was the proportion of satisfactory brain relaxation. Secondary outcomes included emergence and extubation times, recovery of cognitive function and postoperative complications. Results Of 369 patients who were assessed for eligibility, 111 were randomized and 110 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (55 in the desflurane group and 55 in the TIVA group). The proportion of satisfactory brain relaxation was similar between the two groups: 69% in the desflurane group and 73% in the TIVA group (RR: 0.950, 95% CI: 0.748–1.207; P = 0.675). Patients assigned to the desflurane group had shorter emergence (10 [8–13] min vs. 13 [10–20] min, P P P = 0.003), but experienced increased postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (16 [29%] vs. 6 [11%] P = 0.017) and tachycardia (22 [40%] vs. 9 [16%], P = 0.006) during recovery. Conclusions Desflurane anesthesia and TIVA provide similar brain relaxation in patients without intracranial hypertension undergoing elective craniotomy. Desflurane accelerates the recovery from anesthesia but is associated with increased PONV and tachycardia during the recovery period. Trial registration Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04691128). Date of registration: December 31, 2020.

There is continued controversy regarding the optimal anesthetic technique for endovascular therapy in patients with acute posterior circulation ischemic stroke. To compare the clinical outcomes general anesthesia (GA) and non-GA, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies focused on the anesthetic management for endovascular therapy in patients with acute posterior circulation stroke, without language restriction. In addition, we compared clinical outcomes among the studies with different non-GA types (conscious sedation or local anesthesia). Outcome variables were functional independence, excellent outcomes, favorable outcomes, mortality, successful recanalization, hemodynamic instability, intracerebral hemorrhage, and respiratory or vascular complications. Eight studies including 1777 patients were identified. Although GA was associated with a lower odds of functional independence at 90 days (odds ratio [OR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38 to 0.81; P=0.009), substantial heterogeneity was noted (I2=65%). Subgroup analysis showed that GA was associated with higher odds of mortality than conscious sedation (OR: 1.83; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.57; I2=0%), but there was no difference between GA and local anesthesia (I2=0%). Interestingly, subgroup analysis did not identify a relationship between functional independence and GA compared with local anesthesia (OR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.25; P=0.919; I2=0%). This meta-analysis demonstrates that GA is associated with worse outcomes in patients with acute posterior circulation stroke undergoing endovascular therapy based on current studies.

Author(s): Sun, Jian; Liang, Fa; Wu, Youxuan; Zhao, Yan; Miao, Zhongrong; Zhang, Li; Gelb, Adrian W; Chan, Matthew TV; Peng, Yuming; Han, Ruquan; CANVAS Pilot Trial Investigators | Abstract: BackgroundThe effect of choice of anesthesia on clinical outcome for endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains unclear.MethodsWe conducted a pilot trial of 43 patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke having EVT. Patients were randomly allocated to receive general anesthesia or conscious sedation. We documented the rate of recruitment and rate of conversion from conscious sedation to general anesthesia. In addition, we recorded the change in National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) on day 7, the rate of successful reperfusion and measured neurological function by certified researchers using modified Rankin Score (mRS 0 to 2) at 90 days.ResultsThe recruitment rate was 31.4% and majority of patients were excluded because of delay in hospital presentation and posterior circulation stroke. The rate of conversion from conscious sedation to general anesthesia was 18.2%. This was primarily related to excessive sedation and uncontrolled movement. Change in NIHSS score, rate of successful reperfusion and functional recovery were similar between groups.ConclusionsIt was feasible to randomize AIS patients receiving either general anesthesia or conscious sedation for EVT.

The association between anesthesia type and outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) remains a subject of ongoing debate.This prospective nonrandomized controlled trial included 149 consecutive patients with acute anterior circulation stroke who underwent EVT. The primary outcome was functional independence assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 3 months.A total of 105 (70.5%) and 44 (29.5%) patients undergoing EVT who received conscious sedation (CS) and general anesthesia (GA), respectively. The patients who received GA had similar demographics and basic National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores (17 vs. 16, P0.05) as the patients who received CS. The recanalization time (304 vs. 311 min, P=0.940) and the recanalization rate (86.4% vs. 84.1%, P=0.170) did not differ between the patients receiving the different types of anesthesia. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale at 24 hours was lower in the patients who received CS than in those who received GA (β=-2.26, 95% confidence interval, -5.30 to 0.79). The independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2) at 3 months was equal between patients who received GA and those who received CS (odds ratio=0.73, 95% confidence interval, 0.32-1.68). The mortality and the morbidity rates did not differ.The data indicated that the selection of GA or CS during EVT had no impact on the independent outcomes of patients with anterior circulation occlusion.