Search

There have been conflicting reports on whether propofol prolongs, shortens, or does not change QT interval. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol on heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval during anesthetic induction. We examined 50 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Patients received 3 μg/kg of fentanyl and were randomly allocated to one of the following 2 groups. Group S patients received 5 mg/kg of thiamylal followed by sevoflurane, 5 % at the inhaled concentration. Group P patients received propofol using TCI system at 5 μg/mL for 2 min followed by 3 μg/mL. Tracheal intubation was performed after vecuronium administration. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), bispectral index score (BIS), and QTc interval in 12-lead electrocardiogram were recorded at the following time points: just before fentanyl administration (T1), 2 min after fentanyl injection (T2), 1 min after thiamylal injection or 2 min after the start of TCI (T3), just before intubation (T4), and 2 min after intubation (T5). BIS and MAP significantly decreased after anesthetic induction in both groups. HR decreased after anesthetic induction and recovered after tracheal intubation in group P, whereas it did changed in group S throughout the study period. QTc interval was shortened at T3 and T4 in group P, but prolonged at T3, T4, and T5 in group S, as compared with T1. Propofol TCI shortens QTc interval, whereas sevoflurane prolongs QTc interval during anesthetic induction.

Background and Objective: It is known that esmolol, a short-acting beta1-blocker, reduces anaesthetic requirement. In this study, we evaluated whether a low dose of landiolol, a new ultra-short-acting beta1-blocker, can reduce the sevoflurane requirement., Methods: Twenty-five patients undergoing hip surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Group A (n = 13) received landiolol (bolus injection of 0.031 mg.kg(-1) and continuous infusion at a rate of 0.01 mg.kg(-1).min(-1)). Group B (n = 12) received physiological saline. Landiolol and physiological saline were started before the induction of anaesthesia and continued until the end of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, 60% N(2)O and fentanyl. Sevoflurane concentration was controlled to keep the bispectral index at approximately 50. The end-tidal sevoflurane concentration and haemodynamics were measured during anaesthesia., Results: The average end-tidal sevoflurane concentration in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (1.2 +/- 0.30 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.3%, P < 0.01). Maximum values of systolic arterial pressure showed no difference between the groups, whereas the maximum value of heart rate in group A was significantly less than that in group B (61 +/- 10 vs. 76 +/- 14 beats min(-1), P < 0.05)., Conclusion: The results suggest that a low dose of landiolol significantly reduces the intraoperative sevoflurane requirement during sevoflurane/N(2)O/fentanyl anaesthesia in patients undergoing hip surgery.

Purpose: We investigated the effect of low-dose droperidol on heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval and interaction with propofol. Methods: Seventy-two patients undergoing upper limb surgery were included in this study. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group S ( n = 24), which received 1 ml saline; group D1 ( n = 24), which received 1.25 mg droperidol; or group D2 ( n = 24), which received 2.5 mg droperidol. One minute later, fentanyl (3 μg/kg) was administered. Two minutes after fentanyl administration, anesthesia was induced using propofol (1.5 mg/kg) and vecronium. Tracheal intubation was performed 3 min after the administration of propofol. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, bispectral index, and QTc interval were recorded at the following time points: immediately before the droperidol injection (baseline); 3 min after the saline or droperidol injection; 3 min after the propofol injection; and 2 min after tracheal intubation. Results: Compared to baseline, the QTc interval in group S and group D1 was significantly shorter after propofol injection, but recovered after tracheal intubation. In group D2, the QTc interval was significantly prolonged after droperidol injection, but recovered after propofol injection, and was significantly prolonged after tracheal intubation. Conclusions: We found that saline or 1.25 mg droperidol did not prolong QTc interval, whereas 2.5 mg droperidol prolonged the QTc interval significantly, and that propofol injection counteracted the prolongation of the QTc interval induced by 2.5 mg droperidol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. Tracheal intubation using a lightwand device (Trachlight) should minimize hemodynamic change by avoiding direct-vision laryngoscopy. We evaluated hemodynamic and catecholamine responses during tracheal intubation using a Trachlight in elderly patients with hypertension. Methods. Twenty-six hypertensive patients aged over 65 years undergoing orthopedic surgery were randomly divided into two groups, group L (n = 13) and group T (n = 13). Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (2µg⋅kg[sup-1]) and propofol (1.5mg⋅kg[sup-1]), and then muscle relaxation was obtained with vecuronium (0.15mg⋅kg[sup-1]). The trachea was intubated with either a Macintosh laryngoscope (group L) or a Trachlight (group T). Hemodynamics, plasma catecholamine concentrations, and arterial blood gases were measured before the induction of anesthesia (T0), before tracheal intubation (T1), immediately after tracheal intubation (T2), and 3 min after tracheal intubation (T3). Results. The intubation time was shorter in group T than in group L (12.6 ± 1.7 vs 23.5 ± 2.9s, mean ± SE; P < 0.01). Compared with the preinduction (T0) value, systolic blood pressure (SBP) showed a significant decrease at T1 and T3 in group L and at T1, T2, and T3 in group T. The heart rate (HR) and plasma norepinephrine (NE) concentration showed no change in either group throughout the time course, whereas the plasma epinephrine (E) concentration showed a significant decrease at T2 and T3 in both groups. The mean values of the rate-pressure product (RPP: HR X SBP) were less than 15 000 after tracheal intubation in both groups. There was no significant difference in hemodynamic or catecholamine responses between groups at any point. No patient had ischemic ST-T changes in either group. Conclusion. A lightwand has no advantage over a laryngoscope in terms of hemodynamic and plasma catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation in elderly patients with hypertension, despite a... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]