Search

Background: This study aimed to investigate whether human periodontal ligament (PDL) cells secrete pro-angiogenic factors that induce the vascularization of surrounding bone tissue under tensile stress.Methods: Quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting were used to analyze the mRNA and protein expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), Angiopoietin-I (Ang-I), connective tissue growth factor （CTGF）, and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) in PDL cells after tensile force treatments of different durations. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the VEGF concentration in the supernatants of cell cultures. Cell viability assay, wound healing assay, and tube formation assay were performed to evaluate the angiogenic behaviors of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).Results: The mRNA expression and protein expression of VEGF, bFGF, Ang-I, and M-CSF was increased in the cells that received 6 to 48 hours of tensile force treatment. And, the VEGF level in the supernatant significantly increased in the human PDL cell cultures stressed for 6 to 48 hours. The abilities of HUVECs to proliferate, migrate, and form tubes were enhanced in media conditioned with tensile-stressed human PDL cells. Hence, tensile force induced human PDL cells to express and release pro-angiogenic factors enhancing the proliferation, migration, and angiogenic capacity of HUVECs.Conclusion: Tensile stress induced human PDL cells to express and release pro-angiogenic factors, including VEGF, bFGF, Ang-I, and M-CSF, thereby enhancing the proliferation, migration, and angiogenic capacity of HUVECs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the expression patterns of CEACAM5 in prostatic non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions and further investigate its relationship with tumor microvessel density(MVD) and lymphatic vessel density(LVD). Methods: CEACAM5 expression was detected using immunohistochemical staining in a serial sections of the benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and prostate carcinoma (PCa) lesions. MVD and LVD were quantified in CEACAM5 positive areas by dual-labelling with CD34 and D2-40 respectively. Results: Both PIN and PCa had significantly higher expression for CEACAM5 than BPH which has no positive expression for CEACAM5(P<0.05). In PIN and PCa, CEACAM5 staining showed different expression patterns in terms the of most of membranous staining for PIN, less membranous staining and more cytoplasmic staining for PCa. MVD results showed that PCa and PIN had more angiogenesis than BPH tissue. The value of MVD in PCa tissue was correlated with tumor Gleason grading (P<0.05). LVD results showed that neoplastic lesions had more lymphangiogenesis than non-neoplastic lesion. Conclusion: CEACAM5 had different expression patterns in prostatic non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions, and these various expression patterns may be correlated with tumor progression through promoting tumorous angiogenesis or lymphangiogenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]