Search

Intrasaccular flow disruption is a viable alternative to other endovascular treatments for saccular or wide-necked bifurcation intracranial aneurysms; however, wide neck aneurysms with irregular shapes or shallow depth may not be amenable to treatment currently available intrasaccular devices. Here, we present the first ever case report of the novel Saccular Endovascular Aneurysm Lattice Embolization System (SEAL™). The versatile utility of the SEAL™ device is demonstrated in a patient with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from a ruptured, complex, left middle cerebral artery (MCA) trilobed shallow wide-necked bifurcation aneurysm. Deployment and implantation of the SEAL device were technically feasible, safe, and conformed well to the irregular shape of the complex, ruptured aneurysm. Immediate total aneurysm occlusion was observed after implantation. Importantly, 1-year angiographic follow-up demonstrated durable, complete occlusion with no safety concerns. The SEAL device is a promising new novel technology which has the potential to treat very shallow aneurysms with limited height and irregular, multilobulated aneurysms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We report a multicenter experience using endovascular embolization as the first line approach for treatment of anterior cranial fossa (ACF) dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF). Methods: All patients with DAVFs located in the anterior cranial fossa who were treated with endovascular technique as a first line approach were included. Demographics, clinical presentation, angioarchitecture, strategy, complications, immediate angiographic, and follow-up results were included in the analysis. Results: Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria (18 male and 5 female). Age ranged from 14 to 79 years (mean 53 years). Twelve patients presented with hemorrhage. Twenty-eight endovascular procedures were performed. The overall immediate angiographic cure rate after endovascular treatment was 82.6% (19/23 patients). The angiographic cure rate of the transvenous strategy was significantly superior to the transarterial strategy (p ≤ 0.001). There was 1 complication in 28 total procedures (3.6%). Angiographic follow-up was available in 21 out of the 23 patients with a mean of 25 months (range 2 to 108 months). In these 21 patients, the DAVF was completely cured in 20 (95%). At last follow-up, all patients had a modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0 to 2. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that endovascular treatment for ACF DAVFs has an acceptable safety profile with high rates of complete occlusion, particularly with transvenous approach. Whenever possible, transvenous approach should be preferred over transarterial approach as first line strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]