Search

Background: Use of both rotational atherectomy (RA) and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)-the "RotaTripsy" technique-offers a potentially synergistic calcium-modification strategy that can treat both luminal and abluminal calcification. An upfront RotaTripsy strategy using an undersized burr in large-caliber coronaries also offers the advantage of facilitating IVL catheter passage while being able to undertake the procedure with a 6-Fr system., Methods: Consecutive patients with heavily calcified lesions on angiographic or intravascular imaging and large target-vessel caliber (≥3 mm) who underwent an upfront RA followed by IVL between July 2021 and January 2022 were included in this study. Study aims were to evaluate periprocedural efficacy and safety., Results: Of the 21 patients included, RotaTripsy was used for treatment of de novo lesions in 12 patients (57%) and for in-stent-restenosis in 9 patients (43%). Seven cases of in-stent restenosis (ISR) involved 2 layers of stents. Mean reference vessel diameter was 3.67 ± 0.46 mm and baseline diameter stenosis was 77.4 ± 11.3%. Average RA burr-to-artery ratio was 0.43 ± 0.05 and IVL balloon-to-artery ratio was 0.93 ± 0.06, with IVL balloon crossing the lesion in all cases following RA. Procedural success was attained in 20 of 21 cases; 1 periprocedural complication (a death related to coronary perforation following stent postdilation) was recorded., Conclusions: An upfront RotaTripsy strategy is associated with a high degree of procedural success in de novo lesions and ISR cases by facilitating the use of a smaller burr-to-artery ratio and smaller-bore vascular access. Larger studies are required to further evaluate the potential benefits of an upfront RotaTripsy strategy from a safety and cost-benefit perspective.

Purpose of Review: The catheter-based coronary intervention has become a well-established therapeutic modality for obstructive coronary artery disease. However, in-stent restenosis remains a significant limitation of coronary intervention despite the use of newer devices. Intravascular brachytherapy was introduced to treat recurrent in-stent restenosis but only modestly adopted. This review will discuss the mechanism of intracoronary brachytherapy, available clinical evidence of brachytherapy in recurrent in-stent restenosis treatment, and the future of coronary brachytherapy in coronary intervention., Recent Findings: Drug-eluting stents have an inherent limitation as they leave a permanent metal layer inside an artery when deployed. Recently, drug-coated balloon technology has emerged to treat coronary artery disease as a combination of balloon angioplasty and local drug delivery without leaving a metal layer behind. Recent European guidelines recommended using drug-coated balloons when treating in-stent restenosis treatment, while the US guidelines have not yet addressed the use of drug-coated balloons in such cases. Coronary brachytherapy is a valuable addition to treat these challenging diseases despite several logistic issues. If there are newer technologies with easier setup, such as drug-coated balloons, coronary brachytherapy resurgence is improbable in the contemporary era, although it may not become obsolete., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an established tool in interventional cardiology for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. Over 3 decades of clinical experience and research, techniques have matured and outcomes have improved. Heterogeneity exists, however, in RA utilization and technique. We assembled a group of experienced RA operators and device experts to summarize and critique key elements of contemporary RA technique, to identify areas of consensus and controversy, and to offer recommendations for optimal performance for the practicing interventional cardiologist. Evolution in RA strategy toward a focus on lesion modification to facilitate balloon angioplasty and stenting has underpinned major advances in procedural safety, including opportunity to use smaller caliber equipment and radial access. Optimal technique and improved safety have permitted exploratory use of RA for different lesion types and reevaluation of procedural requirements, including flush solution composition and transvenous pacing. Preparedness to manage complications remains paramount and recommendations for operators and institutions are outlined.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the acute outcomes of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) and second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in routine clinical practice. There is a paucity of data regarding BVS use in a real-world patient population., Methods: The study population comprised 40 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with BVS implantation at a tertiary-care center in New York, New York between July and December of 2016. An optimal implantation technique including adequate lesion preparation, mandatory postdilation, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was used in all cases. De novo lesions treated with BVS were compared to lesions treated with DES matched by OCT calcium arc, scaffold/stent size, use of atherectomy device, and lesion postdilation. Acute lumen gain, minimal device area, malapposition, eccentricity, and symmetry index were assessed using OCT., Results: We analyzed OCT images of 40 BVS cases and 40 matching DES cases from 35 and 40 patients, respectively. Compared to the DES group, the BVS group demonstrated similar acute lumen gain, minimal scaffold/stent area, eccentricity index, and symmetry index after PCI. There were fewer malapposed struts detected after BVS implantation; however, malapposition distance and length were not different between the groups., Conclusion: BVS implantation in a real-world patient population with optimal implantation technique resulted in similar stent expansion and better strut apposition compared to DES implantation.

Severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) increases the complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by inhibiting optimal stent expansion, leading to an increased risk of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis. Coronary atherectomy modifies and debulks calcified plaque to facilitate PCI. Although there is no clear consensus, and further studies are needed, the decision to perform atherectomy should be based upon the presence of fluoroscopic CAC or with the use of intravascular imaging. The management of CAC in the modern era relies on rotational and orbital atherectomy to prepare the lesion to facilitate stent delivery and optimal expansion. While the two technologies differ in equipment, technique, and mechanism of action, the available literature suggests similar efficacy and safety of the two systems, although head-to-head comparisons are limited. While rotational and orbital atherectomy have been shown to have excellent procedural success in terms of facilitating stent delivery, no system has been shown to reduce long-term major adverse cardiovascular events, although the definitive trial for orbital atherectomy has not been completed. Additional trials are needed to find the population who would derive the most benefit of atherectomy and to compare the two systems in a prospective manner., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: To investigate the use of the GuideLiner "mother-and-child" guide catheter extension system as a simple solution to facilitate initial device delivery in balloon uncrossable chronic total occlusions (CTOs) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Background: During PCIs for CTO lesions, an important reason for procedural failure is the inability to deliver a balloon or microcatheter across the lesion., Methods: We retrospectively accessed our interventional registry for 07/01/2010 to 03/21/2012 and extracted data on all CTO lesions involving GuideLiner catheter use. Cine review was performed to identify cases where a guidewire had crossed the CTO and the use of a GuideLiner catheter facilitated initial device delivery., Results: We identified 28 patients that underwent PCI for CTO with a GuideLiner catheter used to assist initial balloon or microcatheter advancement across the culprit lesion. Mean overall CTO length was 26.3 ± 18.1 mm. The GuideLiner catheter was successful in delivering a small balloon to the CTO lesion in 85.7% of cases (24/28). A single CTO PCI resulted in a distal guidewire perforation, but there was no hemodynamic compromise or pericardial effusion and the patient was discharged the next day. Overall procedural success in these selected cases (where a guidewire had already crossed the CTO) was 89.3% (25/28)., Conclusions: The GuideLiner mother-and-child catheter is a simple, safe and efficacious adjunctive device for difficult CTO PCIs where despite standard measures it is not possible to deliver an initial balloon or microcatheter across the occluded segment., (© 2013, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Despite surgical advances, the Bentall procedure still carries a 2-6% rate of acute complications involving the coronary vessels, including ostial stenoses, kinking or pseudoaneurysm formation. We report an unusual case of a patient who developed acute cardiogenic shock within hours following a Bentall procedure, requiring urgent mechanical assist device support. Coronary angiography revealed significant bilateral coronary ostial stenoses; suggesting global cardiac hypoperfusion as the cause for this acute hemodynamic collapse. Given the disturbed coronary anatomy, the novel Szabo technique was used to accurately position and deploy an ostial right and then an ostial left main coronary stent, with excellent angiographic results. We conclude that even in situations with altered coronary anatomy, the Szabo technique should be considered for any patient requiring precise aorto-ostial stent placement., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Objectives: The XIENCE V USA (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System Condition-of-Approval Post-Market study) sought to: 1) evaluate the safety of everolimus-eluting coronary stent systems (EECSS) in a contemporary cohort of real-world subjects; and 2) prospectively test the quality of event reporting with analysis of matched patients from the randomized SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) trial., Background: Randomized trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of EECSS in selected "standard-risk" patients., Methods: The XIENCE V USA trial was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study in unselected patients. The primary endpoint was Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-defined definite and probable stent thrombosis (ST); the co-primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death and myocardial infarction at 1 year. Secondary analyses included: 1) stratification by standard-risk and extended-risk cohorts; and 2) late ST after dual antiplatelet therapy interruption., Results: Of 5,054 participants (1,875 standard-risk; 3,179 extended-risk), 4,958 (98.1%) reached 1-year follow-up. The rate of ARC-defined definite and probable ST was 0.84% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60% to 1.14%) in the overall population and 0.33% (95% CI: 0.12% to 10.72%) and 1.14% (95% CI: 0.80% to 11.58%) in the standard-risk and extended-risk cohorts, respectively. No late ST was observed after dual antiplatelet therapy interruption in either cohort after 6 months. The composite rate of cardiac death and ARC-defined myocardial infarction was 6.5% (95% CI: 5.79% to 17.17%) in the overall population, 3.8% (95% CI: 2.98% to 14.78%) in the standard-risk cohort, and 8.0% (95% CI: 7.09% to 19.02%) in the extended-risk cohort., Conclusions: This study comprehensively reports ST rates for EECSS in a contemporary real-world population. The absence of ST after dual antiplatelet therapy interruption beyond 6 months in standard-risk and high-risk patients is notable. Consistent safety outcomes between matched standard-risk cohorts from the XIENCE V USA study and the SPIRIT IV randomized trial suggest that this study affords a reliable benchmark for understanding the safety of EECSS in the context of real-world clinical practice. (XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] USA Post-Approval Study; NCT00676520)., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although current literature demonstrates metabolic abnormalities are associated with mortality, obese patients who tend to have more metabolic abnormalities paradoxically have lower overall mortality rates compared to their normal-weight counterparts. In this study, we examined the prevalence of metabolic abnormality clustering and its relation to mortality in obese and normal-weight patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients (n = 9,673) undergoing elective PCI from October 2003 through December 2006 at a single urban hospital were categorized by body mass index (BMI) levels of 18.5 to 24.9, 25.0 to 29.9, 30.0 to 34.9, and ≥35 kg/m(2) and by number of metabolic abnormalities possessed (hypertension, impaired fasting glucose/diabetes, triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 40 mg/dl, and C-reactive protein ≥2.0 mg/L). All-cause mortality was assessed through June 30, 2007. Mean age of patients was 65.9 years and 66% were men. Prevalences of 4 or 5 metabolic abnormalities were 12%, 18%, 24%, and 31% in patients with BMI levels of 18.5 to 24.9, 25.0 to 29.9, 30 to 34.9, and ≥35 kg/m(2), respectively. In patients with BMI of 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m(2), hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for mortality associated with 2, 3, and 4 to 5 metabolic abnormalities versus 0 to 1 metabolic abnormality were 1.31 (0.79 to 2.17), 1.42 (0.83 to 2.43), and 2.39 (1.24 to 4.59), respectively. Analogous hazard ratios for patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m(2) were 1.94 (0.90 to 4.20), 1.44 (0.63 to 3.28), and 2.17 (0.91 to 5.18). All-cause mortality rates per 1,000 person-years were 55.5, 33.7, 28.3, and 33.8 in patients with BMI levels of 18.5 to 24.9, 25 to 29.9, 30 to 34.9, and ≥35 kg/m(2), respectively. In conclusion, BMI levels of 25.0 to 29.9 and 30 to 34.9 kg/m(2) were associated with lower all-cause mortality after PCI. However, an increased number of metabolic abnormalities translated into increased all-cause mortality., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study evaluated the outcomes of patients discharged the day of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by analyzing the data from a single-center, large, multioperator registry of interventions., Background: Although same-day discharge is likely safe after interventions on low-risk stable patients, there is limited data to guide selection of a broader population of patients. Due to numerous patient variables and physician preferences, standardization of the length of stay after PCI has been a challenge. Most of the reported studies on same-day discharge have strict inclusion criteria and hence do not truly reflect a real-world population., Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of consecutive same-day discharge in 2,400 of 16,585 patients who underwent elective PCI without any procedural or hospital complication. Composite end point included 30-day major adverse cardiac cerebral events and bleeding/vascular complications., Results: The mean age of the study population was 57.0 +/- 23.7 years with 12% aged over 65 years. Twenty-eight percent received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor with closure devices in 90.5%. Clinical and angiographic success was noted in 97% of all PCIs. The average length-of-stay following PCI was 8.2 +/- 2.5 h. The composite end point was reached in 23 patients (0.96%). Major adverse cardiac cerebral events occurred in 8 patients (0.33%) and vascular/bleeding complications in the form of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction minor bleeding in 14 patients (0.58%) and pseudoaneurysm in 1 patient (0.04%)., Conclusions: When appropriately selected, with strict adherence to the set protocol, same-day discharge after uncomplicated elective PCI is safe despite using femoral access in a wide spectrum of patients., (Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease has expanded rapidly in the past decade. Despite the extensive technological advancements in the field, pharmacotherapy has remained a cornerstone in the overall treatment strategy. Oral antiplatelet therapy has become an essential component of therapy with acute coronary syndromes and in PCI by improving clinical outcomes. This article reviews the antiplatelet options for patients undergoing PCI, including aspirin, ADP receptor blockers, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors., ((c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

A panel of leaders in the field of interventional cardiology convened to discuss the evidence-based management of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The articles in this supplement are based on individual presentations given during the panel meeting. Following are key points of the panel's discussion and areas that the panel has indicated warrant further study., ((c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: The optimal combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting (PCI-S) among patients requiring oral anticoagulation (OAC) is unknown., Objectives: We sought to compare the efficacy of a modified dual-antiplatelet regimen (daily aspirin and every other day clopidogrel) to conventional treatment (daily aspirin and daily clopidogrel) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) among patients who are also discharged on warfarin., Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (n = 454) who underwent PCI-S with DES and were discharged on warfarin and either a conventional (n = 170) or modified (n = 284) antiplatelet regimen between March 2003 and May 2007. In-hospital and 1-year events were compared between the two groups., Results: There were no differences in 1-year rates of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revascularization between patients receiving a conventional compared to a modified antiplatelet regimen. In-hospital bleeding rates were also similar between the two groups., Conclusions: An antiplatelet regimen of aspirin with every-other-day clopidogrel may be as efficacious as daily aspirin and clopidogrel among patients receiving warfarin following PCI-S with DES.

Coronary bifurcations are prone to develop atherosclerotic plaque because of turbulent blood flow and high shear stress. When compared with nonbifurcation coronary interventions, bifurcation interventions have historically reported a lower rate of procedural success, higher procedural costs, longer hospitalization, and higher clinical and angiographic restenosis. Treating bifurcation lesions is challenging, but a simple algorithm based on the side branch size, stenosis, and angulation can be used. The ongoing development of novel drug-eluting stent devices designed specifically for coronary bifurcations and the large randomized clinical trials being conducted to address their utility will add to the already present literature regarding treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical outcomes and treatment strategies of coronary wire perforations (WPs) in the era of heparin use compared to the era of bivalirudin use., Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) advances have led to progressive decrease in complications. Therefore, complex coronary lesions such as chronic total occlusions and calcified lesions are being attempted with stiff/hydrophilic wires with resultant higher incidence of coronary WP., Methods: A single-center retrospective data analysis of coronary perforation (CP) for the last 4 years with review of coronary angiograms was done and WPs were identified. A simple classification scheme based on angiographic appearance of CP was made: Type I ("myocardial stain," with no frank dye extravasation) and type II ("myocardial fan," with dye extravasation to pericardial cavity or cardiac chambers)., Results: Overall incidence of CP was 0.49% (82/16,859). Of these 50 (61%) were caused by WP; 30 occurred with heparin use (Group A) and 20 with bivalirudin use (Group B). WPs always occurred in type B2/C lesions (100%) and commonly with use of hydrophilic guidewires (70%). Major adverse cardiac events and cardiac tamponade were frequent in group A (50%) and none in group B (0%); P < 0.01. All WP in group B responded to stopping anticoagulation and prolonged balloon inflation, while group A type II perforations frequently required additional interventions (pericardiocentesis, coil embolization)., Conclusions: Cardiac tamponade and major adverse cardiac events from WPs were less frequent with bivalirudin use compared to heparin use. This beneficial effect of bivalirudin may be explained on the basis of its short half-life and reversible thrombin inhibition property. Therefore, bivalirudin may offer a safer alternative for anticoagulation in complex PCI., (Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Unlabelled: The occurrence of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased mortality after percutaneous revascularization procedures. However, the exact correlation between various levels of creatinine elevation relative to the baseline and subsequent mortality in patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) is not well established. In addition, the relationship between elevated postprocedural creatinine and ensuing mortality in patients with normal baseline renal function needs to be investigated., Methods: All percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients (n = 12,997) were analyzed for any rise in serum creatinine (SCr): CRI group (BSC > or = 1.5 mg/dl) (n = 1,853) and normal baseline renal function (NBR BSC < 1.5 mg/dl) group (n = 11,144). Patients in each group were analyzed for any elevation in SCr postprocedure and subdivided based on the SCr ratio [peak SCr/Baseline creatinine (BSC)] of <1.25, 1.25-1.5, and >1.5. The overall incidence of CIN (defined as an increment of 25% over baseline creatinine) was 5.9%: 11.3% in the CRI group versus 5.1% in normal BSC group (P < 0.01). Recursive partitioning and Cox hazard modeling were used to assess significant variables associated with mortality within 1 year. Only serum creatinine ratio (SCrR) > 1.5 correlated with increased mortality in both CRI group as well as normal BSC group., Conclusions: SCrR > 1.5 predicts mortality at 1 year after PCI. The association between SCrR > 1.5 and increased mortality at follow-up is observed in patients with CRI as well as normal baseline renal function. SCrR may thus serve as a useful clinical tool for risk stratification and prognostication of patients after PCI., (Copyright 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level is a strong predictor of morbidity and mortality in the general population. Conflicting data exist on the protective effects of high HDL cholesterol in patients with optimal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. To determine the association of high HDL cholesterol with mortality in patients with LDL cholesterol levels <70 mg/dl who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention, 3,616 consecutive patients with LDL cholesterol levels <70 mg/dl who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from July 1, 1999, to June 1, 2007, were retrospectively analyzed and followed through July 1, 2007. All-cause mortality was identified using the National Death Index. The mortality rates was 34.7, 25.2, 23.7, and 18.8 per 1,000 person-years in patients with HDL cholesterol levels of <40, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and > or =60 mg/dl, respectively (p for trend <0.001). After multivariate adjustment for demographic characteristics, cigarette smoking, biochemical variables, and co-morbid conditions, the hazard ratios for mortality in patients with HDL cholesterol levels of 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and > or =60 mg/dl, compared with their counterparts with HDL cholesterol levels <40 mg/dl, were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 0.93), 0.55 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.85), and 0.45 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.74), respectively. For each 1-SD increase in HDL cholesterol level (14 mg/dl), the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.68 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.79). In conclusion, in patients with LDL cholesterol levels <70 mg/dl who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, a strong inverse association was present between HDL cholesterol level and all-cause mortality.

Background: The present study was done to analyze if glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) bolus-only will reduce vascular/bleeding complications and cost with similar major adverse cardiac events (MACE) when compared with GPI bolus + infusion. Evidence-based therapy of GPI inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) incorporates intravenous bolus followed by 12 to 18 hours of infusion. However, GPI bolus + infusion may increase vascular/bleeding complications and may not reduce MACE when compared with GPI bolus-only., Methods: From January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2004, 2,629 consecutive patients received GPI during PCI at a single center. Of these, 1,064 patients received GPI bolus + infusion in 2003 and were compared with 1,565 patients that received GPI bolus-only in 2004. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups., Results: Patients receiving GPI bolus-only had reduced vascular/bleeding complications when compared with bolus + infusion (4.9% vs 7%, P < .05, odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.89). Furthermore, ischemic complications were similar in both groups, including periprocedural creatine kinase-MB enzyme release (12.8% vs 15.3%, P = NS), MACE at 30 days (3.2% vs 3%, P = NS), and death and myocardial infarction at 1 year (7.1% vs 7.8%, P = NS). In addition, GPI bolus-only reduced cost in US dollars ($323 vs $706, P < .001) and increased ambulatory PCI (13.1% vs 3.2%, P < .01), with reduced length of stay (1.1 vs 1.6 days, P < .01), when compared with GPI bolus + infusion., Conclusions: Glycoprotein inhibitor bolus-only reduces vascular/bleeding complications with similar MACE and reduced cost when compared with GPI bolus + infusion. In addition, GPI bolus-only improved ambulatory PCI and reduced length of stay. These results are consistent with a safer and cost-effective strategy for bolus-only when GPI therapy is considered during PCI.

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have poor long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) partly because of microvascular disease and distal embolization. Microvascular obstruction can be assessed by measuring coronary flow reserve (CFR). The Prediction of CK-MB RElease During Successful Stenting Correlating with Indicators of Microvascular ObstruCTion (PREDICT) trial compared the CFR in patients with versus without DM during PCI. Patients undergoing elective PCI were prospectively enrolled according to diabetic (n = 36) and nondiabetic (n = 36) status. All patients received drug-eluting stent with abciximab and were followed for 30-day major adverse cardiac events. CFR and FFR (fractional flow reserve) before and after stenting were measured before and after intracoronary adenosine bolus. Procedural success, MB enzyme of creatine-kinase (CK-MB), troponin I, and high-sensitive C-reactive protein elevation, vascular complications, and major adverse cardiac events were not different. FFR before stenting was 0.77 +/- 0.03 in patients with DM versus 0.76 +/- 0.02 in patients without DM (p = 0.69). FFR after stenting was 0.97 +/- 0.03 and 0.99 +/- 0.01 (p = 0.26), respectively. CFR before stenting was 1.36 +/- 0.31 in patients with DM versus 1.49 +/- 0.25 in patients without DM (p = 0.064). However, CFR after stenting was significantly lower in patients with versus without DM (1.89 +/- 0.30 versus 2.44 +/- 0.67, p <0.001, respectively). CFR after stenting only moderately correlated with CK-MB and high-sensitive C-reactive protein after PCI but did not correlate with 30-day major adverse cardiac events. In conclusion, patients with DM have significantly lower CFR after stenting despite equivalent FFR and myonecrosis compared with patients without DM, indicating greater microvascular obstruction after PCI despite abciximab.

We present the case of an 86-year-old female with stenosis of the anomalous left main trunk originating from a stenosed ostial right coronary artery. She underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention using simultaneous sirolimus-eluting kissing stents (SKS) for anomalous bifurcating lesions.

Objectives: The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of implanting a prophylactic left ventricular (LV) assist device prior to high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to assess the impact of suturemediated preclosure of the arteriotomy site on minimizing vascular complications., Background: Patients with multivessel disease, left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) or left main equivalent and/or moderate-to-severe LV dysfunction with elevated LV end-diastolic pressure are at increased risk of complications during PCI. The TandemHeart (TH) is a nonpulsatile percutaneous transseptal ventricular assist device (PTVA) that offers vital temporary hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI., Methods: Between April 2004 and November 2005, the TH was implanted in 20 patients undergoing high-risk PCI. Eight patients underwent unprotected LMCA stenting, and rotational atherectomy was used in 17 patients. Suture-mediated femoral artery preclosure was performed prior to inserting a large-bore arterial cannula., Results: The TH was successfully implanted in all 20 patients. Mean LV ejection fraction of the study patients was 38 +/- 18%. Time-to-implantation of the TH, duration of hemodynamic support and mean flow of the TH device were 31 +/- 9 minutes, 74 +/- 40 minutes and 2.5 +/- 1.3 L/minute, respectively. At the end of PCI, the TH was removed in all cases and Perclose sutures were deployed in 18/20 (90%) patients. There was only 1 minor vascular complication, and the average length of stay was 2 +/- 1 days. Periprocedural and inhospital mortality was 0%., Conclusions: Implantation of the TH PTVA is safe and feasible in patients undergoing high-risk PCI with excellent hemodynamic support. Application of suture-mediated devices prior to large arteriotomies can significantly reduce the incidence of vascular complications.

We hypothesized that direct thrombin inhibition could attenuate platelet activation and release of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L), a marker of inflammation, during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To assess platelet function under flow conditions with bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), we employed the cone and plate(let) analyzer (CPA) assay in drug-spiked blood samples from volunteers (n = 3) in vitro, and then in PCI patients who received bivalirudin alone (n = 20), UFH alone (n = 15), and clopidogrel pretreatment plus bivalirudin (n = 15). Scanning electron microscopy was employed to image bivalirudin or UFH-treated platelets to determine whether platelet function observations had a morphologic explanation. Enzyme immunoassay was used to measure sCD40L levels in PCI patients. In vitro, bivalirudin decreased platelet surface coverage; UFH increased platelet surface coverage. In PCI patients, bivalirudin alone decreased platelet surface coverage, UFH alone increased platelet surface coverage, and clopidogrel pretreatment plus bivalirudin additively reduced platelet surface coverage. Unlike UFH, bivalirudin did not activate platelets in SEM studies. Bivalirudin alone or coupled with clopidogrel significantly reduced plasma sCD40L in PCI patients. In conclusion, our findings suggest that under flow conditions, bivalirudin alone or coupled with clopidogrel may have an antiplatelet effect versus UFH alone during PCI. These data suggest that bivalirudin and UFH may confer an anti-inflammatory effect by reducing sCD40L during PCI.

Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions represents a challenging area in interventional cardiology, but recent advances in percutaneous coronary interventions have led to a dramatic increase in the number of patients successfully treated percutaneously. When compared with nonbifurcation interventions, bifurcation interventions have a lower rate of procedural success, higher procedural costs, longer hospitalization, and a higher rate of clinical and angiographic restenosis. The recent introduction of drug-eluting stents has resulted in a lower event rate and reduction of main vessel restenosis compared with historical controls. Side branch ostial residual stenosis and long-term restenosis remain a problem, however. Although stenting the main vessel with provisional side branch stenting seems to be the prevailing approach, in the era of drug-eluting stents, various two stent techniques have emerged to allow stenting of the large side branch also.

With increased operator experience and improved device technology, there has been a constant growth in the number of complex lesions (ie, thrombotic lesions, diffuse lesions,calcified lesions, nondilatable rigid lesions, ostial lesions, bifurcations, and chronic total occlusions) attempted by interventionalists with the use of drug-eluting stents. Although coronary stent implantation remains the mainstay and ultimate step for the treatment of most coronary lesions, adjunctive devices may be essential for lesion preparation in some cases (5%-10%) to allow stent deployment and expansion and prevent distal embolization. Thrombectomy and distal protection devices have shown to be effective in the interventions of saphenous vein graft lesions, although their use remains unproven in acute myocardial infarctions.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to assess whether anemia is a marker of increased risk during interventional procedure and poor midterm survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Background: Anemia is associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with heart failure and myocardial infarction (MI)., Methods: We examined the outcomes of 6,116 consecutive PCI patients based on the hemoglobin (Hb) value before the interventional procedure. Patients were divided into three groups based on the baseline Hb level (g/l): Hb <10 = severe anemia; Hb 10 to 12 = mild anemia; Hb >12 = no anemia., Results: The presence of anemia is associated with higher 30-day major adverse cardiac events, post-PCI peak troponin and creatine kinase-MB fraction, and a longer length of stay. After controlling for multiple covariates, significant difference in one-year survival was noted in the anemic groups compared with no anemia group (adjusted hazard ratio for Hb 10 to 12: 1.5 [95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.8]; for Hb <10: 1.8 [95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.3]; p = 0.004.) This adverse effect of anemia on survival was noted in all three presenting clinical syndromes (stable angina, unstable angina, and MI)., Conclusions: Anemia is an independent predictor of mortality after PCI and is associated with higher short-term adverse procedural events.

Background: Various autopsy and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies have shown neointimal proliferation as the main mechanism of in-stent restenosis (ISR) responsible for >95% of luminal narrowing while stent struts are not compressed. ISR of diffuse type has a high incidence of recurrence (up to 70%) after balloon angioplasty (PTCA). Tissue ablation with percutaneous rotational coronary atherectomy (PRCA) may be more efficacious compared to tissue compression or extrusion after PTCA for the interventional treatment of diffuse ISR., Methods: The Rotational Atherectomy Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Diffuse In-Stent Restenosis (ROSTER) trial is a single-center, randomized trial comparing PRCA to PTCA (both with IVUS guidance) in the treatment of diffuse ISR in 200 patients. In the PRCA group (n = 100), rotablation was performed using a burr-to-artery ratio >0.7 followed by adjunctive balloon dilatation at low pressure (4-6 atm). In the PTCA group (n = 100), high-pressure (>12 atm) balloon dilatation was performed using an optimal size balloon. The study's primary end point was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 9 months and secondary end points included clinical events at 1 year and angiographic restenosis in a substudy of the last 75 patients enrolled., Results: Baseline clinical and angiographic variables were comparable between the 2 groups with similar procedural and angiographic success, but a higher rate of repeat stenting occurred in the PTCA group (31% vs 10%; P <.001). Although the angiographic acute luminal gain was similar between the 2 groups, IVUS analysis revealed lower residual intimal hyperplasia area after PRCA versus PTCA (2.1 +/- 0.9 mm2 vs. 3.3 +/- 1.8 mm2; P =.005). At a mean follow-up of 12 +/- 2 months, there were 2 deaths, 3 myocardial infarctions, and 3 coronary artery bypass graft procedures in each group. TLR incidence was 32% in the PRCA group and 45% in the PTCA group (P =.042), with a similar trend noted in the angiographic substudy., Conclusion: The ROSTER trial for diffuse ISR revealed both PRCA and PTCA to be safe and effective, but PRCA resulted in less residual intimal hyperplasia, lower repeat stent use, and decreased TLR.

Background: The seven-component Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score has been used to risk stratify, and to guide the medical management of, patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We assessed the usefulness of the risk score in predicting in-hospital and 30-day outcomes in such patients who were undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention., Methods: Using the TIMI score, 2501 patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction were divided into low-risk (zero to two risk factors; n = 974), intermediate-risk (three to four risk factors; n = 1339), and high-risk (five to seven risk factors; n = 188) groups, and outcomes were compared., Results: Angiographic/clinical success and the rate of minor procedural events were similar among the three groups. A higher TIMI risk score was associated with more cardiac comorbid conditions and more complicated angiographic lesions: longer lesions (P = 0.0009), more thrombotic lesions (P = 0.03), more multivessel disease (P <0.0001), and more American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type B2/C lesions (P = 0.05). Although the risk score did not predict interventional technical success or intraprocedural complications, a high score was associated with prolonged hospital stay, higher postprocedural peak troponin levels, and 30-day major adverse cardiac events. Stepwise logistic regression showed that in conjunction with lesion length and patient sex, a high score was an independent predictor of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio = 2.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 4.1; C statistic = 0.62)., Conclusion: Although a higher TIMI risk score in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction who were undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention correlated with adverse clinical outcome, the score alone cannot be used to guide diagnostic or therapeutic strategies.

Background: The optimum treatment of obstructive coronary disease in small (<3.0 mm diameter) arteries remains unknown. Rotational atherectomy is an approved treatment that might reduce the vascular injury during percutaneous coronary intervention compared with angioplasty. We report on a multicenter, randomized, blinded end point trial comparing rotational atherectomy with balloon angioplasty in the prevention of restenosis of obstructed small coronary arteries., Methods: A total of 446 patients with myocardial ischemia associated with an angiographic stenosis in a native coronary artery 2 to 3 mm in diameter and < or =20 mm in length without severe calcification were randomly assigned to receive rotational atherectomy (n = 227) or balloon angioplasty (n = 219). The primary end point was target vessel failure at 12 months (defined as the composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and clinically driven repeat revascularization of the target vessel)., Results: The mean reference vessel diameter was 2.46 +/- 0.40 mm, the mean lesion length was 9.97 +/- 5.59 mm, and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 32%. Acute procedural success (91.6% for rotational atherectomy, 94.1% for balloon angioplasty, P =.36) and target vessel failure at 12 months were not significantly different (30.5% vs 31.2%, P =.98). At 8 months, there were no significant differences in minimum lumen diameter (1.28 +/- 0.63 mm vs 1.19 +/- 0.54 mm, P =.26), percent diameter stenosis (28% +/- 12% vs 29% +/- 15%, P =.59), binary restenosis rate (50.5% vs 50.5%, P = 1.0), or late loss index (0.57 vs 0.62, P =.7). No Q-wave myocardial infarctions occurred in either arm of the study, and non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions (defined as creatine kinase level >2 times normal with an elevated creatine kinase-myocardial band isoenzyme level) occurred in 2.2% and 1.4% of the patients in the rotational atherectomy and balloon angioplasty groups, respectively (P =.72)., Conclusion: Rotational atherectomy was found to be safe in the treatment of obstructed small arteries, but lower rates of target vessel failure were not achieved compared with balloon angioplasty. Because the acute gain and loss index ratios of the 2 treatments were similar, there was no evident beneficial antirestenosis mechanism seen for rotational atherectomy.

Objectives: This study was designed to compare the dose response of dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the activated clotting time (ACT), and to determine whether the ACT can be used to monitor intravenous (IV) dalteparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Background: The use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during PCI has been limited by the presumed inability to monitor its anticoagulant effect using bedside assays., Methods: This study was performed in three phases. In vitro, ACTs were measured on volunteer (n = 10) blood samples spiked with increasing concentrations of dalteparin or UFH. To extend these observations in vivo, ACTs were then measured in patients (n = 15) who were sequentially treated with IV dalteparin and then UFH. Finally, a larger monitoring study was undertaken involving patients (n = 110) who received dalteparin 60 or 80 international U (IU)/kg alone or followed by abciximab. We measured ACT (Hemochron), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), plasma anti-Xa and anti-IIa levels, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) concentration, and plasma dalteparin concentration., Results: Dalteparin induced a significant rise in the ACT with a smaller degree of variance as compared to UFH. Five min after administration of IV dalteparin 80 IU/kg the ACT increased from 125 s (122 s, 129 s) to 184 s (176 s, 191 s) (p < 0.001). The aPTT, anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities, and TFPI concentration also demonstrated significant increases following IV dalteparin., Conclusions: The ACT and aPTT are sensitive to IV dalteparin at clinically relevant doses. These data suggest that the ACT may be useful in monitoring the anticoagulant effect of intravenously administered dalteparin during PCI.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to analyze the incidence and predictors of postprocedure chest pain (PPCP) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its correlation with clinical restenosis., Background: Chest pain after PCI occurs frequently even in the absence of procedural events and is considered to be due to vasospasm or coronary artery stretch. The short- and long-term significance of PPCP after otherwise successful stenting is not clear., Methods: We analyzed 1,362 patients undergoing coronary stenting for PPCP, procedural and in-hospital events, 30-day major adverse cardiac events, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 6 to 9 months., Results: There were 488 patients with PPCP and, of these, 312 patients were excluded due to procedural events. The remaining 176 patients with PPCP were compared with 874 patients without PPCP. Creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme elevation occurred in 25.6% of the PPCP group versus 9.6% of the no PPCP group (p < 0.001). Despite similar reference vessel diameter, the PPCP group had larger postprocedure minimum lumen diameter, higher stent-to-vessel ratio, and higher inflation pressure versus the no PPCP group (p < 0.01). At 30 days, the emergency room visits and repeat catheterization (16% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001) were higher in the PPCP group versus the no PPCP group, but repeat intervention was similar. At 6- to 9-month follow-up, the TVR was significantly higher in the PPCP group compared with the no PPCP group (29.5% vs. 16.6%; p < 0.01)., Conclusions: Our analysis suggests micromyonecrosis and vessel stretch as causes of PPCP. Postprocedure chest pain is associated with similar short-term outcome as no PPCP, but has higher restenosis, perhaps mediated by deep vessel wall injury. Therefore, PPCP may identify patients at high risk for restenosis.