In 1993, we conducted an anuran-vocalization survey of 87 sites within two river systems (Mullica River and Wading River) of a major Coastal Plain watershed in the New Jersey Pinelands. The Mullica River system is more intensely developed and farmed than the Wading River system. Degraded waters, characterized by elevated pH, specific conductance, and nitrate-nitrogen values, are more frequently encountered in the Mullica River system. We found differences in the distribution of both individual anuran species and species-based site classes between the two river systems. Six native-Pinelands species, the Pine Barrens treefrog (Hyla andersonii), the carpenter frog (Rana virgatipes), the southern leopard frog (Rana utricularia), Fowler's toad (Bufo woodhousii fowleri), the spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer), and the green frog (Rana clamitans melanota), were widely distributed, although spring peepers occurred more frequently in the Mullica River system. Four species that are distributed outside the region, but do not usually occur in the Pinelands, were heard only in the Mullica River system. These non-native Pinelands species were bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana), pickerel frogs (Rana palustris), northern cricket frogs (Acris crepitans crepitans), and gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor). Bullfrogs occurred more frequently at sites with adjacent developed or upland-agricultural land, while carpenter frogs were more closely associated with unaltered sites. Pine Barrens treefrogs and carpenter frogs were generally absent and leopard frogs occurred infrequently at sites where bullfrogs occurred. al of Herpetology, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 210-221, 2000 i t 20 0 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles istribution of Anurans in Two River Systems of a Coastal Anthropogenic factors have contributed to declines in amphibian populations in many areas (Wake and Morowitz, 1991). Causal hypotheses for local or regional declines in amphibian Corresponding author. species include wetland habitat loss (Lannoo et al., 1994; Hecnar, 1997), landscape fragmentation (Laan and Verboom, 1990; Gulve, 1994), aquatic pollution (Berger, 1989; Baker and Waights, 1993, 1994; Hecnar, 1995; Materna et al., 1995; Berrill et al., 1997), the presence of non210 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.217 on Mon, 05 Sep 2016 05:00:20 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms COASTAL PLAIN ANURANS native amphibians or predatory fish (Hammerson, 1982; Hayes and Jennings, 1986; Sexton and Philips, 1986; Bradford, 1989; Hecnar, 1997), and disease related to environmental stress (Carey, 1993; Crawshaw, 1997). The association between anthropogenic stresses and amphibian declines suggests that amphibians may be good indicators of environmental conditions (Barinaga, 1990; Wake, 1991; Wake and Morowitz, 1991; Blaustein, 1994; Hecnar and M'Closkey, 1996a), although the general applicability of this assumption has been disputed (Pechmann and Wilbur, 1994). The amphibian fauna of the Pinelands (Pine Barrens), located in southern New Jersey, is distinct from other areas of the state (Gosner and Black, 1957; Conant, 1979). In New Jersey, Pine Barrens treefrogs (Hyla andersonii) and carpenter frogs (Rana virgatipes) are found only in Pinelands habitats. Other Pinelands species, such as southern leopard frogs (Rana utricularia), Fowler's toads (Bufo zwodhousii fowleri), spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer), and green frogs (Rana clamitans melanota), are also found throughout the southern portion of the state. Anuran species that are widely distributed outside the region, but do not usually occur in the Pinelands, include bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana), pickerel frogs (Rana palustris), northern cricket frogs (Acris crepitans crepitans), and gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor). These species may be found in Pinelands habitats that have been disturbed by humans (Gosner and Black, 1957; Conant, 1979). The general absence of these non-indigenous species in undisturbed areas of the Pinelands has been attributed to the high acidity of surface waters, among other factors (Gosner and Black, 1957; Freda and Dunson, 1986). The presence of bullfrogs in the Pinelands may be especially significant because predation or competition by this species has been implicated in the decline of native amphibian populations in other parts of the United States (Moyle, 1973; Bury and Luckenbach, 1976; Hammerson, 1982; Schwalbe and Rosen, 1988; Kupferberg, 1997). Assessing the status of amphibians in relation to anthropogenic factors requires a regional viewpoint (Hecnar and M'Closkey, 1996a). In this paper, we describe the results of an anuran survey conducted in 1993 within two river systems (Mullica River and Wading River) of a major Coastal Plain watershed located entirely within the Pinelands. We address four major questions. First, are there differences in the distribution and abundance of individual Pinelands and non-Pinelands anuran species between the two river systems? Second, is the distribution and abundance of individual anuran species related to land-use disturbance? Third, what is the association between the bullfrog and Pinelands anuran species? Fourth, are there differences in the species composition of sites between the two river systems? MATERIALS AND METHODS Study Area.-We conducted our survey in the 1473-km2 Mullica River basin (Fig. 1). This watershed comprises about one-third of the Pinelands, is centrally located in the region, and displays a range of land-use characteristics, including forest and highly developed and farmed areas. It lies entirely within the Pinelands on the Outer Coastal Plain and is associated with the Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer (Rhodehamel, 1979; Johnson and Watt, 1996). The Mullica River b sin includes two major river systems, the Mullica River and the Wading River (Fig. 1). These two river systems display distinctly different land-use patterns and associated waterq ality characteristics. The Mullica River system, located on the western side of the Mullica River basin, is more intensely developed and farmed than the Wading River system, located on the eastern side of the basin (Fig. 1). Most alt r d land in the Wading River system is farmed wetlands. Differences in land-use patterns are reflected in stream water quality (Fig. 1). Stream waters in the least disturbed Pinelands drainage basins are usually acid and low in dissolved solids compared to waters affected by development and upland agriculture (Morgan and Good, 1988; Zampella, 1994; Johnson and Watt, 1996). Degraded waters, characterized by el vated pH, specific conductance, and nitrate-nitrogen values, are more frequently encountered in the Mullica River system (Fig. 1). Non-indigenous plant and fish species also occur in degraded streams in this portion of the Mullica River basin (Hastings, 1984; Zampella and Laidig, 1997; Zampella and Bunnell, 1998). Study Sites.-We surveyed 39 sites in the Wading River system and 48 sites in the Mullica River system (Fig. 2). Survey sites included three forested and 26 non-forested stream sites, 27 stream impoundments, six abandoned bogs, 14 borrow pits (excavated ponds), and 11 ponds found in naturally occurring depressions (Table 1). All stream sites were located at road crossings. Forested stream sites were bordered by red maple (Acer rubrum) or Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides) swamps. Non-forested stream sites included small impoundments ( 0.5 ha), open water habitats. The abandoned-bog group included old cranberry bogs or impoundments that have succeeded to mixed shrub /emergent wetlands with open water. All abandoned bogs were historically connected to streams. The borrow pits 211 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.217 on Mon, 05 Sep 2016 05:00:20 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms R. A. ZAMPELLA AND J. F. BUNNELL Mullica River System Specific conductance (gS/cm)