Search

Genotropis mauroknema sp. nov. Figs. 5–6 Material examined. Holotype: female, Yunnan, Dali Yunlong Daorenshan, 3.VI.2009, Tan Jiangli, No202019709. Paratype: 1female, 2 males, Yunnan, Dali Yunlong Daorenshan, 3.VI.2009, Tan Jiangli, No 202019710, 202019711, 202019712. Description. Female holotype. Body length 8.0 mm, fore wing length 6.0 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 29 flagellomeres (apex missing); first flagellomere ca 1.3× length of second flagellomere. Face granulose (Fig. 6D). Clypeus granulose, convex, apical margin arched, slightly reflexed (Fig. 6D). Malar space weakly granulose, ca 0.5× basal width of mandible. Upper tooth of mandible longer than lower tooth, with a weak lamella. Frons granulose-punctate and without median carina. Vertex granulose (Fig. 6E). Interocellar distance 1.3× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocelli and eyes equal to diameter of ocellus (Fig. 6E). Temple mat, ca 0.5× as long as eyes in lateral view. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally and transversely striate ventrally. Mesoscutum granulose, granulosepunctate on notaulic area (Fig. 4F). Scutellum granulose. Metanotum granulose-punctate. Mesopleuron rugulose on its upper half, granulose-punctate on lower half, transversely striate below tegula, speculum weakly granulose (Fig. 6B). Metapleuron rugose, rugosity denser on juxtacoxal area (Fig. 6B). Propodeum (Fig. 6C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia long and narrow, granulose, lateromedian longitudinal carina weak on area superomedia, gradually strong apically; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris; area petiolaris rugose; area external granulose; area dentipara granulose-punctate; area lateralis granulose; costula developed; lateral longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 6A) areolet absent; portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu ca 0.7× as long as 2rs-m. Marginal cell long, vein RS ca 2.3× longer than vein 2r& RS. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M& RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (75°). Hind wing with CU&cu-a slightly reclivous, 2-CU not connected with CU&cu-a, not intercepted. Legs. Hind femur 6.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia ca 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws strongly pectinate. Metasoma. First segment (Fig. 6G) without glymma, ca 4.0× longer than width of postpetiole; petiole ca 2.3× longer than postpetiole. Second tergite ca 0.8× as long as first tergite, 2.1× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite about equal to its length. Third tergite ca 1.6× longer than its apical width. Ovipositor and ovipositor sheath as long as apical depth of metasoma, with a weak subapical notch on upper valve. Colour. Black. Scape and pedicel blackish brown, yellowish anteriorly; mandible brownish with medial portion yellowish brown; palpi yellow; tegula blackish brown; coxa black except hind coxa with a yellow mark dorsalapically; fore trochanter and trochantellus dorsally brownish, femur ventrally and telotarsus brownish, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown; mid trochanter, trochantellus and femur blackish brown, tibia infuscated basally and apically, yellowish brown medially, tarsus brown except basal tarsi 0.8 yellowish brown; hind leg black except tibia medially slightly blackish brown; first metasomal segment except extreme apically, basal 0.9 of second tergite and third tergite only basally black, remainder of metasoma reddish brown. Distribution. China (Yunnan). Comparison. This new species is similar to G. clara Townes, 1970, but differs from the latter by having the mesopleuron rugulose on its upper half and granulose-punctate on lower half, scape and pedicel blackish brown and yellowish anteriorly, mandible brownish with medial portion yellowish brown, tegula mainly blackish brown, fore and mid coxae black, and hind leg black except tibia medially slightly blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from mauros (Greek for black) and kneme (Greek for leg), because of the almost entirely black hind leg., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Four rare genera of the subfamily Campopleginae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 247-264 in Zootaxa 5219 (3) on pages 254-257, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5219.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/7417399, {"references":["Townes, H. K. (1970) The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 3. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 13 (1969), 1 - 307."]}

Genus Leptocampoplex Horstmann, 1970 Type species: Nemeritis cremastoides Holmgren, 1860; designation by Horstmann (1970). Diagnosis. Slender species; body largely granulose; clypeus convex from lateral view, apical margin of clypeus arched; temple narrow behind eyes; mandible with upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth, without lamella; propodeal area superomedia longer than wide; fore wing areolet absent; hind wing vein CU&cu-a not or intercepted far below; tarsal claw pectinate basally; first metasomal sternite distinctly behind the level of spiracle; glymma small but distinct; sixth and seventh tergite distinctly emarginated dorso-medially; ovipositor very thin, ca. equal to the length of metasoma., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Four rare genera of the subfamily Campopleginae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 247-264 in Zootaxa 5219 (3) on page 257, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5219.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/7417399, {"references":["Horstmann, K. (1970) Bemerkungen zur Systematik einiger Gattungen der Campopleginae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Nachrichtenblatt der Bayerischen Entomologen, 19, 77 - 84.","Holmgren, A. E. (1860) Forsok till uppstallning och beskrifning af de i Sverige funna Ophionider. (Monographia Ophionidum Sueciae). Kongliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, 2 (8), 1 - 158."]}

Dolophron granulosa sp. nov. Figs. 1–2 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Niubeiliang Guanghuojie, 26.VII.2014, Mao Juan, No 202019707 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 1) holotype. Body length 5.2 mm, fore wing length 3.6 mm. Head. Antenna with 29 flagellomeres; first flagellomere ca. 1.4× longer than wide. Face (Fig. 2E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 2E) granulose with small punctures, apical margin of clypeus widely arched, blunt. Malar space granulose, ca. 0.5× basal width of mandible. Upper tooth of mandible slightly larger than lower tooth, with a lamella. Frons (Fig. 2E) granulose and without median carina. Vertex (Fig. 2F) granulose. Interocellar region (Fig. 2F) granulose. Interocellar distance 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 2.2× distance between median and lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocelli and eyes ca. 1.0 × as long as diameter of ocellus. Temple mat, ca. 0.5× as long as eyes in lateral view. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina before mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose, transversely striate extreme-ventrally. Mesoscutum (Fig. 2G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 2B) granulose, very weakly transversely striate below tegula. Metapleuron (Fig. 2B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 2C) granulose; area basalis triangular; area superomedia separate from area petiolaris; costula absent; other carinae all strongly developed; propodeal spiracle nearly round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 2A) areolet present emitting vein 2m-cu from its apical half, with a moderate stalk. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a distad of M& RS by 0.3 of its length. External angles of second discal cell acute (75°). Hind wing with CU&cu-a inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2. Legs. Hind femur 4.2× longer than wide. First tarsal segment without ventral row of setae medially. Tarsal claws weakly pectinate basally. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 2H) with glymma located at basal 0.3. First tergite 2.3× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole granulose. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.8× its apical width; thyridium circular and close to base of second tergite. Third tergite 0.6× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without medial emargination. Ovipositor (Fig. 2D) straight, ca. 2.0× longer than apical depth of metasoma, with a nodus before apical notch. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth and tegula, yellow, scape and pedicel brown; fore and mid coxae apically, trochanters and trochantelli pale whitish, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown with tarsomeres darker; hind coxa black, femur yellowish brown, tibia medially pale yellow, tibia basally and apically infuscated, tarsomere blackish brown; metasoma wholly black. Comparison. This species is similar to D. pedella (Holmgren, 1860), but differs from the latter by having a nodus before apical notch of ovipositor, propodeal costula absent and hind tibia infuscated basally and apically. Etymology. Name derived from “granosus” (Latin for “granular”), because of its largely granulose body sculpture.

Philositus parva sp. nov. Figs. 9–10 Material examined. Holotype: female, Yunnan, Maguanxian Maanshan, 16.VII.2017, Malaise trap, No 202019708 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 9) holotype. Body length 3.1 mm, fore wing length 2.6 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 15 flagellomeres (apical part missing); first flagellomere ca. 3.2× longer than its wide. Face (Fig. 10F) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 10F) granulose, apical margin of clypeus slightly arched. Malar space granulose, ca. 0.8× basal width of mandible. Upper tooth of mandible slightly longer than lower tooth, without lamella. Frons (Fig. 10F) granulose and without median carina. Vertex (Fig. 10G) granulose. Interocellar region (Fig. 10G) granulose. Interocellar distance 1.0× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocelli and eyes ca. 1.4 × longer than diameter of ocellus. Temple mat, ca. 0.6× as long as eyes in lateral view. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose laterally, transversely striate ventrally.Mesoscutum (Fig. 10H) granulose, notauli weakly present. scutellum and metanotum granulose with very small punctures. Mesopleuron (Fig. 10B) granulose, weakly transversely striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 10B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 10C) with area basalis long trapezoid; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris; area superomedia, area external and area dentipara granulose; area petiolaris granulose rugose; all carinae weakly developed. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 10A) areolet absent, portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu ca. 0.5× as long as 2rsm. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 3.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite of M& RS. External angles of second discal cell vertical. Hind wing with CU&cu-a vertical, not intercepted. Legs. Hind femur ca. 5.0× longer than wide. First tarsal segment with ventral row of setae medially. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 10I) without glymma. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole granulose. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.8× its apical width; thyridium circular, indistinct, away from base of second tergite by 0.5× its diameter. Third tergite 0.7× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without medial emargination. Ovipositor (Fig. 10D) straight, ca. 3.0× longer than apical depth of metasoma, with a subapical notch; ovipositor sheath slightly expanded apically. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellowish brown; palpi and tegula pale whitish; scape and pedicel yellowish brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown except trochanters and trochantelli pale whitish; hind coxa blackish brown, trochanter and trochantellus whitish yellow, femur and tibia medially yellowish brown, tibia basally pale whitish, tibia subbasally and apically and tarsomere blackish brown; metasoma wholly black. Comparison. This species differs distinctly from the only other known species of this genus P. enchophorus as shown in the key above. Etymology. Name derived from “parvus” (Latin for “little”), because of its small body., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Four rare genera of the subfamily Campopleginae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 247-264 in Zootaxa 5219 (3) on pages 260-263, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5219.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/7417399

Dolophron granulosa sp. nov. Figs. 1–2 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Niubeiliang Guanghuojie, 26.VII.2014, Mao Juan, No 202019707 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 1) holotype. Body length 5.2 mm, fore wing length 3.6 mm. Head. Antenna with 29 flagellomeres; first flagellomere ca. 1.4× longer than wide. Face (Fig. 2E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 2E) granulose with small punctures, apical margin of clypeus widely arched, blunt. Malar space granulose, ca. 0.5× basal width of mandible. Upper tooth of mandible slightly larger than lower tooth, with a lamella. Frons (Fig. 2E) granulose and without median carina. Vertex (Fig. 2F) granulose. Interocellar region (Fig. 2F) granulose. Interocellar distance 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 2.2× distance between median and lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocelli and eyes ca. 1.0 × as long as diameter of ocellus. Temple mat, ca. 0.5× as long as eyes in lateral view. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina before mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose, transversely striate extreme-ventrally. Mesoscutum (Fig. 2G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 2B) granulose, very weakly transversely striate below tegula. Metapleuron (Fig. 2B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 2C) granulose; area basalis triangular; area superomedia separate from area petiolaris; costula absent; other carinae all strongly developed; propodeal spiracle nearly round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 2A) areolet present emitting vein 2m-cu from its apical half, with a moderate stalk. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a distad of M& RS by 0.3 of its length. External angles of second discal cell acute (75°). Hind wing with CU&cu-a inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2. Legs. Hind femur 4.2× longer than wide. First tarsal segment without ventral row of setae medially. Tarsal claws weakly pectinate basally. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 2H) with glymma located at basal 0.3. First tergite 2.3× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole granulose. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.8× its apical width; thyridium circular and close to base of second tergite. Third tergite 0.6× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without medial emargination. Ovipositor (Fig. 2D) straight, ca. 2.0× longer than apical depth of metasoma, with a nodus before apical notch. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth and tegula, yellow, scape and pedicel brown; fore and mid coxae apically, trochanters and trochantelli pale whitish, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown with tarsomeres darker; hind coxa black, femur yellowish brown, tibia medially pale yellow, tibia basally and apically infuscated, tarsomere blackish brown; metasoma wholly black. Comparison. This species is similar to D. pedella (Holmgren, 1860), but differs from the latter by having a nodus before apical notch of ovipositor, propodeal costula absent and hind tibia infuscated basally and apically. Etymology. Name derived from “granosus” (Latin for “granular”), because of its largely granulose body sculpture., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Four rare genera of the subfamily Campopleginae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 247-264 in Zootaxa 5219 (3) on pages 249-251, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5219.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/7417399, {"references":["Holmgren, A. E. (1860) Forsok till uppstallning och beskrifning af de i Sverige funna Ophionider. (Monographia Ophionidum Sueciae). Kongliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, 2 (8), 1 - 158."]}

Leptocampoplex cremastoides (Holmgren, 1860) Figs. 7–8 Nemeritis cremastoides Holmgren, 1860: 105; Brischke, 1880: 177; Kasparyan, 1981: 403. Porizon moderator Townes, 1970: 167. Phaedroctonus cremastoides Schmiedeknecht, 1909: 1640. Material examined. 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Tongmucun, 26.IV.2012, Lujing Yang, No202019706; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Longtangshan, 29.V.2012, Pu Tang, No201205536. Redescription. Based on the female specimen from Fujian province (No202019706). Body length 6.5 mm, fore wing length 4.2 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 20 flagellomeres (apical part missing); first flagellomere ca. 4.3× longer than wide. Face (Fig. 8E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 8E) convex, granulose, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose, ca. 0.5× basal width of mandible. Upper tooth of mandible slightly longer than lower tooth, without lamella. Frons (Fig. 8E) granulose and without median carina. Vertex (Fig. 8F) granulose. Interocellar region (Fig. 8F) granulose. Interocellar distance 1.1× ocello-ocular distance and 1.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocelli and eyes ca. 1.1 × as long as diameter of ocellus. Temple mat, ca. 0.35× as long as eyes in lateral view. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally and transversely striate laterally. Mesoscutum (Fig. 8G) granulose, notauli weakly present anteriorly. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 8B) granulose, weakly transversely striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 8B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 8C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris; all carina weakly developed; propodeal spiracle oval, connected to pleural carina by a distinct carina. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 8A) areolet absent, portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu ca. 0.35× as long as 2rsm. Marginal cell short, vein RS ca. 2.5× longer than vein 2r& RS. Vein 1cu-a opposite of M& RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with CU&cu-a inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15. Legs. Hind femur 5.4× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia ca. 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws weakly pectinate basally. Metasoma. First segment (Fig. 8H) with glymma, ca. 3.0× longer than width of postpetiole; petiole ca. 1.25× longer than postpetiole. Second tergite ca. 1.15× longer than first tergite, 2.2× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite ca. 5.5× its length. Third tergite 1.6× its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with a deep emargination dorso-medially. Ovipositor (Fig. 8D) very long and thin, slightly longer than length of metasoma, with a subapical notch on upper valve. Colour. Black. Scape and pedicel blackish brown, mandible except teeth and tegula yellow; fore and mid coxae apically, trochanters and trochantelli pale whitish, coxa basally yellowish brown, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown with apical tarsomere darker; hind coxa, trochanter and femur extreme basally, blackish, trochantellus, femur and tibia medially yellowish brown, tibia basally and apically infuscated, tarsomere blackish brown; metasoma wholly black. Variation: Antennal with 32 flagellomeres; portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu 0.25–0.35× as long as 2rs-m; hind wing with CU&cu-a intercepted at lower 0.15–0.25. Distribution. China (Fujian, Zhejiang); Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Four rare genera of the subfamily Campopleginae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 247-264 in Zootaxa 5219 (3) on pages 257-259, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5219.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/7417399, {"references":["Holmgren, A. E. (1860) Forsok till uppstallning och beskrifning af de i Sverige funna Ophionider. (Monographia Ophionidum Sueciae). Kongliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, 2 (8), 1 - 158.","Brischke, C. G. A. (1880) Die Ichneumoniden der Provinzen West- und Ost-Preussen. Schriften der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Danzig, 4 (4), 108 - 210.","Kasparyan, D. R. (1981) A guide to the insects of the European part of the USSR. Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae. 11 Ctenopelmatinae. 12 Phrudinae. 13 Tersilochinae. 14 Cremastinae. 15 Campopleginae. 16 Ophioninae. (in Russian). Opredeliteli Faune SSSR, 3 (3), 316 - 431.","Townes, H. K. (1970) The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 3. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 13 (1969), 1 - 307.","Schmiedeknecht, O. (1909) Opuscula Ichneumonologica. IV. Band. (Fasc. XXI-XXIII.) Ophioninae. Blankenburg in Thuringen, 1909, 1601 - 1840."]}

Genotropis mauroknema sp. nov. Figs. 5–6 Material examined. Holotype: female, Yunnan, Dali Yunlong Daorenshan, 3.VI.2009, Tan Jiangli, No202019709. Paratype: 1female, 2 males, Yunnan, Dali Yunlong Daorenshan, 3.VI.2009, Tan Jiangli, No 202019710, 202019711, 202019712. Description. Female holotype. Body length 8.0 mm, fore wing length 6.0 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 29 flagellomeres (apex missing); first flagellomere ca 1.3× length of second flagellomere. Face granulose (Fig. 6D). Clypeus granulose, convex, apical margin arched, slightly reflexed (Fig. 6D). Malar space weakly granulose, ca 0.5× basal width of mandible. Upper tooth of mandible longer than lower tooth, with a weak lamella. Frons granulose-punctate and without median carina. Vertex granulose (Fig. 6E). Interocellar distance 1.3× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocelli and eyes equal to diameter of ocellus (Fig. 6E). Temple mat, ca 0.5× as long as eyes in lateral view. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally and transversely striate ventrally. Mesoscutum granulose, granulosepunctate on notaulic area (Fig. 4F). Scutellum granulose. Metanotum granulose-punctate. Mesopleuron rugulose on its upper half, granulose-punctate on lower half, transversely striate below tegula, speculum weakly granulose (Fig. 6B). Metapleuron rugose, rugosity denser on juxtacoxal area (Fig. 6B). Propodeum (Fig. 6C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia long and narrow, granulose, lateromedian longitudinal carina weak on area superomedia, gradually strong apically; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris; area petiolaris rugose; area external granulose; area dentipara granulose-punctate; area lateralis granulose; costula developed; lateral longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 6A) areolet absent; portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu ca 0.7× as long as 2rs-m. Marginal cell long, vein RS ca 2.3× longer than vein 2r& RS. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M& RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (75°). Hind wing with CU&cu-a slightly reclivous, 2-CU not connected with CU&cu-a, not intercepted. Legs. Hind femur 6.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia ca 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws strongly pectinate. Metasoma. First segment (Fig. 6G) without glymma, ca 4.0× longer than width of postpetiole; petiole ca 2.3× longer than postpetiole. Second tergite ca 0.8× as long as first tergite, 2.1× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite about equal to its length. Third tergite ca 1.6× longer than its apical width. Ovipositor and ovipositor sheath as long as apical depth of metasoma, with a weak subapical notch on upper valve. Colour. Black. Scape and pedicel blackish brown, yellowish anteriorly; mandible brownish with medial portion yellowish brown; palpi yellow; tegula blackish brown; coxa black except hind coxa with a yellow mark dorsalapically; fore trochanter and trochantellus dorsally brownish, femur ventrally and telotarsus brownish, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown; mid trochanter, trochantellus and femur blackish brown, tibia infuscated basally and apically, yellowish brown medially, tarsus brown except basal tarsi 0.8 yellowish brown; hind leg black except tibia medially slightly blackish brown; first metasomal segment except extreme apically, basal 0.9 of second tergite and third tergite only basally black, remainder of metasoma reddish brown. Distribution. China (Yunnan). Comparison. This new species is similar to G. clara Townes, 1970, but differs from the latter by having the mesopleuron rugulose on its upper half and granulose-punctate on lower half, scape and pedicel blackish brown and yellowish anteriorly, mandible brownish with medial portion yellowish brown, tegula mainly blackish brown, fore and mid coxae black, and hind leg black except tibia medially slightly blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from mauros (Greek for black) and kneme (Greek for leg), because of the almost entirely black hind leg.

Genotropis clara Townes, 1970 Figs. 3–4 Genotropis clara Townes, 1970: 184. Material examined. 1 female, Fujian, Fuzhou Jinshan, 28.X.1990, Liu Changming, No 20009468; 1 male, Guizhou, Guiyang, 22. V.1981, He Junhua, No 814180; 1 male, Guizhou, Guiyang, 18.X.1988, He Junhua, No 834674; 1 male, Liaoning, Dalian, 5.IX.1992, Lou Juxian, No 976146; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi Cibagou Natural Reserve, 12.VIII.2019, 28°33′19″N, 97°5′18″E, 1700m, Li Zekai, No 202019718; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi Cibagou Natural Reserve, 12.VIII.2019, 28°33′19″N, 97°5′18″E, 1680m, Wang Chunhong, No 202019721; 1 female, Yunnan, Maguan, 28. VI.2019, Malaise trap, No 201219713; 4 female, 27 male, Yunnan, Maguan, VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 201806564, 201806584, 201806825, 201806985, 201806731, 201806933, 201806937, 201806997, 201806782, 201806792, 201806743, 201806773, 201806867, 201806996, 201806594, 201806573, 201806546, 201806567, 201806566, 201807120, 201806898, 201806664, 201806640, 201806644, 201806646, 201806653, 201807249, 201806223, 201806602, 201806902, 201806582; 1 female, 1 male, Yunnan, Menghai, 7. VI.1982, Luo Hengwen, No 824441 (2); 1 female, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, 28.VII.2011, Wang Manman, No 201507248; 3 female, 1 male, Yunnan, Maguan, 23.IX.2019, Malaise trap, No 202019714, 202019715, 202019717, 202019720; 1 female, Yunan, Xishuangbanna Menglaxian, 10.VII.2012, 21°36′38.4″N, 101°34′3″E, 823m, Zhao & Chen, No 202019719; 1 male, Yunnan, Tengchong, 19.IV.1981, He Junhua, No 814406; 5 female, 1male, Zhejiang, Songyang, 28.VII.1992, Chen Hanlin, No 924586, 924478, 924655, 924435, 924378, 955010; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang Baimashan, 12. V.1994, No 941531. Redescription. Based on the female specimen from Yunnan province (No202019715). Body length 9.3 mm, fore wing length 6.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 42 flagellomeres; first flagellomere ca 1.4× length of second flagellomere. Face granulosepunctate (Fig. 4D). Clypeus granulose, convex, apical margin arched, reflexed (Fig. 4D). Malar space weakly granulose, ca 0.9× basal width of mandible. Upper tooth of mandible longer than lower tooth, with a weak lamella. Frons granulose-punctate and without median carina. Vertex granulose (Fig. 4E). Interocellar distance 1.3× ocelloocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocelli and eyes equal to diameter of ocellus (Fig. 4E). Temple mat, ca 0.5× as long as eyes in lateral view. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally and transversely striate ventrally. Mesoscutum granulose-punctate, rugose on notaulic area (Fig. 4F). Scutellum and metanotum rugulose-punctate. Mesopleuron rugose-reticulate, speculum granulose(Fig.4B).Metapleuron rugose-reticulate,rugosity denser on juxtacoxal area(Fig.4B).Propodeum (Fig. 4C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia long and narrow, rugose, lateromedian longitudinal carina strongly developed; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris; area petiolaris rugose-reticulate; area external granulose-punctate; area dentipara rugose-punctate; area lateralis rugulose; costula developed; lateral longitudinal carina developed; propodeal spiracle oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 4A) areolet absent; portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu ca 0.7× as long as 2rs-m. Marginal cell long, vein RS ca 2.0× longer than vein 2r& RS. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M& RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (75°). Hind wing with CU&cu-a slightly reclivous, 2-CU not connected with CU&cu-a, not intercepted. Legs. Hind femur 5.5× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia ca 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws strongly pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 4G) without glymma, ca 3.25× longer than width of postpetiole; petiole ca 2.5× longer than postpetiole. Second tergite ca 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.25× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite about equal to its length. Third tergite ca 1.1× longer than its apical width. Ovipositor and ovipositor sheath as long as apical depth of metasoma, with a weak subapical notch on upper valve. Colour. Black. Scape and pedicel yellowish brown, blackish brown laterally; mandible yellowish brown; palpi yellow; tegula yellowish brown; fore and mid coxae apical 0.5, trochanter and trochantellus yellow, basal 0.5 of coxa black, remainder of fore and mid legs reddish brown; hind coxa black with a yellow mark dorso-apically, femur reddish brown but basally darkened, tibia medially reddish brown, subbasally and apically darkened, extreme basally with a yellow mark, tarsus blackish brown; first metasomal segment black with apical-laterally yellow, second metasomal tergite basal 0.9 black with apical 0.1 yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma yellowish brown. Variation. Body length 7.5–9.6 mm; fore wing length 5.3–6.2 mm; malar space 0.6–0.9× basal width of mandible; frons granulose to granulose punctate; propodeal area external granulose to granulose-punctate; hind wing with CU&cu-a slightly reclivous to vertical; hind trochanter yellow to blackish brown; hind femur yellowish brown to blackish brown; metasoma from third tergite on reddish brown to blackish brown. Male. Essentially similar to female. Distribution. China (Fujian, Guizhou, Liaoning, Xizang, Yunnan, Zhejiang); Philippines., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Four rare genera of the subfamily Campopleginae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 247-264 in Zootaxa 5219 (3) on pages 251-254, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5219.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/7417399, {"references":["Townes, H. K. (1970) The genera of Ichneumonidae, Part 3. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 13 (1969), 1 - 307."]}

Charops mauroknemus sp. nov. Figs. 3–4 Materia examined. Holotype: female, Liaoning, Shenyang, 10.VII.1994, Lou Juxian, No947297. Paratypes: 2 males, Liaoning, Shenyang, VI–VII. 1995, Lou Juxian, No 960909, No 960913. Description. Female holotype. Body length 9.7 mm, fore wing length 5.3 mm. Head. Antenna with 38 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.5× longer than second flagellomere. Face strongly rugose. Clypeus rugose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons rugose, with a median carina. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance twice ocello-ocular distance and 1.6× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched. Mesosoma. Pronotum rugose-punctate above, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum rugose-punctate, rugosities weak medially. Scutellum rugose-punctate. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron granulose-punctate, transversely striate below tegula, striations long and covered region of speculum. Metapleuron strongly rugose, juxtacoxal carina strong, juxta-coxal area finely rugose. Propodeum with anterior transverse carina very close to base, and area basalis nearly absent; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, rugose with area petiolaris apically tending to be transversely striate; area dentipara rugose-punctate; area lateralis finely trans-rugose; all carinae strong; propodeal spiracle oval. Wing. Fore wing without areolet. Marginal cell short, RS vein 1.6× longer than 2r&RS vein. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell slightly acute(80°). Hind wing with 1-cu reclivous, ca 3.0× longer than cu-a. Legs. Hind femur 5.2× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.7× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. Slender. Basal 0.3 of first metasomal segment round in cross-section. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite; thyridium elongate oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite ca 3.5× its length; metasoma from third to seventh tergites strongly compressed. Ovipositor 1.1× longer than hind femur, straight. Colour. Black. Scape and pedicel, mandible, tegulae black; palpi brown. Fore leg with coxa, trochanter, trochantellus, inner side of basal 0.3 of femur and apical tarsus, blackish brown, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown. Mid leg with coxa, trochanter, trochantellus, basal 0.7 of femur and tarsus, blackish brown, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown. Hind leg entirely black. First metasomal segment with sternum blackish brown, tergite yellowish brown; dorsal surface of second segment black and its lateral surface yellowish brown; third tergite yellowish brown with a black mark antero-dorsally; fourth segment yellowish brown; remainder of metasoma blackish brown. Male. Malar space sculpture coarser, tending to be rugose-punctate, about equal to the length of basal width of mandible. Thyridium larger, its distance from basal margin of tergite ca 3.0× its length. Otherwise same as the female. Male genitalia. Parameres broad, not rod-like. Distribution. China (Liaoning). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1971) to C. ganges Cushman, 1927, but the new species differs from latter by having interocellar distance twice ocello-ocular distance (4.0–4.7× in C. ganges), malar space granulose and 0.6× basal width of mandible (malar space rugose and 0.37–0.46× basal width of mandible in C. ganges), mesopleuron granulose-punctate (rugoso-reticulate in C. ganges), juxta-coxal area finely rugose (with a few striations in C. ganges), mandible black (mandible yellow except teeth in C. ganges), palpi brown (black in C. ganges) and hind leg entirely black (hind leg not entirely black in C. ganges). Etymology. Name derived from mauros (Greek for black) and kneme (Greek for leg), because of the entirely black hind leg., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on pages 533-535, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1971) Indian species of Charops Holmgren (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects, 4, 453 - 480. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00305316.1970.10433983"]}

Scenocharops montanus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1971 Scenocharops montanus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1971: 309. Material examined. 1 female, Hunan, Changde, 8.XII.1977, Tong Xinwang, No 846550; 1 female, Yunnan, Ruili, 3. V.1981, He Junhua, No 812350; 1 female, Yunnan, Sanchahe, 12.IV.1981, He Junhua, No 811646; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Fenghuangshan, 15. VI.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20055950; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Yuquanshan, 20.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20057131; 1 female, Zhejiang, Quzhou, 25.IX.1984, Chen Xuexin, No 845821. Distribution. China (Hunan, Yunnan, Zhejiang); India. Note. This species is recorded from China for the first time.

Scenocharops yunnanensis sp. nov. Figs. 5–6 Materia examined. Holotype: female, Yunnan, Menghai, 18.VII.1983, Luo Hengwen, No840477. Paratype: 1 male, Yunnan, Menghai, 22.VII.1983, Luo Hengwen, No 835410. Description. Female holotype. Body length 12.4 mm, fore wing length 7.1 mm. Head. Antenna with 43 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face strongly rugose. Clypeus strongly rugose, slightly convex, apical margin curved. Malar space granulose, 0.4× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons rugose, without a median carina. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance 2.0× ocello-ocular distance and 2.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, 0.3× as long as eyes in dorsal view. Occipital carina evenly arched. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-rugulose dorsally, transversely striate laterally. Mesoscutum punctate on median lobe, rugose-punctate on notaulic area. Scutellum rugose-reticulate. Metanotum rugose. Mesopleuron rugose-reticulate dorsally, slightly striate below tegula, punctate ventrally. Metapleuron rugulose dorsally, rugose ventrally, juxtacoxal carina strong. Propodeum strongly rugose-reticulate, propodeal spiracle oval. Wing. Fore wing without areolet. Marginal cell short, RS vein 1.3× longer than 2r&RS vein. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (80°). Hind wing with 1-cu vertical, ca 2.5× longer than cu-a. Legs. Hind femur 6.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.7× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, with 5 teeth, apically strongly upcurved. Metasoma. Slender. Basal 0.3 of first metasomal segment round in cross-section. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite ca 1.2× its length; metasoma strongly compressed. Ovipositor 1.1× longer than hind femur, straight, curved downward apically. Colour. Mandible, palpi and tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore leg yellow except femur ventrally yellowish brown; mid leg yellow except trochanter, trochantellus, and femur ventrally blackish brown; hind coxa, trochanter, trochantellus and femur blackish brown, hind tibia except apically yellowish brown, infuscated apically, tarsus brown; metasoma entirely yellowish brown except second tergite dorsally black. Male. Essentially same to female. Male genitalia. Parameres narrow, rod-like. Host. Cania bilineata (Walker, 1855). Distribution. China (Yunnan). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by He et al. (1996) to S. exareoletus, He, 1980, but the new species differs from latter by having mesopleuron punctate ventrally (rugose-reticulate in S. exareoletus), hind tarsal claw strongly curved apically (weakly curved in S. exareoletus), scape and pedicel blackish brown (yellowish brown in S. exareoletus), and hind femur blackish brown (yellowish brown in S. exareoletus). Etymology. Name derived from the name of type locality of species.

Genus Picacharops Gauld, 1984 Type species: Picacharops brevithorax Gauld, 1984 (by monotypy and original designation). Diagnosis. Small species; body short and stout; clypeus weakly convex; mandible with a strong lamella and upper tooth as long as lower tooth or slightly longer; eye weakly indented opposite antennal socket; occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina at base of mandible; propodeum abruptly declivous; propodeal area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly concave; hind tarsal segments without row of ventral setae medially; fore wing with 1cu-a vein strongly oblique, making an angle of 55° with AA vein; areolet present, small rhombic shape, with a moderate stalk; hind wing with distal abscissa of CU vestigial, CU&cu-a not intercepted; first metasomal segment with glymma absent; metasoma rather short, tergite 3 with laterotergite separated by a crease; ovipositor very short and its sheath widened, straight, with a distinct dorsal subapical notch, not projecting beyond apex of metasoma (Fig. 1). Remarks. Prior to this study, the genus Picacharops was only known from the Australasian realm. There are few reports since the original description of this genus (Gupta 1984; Yu & Horstmann 1997)., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, The rare genera Picacharops Gauld and Sliochia Gauld (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) found in China, with description of two new species, pp. 577-584 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 578, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.8, http://zenodo.org/record/6531152, {"references":["Gauld, I. D. (1984) An introduction to the Ichneumonidae of Australia. British Museum publication, 895, 1 - 413.","Yu, D. S. & Horstmann, K. (1997) A catalogue of world Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera). Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 58, 1 - 1588."]}

Charops taiwanus Uchida, 1932 Charops taiwanus Uchida, 1932: 199. Charops (Charops) taiwanus: Uchida, 1941: 160. Charops taiwana: He, 1996: 323–324. Material examined. 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 1934; 1 male, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 13.X.1957, Hu Cui, No 5784.8; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 2. VI.1985, He Junhua, No 850395; 1 male, Guangxi, Nanning, 18. V.1981, Huang Ruiqing, No 860994. Distribution. China (Guangdong, Jiangxi, Taiwan, Zhejiang)., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 536, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["He, J. H., Chen, X. X. & Ma, Y. (1996) Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae. Economic Insect Fauna of China. Science Press, Beijing, 697 pp. [in Chinese]"]}

Scenocharops montanus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1971 Scenocharops montanus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1971: 309. Material examined. 1 female, Hunan, Changde, 8.XII.1977, Tong Xinwang, No 846550; 1 female, Yunnan, Ruili, 3. V.1981, He Junhua, No 812350; 1 female, Yunnan, Sanchahe, 12.IV.1981, He Junhua, No 811646; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Fenghuangshan, 15. VI.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20055950; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Yuquanshan, 20.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20057131; 1 female, Zhejiang, Quzhou, 25.IX.1984, Chen Xuexin, No 845821. Distribution. China (Hunan, Yunnan, Zhejiang); India. Note. This species is recorded from China for the first time., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 537, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1971) Indian species of Charops Holmgren (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects, 4, 453 - 480. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00305316.1970.10433983"]}

Picacharops granulosus sp. nov. Figs 1–2 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Zuoshui Niubeiliang Natural Reserve, 16.VII.2013, Tan Jiangli, No 202019696 (ZJUH). Description. Holotype female (Fig. 1). Body length 4.7 mm, fore wing length 3.7 mm. Head. Antenna with 26 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 2E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 2E) granulose, weakly convex in lateral view, apical margin slightly arched, sharp. Malar space granulose, its length 0.3× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a strong lamella, upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Inner margin of eye slightly indented opposite antennal socket. Eyes convergent downward. Interocellar distance (Fig. 2F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 2.2× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, transversely striate ventrally. Mesoscutum (Fig. 2G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 2B) granulose, weakly transversely striate below tegula. Metapleuron (Fig. 2B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 2C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly concave, granulose; area externa and area dentipara granulose; lateral longitudinal carina absent; lateromedian longitudinal carina and anterior transverse carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle nearly round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 2A) areolet present emitting vein 2m-cu from its apical half, with a moderate stalk. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.4× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS, 1cu-a strongly oblique, angle with vein AA 55°. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with CU&cu-a inclivous, not intercepted. Legs. Hind femur 4.3× longer than wide. First tarsal segment without ventral row of setae medially. Tarsal claws short, weakly pectinate basally. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 2D) without glymma. First tergite 2.6× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole granulose. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, slightly shorter than its apical width; thyridium circular, its distance from basal margin of tergite 0.8× its diameter. Metasoma from second tergite largely granulose and mat. Third tergite 0.6× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without medial emargination. Ovipositor (Fig. 2H) short and straight, with a distinct dorsal subapical notch, not projecting beyond apex of metasoma. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, scape and pedicel, palpi, tegula, fore and mid legs, hind trochanter, trochantellus, medially of tibia, yellowish brown; hind coxa and femur, blackish-brown; hind tibia basally and apically, infuscated; metasoma blackish brown with apical 0.3 of second segment yellowish brown. Distribution. China (Guizhou). Notes. The distribution of the two known species of Picacharops is widely disjunct, China and Australia, so until further specimens are able to be examined, we have placed this new species in this Picacharop because the new species matches the generic characters well. This new species, however, differs distinctly from the only other known species of this genus, P. brevithorax, as shown in the key above. Etymology. Name derived from “granosus” (Latin for “granular”), because its body sculpture is largely granulose., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, The rare genera Picacharops Gauld and Sliochia Gauld (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) found in China, with description of two new species, pp. 577-584 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on pages 578-581, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.8, http://zenodo.org/record/6531152

Scenocharops yunnanensis sp. nov. Figs. 5–6 Materia examined. Holotype: female, Yunnan, Menghai, 18.VII.1983, Luo Hengwen, No840477. Paratype: 1 male, Yunnan, Menghai, 22.VII.1983, Luo Hengwen, No 835410. Description. Female holotype. Body length 12.4 mm, fore wing length 7.1 mm. Head. Antenna with 43 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face strongly rugose. Clypeus strongly rugose, slightly convex, apical margin curved. Malar space granulose, 0.4× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons rugose, without a median carina. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance 2.0× ocello-ocular distance and 2.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, 0.3× as long as eyes in dorsal view. Occipital carina evenly arched. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-rugulose dorsally, transversely striate laterally. Mesoscutum punctate on median lobe, rugose-punctate on notaulic area. Scutellum rugose-reticulate. Metanotum rugose. Mesopleuron rugose-reticulate dorsally, slightly striate below tegula, punctate ventrally. Metapleuron rugulose dorsally, rugose ventrally, juxtacoxal carina strong. Propodeum strongly rugose-reticulate, propodeal spiracle oval. Wing. Fore wing without areolet. Marginal cell short, RS vein 1.3× longer than 2r&RS vein. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (80°). Hind wing with 1-cu vertical, ca 2.5× longer than cu-a. Legs. Hind femur 6.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.7× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, with 5 teeth, apically strongly upcurved. Metasoma. Slender. Basal 0.3 of first metasomal segment round in cross-section. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite ca 1.2× its length; metasoma strongly compressed. Ovipositor 1.1× longer than hind femur, straight, curved downward apically. Colour. Mandible, palpi and tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore leg yellow except femur ventrally yellowish brown; mid leg yellow except trochanter, trochantellus, and femur ventrally blackish brown; hind coxa, trochanter, trochantellus and femur blackish brown, hind tibia except apically yellowish brown, infuscated apically, tarsus brown; metasoma entirely yellowish brown except second tergite dorsally black. Male. Essentially same to female. Male genitalia. Parameres narrow, rod-like. Host. Cania bilineata (Walker, 1855). Distribution. China (Yunnan). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by He et al. (1996) to S. exareoletus, He, 1980, but the new species differs from latter by having mesopleuron punctate ventrally (rugose-reticulate in S. exareoletus), hind tarsal claw strongly curved apically (weakly curved in S. exareoletus), scape and pedicel blackish brown (yellowish brown in S. exareoletus), and hind femur blackish brown (yellowish brown in S. exareoletus). Etymology. Name derived from the name of type locality of species., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on pages 538-540, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["He, J. H., Chen, X. X. & Ma, Y. (1996) Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae. Economic Insect Fauna of China. Science Press, Beijing, 697 pp. [in Chinese]","He, J. H. (1980) Two new species and a new record of the genus Scenocharops Uchida from China (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 6 (2), 79 - 83. [in Chinese with English summary]"]}

Breviterebra apicocrinis sp. nov. Figs. 1–2 Material examined. Holotype: female, Sichuan, Luhuo Zhuweixiang, 30.VI.2009, Tan Jiangli, No202019693. Paratypes: 1 female, same data, No 202019694; 1 female, Xizang, Changdu; 3.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No202019694. Description. Female holotype. Body length 5.9 mm, fore wing length 4.5 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 18 flagellomeres (apex missing); first flagellomere ca 1.1× length of second flagellomere. Face granulose. Clypeus granulose, convex, apical margin truncated, blunt. Malar space granulose, ca 0.4× basal width of mandible. Upper tooth of mandible slightly longer than lower tooth, with a weak lamella. Frons granulose and without median carina. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance equal to ocello-ocular distance and 2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocelli and eyes ca 1.2 × longer than diameter of ocellus. Temple mat, ca 0.5× as long as eyes in lateral view. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally and transversely striate laterally. Mesoscutum granulose, notauli absent. Scutellum granulose-punctate, metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron punctate, punctures separated by their diameter, finely transversely striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron punctate and interspaces smooth. Propodeum with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia hexagonal, slightly longer than wide and separated from area petiolaris; area superomedia flat, granulose-rugulose; costula relatively weak; propodeal spiracle oval, connected to pleural carina by a distinct carina. Wing. Fore wing areolet absent; portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu ca. 0.8× as long as 2rs-m. Marginal cell short, vein RS ca 2.3× longer than vein 2r&RS. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65°). Hind wing with CU&cu-a inclivous, 2-CU connected with CU&cu-a, intercepted at lower 0.2 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.7× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia ca 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally (Fig. 2J). Metasoma. First segment with dorso-lateral carinae, ca 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole; petiole ca 2.2× longer than postpetiole. Second tergite ca 0.7× as long as first tergite, as long as its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite about equal to its length. Third tergite ca 0.8× as long as its apical width. Ovipositor a little shorter than apical depth of metasoma, with a weak subapical notch on upper valve (Fig. 2E); setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.4× as long as hind tibia. Colour. Black. Scape and pedicel black; mandible yellow except teeth reddish brown; palpi and tegula yellow; fore and mid legs from apical half of coxae on yellowish brown; basal half of fore and mid coxae blackish brown; hind coxa, trochanter and trochantellus black, femur and tibia yellowish brown with base and apex of tibia more or less infuscated, basal 0.9 of tarsi yellowish brown and remainder infuscated; metasoma entirely blackish. Variation. Propodeal costula varies from weak to strong; area superomedial slightly longer than wide to slightly wider than long; specimen from Xizang province has area petiolaris stronger rugulose than in the Sichuan specimens. Distribution. China (Sichuan, Xizang). Comparison. This species differs distinctly from the only other known species of this genus, B. laticlypeata as shown in the key above. DNA Barcoding: The COI sequence iss deposited in GenBank (accession number MZ647963). Etymology. Name derived from apex (Latin for tip) and crinis (Greek for hair), because its metasoma is densely setose apically.

Scenocharops koreanus Uchida & Momoi, 1960 Scenocharops koreanus Uchida & Momoi, 1960: 12; Townes et al., 1965: 280; Gupta & Maheshwary, 1971: 314; He, 1980: 82; He et al., 1996: 325. Material examined. 1 female, Heilongjiang, Haerbing, VII.1964, Fang Sanyang, No772156; 1 female, 1male, Liaoning, Fengchen, 12.VI.1981, Wei Chenggui, No814646 (2); 1 female, Liaoning, Shenyang, Dongling, 22.VII.1986, Sun Liming, No948288. Distribution. China (Heilongjiang, Liaoning); Korea, Russia., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 537, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["Uchida, T. & Momoi, S. (1960) Description of a new species of the genus Scenocharops Uchida from Korea (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Insecta Matsumurana, 23, 11 - 13.","Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1971) Indian species of Charops Holmgren (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects, 4, 453 - 480. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00305316.1970.10433983","He, J. H. (1980) Two new species and a new record of the genus Scenocharops Uchida from China (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 6 (2), 79 - 83. [in Chinese with English summary]","He, J. H., Chen, X. X. & Ma, Y. (1996) Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae. Economic Insect Fauna of China. Science Press, Beijing, 697 pp. [in Chinese]"]}

Genus Charops Holmgren, 1859 Type species: Campoplex deficiens Gravenhorst, 1829; by original designation. Diagnosis. Head strongly lenticular; mandible with lamella, teeth equal or subequal; eye strongly emarginated opposite antennal socket; temple short; notauli absent; central 0.3 or more of mesopleural furrow not impressed, indicated by weakly raised mesepimeron; scutellum slightly concave to convex; propodeum rugose to reticulate, spiracle elongate; apex of propodeum close to apex of hind coxa; areolet absent; fore wing 2m-cu vein vertical; nervellus intercepted below middle; tarsal claws pectinate; metasoma long and strongly compressed; postpetiole swollen and bulbous; male parameres rod-like or not; ovipositor short, straight or upcurved, not projecting beyond apex of metasoma and with a distinct notch subapically., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 531, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136

Sliochia adustifemur sp. nov. Figs 3–4 Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Leishanxian Leishanxiang Natural Reserve, 2.VI.2005, Liu Jingxian, No 202019697 (ZJUH). Description. Holotype female (Fig. 3). Body length 4.5 mm, fore wing length 3.4 mm. Head. Antenna with 25 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 4F) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 4F) granulose, not convex in lateral view, apical margin slightly arched, sharp. Malar space granulose, its length 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Inner margin of eye not indented opposite antennal socket. Interocellar distance (Fig. 4G) 1.1× ocello-ocular distance and 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-rugulose dorsally, mat, transversely striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 4H) granulose, rugose on notaulic area. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 4B) granulose, weakly transversely striate below tegula. Metapleuron granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 4C) with area basalis trapozoid; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; area superomedia granulose-rugulose; area petiolaris rugose; area externa and area dentipara granulose; all carinae distinctly developed. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 4A) areolet absent, length of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu approx. 0.4× vein 2rs-m. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.3× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite vein M&RS, vein 1cu-a strongly oblique and angle with vein AA (60°). External angles of second discal cell nearly straight (80°). Hind wing with vein CU&cu-a nearly vertical, not intercepted. Legs. Hind femur 3.8× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.7× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. First tarsal segment with ventral row of setae medially (Fig. 4E). Tarsal claws weakly pectinate basally. Metasoma. (Fig. 4J) First metasomal segment (Fig. 4D) without glymma. First tergite 2.6× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole granulose. Second tergite granulose-rugulose basally, smooth and shiny apically, 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.8× longer than its apical width; thyridium transverse oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 0.5× its length. Third tergite 0.8× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without medial emargination. From third tergite on smooth and shiny. Ovipositor (Fig. 4I) straight, with a nodus before an inconspicuous dorsal subapical notch. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, scape and pedicel, palpi, tegula, fore and mid legs, hind coxa, trochanter, trochantellus and tibia basal 0.5, yellowish brown; hind femur and tibia apical 0.5, brown; hind tarsal segments blackish brown; metasoma from third segment on laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma blackish. Distribution. China (Guizhou). Notes. We have placed this new species in Sliochia because the new species matches the generic characters well. The new species differs distinctly from the only other known species of this genus, S. bala as shown in the key above. Etymology. Name derived from “adustus” (Latin for “brown”) and “femur” (Latin for “thigh”), because its hind femur brown., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, The rare genera Picacharops Gauld and Sliochia Gauld (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) found in China, with description of two new species, pp. 577-584 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on pages 581-582, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.8, http://zenodo.org/record/6531152

Scenocharops exareoletus He, 1980 Scenocharops exareolata He, 1980: 81; 1996: 324. Material examined. Holotype: female, Jiangsu, Nanjing, VIII.1960, Xu Tiansen. Distribution. China (Jiangsu)., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 537, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["He, J. H. (1980) Two new species and a new record of the genus Scenocharops Uchida from China (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 6 (2), 79 - 83. [in Chinese with English summary]","He, J. H., Chen, X. X. & Ma, Y. (1996) Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae. Economic Insect Fauna of China. Science Press, Beijing, 697 pp. [in Chinese]"]}

Sliochia adustifemur sp. nov. Figs 3–4 Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Leishanxian Leishanxiang Natural Reserve, 2.VI.2005, Liu Jingxian, No 202019697 (ZJUH). Description. Holotype female (Fig. 3). Body length 4.5 mm, fore wing length 3.4 mm. Head. Antenna with 25 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 4F) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 4F) granulose, not convex in lateral view, apical margin slightly arched, sharp. Malar space granulose, its length 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Inner margin of eye not indented opposite antennal socket. Interocellar distance (Fig. 4G) 1.1× ocello-ocular distance and 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-rugulose dorsally, mat, transversely striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 4H) granulose, rugose on notaulic area. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 4B) granulose, weakly transversely striate below tegula. Metapleuron granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 4C) with area basalis trapozoid; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; area superomedia granulose-rugulose; area petiolaris rugose; area externa and area dentipara granulose; all carinae distinctly developed. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 4A) areolet absent, length of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu approx. 0.4× vein 2rs-m. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.3× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite vein M&RS, vein 1cu-a strongly oblique and angle with vein AA (60°). External angles of second discal cell nearly straight (80°). Hind wing with vein CU&cu-a nearly vertical, not intercepted. Legs. Hind femur 3.8× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.7× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. First tarsal segment with ventral row of setae medially (Fig. 4E). Tarsal claws weakly pectinate basally. Metasoma. (Fig. 4J) First metasomal segment (Fig. 4D) without glymma. First tergite 2.6× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole granulose. Second tergite granulose-rugulose basally, smooth and shiny apically, 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.8× longer than its apical width; thyridium transverse oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 0.5× its length. Third tergite 0.8× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without medial emargination. From third tergite on smooth and shiny. Ovipositor (Fig. 4I) straight, with a nodus before an inconspicuous dorsal subapical notch. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, scape and pedicel, palpi, tegula, fore and mid legs, hind coxa, trochanter, trochantellus and tibia basal 0.5, yellowish brown; hind femur and tibia apical 0.5, brown; hind tarsal segments blackish brown; metasoma from third segment on laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma blackish. Distribution. China (Guizhou). Notes. We have placed this new species in Sliochia because the new species matches the generic characters well. The new species differs distinctly from the only other known species of this genus, S. bala as shown in the key above. Etymology. Name derived from “adustus” (Latin for “brown”) and “femur” (Latin for “thigh”), because its hind femur brown.

Scenocharops parasae He, 1980 Scenocharops parasae He, 1980: 81; He, 1996: 326. Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Siminshan, 16.VII.1973, Host: Parasa bicolor, Xu Tiansen, No 801025. Paratypes: 1 female, 10.VII.1933, Zhu Ruzuo; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 13.XI.1957, Zhou Zhengnan; 1 female, Zhejiang, Yuhang, 21.VII.1973, Host: Parasa bicolor, Xu Tiansen; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 31.X.1979, Xu Xingsheng, No 791048. 1 female, Fujian, Longhai, 10.XI.1981, Lin Changhai, No 20005405; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 24. VI.1989, He Junhua, No 893077; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 5. VI.1992, Chen Xuexin, No 921998; 1 male, Zhejiang, Yuhang, 6.X.1980, Xu Tiansen; 1 female, Zhejiang, Yuhang, 6.X.1980, Xu Tiansen, No 803477. Distribution. China (Fujian, Hunan, Jiangxi, Zhejiang), first report from Fujian province., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 538, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["He, J. H. (1980) Two new species and a new record of the genus Scenocharops Uchida from China (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 6 (2), 79 - 83. [in Chinese with English summary]","He, J. H., Chen, X. X. & Ma, Y. (1996) Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae. Economic Insect Fauna of China. Science Press, Beijing, 697 pp. [in Chinese]"]}

Charops brachypterus (Cameron, 1897) Anomalon brachypterum Cameron, 1897: 25. Charops longiventris Ashmead, 1905: 117. Charops brachypterum: Townes, Townes & Gupta, 1961: 227; He, 1996: 320–321; Choi & Lee, 2008: 159. Material examined. 5 females, 2 males, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, VII. 2018, 164m, N21°44.521′, E100°26.647′, malaise trap, No 20180194, No 20180184, No 201801903, No 201801920, No 201801908, No 201801880, No 201801788; 1 female, Yunnan, Sanchahe, 12.IV.1981, He Junhua, No 811643; 3 females, 2 males, Fujian, Fuzhou, 13.VIII.1990, Liu Changming, No 966919; 1 male, Fujian, Fuzhou, 10. V.1993, No 967273; 2 males, Hainan, Yinggeling, 18.X.2007, Liu Jingxian, No 200709882, No 200709802; 1 female, Guangdong, Yunan, 12.VIII.2003, Xu Zaifu, No 20054352; 3 females, Zhejiang, Tianhua, 25.VII.1983, Fu Xiaolong, No 831920; 1 female, Sichuan, Chengdu, IX.1979, He Rongrong, No 801622; 1 male, Guizhou, Luodian, 1974, Liu Zhibang, No 750119; 2 females, Jiangxi, Pingxiang, VII.1979, Wang Mazhong, No 800288; 1 female, Guangxi, Sanjiang, X.1982, Mei Yi, No 826490; 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia, 23.VII.1982, He Junhua, No 826486. Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, Sichuan, Taiwan, Yunnan, Zhejiang), first report from Hainan province; India, Indonesia, Korea, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 533, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["Townes, H. K., Townes, M. & Gupta, V. K. (1961) A catalogue and reclassification of the Indo-Australian Ichneumonidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 1, 1 - 522.","He, J. H., Chen, X. X. & Ma, Y. (1996) Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae. Economic Insect Fauna of China. Science Press, Beijing, 697 pp. [in Chinese]","Choi, J. K. & Lee, J. W. (2008) Taxonomic study of the genus Charops Holmgren (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Campopleginae) from the Eastern Palaearctic Region. Entomological Research, 38 (2), 157 - 164. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1748 - 5967.2008.00152. x"]}

Genus Breviterebra Kusigemati, 1982 Type species: Breviterebra laticlypeata Kusigemati, 1982 (by monotypy and original designation). Diagnosis. Body short and stout; inner margins of eyes weakly convergent ventrally and weakly indented opposite antennal sockets; face separated from clypeus by a weak groove; clypeus convex, its apical margin blunt, truncated, slightly concave medially; mandible medium-sized, with a narrow lamella on lower margin, lower tooth a little shorter than upper tooth; temple not swollen; occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base; mesopleuron with densely medium-sized punctures; propodeum areolated, area superomedial hexagonal, separated from area petiolaris by a distinct carina; area petiolaris flat; propodeal spiracle oval; fore wing areolet absent, portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu ca. 0.8× as long as 2rs-m, vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS; hind wing vein CU&cu-a inclivous, intercepted at its lower half, 2-CU reaching CU&cu-a, unpigmented. Legs with tarsal claws moderately long, weakly pectinate basally; hind basitarsus without a midventral row of closely spaced setae; first metasomal segment with spiracles situated at apical 0.3, sternite ends before spiracle, glymma large; ovipositor short, about as long as apical depth of metasoma. Remarks. Kusigemati (1982) described fore wing vein 1cu-a distad of M&RS by ca 0.3 × its own length, but checking carefully his figure 4 we find 1cu-a is only slightly distad of M&RS. Combined with our specimens, we conclude that fore wing vein 1cu-a is only slightly distad of M&RS in both known species., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 528, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["Kusigemati, K. (1982) A new Porizontine genus Breviterebra from Japan (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Kontyu, 50 (4), 621 - 625."]}

Charops striatus (Uchida), 1932 Zacharops striatus Uchida, 1932: 198. Charops striatus: He, 1996: 321–322; Yu and Horstmann, 1997: 130. Material examined. 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan, 1.VII.2010, Chen Wei; 1 female, Guangxi, Longsheng, 23. VI.1982, He Junhua, No 823272; 2 females, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 20.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20057216, No 20057161; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 3.X.2008, Tang Jiangli, No 200804721; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 5.VII.2003, Shi min, No 20056223; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 5. VI.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20056027; 1 female, Zhejiang, Deqing, 27. V.1995, He Junhua, No. 959097; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmu Mountain, 11.VIII.1987, Yu ping, No 887873; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 28.VII.1991, Ma Yun, No 911217; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 28. VI.1991, Gao Qikang, No 911410; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmu Mountain, 15.IX.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 20000378; 2 females, Fujian, Jiangle, 1.VII.1991, Liu Changming, No 20006383, No 20007403; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 5.VIII.2003, Wan Zhiwei, No 20056750; 1 female, Guangdong, Dinghu Mountain, 1.VII.1978, He Junhua, No 780614. Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Henan, Jiangxi, Guangxi, Taiwan, Zhejiang), first report from Fujian, Guangxi and Zhejiang province; Japan, Korea, Russia., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on pages 535-536, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["He, J. H., Chen, X. X. & Ma, Y. (1996) Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae. Economic Insect Fauna of China. Science Press, Beijing, 697 pp. [in Chinese]","Yu, D. S. & Horstmann, K. (1997) A catalogue of world Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera). Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 58, 1 - 1558 pp."]}

Scenocharops flavipetiolus (Sonan, 1929) Charops flavipetiolus Sonan, 1929: 416. Scenocharops longipetiolaris Uchida, 1932: 201; Townes, 1957: 118; Uchida & Momoi, 1960: 11; Townes & Gupta, 1961: 227. Scenocharops flavipetiola: Townes & Gupta, 1961: 227; Gupta & Maheshwary, 1971: 311. Material examined. 1 female, Fujian, Jiangle Longqishan, 16.VII.1991, Liu Changmin, No 20007188; 1 female, Fujian, Shaxian, 20.IX.1979, Qi Shichen, No 803743; 1 female, Fujian Wuyishan, 14.VII.1994, Chen Xuexin, No 943657; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 14.VII.1994, Ye Shufeng, No 943187; 1 female, Guizhou Meitan, 1980, Mai Huaien, No 801752; 1 female, 2 males, Yunnan, Menghai, 22.VII.1983, Luo Hengwen, No 835410, 840477; 1 female, Zhejiang, Fengyangshan, 27.VII.2007; 1 female, Zhejiang, Fengyangshan, 24.VII.24, 1470m, Liu Shenglong; 1 female, Zhejiang, Gutianshan, 18.VII.1992, Ma Yun, No 923946; 1 female, Zhejiang, Gutianshan, Zhang Hongying; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 11.VII.1989, Wang Hongcan, No 851343; 1 female, Zhejiang, Jingning, VII.1991, Ye Shufeng, No 943704; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 14.IX.1998, Zhao Minshui, No 998657; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 11.VII.1985, He Junhua, No 851475; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 5.IX.1998, Zhao Minshui, No 20047293; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 28.VII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20039229; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 1.VII.2010, Hu Lingfei. Distribution. China (Fujian, Guizhou, Taiwan, Yunnan, Zhejiang), first report from Fujian, Guizhou, Yunnan and Zhejiang province; Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 537, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["Sonan, J. (1929) A few host-known Ichneumonidae found in Formosa (Hym.). Transactions of the Natural History Society of Formosa, 19 (104), 415 - 425.","Uchida, T. & Momoi, S. (1960) Description of a new species of the genus Scenocharops Uchida from Korea (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Insecta Matsumurana, 23, 11 - 13.","Townes, H. K., Townes, M. & Gupta, V. K. (1961) A catalogue and reclassification of the Indo-Australian Ichneumonidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 1, 1 - 522.","Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1971) Indian species of Charops Holmgren (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects, 4, 453 - 480. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00305316.1970.10433983"]}

Key to species of Scenocharops Uchida from China 1. Clypeus strongly convex, distinctly projecting forward in lateral view; clypeus granulose-mat, distinctly differentiated from irregularly rugose face; hind trochanter, trochantellus and femur black............... S. koreana Uchida & Momoi, 1960 -. Clypeus flat, in same plane as face in lateral view; sculpture of clypeus similar to face, rugose; hind trochanter, trochantellus and femur usually yellowish brown....................................................................... 2 2. Fore wing areolet present............................................................................... 3 -. Fore wing areolet absent................................................................................ 5 3. Mesopleuron shiny and sparsely punctate medially; scape and pedicel blackish; hind trochanter, trochantellus, and basal half of hind femur blackish brown....................................................... S. flavipetiolus (Sonan, 1929) -. Mesopleuron dull and rugose-punctate or rugose-reticulate medially; scape and pedicel yellowish brown; hind trochanter, trochantellus, and femur yellowish brown.................................................................. 4 4. Malar space 0.35–0.40× basal width of mandible; mesopleuron rugose-punctate; hind tarsal claw with 9 teeth................................................................................................. S. parasae He, 1980 -. Malar space ca 0.47× basal width of mandible; mesopleuron rugose-reticulate; hind tarsal claw with 3–5 teeth............................................................................. S. montanus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1971 5. Mesopleuron punctate medially (Fig. 6C); hind tarsal claw distinctly upcurved apically (Fig. 6K); scape and pedicel blackish brown (Fig. 6F); hind femur blackish brown (Fig. 5)....................................... S. yunnanensis sp. nov. -. Mesopleuron rugose-reticulate medially; hind tarsal claw not distinctly upcurved apically; scape and pedicel yellowish brown; hind femur yellowish brown........................................................... S. exareoletus He, 1980, Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 536, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["Uchida, T. & Momoi, S. (1960) Description of a new species of the genus Scenocharops Uchida from Korea (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Insecta Matsumurana, 23, 11 - 13.","Sonan, J. (1929) A few host-known Ichneumonidae found in Formosa (Hym.). Transactions of the Natural History Society of Formosa, 19 (104), 415 - 425.","He, J. H. (1980) Two new species and a new record of the genus Scenocharops Uchida from China (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 6 (2), 79 - 83. [in Chinese with English summary]","Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1971) Indian species of Charops Holmgren (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects, 4, 453 - 480. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00305316.1970.10433983"]}

Breviterebra apicocrinis sp. nov. Figs. 1–2 Material examined. Holotype: female, Sichuan, Luhuo Zhuweixiang, 30.VI.2009, Tan Jiangli, No202019693. Paratypes: 1 female, same data, No 202019694; 1 female, Xizang, Changdu; 3.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No202019694. Description. Female holotype. Body length 5.9 mm, fore wing length 4.5 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 18 flagellomeres (apex missing); first flagellomere ca 1.1× length of second flagellomere. Face granulose. Clypeus granulose, convex, apical margin truncated, blunt. Malar space granulose, ca 0.4× basal width of mandible. Upper tooth of mandible slightly longer than lower tooth, with a weak lamella. Frons granulose and without median carina. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance equal to ocello-ocular distance and 2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocelli and eyes ca 1.2 × longer than diameter of ocellus. Temple mat, ca 0.5× as long as eyes in lateral view. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally and transversely striate laterally. Mesoscutum granulose, notauli absent. Scutellum granulose-punctate, metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron punctate, punctures separated by their diameter, finely transversely striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron punctate and interspaces smooth. Propodeum with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia hexagonal, slightly longer than wide and separated from area petiolaris; area superomedia flat, granulose-rugulose; costula relatively weak; propodeal spiracle oval, connected to pleural carina by a distinct carina. Wing. Fore wing areolet absent; portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu ca. 0.8× as long as 2rs-m. Marginal cell short, vein RS ca 2.3× longer than vein 2r&RS. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65°). Hind wing with CU&cu-a inclivous, 2-CU connected with CU&cu-a, intercepted at lower 0.2 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.7× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia ca 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally (Fig. 2J). Metasoma. First segment with dorso-lateral carinae, ca 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole; petiole ca 2.2× longer than postpetiole. Second tergite ca 0.7× as long as first tergite, as long as its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite about equal to its length. Third tergite ca 0.8× as long as its apical width. Ovipositor a little shorter than apical depth of metasoma, with a weak subapical notch on upper valve (Fig. 2E); setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.4× as long as hind tibia. Colour. Black. Scape and pedicel black; mandible yellow except teeth reddish brown; palpi and tegula yellow; fore and mid legs from apical half of coxae on yellowish brown; basal half of fore and mid coxae blackish brown; hind coxa, trochanter and trochantellus black, femur and tibia yellowish brown with base and apex of tibia more or less infuscated, basal 0.9 of tarsi yellowish brown and remainder infuscated; metasoma entirely blackish. Variation. Propodeal costula varies from weak to strong; area superomedial slightly longer than wide to slightly wider than long; specimen from Xizang province has area petiolaris stronger rugulose than in the Sichuan specimens. Distribution. China (Sichuan, Xizang). Comparison. This species differs distinctly from the only other known species of this genus, B. laticlypeata as shown in the key above. DNA Barcoding: The COI sequence iss deposited in GenBank (accession number MZ647963). Etymology. Name derived from apex (Latin for tip) and crinis (Greek for hair), because its metasoma is densely setose apically., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on pages 529-531, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136

Charops mauroknemus sp. nov. Figs. 3–4 Materia examined. Holotype: female, Liaoning, Shenyang, 10.VII.1994, Lou Juxian, No947297. Paratypes: 2 males, Liaoning, Shenyang, VI–VII. 1995, Lou Juxian, No 960909, No 960913. Description. Female holotype. Body length 9.7 mm, fore wing length 5.3 mm. Head. Antenna with 38 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.5× longer than second flagellomere. Face strongly rugose. Clypeus rugose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons rugose, with a median carina. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance twice ocello-ocular distance and 1.6× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched. Mesosoma. Pronotum rugose-punctate above, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum rugose-punctate, rugosities weak medially. Scutellum rugose-punctate. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron granulose-punctate, transversely striate below tegula, striations long and covered region of speculum. Metapleuron strongly rugose, juxtacoxal carina strong, juxta-coxal area finely rugose. Propodeum with anterior transverse carina very close to base, and area basalis nearly absent; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, rugose with area petiolaris apically tending to be transversely striate; area dentipara rugose-punctate; area lateralis finely trans-rugose; all carinae strong; propodeal spiracle oval. Wing. Fore wing without areolet. Marginal cell short, RS vein 1.6× longer than 2r&RS vein. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell slightly acute(80°). Hind wing with 1-cu reclivous, ca 3.0× longer than cu-a. Legs. Hind femur 5.2× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.7× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. Slender. Basal 0.3 of first metasomal segment round in cross-section. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite; thyridium elongate oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite ca 3.5× its length; metasoma from third to seventh tergites strongly compressed. Ovipositor 1.1× longer than hind femur, straight. Colour. Black. Scape and pedicel, mandible, tegulae black; palpi brown. Fore leg with coxa, trochanter, trochantellus, inner side of basal 0.3 of femur and apical tarsus, blackish brown, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown. Mid leg with coxa, trochanter, trochantellus, basal 0.7 of femur and tarsus, blackish brown, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown. Hind leg entirely black. First metasomal segment with sternum blackish brown, tergite yellowish brown; dorsal surface of second segment black and its lateral surface yellowish brown; third tergite yellowish brown with a black mark antero-dorsally; fourth segment yellowish brown; remainder of metasoma blackish brown. Male. Malar space sculpture coarser, tending to be rugose-punctate, about equal to the length of basal width of mandible. Thyridium larger, its distance from basal margin of tergite ca 3.0× its length. Otherwise same as the female. Male genitalia. Parameres broad, not rod-like. Distribution. China (Liaoning). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1971) to C. ganges Cushman, 1927, but the new species differs from latter by having interocellar distance twice ocello-ocular distance (4.0–4.7× in C. ganges), malar space granulose and 0.6× basal width of mandible (malar space rugose and 0.37–0.46× basal width of mandible in C. ganges), mesopleuron granulose-punctate (rugoso-reticulate in C. ganges), juxta-coxal area finely rugose (with a few striations in C. ganges), mandible black (mandible yellow except teeth in C. ganges), palpi brown (black in C. ganges) and hind leg entirely black (hind leg not entirely black in C. ganges). Etymology. Name derived from mauros (Greek for black) and kneme (Greek for leg), because of the entirely black hind leg.

Charops bicolor (Szépligeti), 1906 Agrypon bicolor Szépligeti, 1906: 124. Gongropelma formosanum Enderlein, 1921: 13. Zacharops narangae Cushman, 1922: 593. Charops (Zacharops) formosanus: Uchida, 1941: 160. Charops bicolor: Townes, Townes & Gupta, 1961: 227; He, 1996: 319–320; Choi & Lee, 2008: 158. Material examined. 1 female, 1 male, Yunnan, Xinping, 15.IX.1977, No 771259; 1 female, Guangxi, Nanning, 2.IX.1987, He Junhua, No 878838; 2 females, Zhejiang, Pinghu, 22.X.1985, No 853372; 1 female, Zhejiang, Yiwu, 1.VIII.1986, Lou Xiaoming, No 863631; 1 male, Jilin, Changchun, 3.IX.1982, No 841315; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyi Mountain, 24.VIII.2007, Liu Jingxian, No 201605565; 1 male, Guangdong, 2.II.1981, Hua Lizhong, No 870238; 1 female, 3males, Zhejiang, Jiangshan, 18.XI.1984, Zhu Kunmei, No 842702; 3 females, Fujian, Zhangzhou, IV.1987, Lin Naiquan, No 984962; 1 female, Liaoning, Shenyang, 19.VII.1997, Lou Juxian, No 975724; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 3.VII.1989, He Junhua, No 893546; 1 female, Jilin, Changbai Mountain, 4.VII.1993, Lou Juxian, No 976380; 1 female, Jilin, Longtan Mountain, 21.VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 954626; 1 male, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 5.VIII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20056927; 1 female, Fujian, Nanping, 22.IX.2002, Ruan Desong, No 20024341; 1 female, Yunnan, Jinghong, 31.VII.2003, Lu Jia, No 20045947; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 8.X.1983, He Junhua, No 884376; 1 female, Guangdong, Guangzhou, Liang Weiguang, No 888996; 4 females, 1male, Henan, Xinye, No 981004; 1 female, Anhui, Jixi, No 780968; 1 female, Shaanxi, Xianyang, IX.1978, No 76579; 1 female, Jiangxi, Nanchang, V.1974, Ye Zhengshuai, No 740651; 1 female, Sichuan, Nanchong, 1939, Zhu Ruzuo, No 73017.1; 1 male, Beijing, 1.I.1954, Liao Zhixi, No 5401.8; 1 male, Jiangsu, Sheyang, IX.1957, Ren Xiaokuan, No 5793.1; 1 female, Heilongjiang, Jiamusi, Ma Huaishi, No 790618. Distribution. China (Anhui, Beijing, Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Jilin, Liaoning, Shaanxi, Shandong, Sichuan, Taiwan, Yunnan, Zhejiang); Australia, Bangladesh, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka, Thailand. Remarks. Two females and two males from Shenyang (Liaoning) differ from the other specimens because of the black metasoma and tegulae. However, other characters are similar and we regard it as intraspecific variation., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 532, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["Townes, H. K., Townes, M. & Gupta, V. K. (1961) A catalogue and reclassification of the Indo-Australian Ichneumonidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 1, 1 - 522.","He, J. H., Chen, X. X. & Ma, Y. (1996) Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae. Economic Insect Fauna of China. Science Press, Beijing, 697 pp. [in Chinese]","Choi, J. K. & Lee, J. W. (2008) Taxonomic study of the genus Charops Holmgren (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Campopleginae) from the Eastern Palaearctic Region. Entomological Research, 38 (2), 157 - 164. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1748 - 5967.2008.00152. x"]}

Key to species of Charops Holmgren from China 1. Mesopleuron granulose-punctate (Fig. 4B); scutellum convex; scape and pedicel black (Fig. 4E); mandible black (Fig. 4E); palpi brown (Fig. 4E); hind leg entirely black (Fig. 3).................................... C. mauroknemus sp. nov. -. Mesopleuron densely rugose, rugose-reticulate or rugose-striate; scutellum slightly concave to flat; scape and pedicel, mandible, palpi yellowish brown; at least trochantellus of hind leg yellowish brown......................................... 2 2. Malar space 0.4× basal width of mandible; hind femur 7.0× longer than width; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by ca 3.0× its length; metasoma predominantly ferruginous; hind femur rusty reddish, dark brown ventrally............................................................................................. C. aeruginosus Vas, 2020 -. Malar space usually more than 0.4× basal width of mandible; hind femur 6.0–6.5× longer than width; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by approximately its length (except C. brachypterum 3.0× its length); metasoma predominantly yellowish brown; hind femur yellowish brown or entirely black................................................. 3 3. Propodeal medio-longitudinal carina distinct................................................................ 4 -. Propodeal medio-longitudinal carina obscure or absent....................................................... 5 4. Mesopleuron rugose-striate; tegula pale yellow; fore and mid femora entirely yellow; hind tibia basally, first and second tarsal segments yellow.................................................................. C. striatus (Uchida, 1932) -. Mesopleuron rugose-reticulate; tegula black; fore femur with a black mark below; mid femur blackish brown except apically; hind tibia, first and second tarsal segments black........................................ C. taiwanus Uchida, 1932 5. Propodeal medio-longitudinal carina faintly indicated; hind femur and tibia yellowish brown; male genitalia short...................................................................................... C. bicolor (Szépligeti,1906) -. Propodeal medio-longitudinal carina absent; hind femur and tibia black; male genitalia long................................................................................................... C. brachypterus (Cameron, 1897), Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, Review of the genera Breviterebra Kusigemati, Charops Holmgren and Scenocharops Uchida (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, with description of three new species, pp. 527-542 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 532, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/6531136, {"references":["Vas, Z. (2020) New species and records of Charops Holmgren, 1859 (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Campopleginae). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 66 (3), 247 - 264. https: // doi. org / 10.17109 / AZH. 66.3.247.2020"]}

Genus Sliochia Gauld, 1976 Type species: Sliochia bala Gauld, 1976 (by monotypy and original designation). Diagnosis. Small species; body short and stout; inner margins of eyes not indented opposite antennal sockets; face not separated from clypeus; clypeus not or weakly convex, apical margin weakly arcuate; mandible with a weak lamella on lower margin, lower tooth at most slightly shorter than upper tooth; temple not swollen; occipital carina reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base; mesopleuron granulose; posterior transverse carina of mesosternum complete; propodeum with area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris; fore wing areolet absent, vein 1 cu-a opposite vein M&RS; hind wing vein CU&cu-a vertical, not intercepted; first tarsal segment of hind leg with row of ventral setae medially; total length of hind tarsal segments shorter than length of hind tibia; tarsal claws short, weakly pectinate basally; glymma of first metasomal segment absent; ovipositor straight, with a nodus before an inconspicuous dorsal subapical notch., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2022, The rare genera Picacharops Gauld and Sliochia Gauld (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) found in China, with description of two new species, pp. 577-584 in Zootaxa 5133 (4) on page 581, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.4.8, http://zenodo.org/record/6531152, {"references":["Gauld, I. D. (1976) Description of a new genus of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) of economic importance from Sabah. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 66 (1), 1 - 4. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 000748530000643 X"]}

Campoplex exareola sp. nov. Figs. 27���28 Material examined. Holotype: female, Jilin, Changbaishan, 4.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No 951985 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 27) holotype. Body length 4.5 mm, fore wing length 3.6 mm. Head. Antenna with 24 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.25�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 28E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 28E) granulose, not convex, apical margin slightly arched and thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.65�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 28F) 1.3�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.5�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 28G) granulose, notauli absent. Scutellum granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 28B) granulose with sparse and minute punctures, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 28B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 28C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia finely granulose, subpolished; area petiolaris weakly rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; costula absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 28A) areolet absent. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.25. Legs. Hind femur 4.6�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally, teeth very weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 28H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7�� as long as first tergite, 1.1�� longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5�� its diameter. Third tergite 0.7�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.0�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 28D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; all trochantellus yellow; fore leg from trochantellus on yellowish brown, coxa, trochanter and telotarsus blackish brown; mid leg with extreme base of femur, tibia media-externally and basal 0.5 of tarsus yellow, remainder of mid leg brown; hind leg with base and middle of tibia and basal 0.5 of tarsus whitish yellow, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Jilin). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. maurotrochanter sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having area petiolaris weakly rugose, propodeal median area slightly depressed, fore wing areolet absent, mid leg largely brown, and metasoma from third tergite on not compressed. Etymology. Name derived from ���ex-��� (Latin for ���out of���) and ���areola��� (Latin for ���small open space���), because its fore wing is without areolet., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 43-44, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex atricrus sp. nov. Figs. 15���16 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Hongjialike, 10.VII.1992, He Junhua, No 914155 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, 3 males, Xinjiang, Hongjialike, 10.VII.1992, He Junhua, No 914128, 914125, 914142, 914126. Description. Female (Fig. 15) holotype. Body length 3.6 mm, fore wing length 3.1 mm. Head. Antenna with 25 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 16E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 16E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated, blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.7�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 16F) 1.2�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.8�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, slightly swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 16G) granulose, notauli absent. Scutellum granulose and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 16B) rugose-punctate dorsally, granulose-punctate ventrally, trans-striate below tegula, speculum rugose. Metapleuron (Fig. 16B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 16C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, mat; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 16A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.3. Legs. Hind femur 4.5�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.57�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws slightly pectinate basally, its teeth weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 16H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 2.2�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.8�� as long as first tergite, equal to its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.7�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.0�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 16D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellowish brown; palpi brown; tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel black; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa, trochanter, femur basal-ventrally and telotarsus blackish brown; mid leg black except trochantellus and tibia medially yellowish brown; hind leg black except trochantellus apically, femur extreme basally and tibia medially yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Pronotum granulose to rugulose-punctate, mesopleuron granulose-punctate to rugose-punctate, propodeal area petiolaris rugose to trans-striate, lateral carina present or absent. Male. Propodeal area superomedia narrow, area superomedia rugulose; otherwise similar to female. Distribution. China (Xinjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. granulosus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having apical margin of clypeus slightly arched, malar space 0.7�� basal width of mandible base, pronotum rugulosepunctate dorsally, mesopleuron rugose-punctate dorsally, mid leg and hind leg largely black, and metasoma entirely black. Etymology. Name derived from ���atrum��� (Latin for ���black���) and ���crus��� (Latin for ���leg���), because its mid and hind legs are largely black., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 28-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex proportionis sp. nov. Figs. 61���62 Material examined. Holotype: female, Fujian, Fuzhou, 11.IV.1991, Liu Changming, No966415 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 61) holotype. Body length 6.8 mm, fore wing length 4.8 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 16 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere equal to the length of second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 62E) granulose-punctate medially, punctate around. Clypeus (Fig. 62E) punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched. Malar space shallowly punctate, 0.5�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose-punctate, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 62F) 1.5�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.7�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished. Occipital carina narrowly curved dorsally, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 62G) granulose punctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum with sparse and minute punctures. Metanotum shallowly punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 62B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 62B) punctate, rugose on the region before hind coxa. Propodeum (Fig. 62C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose, polished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 62A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (50��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.1�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.4�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 62H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina basally, and with a shallow groove. First tergite 3.0�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.7�� as long as first tergite, 1.25�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0�� its diameter. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Metasoma compressed from third segment on. Sixth and seventh tergites with weak emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.0�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 62D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, fore and middle legs entirely and tegula, yellow with telotarsus brownish; scape and pedicel yellowish brown anteriorly and brown dorsally; hind coxa black, trochanter except basally, femur and tibia yellowish brown, tibia infuscated subbasally and apically, tarsus blackish brown; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Fujian). Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. bazariae Sheng, 2014, but differs from the latter by having face granulose-punctate medially and mat, clypeus mat, first flagellomere equal to the length of second flagellomere, notauli present and rugose, scutellum sparsely punctate, vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS, area superomedia granulose, first metasomal tergite with weak dorso-lateral carina and a shallow groove, sixth and seventh metasomal tergites without median emarginations, fore and mid coxae yellow, and mid and hind femur entirely yellowish brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���proportionis��� (Latin for ���relative equality���), because the length of the first flagellomere is equal to that of the second flagellomere., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 89-91, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex assosae Kittel, 2016 Figs. 71���72 Campoplex pusillus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977: 71���72. (preoccupied by Campoplex pusillus Ratzeburg, 1852) Campoplex assosae Kittel, 2016: 163���164. New name for Campoplex pusillus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977 Material examined. 1 female, Guangdong, Conghua Liuxihe, 13.IV.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 20026943; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 18. VI.1983, Ma Yun, No 831261; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Fan Jinjiang, No 875704; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 21.VII.1987, Chen Xuexin, No 877351, 872444. Distribution. China (Guangdong, Taiwan, Zhejiang). Notes. This species is known as Campoplex pusillus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but this name is a junior homonym of Campoplex pusillus Ratzeburg, 1852. Therefore, it was renamed as C. assosae Kittel, 2016., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 101-103, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex xizangensis sp. nov. Figs. 81–82 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, Yangzhuoyongchuo, 15.VII.2015, 3048m, N29.79°, E93.91°, 15.VII.2015, Liu Zhen, No201409026 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 81) holotype. Body length 9.0 mm, fore wing length 6.2 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 30 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 82E) rugose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 82E) rugose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Malar space nearly smooth, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 82F) 1.3× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 82G) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 82B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 82B) rugose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 82C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia rugulose, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a moderately groove medially; all carinae developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 82A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1. Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 82H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its length. Third tergite 1.4× longer than its width. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.2× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 82D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; tegula yellowish brown; fore leg entirely yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa black, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically and tarsus blackish-brown, femur and tibia medially reddish brown; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Xizang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. homonae Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face and clypeus rugose-punctate, pronotum rugulosepunctate dorsally, prepectal carina without a notch-like constriction, areolet relatively large and higher than stalk, and mandible yellowish brown medially. Etymology. Name derived from the name of type locality of species.

Campoplex maurotrochanter sp. nov. Figs. 47–48 Material examined. Holotype: 1 female, Shaanxi, Ningshan Xunyangzhen, 6.VI.1998, Ma Yun, No 982824 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Gansu, Wenxian Dianba, 16. VI. 1998, 900m, Ma Yun, No 982279; 1 female, Hebei, Zhangbei, 1981, Dai Junrong, No 820163; 1 female, Shaanxi, Huoditang Huodigou, 5. VI.1998, 1900m, Ma Yun, No 982683; 1 female, 1 male, Shaanxi, Qingling, 10. VI.1998, 1800m, Ma Yun, No 983990, 983977; 1 female, Shaanxi, Zhashui Niubeiliang, 15.VIII.2003, Tan Jiangli, No 201306781. Description. Female (Fig. 47) holotype. Body length 4.3 mm, fore wing length 3.4 mm. Head. Antenna with 27 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.25× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 48E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 48E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin arched and blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.7× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 48F) 1.3× ocelloocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 48G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Metanotum granulose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 48B) granulose-punctate, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 48B) granulose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 48C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia finely granulose, subpolished; area petiolaris coarsely rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 48A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3. Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws nearly not pectinate, teeth very weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 48H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.0× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.2× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite 0.9× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 48D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; tegula whitish; all trochantellus yellow; fore leg from trochantellus on yellowish brown, coxa, trochanter and apical tarsus blackish brown; mid leg with coxa, trochanter and femur ventrally blackish brown, femur dorsally and tibia medially yellowish brown, tibia basally and apically and tarsus brown; hind coxa, trochanter, and femur black, tibia yellowish brown medially, tibia basally and apically, and tarsus brown; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.3 or only slightly below middle; the specimen from Hebei province with metasoma from third tergite on not compressed. Male. The surface of body shinier than in female; propodeal carina stronger than in female; otherwise quite similar to female. Distribution. China (Gansu, Hebei, Shaanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. kalatopensis Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.5× basal width of mandible, mesopleuron granulose-punctate and with punctures dense, area petiolaris coarsely rugose, and fore and mid trochanters blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from “mauros” (Latin for “dark”) and “trochanter” (Latin for “trochanter”), because all its trochanters are black.

Campoplex monochroma sp. nov. Figs. 51���52 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 9.VIII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20042321 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Guangdong, Shixing Chebaling, 25. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 201806185; 3 females, Henan, Neixiang Wangoulinchang, 11.VII. 1998, Chen Xuexin, No 985939; 1 female, Jilin, Fusong Donggangzhen, 30.VIII.1989, Li Lin, No 974169; 1 female, Neimeng, Gegentala, 16.VIII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200100852; 1 female, Shaanxi, Hanzhong Liubaxian, 20.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201309161; 3 females, Shenyang National Forest Park, 16. VII.2011, Yan Chenjin, No 201103694, 201103690, 201103695; 3 females, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Liu Jingxian, No 201804841, 201805167, 201804175; 2 females, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 22.VIII.1982, Song Qisheng, No 826561, 826560; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 16.VIII.1982, Le Yanhua, No 826757; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 30.VII.1993, Wu Hong, No 945170; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang Jiulongshan, 18.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 944491; 4 females, Zhejiang, Songyang, 17.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 944382, 943976, 944195, 944197. Description. Female (Fig. 51) holotype. Body length 6.2 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.15�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 52E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 52E) punctate, punctures larger than that on face, slightly convex, apical margin arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 52F) 1.5�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.9�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 52G) granulose punctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region anteriorly. Scutellum with sparse and minute punctures, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 52B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 52B) punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 52C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose medially and short rugose laterally, polished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 52A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 52H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina, and with a shallow groove. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.6�� as long as first tergite, 0.85�� its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.8�� as long as its apical width. Metasoma not compressed apically. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 52D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, fore and middle legs entirely and tegula, yellow with telotarsus brownish; scape and pedicel yellowish brown anteriorly and brown dorsally; hind coxa black, trochanter except basally, femur and tibia yellowish brown, tibia unicolorous, slightly infuscated apically, tarsus brown; metasoma entirely black with second and third segments slightly blackish brown. Variation. First flagellomere 1.1���1.25�� second flagellomere; face granulose to granulose-punctate; frons with median carina absent or present; pronotum granulose-punctate to punctate dorsally; specimens from Shenyang province with ovipositor thinner; scape and pedicel entirely brown or yellowish-brown anteriorly; specimens from Henan province with hind tibia banded. Distribution. China (Guangdong, Henan, Jinlin, Neimeng, Shaanxi, Shenyang, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. proportionis sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having second tergite 0.8���0.9�� as long as its apical width, thyridium separated from the basal margin of tergite by its diameter, metasoma not compressed apically, malar space and frons granulose, and metanotum rugose-punctate. Etymology. Name derived from ���mono-��� (Greek for ���single���), and ���chroma��� (Greek for ���colour���), because its hind tibia is unicolorous., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 74-77, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex hei sp. nov. Figs. 39���40 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 1.VII.2001, 1520m, Piao Meihua, No 200105708 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Fujian, Chongan Sangang, 5.XII.1989, Wang Jiashe, No 20008409; 1 female, Fujian, Sangang, 9.IV.1981, Wang Jiashe, No 854190; 1 female, 3 males, Guangdong, Dawuling, 3.X.2001, Xu Zaifu, No 20020470, 20020548, 20020478, 20020944; 15 females, 2 males, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Jinding, 12.VII.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 938313, 938830, 938139, 938683, 938665, 938684, 939315, 939340, 939328, 939330, 938319, 938803, 939342, 939341, 939345; 4 females, 2 males, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huixiangpin, 13.VII.1993, Xu Zaifu, No 938254, 936290, 935870, 935855, 936038, 936286; 1 female, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huixiangpin, 11.VII.1993, Yao Songlin, No 937220; 3 females, 1 male, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huguosi, 1.VIII.2001, 1300m, Piao Meihua, No 200107681, 200108977, 200108787, 200108241; 1 female, Guizhou, Xishui Changqiangou, 29.IX.2000, Ma Yun, No 200102761; 1 female, Henan, Luanchuan Longyuwan, 13.VII.1996, Cai Pin, No 974761; 1 female, Henan, Ludai Honghe, 27. V.2000, Cai Ping, No 200101753; 1 female, Henan, Neixiangbao Tianman, 15.VII.1998, Chen Xuexin, No 988826; 1 female, Henan, Songxian Baiyunshan, 11���18.VII.1996, Cai Pin, No 972765; 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia Muyuzhen, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206503; 1 female, Shaanxi, Liubaxian Shibandian, 19.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201310432; 1 female, Shaanxi, Qinling Niubeiliang, 11.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201305740; 1 female, Shaanxi, Zhouzhi, 26.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201309500, 201309495, 201309565; 1 female, Shandong, Junan, 8.VII.1987, Dong Yancai, No 875415; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206503; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206503; 1 female, 1 male, Sichuan, Daofu Luhuo, 5.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201407160, 201407149; 1 female, Sichuan, Qingchengshan, 3.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 802795; 1 female, Sichuan, Wolong Dengshenggou, 9.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201401452; 2 females, Sichuan, Wolong Yinchanggou, 7.VIII.2013, Liuzhen, No 201409360, 201409316; 4 females 1 male, Sichuan, Xiaojinxian, 9.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201404326, 201404310, 201404306, 201404287, 201404305; 2 females, Sichuan, Xichang, 17.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 801820, 801830; 2 females, Xizang, Lasa, 15.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201406125, 201406117; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi Bayizhen, 3.IX.2002, Lin Naiquan, No 20033340; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi, 21.VIII.2003, Deji Meiduo, No 20034366; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi, 21.VIII.2003, Deji Meiduo, No 20034366; 4 females, Xizang, Xiayadong, 19.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400796, 201403484, 201400665, 201400086; 1 female, Xizang, Zhangmu, 27.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400348; 1 female, Xizang, Zhangmu, 27.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400348; 1 female, Yunnan, Kunming, 30.III.1981, He Junhua, No 811125; 1 female, Yunnan, Lijiang Wenbishan, 28. VI.2007, Sharkey, No 200804984; 1 female, Yunnan, Maguan, 6. VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 20180611; 1 female, Yunnan, Ruili Mengxiu, 2. V.1981, He Junhua, No 813124; 2 females, Yunnan, Xiaguan, 14. V.1981, He Junhua, No 810920, 810915; 1 female, Zhejiang, Anji Longwanshan, 11.IV.1999, Wu Hong, No 20001818; 1 male, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Yuhuangshan, 20.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20057224; 1 female, Zhejiang, Kaihua Gutianshan, 18.VIII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20058661; 1 female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Daiwu, No 20042897; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 7.VIII.2003, No 20055739; 1 female, Zhejiang, Moganshan, 9.VIII.1984, Qian Mo, No 845807; 1 male, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 13.IX.1993, Chen Hanlin, No 950037; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingliangfeng, 21. V.2012, Yan Chengjin, No 201202502; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 2.X.1993, Wu Hong, No 945628, 905659; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 15.VII.1989, He Junhua, No 894199; 15 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25. VI.1984, Chen Xuexin, No 980615, 941824, 997265, 980053, 842593, 20038367, 877194, 872585, 873330, 872393, 872710, 872325, 872375, 872415, 872411; 5 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 20.VII.1987, Lou Xiaoming, No 873712, 874330, 873844, 873794, 874293, 874286; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 25.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 201101535; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 30.VII.2003, Shi Min, No 20030634; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 25.VII.2011, Liu Zhen, No 201101877, 201101346; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan Xianrending, 29.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20040044; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan Xianrending, 2.VII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200103977; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 12. VI.1993, Ma Yun, No 934410; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, No 882753, 882709; 3 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 1.VII.2001, 1520m, Piao Meihua, No 200105179, 200105697, 200105929; 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 18. VI.1983, Shi Zuhua, No 830427; 4 females, 3 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, VII.1998 ��� IV.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 992423, 20057642, 994370, 998796, 995413, 994354, 200010647; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Fan Jinjiang, No 875634; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2. VI.1990, He Junhua, No 905091; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. V.1988, Xu Weiliang, No 885597. Description. Female (Fig. 39) holotype. Body length 6.5 mm, fore wing length 5.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 29 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 40E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 40E) mat, slightly convex, apical margin slightly curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 40F) 1.8�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.3�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple mat. Occipital carina evenly arched. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 40G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 40B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 40C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed medially; all carina strong with median carina under costulae weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 40A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.15 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.9�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 40H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.62�� as long as first tergite, as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 40D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, extreme apex of fore and mid coxae, fore and mid trochanters, yellow; scape and pedicel blackish-brown; fore and mid coxae below, hind coxa and hind trochanter blackish-brown; remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown with telotarsus infuscated; remainder of hind leg yellowish brown with apex of hind tibia infuscated and tarsus from first tarsomere 0.8, brownish; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Malar space 0.5���0.8�� basal width of mandible; interocellar distance 0.8���1.8�� ocello-ocular distance; propodeal carina with medio-longitudinal carina under costula sometimes indistinct to absent; lateral longitudinal carina weak to strong; areolet with stalk short to long; hind femur yellowish brown to black; subbase of hind tibia not infuscated to infuscated. Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guizhou, Henan, Hubei, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Sichuan, Xizang, Yunnan, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. concretus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having pronotum granulose dorsally, metanotum granulose, propodeal carinae not strongly developed, thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by its diameter, and metasoma entirely black. Etymology. Named in honour of Prof. Jun-hua He for his great contribution to the knowledge of Chinese Hymenoptera., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 58-60, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex artivultus sp. nov. Figs. 13–14 Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2001, Wu Qiong, No 201505125 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 2 females, Sichuan, Emeishan, 11.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 802364, 802372; 1 female, Yunnan, Maguan Bazhaizhen, VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 201807023; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 4.IX.1987, Chen Xuexin, No 877203, 877171; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Fan Jinjiang, No 875511, 875691; 1 female, Zhejiang Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Wang Beigeng, No 876443; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 20.VII.1987, Lou Xiaoming, No 873835; 2 females, 2 males, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 16.VIII.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 994341, 994361, 994883, 20000928. Description. Female (Fig. 13) holotype. Body length 6.7 mm, fore wing length 4.5 mm. Head. Antenna with 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 14E) granulose, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 14E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin blunt, almost truncated. Malar space shiny, 0.3× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth longer than the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 14F) 1.0× ocelloocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 14G) granulose. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 14B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 14B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 14C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose-rugulose, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; latero-longitudinal carina weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and nearly round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 14A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2. Legs. Hind femur 4.9× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 14H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 3.7× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.8× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its diameter. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 0.9× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 14D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth and tegula yellowish brown; palpi yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus externally, basal 0.7 of femur and telotarsus blackish brown, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind leg with extreme base of femur yellowish brown, tibia medially whitish yellow, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Antenna with 33–36 flagellomeres; interocellar distance 1.3–2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli; fore wing areolet with stalk short to moderately long; ovipositor sheath approx. 0.9–1.2× longer than hind femur; mid femur entirely yellowish brown or black basally. Male. Essentially similar to female except propodeal carina stronger, mid leg whitish yellow except femur basal-ventrally and coxa brown. Distribution. China (Guizhou, Sichuan, Yunnan, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. maximalus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.3× basal width of mandible, medio-longitudinal carina moderately developed, areolet equal to the length of stalk, nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2, and first metasomal segment with a strong lateral carina. Etymology. Name derived from “artus” (Latin for “narrow”) and “vultus” (Latin for “face”), refer to its comparatively narrow face.

Campoplex protenus sp. nov. Figs. 63���64 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Daiwu, No 20042898 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Guangdong, Nanling, 21���25.IV.2011, YTP; 1 female, Shaanxi, Foping, 27.VII.2013, Tan Jiangli, No 201303527; 1 female, Zhejiang, Kaihua Gutianshan, 18.VIII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20043899; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Tianmushan, 11. VI.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 935113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Longtangshan, 29. V.2012, Tang Pu, No 201204899; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 19. V.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 998479. Description. Female (Fig. 63) holotype. Body length 5.3 mm, fore wing length 3.7 mm. Head. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.05�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 64E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 64E) finely granulose, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Face and clypeus combined equal to minimum width of face. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 64F) 1.0�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.4�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 64G) granulose, rugulose-punctate on notaulic region. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 64B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugulose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 64B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 64C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia area granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; medio-longitudinal carina very weakly developed under costula, strongly developed apically; latero-longitudinal carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 64A) areolet present and with a very short stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3. Legs. Hind femur 5.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.54�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 64H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and without lateral groove. First tergite 3.0�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, finely granulose on subsequent tergites. Second tergite 0.75�� as long as first tergite, 1.5�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.3�� its diameter. Third tergite 0.9�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 64D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth and tegula yellowish brown; palpi yellow; scape and pedicel brown; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa basally brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa basally and telotarsus brown; hind leg with coxa, trochanter, extreme apical of femur, tibia basally and apically, brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; third and fourth metasomal tergites basal-laterally blackish brown, subsequent tergites laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black. Variation. Antenna with 29���32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.05���1.2�� longer than second flagellomere; malar space 0.5���0.6�� basal width of mandible; interocellar distance 0.9���1.0�� ocello-ocular distance; hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2���0.4; first tergite 2.8���3.1�� longer than width of postpetiole; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite 1.8���2.3�� its diameter; ovipositor sheath 1.3���1.5�� longer than hind femur. Distribution. China (Guangdong, Shaanxi, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. grandicella sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.0���1.1�� longer than second flagellomere, rugulose-punctate on notaulic region, medio-longitudinal carina strong apically, latero-longitudinal carina strongly developed, fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part, and hind femur yellowish brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���protenus��� (Latin for ���before���), because its fore wing areolet is emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 91-92, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex adustantennalis sp. nov. Figs. 5���6 Material examined. Holotype: female, Gansu, Zhenyuanxian, VII.1981, Cao Wei, No 815326 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 962390. Description. Female (Fig. 5) holotype. Body length 6.6 mm, fore wing length 5.2 mm. Head. Antenna with 35 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 6D) granulose-punctate to punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 6D) punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose-punctate, 0.7�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose-punctate, median carina absent. Vertex granulose-punctate. Interocellar distance (Fig. 6E) 1.7�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.8�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 6F) granulose-punctate. Scutellum punctate and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 6B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 6B) punctate, punctures smaller than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 6C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, with sparse punctures; area petiolaris rugulose-punctate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 6A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.9�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.4 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 6G) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.6�� as long as first tergite, 0.9�� its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.7�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.1�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi yellowish brown; antenna, scape and pedicel brown; tegula yellow; fore leg yellowish brown with coxa black and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellowish brown with coxa and telotarsus black, trochanter brown; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, trochantellus basally, tibia subbasally and apically, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma black except postpetiole apically, second tergite apically and third segment basal-laterally brown. Variation. Antenna with 35���39 flagellomeres; hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2���0.4; second and third metasomal tergites yellowish brown. Distribution. China (Gansu, Heilongjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. monochroma sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.7�� basal width of mandible, frons rugose-punctate, propodeal area petiolaris rugulose-punctate, first metasomal segment without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove, ovipositor sheath approx. 1.1�� longer than hind femur, hind tibia subbasally and apically brown, second metasomal tergite apically, and third metasomal tergite basal-laterally brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���adustus��� (Latin for ���brown���) and ���antenna��� (Latin for ���antenna���), because of its antenna brown., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 14-16, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex confluentus sp. nov. Figs. 21–22 Material examined. Holotype: female, Liaoning, Shenyang, VI–VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 961003 (ZJUH). Paratype: female, Liaoning, Shenyang, VI–VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No961043. Description. Female (Fig. 21) holotype. Body length 5.1 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 25 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.25× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 22E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 22E) granulose with sparse punctures, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched. Malar space granulose, 0.55× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 22F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 22G) granulose punctate. Scutellum granulose-punctate. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 22B) granulosepunctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 22B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 22C) granulose; area basalis confluent with area superomedia; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris; area petiolaris granulose-rugulose; all carina very weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 22A) areolet absent. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.2× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15. Legs. Hind femur 5.3× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 22H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.6× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.0× as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.8× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.0× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 22D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, whitish yellow; scape and pedicel yellowish brown; fore and mid legs with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus whitish yellow, mid leg coxa basally weakly brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg coxa and trochanter black, trochantellus whitish-yellow, femur yellowish brown, tibia whitish yellow with apically infuscated, tarsus from basal 0.8 on brown, basal 0.8 yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Interocellar distance 1.2–1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli; propodeal lateral carina absent to very weak; hind femur 5.3–5.7× longer than wide. Distribution. China (Liaoning). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. assosae Kittel, 2016, but differs from the latter by having interocellar distance 1.2× ocello-ocular distance, propodeal area basalis confluent with area superomedia, area petiolaris granulose-rugulose, hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, fore and mid legs coxa whitish yellow, and hind trochanter blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from “confluus” (Latin for “confluent”), because its propodeal area basalis, area superomedia area and area petiolaris are confluent.

Campoplex collucatus sp. nov. Figs. 17–18 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Qingling, 8.VI.1998, Ma Yun, No 983546 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 17) holotype. Body length 8.0 mm, fore wing length 5.1 mm. Head. Antenna with 33 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.15× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 18E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 18E) finely granulose, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated, blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella present basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 18F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 18G) granulose, becoming rugose in notaulic area. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 18B) granulose with small punctures, punctures denser in low half, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 18B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 18C) granulose, with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose medially and rugose laterally; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, moderately depressed; medio-longitudinal carina weak under costula, gradually strong apically; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 18A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.1× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 5.5× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 18H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 3.3× longer than width of postpetiole. Metasoma entirely granulose except petiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 2.4× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× of its length. From third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 18D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, scape and pedicel brown; palpi and tegula yellowish brown; fore and mid legs except coxae and telotarsus brown; hind leg coxa black, trochanter, extreme base of tibia and each tarsal segment apically brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma from third tergites on laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black. Distribution. China (Shaanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. multicinctus Gravenhorst, 1829, but differs from the latter by having fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part, first metasomal segment shorter than hind femur, third tergite 2.0× longer than its apical width, and mandible brown except teeth. Etymology. Name derived from “collucatus” (Latin for “thin”), because this species looks thin.

Campoplex longiclypeus sp. nov. Figs. 45–46 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, Naqu Naixian, 31.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201408822 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 45) holotype. Body length 5.5 mm, fore wing length 4.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 30 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.45× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 46E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 46E) granulose, convex and long, apical margin arched, sharp. Malar space granulose, 0.9× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 46F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate, mat, weakly trans-striate on extremely below. Mesoscutum granulose punctate. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 46B) granulose-punctate, trans-striations below tegula short and weak, speculum smooth and shiny, mesopleural fovea absent. Metapleuron (Fig. 46B) granulose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 46C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose-rugulose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; medio-longitudinal carina present below costulae and absent apically; lateral longitudinal carina absent; other carinae present; propodeal spiracle small and short oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 46A) areolet present and with a long stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its middle. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell vertical. Hind wing with nervellus intercepted slightly below middle. Legs. Hind femur 5.1× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.44× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, teeth very weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 46H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.85× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite about its length. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.1× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 46D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellow; palpi brown; tegula, scape and pedicel black; pterostigma whitish basally; fore coxa brown except extreme apically yellow, trochanter basally, trochantellus basally, femur ventrally, tibia dorsally and tarsus, blackish brown, remainder of fore leg yellow; mid trochantellus apically and femur extreme basally yellow, tibia medially brownish, remainder of mid leg blackish; hind leg with trochantellus apically, femur extreme basally and tibia dorso-medially brownish, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Xizang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. kalatopensis Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having clypeus long, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, mediolongitudinal carina absent underneath, lateral carina absent, area petiolaris granulose, the length of areolet shorter than its stalk, and body colour different. Etymology. Name derived from “longus” (Latin for “long”) and “clypeus” (Latin for “clypeus”), because its clypeus is long.

Campoplex concretus sp. nov. Figs. 19���20 Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2004, Wu Qiong, No 201505028 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 male, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, No 201503196. Description. Female (Fig. 19) holotype. Body length 5.7 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm. Head. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1�� length of second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 20E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 20E) sparsely punctate, polished, slightly convex, apical margin slightly curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella. Frons granulose-punctate, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 20F) 1.8�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina before mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 20G) granulose-punctate, rugose on notaulic area anteriorly. Scutellum punctate, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 20B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 20C) smooth and compact; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia nearly smooth, shiny, with few small punctures; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed medially; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 20A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.7�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.1 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.1�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws strongly pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 20H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove very weak. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, subpolished. Second tergite 0.6�� as long as first tergite, 0.8�� as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5�� its diameter. Third tergite 0.55�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 20D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi, yellowish brown; tegula yellow; scape and pedicel brown; fore and mid coxae and apical tarsal segments brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg coxa and trochanter blackish brown, tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma black with second and third tergites somewhat blackish brown basally. Male. Essentially same as female. Distribution. China (Guizhou). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. hei sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having pronotum punctate dorsally, metanotum rugose-punctate, propodeal carina strongly developed, thyridium away from basal margin of tergite 1.5�� its diameter, and metasoma with second and third tergites somewhat blackish brown basally. Etymology. Name derived from ���concretus��� (Latin for ���thick���), because its propodeum is compact., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 33-34, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex medicarinatus sp. nov. Figs. 49���50 Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 15.X.1983, He Junhua, No834559 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 49) holotype. Body length 5.2 mm, fore wing length 4.4 mm. Head. Antenna with 30 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.4�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 50E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 50E) granulose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 50F) 1.2�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 50G) granulose punctate. Scutellum punctate and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 50B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 50B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 50C) granulose; area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 50A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15. Legs. Hind femur 5.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws with indistinct teeth basally. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 50H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove weakly present. First tergite 2.7�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.6�� as long as first tergite, 0.8�� its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath 1.5�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 50D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi yellowish brown; mandible basally black; tegula yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus blackish; hind leg with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus basally blackish brown, tibia apically infuscated, tarsus from basal tarsomere 0.8 on brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma black except second tergite laterally yellowish brown. Distribution. China (Guizhou). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. liuae sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.4�� longer than second flagellomere, clypeus granulose-punctate, frons with median carina present, area petiolaris rugose, nervellus intercepted at lower 0.15, tarsal claws with indistinct teeth basally, and the colour of metasoma different. Etymology. Name derived from ���medius��� (Latin for ���middle���) and ���carina��� (Latin for ���carina���), because its frons has a median carina., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 72-74, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex plicopunctatus sp. nov. Figs. 65���66 Material examined. Holotype: female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 14.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 943159 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 962393; 1 female, Jilin, Liaoyuan, 10.VIII.1990, Lou Juxian, No 977327; 1 female, Liaoning, Fuxin, 6.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 961577; 1 female, Xinjiang, Bayin Buluke, 10.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 914390; 2 females, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 23.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 916157, 914746; 2 females, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 29.VIII.1987, Ma Qi, No 880076, 880101. Description. Female (Fig. 65) holotype. Body length 9.0 mm, fore wing length 5.5 mm. Head. Antenna with 44 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.4�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 66E) rugose-punctate, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 66E) punctate, truncated apically. Malar space granulose, 0.45�� basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 66F) 2.0�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum rugose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 66G) granulose-punctate. Scutellum punctate, becoming rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 66B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 66B) punctate, punctures denser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 66C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia trans-striate, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 66A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.9�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3. Legs. Hind femur 5.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 66H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.2�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75�� as long as first tergite, 1.6�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.0�� its diameter. Third tergite 1.2�� longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 66D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially, palpi, tegula and scape in front yellowish brown; pedicel, mandible basally and back of scape brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown except coxae black; hind leg with coxa black, trochanter brown, tibia apically infuscated, tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black except second tergite dorso-apically reddish brown. Variation. Frons with median carina absent or present; propodeal area basalis triangular to trapezoid; area superomedia rugose to trans-striate; lateral carina weak to strong; hind femur 4.5���5.0�� longer than wide; metasoma second tergite 1.3���1.6�� longer than its apical width. Distribution. China (Fujian, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Xinjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. indicus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by face rugose-punctate, frons and ocellar area granulose, pronotum rugose-punctate dorsally, mesoscutum granulose-punctate, scutellum punctate, metapleuron not rugose in juxtacoxal region, nervellus inclivous, and mandible yellowish brown medially. Etymology. Name derived from ���plicatus��� (Latin for ���fold���) and ���punctum��� (Latin for ���dot���), because its face is rugose-punctate., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 94-96, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}