Search

Background Recent studies have demonstrated that blocking the PI3Kδ signalling enzyme (by administering a small molecule inhibitor, PI-3065) can potently improve the anti-tumour T-cell response through direct inhibition of Tregs. This treatment also has a negative impact on MDSC numbers but the primary mechanism driving this effect has remained unclear. Methods The 4T1 breast cancer mouse model was used in combination with PI-3065 to gain insights into the effect of PI3Kδ inhibition on MDSCs. Results PI-3065 treatment resulted in a concomitant reduction in MDSC expansion and tumour size. However, targeting Tregs independent of PI-3065 was also associated with reduced tumour volume and MDSC numbers. Surgical removal of tumours resulted in a rapid and significant decline in MDSC numbers, whilst ex vivo studies using cells from PI-3065-treated mice demonstrated no direct effect of the inhibitor on MDSC activity. Conclusions Our data suggest that MDSCs are not inhibited directly by PI-3065 treatment but that their reduced recruitment and immunosuppression within the tumour microenvironment is an indirect consequence of PI3Kδ-inhibition-driven tumour control. This indicates that PI3Kδ inhibition drives tumour immunity by breaking down multiple immunosuppressive pathways through both direct mechanisms (on Treg) and indirect mechanisms, secondary to tumour control (on MDSCs).

Summary The power of T cells for cancer treatment has been demonstrated by the success of co‐inhibitory receptor blockade and adoptive T‐cell immunotherapies. These treatments are highly successful for certain cancers, but are often personalized, expensive and associated with harmful side effects. Other T‐cell‐modulating drugs may provide additional means of improving immune responses to tumours without these disadvantages. Conventional chemotherapeutic drugs are traditionally used to target cancers directly; however, it is clear that some also have significant immune‐modulating effects that can be harnessed to target tumours. Cyclophosphamide is one such drug; used at lower doses than in mainstream chemotherapy, it can perturb immune homeostasis, tipping the balance towards generation of anti‐tumour T‐cell responses and control of cancer growth. This review discusses its growing reputation as an immune‐modulator whose multiple effects synergize with the microbiota to tip the balance towards tumour immunity offering widespread benefits as a safe, and relatively inexpensive component of cancer immunotherapy.

The tumor microenvironment comprises newly formed blood and lymphatic vessels which shape the influx, retention and departure of lymphocytes within the tumor mass. Thus, by influencing the intratumoral composition of lymphocytes, these vessels affect the manner in which the adaptive immune system responds to the tumor, either promoting or impairing effective antitumor immunity. In our study, we utilized a mouse model of carcinogen‐induced fibrosarcoma to examine the composition of tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes during tumor progression. In particular, we sought to determine whether CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) became enriched during tumor progression thereby contributing to tumor‐driven immunosuppression. This was not the case as the proportion of Tregs and effector CD4+ T cells actually declined within the tumor owing to the unexpected accumulation of naïve T cells. However, we found no evidence for antigen‐driven migration of these T cells or for their participation in an antitumor immune response. Our data support the notion that lymphocytes can enter tumors via aberrantly formed blood and lymphatic vessels. Such findings suggest that targeting both the tumor vasculature and lymphatics will alter the balance of lymphocyte subpopulations that enter the tumor mass. A consideration of this aspect of tumor immunology may be critical to the success of solid cancer immunotherapies., What's new? It is well known that a tumors' microenvironment can impair the anti‐tumor immune response. The culprits are usually assumed to be various suppressor cells and cytokines. In this study, however, the authors found that seemingly innocuous, naïve T cells may also play a significant role—simply by accumulating and possibly out‐competing activated effector cells within the tumor. A better understanding of the signals produced by the tumor microenvironment may allow researchers to alter this T‐cell pool, thus enhancing the immune response.