1. Scientific theories and reality in gastric pathology
- Author
-
G. Budillon and Budillon, Gabriele
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Peptic Ulcer ,Alternative hypothesis ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Disease ,Hypothesis ,Gastroenterology ,Helicobacter Infections ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,Aerophagia ,Intensive care medicine ,Skepticism ,media_common ,Hepatology ,biology ,Helicobacter pylori ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,biology.organism_classification ,Etiology ,Identification (biology) ,business - Abstract
Adhess for ctnms~akwtce: Prof. G. BudiNon, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentele, Unita di Gastroenterologie, Universita degli Studi “Federico ll”, vie S. Pansini 5, 8013 1 Napoli, ltely. Fax: +39-081-7462751. E-mail: gabudill@unine. it The recent history of medicine has been characterized by an important change in the definition of peptic ulcer, a common pathology of the upper digestive tract. In 1983, the hypothesis that ulcer had a bacterial aetiopathogenesis aroused much scepticism: ulcer was believed to be caused by excess gastric acid, evidence to this was the effectiveness of antisecretory drugs such as cimetidine and ranitidine. In 1994, the National Institute of Health Conference supported the use of antibiotics for the treatment of ulcers, thus accepting the bacterial hypothesis and contradicting the medical orthodoxy of the time, even against the interests of pharmaceutical industries. According to Paul Thagard, a philosopher of science, the history of ulcer disproves that science is either related to pure logic or power ‘. He believes that this discipline is both a social and a logical process, where technology and instrumentation play a crucial role. Science proceeds through an adaptive reasoning vaguer than probabilistic deduction, because it accounts both for the positive links with the interpretation of empirical data, and for the negative links that disprove conflicting hypotheses, in agreement with consolidated beliefs of a given period and historical setting 2. According to Thagard, the bacterial hypothesis was eventually accepted because its coherence in explaining the aetiology of the disease exceeded the alternative hypothesis in the new network that emerged from the empirical data and knowledge of the 90’s. At present Helicobacter pylori has become the undisputed protagonist of gastric pathology, from ulcer, to gastritis, to cancer. The identification of its genome, its biology, the interactions between the bacterium and its host, and the immune response, have led to the incredible progress experienced in the last 5 years. The knowledge of functional dyspepsia is not expected to meet the same destiny as ulcer and the other gastric pathologies. The development of diagnostic criteria in the last 15 years has improved our understanding of functional gastrointestinal disorders through a better definition of their symptoms, following the guidelines emerging from the Rome I and Rome II Consensus Conferences 7. The difference between aerophagia, functional vomiting and functional dyspepsia whether ulcer-like, dysmotility-like or aspecific seems to be well consolidated. However, the usefulness of a distinction between organic and functional disorders is still debated4. What needs to be further defined is the network of pathogenic interpretation relating the symptoms to specific pathophysiological alterations. Abnormal motility, visceral hypersensitivity, mucosal inflammation, neuro-immunological and psychological interactions between the brain and the intestine all make up the network of possible pathogenic interrelations. The technological tools available have become extremely sophisticated, among which imaging techniques, such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), positron emission tomography (PET), and electrogastrographic, manometric and barostat methodologies. These are aimed at identifying the possible relations between specific areas of the central nervous system and the gastroduodenal peripheral motor system. Nowadays, there is still no scientific hypothesis capable of putting together, with explicative coherence, all the clinical and instrumental data available. However, an infective aetiopathogenesis has been postulated also for motility disorders, accounting for some of the functional abnormalities as possible con
- Published
- 2000