Search

Rod and cone photoreceptors are photosensitive cells in the retina that convert light to electrical signals that are transmitted to visual processing centres in the brain. During development, cones and rods are generated from a common pool of multipotent retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) that also give rise to other retinal cell types. Cones and rods differentiate in two distinct waves, peaking in mid-embryogenesis and the early postnatal period, respectively. As RPCs transition from making cones to generating rods, there are changes in the expression profiles of genes involved in photoreceptor cell fate specification and differentiation. To better understand the temporal transition from cone to rod genesis, we assessed the timing of onset and offset of expression of a panel of 11 transcription factors and 7 non-transcription factors known to function in photoreceptor development, examining their expression between embryonic day (E) 12.5 and postnatal day (P) 60. Transcription factor expression in the photoreceptor layer was observed as early as E12.5, beginning with Crx, Otx2, Rorb, Neurod1 and Prdm1 expression, followed at E15.5 with the expression of Thrb, Neurog1, Sall3 and Rxrg expression, and at P0 by Nrl and Nr2e3 expression. Of the non-transcription factors, peanut agglutinin lectin staining and cone arrestin protein were observed as early as E15.5 in the developing outer nuclear layer, while transcripts for the cone opsins Opn1mw and Opn1sw and Recoverin protein were detected in photoreceptors by P0. In contrast, Opn1mw and Opn1sw protein were not observed in cones until P7, when rod-specific Gnat1 transcripts and rhodopsin protein were also detected. We have thus identified four transitory stages during murine retina photoreceptor differentiation marked by the period of onset of expression of new photoreceptor lineage genes. By characterizing these stages, we have clarified the dynamic nature of gene expression during the period when photoreceptor identities are progressively acquired during development.

Despite the apparent uniformity in cellular composition of the adult mammalian cerebellar cortex, it is actually highly compartmentalized into transverse zones and within each zone further subdivided into a reproducible array of parasagittal stripes. This basic cerebellar architecture is highly conserved in birds and mammals. However, different species have very different cerebellar morphologies, and it is unclear if cerebellar architecture reflects taxonomic relations or ecological niches. To explore this, we have examined the cerebellum of the naked mole-rat Heterocephalus glaber, a burrowing rodent with adaptations to a subterranean life that include only a rudimentary visual system. The cerebellum of H. glaber resembles that of other rodents with the remarkable exception that cerebellar regions that are prominent in the handling of visual information (the central zone, nodular zone, and dorsal paraflocculus) are greatly reduced or absent. In addition, there is a notable increase in size in the posterior zone, consistent with an expanded role for the trigeminal somatosensory system. These data suggest that cerebellar architecture may be substantially modified to serve a particular ecological niche.

The locus coeruleus (LC) located at the level of the pons, is involved in cognitive functions such as learning and memory. The bilateral lidocaineinduced reversible inactivation of this nucleus has been considered in order to study its role in the phases of memory processing (acquisition, consolidation and retention) without any interference with the function of the same structure either during earlier and/or later phases of the same process. In this study, inhibitory avoidance (IA) learning task used to find the LC function in acquisition, consolidation and retrieval. Saline or lidocaine 4% (0.5l/side) microinjected into the LC, for assessing the acquisition (5 min before training), consolidation (5, 90 and 360 min after training) and memory retrieval, 5 min before testing. The retention test was done 24 h after learning. Our results indicated that: (1) The bilateral functional inactivation of LC before training did not affect acquisition, but affected subsequent memory retention 24 h later in IA task. (2) The lidocaine-induced inactivation of LC only 5 min after training impaired consolidation but did not affect it after 90 or 360 min. (3) Inactivation of the LC, 5 min before pre-retrieval test, impaired memory retrieval in IA task. In conclusion, it seems that the nucleus locus coeruleus does not affect acquisition while it involves in the memory consolidation and retrieval of inhibitory avoidance learning task. Published by Elsevier B.V.