Search

Objective To assess the effect of filgotinib, which preferentially inhibits Janus kinase 1 (JAK1), on MRI measures of structural change in the SI joint in patients with active AS in the TORTUGA trial. Methods Adults with active AS and inadequate response/intolerance to two or more NSAIDs were randomized 1:1 to filgotinib 200 mg (n = 58) or placebo (n = 58) once daily for 12 weeks. In this post hoc analysis, T1-weighted MRI scans of the SI joint were evaluated by two independent readers using Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score (SSS) definitions for erosion, backfill, fat metaplasia and ankylosis. Correlations between SPARCC SSS and improvement in clinical outcomes were also assessed. Results MRI scans from 87 patients (48 filgotinib, 39 placebo) were evaluated. At baseline there were no notable differences between filgotinib and placebo for any MRI structural lesion types. From baseline to week 12, filgotinib was associated with a significant reduction in SI joint erosion score (P = 0.02) and an increase in backfill score (P = 0.005) vs placebo, with no significant between-group differences for ankylosis (P = 0.46) or fat metaplasia (P = 0.17). At week 12, the change in SPARCC MRI SI joint inflammation scores correlated positively with erosion scores but negatively with backfill scores. Conclusion The significant changes in MRI structural lesions induced by filgotinib in the SI joint by week 12 demonstrate that tissue repair can be observed very soon after starting treatment with a JAK1 preferential inhibitor. This could have prognostic implications for development of ankylosis. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03117270

To detail the unmet clinical and scientific needs in the field of rheumatology. After a 2-year hiatus due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the 22nd annual international Advances in Targeted Therapies meeting brought together more than 100 leading basic scientists and clinical researchers in rheumatology, immunology, epidemiology, molecular biology and other specialties. Breakout sessions were convened with experts in five rheumatological disease-specific groups including: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and connective tissue diseases (CTDs). In each group, experts were asked to identify and prioritise current unmet needs in clinical and translational research, as well as highlight recent progress in meeting formerly identified unmet needs. Clinical trial design innovation was emphasised across all disease states. Within RA, developing therapies and trials for refractory disease patients remained among the most important identified unmet needs and within lupus and spondyloarthritis the need to account for disease endotypes was highlighted. The RA group also identified the need to better understand the natural history of RA, pre-RA states and the need ultimately for precision medicine. In CTD generally, experts focused on the need to better identify molecular, cellular and clinical signals of early and undifferentiated disease in order to identify novel drug targets. There remains a strong need to develop therapies and therapeutic strategies for those with treatment-refractory disease. Increasingly it is clear that we need to better understand the natural history of these diseases, including their ‘predisease’ states, and identify molecular signatures, including at a tissue level, which can facilitate disease diagnosis and treatment. As these unmet needs in the field of rheumatic diseases have been identified based on consensus of expert clinicians and scientists in the field, this document may serve individual researchers, institutions and industry to help prioritise their scientific activities.

BACKGROUND: The current core outcome set for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has had only minor adaptations since its development 20 years ago. Considering the significant advances in this field during the preceding decades, an update of this core set is necessary.OBJECTIVE: To update the ASAS-OMERACT core outcome set for AS into the ASAS-OMERACT core outcome set for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).METHODS: Following OMERACT and COMET guidelines, an international working group representing key stakeholders (patients, rheumatologists, health professionals, pharmaceutical industry and drug regulatory agency representatives) defined the core domain set for axSpA. The development process consisted of: i) Identifying candidate domains using a systematic literature review and qualitative studies; ii) Selection of the most relevant domains for different stakeholders through a 3-round Delphi survey involving axSpA patients and axSpA experts; iii) Consensus and voting by ASAS; iv) Endorsement by OMERACT. Two scenarios are considered based on the type of therapy investigated in the trial: symptom modifying therapies and disease modifying therapies.RESULTS: The updated core outcome set for axSpA includes 7 mandatory domains for all trials (disease activity, pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, physical function, overall functioning and health, and adverse events including death). There are 3 additional domains (extra-musculoskeletal manifestations, peripheral manifestations and structural damage) that are mandatory for disease modifying therapies and important but optional for symptom modifying therapies. Finally, 3 other domains (spinal mobility, sleep, and work and employment) are defined as important but optional domains for all trials.CONCLUSION: The ASAS-OMERACT core domain set for AS has been updated into the ASAS-OMERACT core domain set for axSpA. The next step is the selection of instruments for each domain.

Objectives To assess the effects of filgotinib on inflammatory and structural changes at various spinal locations, based on MRI measures in patients with active AS in the TORTUGA trial. Methods In the TORTUGA trial, patients with AS received filgotinib 200 mg (n = 58) or placebo (n = 58) once daily for 12 weeks. In this post hoc analysis, spine MRIs were evaluated using the Canada–Denmark (CANDEN) MRI scoring system to assess changes from baseline to week 12 in total spine and subscores for inflammation, fat, erosion and new bone formation (NBF) at various anatomical locations. Correlations were assessed between CANDEN inflammation and clinical outcomes and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scores and between baseline CANDEN NBF and baseline BASFI and BASMI scores. Results MRIs from 47 filgotinib- and 41 placebo-treated patients were evaluated. There were significantly larger reductions with filgotinib vs placebo in total spine inflammation score and most inflammation subscores, including posterolateral elements (costovertebral joints, transverse/spinous processes, soft tissues), facet joints and vertebral bodies. No significant differences were observed for corner or non-corner vertebral body inflammation subscores, spine fat lesion, bone erosion or NBF scores. In the filgotinib group, the change from baseline in the total inflammation score correlated positively with the SPARCC spine score. Baseline NBF scores correlated with baseline BASMI but not BASFI scores. Conclusions Compared with placebo, filgotinib treatment was associated with significant reductions in MRI measures of spinal inflammation, including in vertebral bodies, facet joints and posterolateral elements. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT03117270.

Introduction Clinical remission in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has been determined using composite indices such as the AS Disease Activity Score inactive disease (ASDAS-ID), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria partial remission (ASAS-PR), and low Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores. The objective of this exploratory analysis was to evaluate the proportion of secukinumab-treated patients with AS achieving remission defined based on the ASDAS-ID (score < 1.3), ASAS-PR or BASDAI score ≤ 2. Methods The analysis pooled data from the MEASURE 1 and 2 studies over 3 years. The proportion of patients who achieved ASDAS-ID, ASAS-PR, or BASDAI ≤ 2 with secukinumab was compared with placebo at week 16; results for secukinumab-treated patients were summarized through week 156. Sustainability of each criterion was assessed from week 16 to 156 using shift analysis. The association between each of these criteria and specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as health-related quality of life, function, fatigue, and work impairment, was also explored. Results At week 16, a higher proportion of secukinumab-treated patients versus placebo achieved ASDAS-ID (17.6 vs. 3.5%), ASAS-PR (15.4 vs. 4.1%), or BASDAI ≤ 2 (22.3 vs. 6.4%) criteria (all P

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a chronic systemic rheumatic disease, the hallmark manifestation of which is inflammatory back pain, and may also involve peripheral joints. There have been important developments in SpA, from its classification to the available imaging modalities, treatment options, and outcome measures. There has been a shift in the treatment paradigm to a more treat-to-target approach, where a level of a relevant outcome of the disease (e.g., disease activity) is defined as a goal to prevent consequent disability.1 The past typical example of a patient with SpA was a young person with irreversible deformation and functional disability that occurred over several years. Nowadays, the typical example of a patient with SpA is someone with a chronic but manageable disease who can remain active and participative. The reality is less ideal, since mandatory steps for a successful management (early recognition, referral, and treatment) are still undervalued. This review approaches the major ‘checkpoints’ that enable prompt and correct diagnosis and management of SpA.

ObjectivesBimekizumab selectively neutralises both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F. We report efficacy and safety in a phase IIb dose-ranging study in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsAdults with AS (fulfilling modified New York criteria) were randomised 1:1:1:1:1 to bimekizumab 16 mg, 64 mg, 160 mg, 320 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks (double-blind period). At week 12, patients receiving bimekizumab 16 mg, 64 mg or placebo were re-randomised 1:1 to bimekizumab 160 mg or 320 mg every 4 weeks to week 48; other patients continued on their initial dose (dose-blind period). The primary end point was Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 40 response at week 12 (non-responder imputation (NRI) for missing data).Results303 patients were randomised: bimekizumab 16 mg (n=61), 64 mg (n=61), 160 mg (n=60), 320 mg (n=61) or placebo (n=60). At week 12, significantly more bimekizumab-treated patients achieved ASAS40 vs placebo (NRI: 29.5%–46.7% vs 13.3%; pConclusionsBimekizumab provided rapid and sustained improvements in key outcome measures in patients with active AS, with no unexpected safety findings versus previous studies.Trial registration numberNCT02963506.

Secukinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-17A monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated low radiographic progression over 4 years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). An adalimumab (tumor necrosis factor [TNF] inhibitor) biosimilar, GP2017 (SDZ-ADL; Sandoz), has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (July 2018) for use in all same indications as adalimumab, including AS. Adalimumab has also shown low long-term radiographic progression in patients with AS. Direct comparison of radiographic progression in AS between IL-17A and TNF inhibitors has not been studied. SURPASS is the first head-to-head, Phase IIIb, randomized, biologic-controlled study in AS to compare effects of secukinumab versus SDZ-ADL on spinal radiographic progression. Overall, 858 biologic-naive patients with AS with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (≥ 5 mg/L) and/or at least one syndesmophyte in the cervical/lumbar spine at baseline (without total ankylosis) were randomized (1:1:1) to subcutaneous (sc) secukinumab (300 or 150 mg) or SDZ-ADL (40 mg). Secukinumab will be administered at baseline, weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4, and then every 4 weeks until week 100. SDZ-ADL will be administered every 2 weeks from baseline until week 102. Patients and investigators will be unblinded to drug but blinded to secukinumab doses. Spinal X-rays will be obtained at baseline, and weeks 52 and 104, sacroiliac joint (SIJ) X-rays at baseline and week 104, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of SIJs and spine at baseline, weeks 16, 52, and 104. The primary endpoint is to demonstrate superiority of secukinumab (300 or 150 mg) treatment versus SDZ-ADL regarding proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (change from baseline in modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score [mSASSS] ≤ 0.5) at week 104. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline in mSASSS, proportion of patients with syndesmophyte at baseline who develop no new syndesmophytes, reduction of osteitis on MRI of SIJs and spine (Berlin method). Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 20/40 responses, ASAS partial remission, and AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease (ASDAS

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease characterized by inflammation and new bone formation in the axial skeleton. AxSpA is considered a spectrum of disease that includes two subtypes identified by the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria, namely, radiographic (r-axSpA usually referred to as ankylosing spondylitis) and non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA). Although the burden of disease appears similar between the two classified subtypes, the degree of inflammation, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and C-reactive protein, and the degree of new bone formation are significantly higher in r-axSpA than in nr-axSpA. Nevertheless, axSpA is considered one disease with different courses. International guidelines for the management of axSpA have outlined treatment goals focused on control of signs and symptoms, inflammation, prevention of progressive structural damage, preservation of physical function, normalization of social participation and improvement of quality of life. The pathogenesis of axSpA has not been completely elucidated to date. A strong link between human leukocyte antigen B27 and axSpA, however, has been identified, and the success of anti-tumour necrosis factor and anti-interleukin (IL)-17A therapy has highlighted some of the key pro-inflammatory cytokines involved. The anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody secukinumab is approved for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis and nr-axSpA in the European Union and United States. In this narrative review, we discuss data for secukinumab in axSpA from randomized controlled trials, including MEASURE trials in AS and PREVENT in nr-axSpA, and real-world evidence.

Objective.International recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) recommend a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) level of disease activity of ≥ 4 to initiate treatment with biologics. We aimed to evaluate the level of disease activity used to initiate tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment and the level of responses to treatment based on different BASDAI cutoffs.Methods.This is a posthoc analysis of the noninterventional, prospective, GO-NICE study in the subgroup of biologic-naive AS treated with golimumab (GOL) 50 mg subcutaneously once monthly.Results.Of the 244 biologic-naive AS patients at baseline, 70.5% had a BASDAI ≥ 4 (Group 1), 14.3% had 2.8 to < 4 (Group 2), and 15.2% had even < 2.8 (Group 3). A total of 134 patients (54.9%) completed the 24-month observational period. The mean BASDAI in Groups 1, 2, and 3 was initially 5.9 ± 1.3, 3.4 ± 0.4, and 2.0 ± 0.8, decreased to 2.2 ± 2.0, 1.9 ± 1.2, and 1.0 ± 1.2 within 3 months (all p < 0.0001 vs baseline), and decreased significantly to 2.2 ± 1.7, 1.9 ± 1.7, and 1.4 ± 1.0 at Month 24 (all p < 0.005), respectively. BASDAI 50% improvement was noted in 68.8%, 44.8%, and 45.2% of patients at Month 3, and in 84.9%, 61.9%, and 55.0% at Month 24.Conclusion.TNFi treatment was initiated in almost a third of AS patients with lower disease activity states as assessed by BASDAI cutoff of ≥ 4. Patients with a BASDAI between 2.8 and < 4 appeared to benefit significantly from GOL treatment, while patients with BASDAI < 2.8 did not. This finding should lead to a reevaluation of the established BASDAI cutoff of ≥ 4.

Aim To calculate the prevalence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 in axial spondyloarthritis patients (axSpA) compared to blood donors (BD) in Lebanon, to identify the clinical and radiological findings associated with HLA-B27 and to estimate the proportion of patients fulfilling the clinical arm of the Assessment of the Spondyloarthritis International Association (ASAS) criteria. Method Consecutive Lebanese adult axSpA patients fulfilling the ASAS classification criteria were included from 12 rheumatology clinics across Lebanon. BD served as controls. A binary logistic regression was used to study the association between HLA-B27 and the disease features. Results A total of 247 individuals were included (141 axSpA patients and 106 BD). The prevalence of HLA-B27 was 3.8% in BD and 41.1% in axSpA. Overall, 39.7% of the axSpA patients fulfilled the clinical arm of the ASAS classification criteria. Sensitivity of HLA-B27 for axSpA was 41.1%, specificity was 96.2%, positive predictive value was 93.6%, and negative predictive value was 55.13%. Positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 10.9 and negative LR was 1.63. We found a positive association of HLA-B27 with family history of SpA and psoriasis. Conclusion Our study confirmed a low prevalence of HLA-B27 in axSpA patients and BD in this Lebanese population, However, we found a high specificity and positive LR, as well as the same number of axSpA patients fulfilling the clinical arm of the ASAS criteria as in European studies. HLA-B27 is therefore valuable for identification of axSpA in Lebanese patients despite the overall low prevalence in this population. Our results may guide future evaluations the role of HLA-B27 in planning local referral strategies.

ObjectiveStudying vertebral bone loss in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) has been challenging due to ectopic bone formation. We cross-sectionally analysed low-dose CT (ldCT) trabecular bone density Hounsfield units (HU) measurements and calculated inter-reader reliability at the vertebral level in patients with r-axSpA.MethodsLdCT scans of 50 patients with r-axSpA from the sensitive imaging in ankylosing spondylitis study, a multicentre 2-year prospective cohort were included. Trabecular bone HU taken from a region of interest at the centre of each vertebra (C3-L5) were independently assessed by two trained readers. HU mean (SD), and range were provided at the vertebral level, for each reader and centre separately. Inter-reader reliability and agreement were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; single measurements, absolute agreement, two-way mixed effects models); smallest detectable difference and Bland-Altman plots.ResultsOverall, 1100 vertebrae were assessed by each reader. HU values decreased from cranial to caudal vertebrae. For readers 1 and 2 respectively, the highest mean (SD) HU value was obtained at C3 (354(106) and 355(108)), and the lowest at L3 (153(65) and 150 (65)). Inter-reader reliability was excellent (ICC(2,1):0.89 to 1.00). SDD varied from 4 to 8. For most vertebrae, reader 1 scored somewhat higher than reader 2 (mean difference of scores ranging from −0.6 to 2.9 HU). Bland-Altman plots showed homoscedasticity.ConclusionLdCT measurement of HU is a feasible method to assess vertebral bone density in r-axSpA with excellent inter-reader reliability from C3 to L5. These results warrant further validation and longitudinal assessment of reliability.

Despite the control of inflammation, many patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) still report pain as a significant concern. Our objective was to explore the prognostic value of the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ) in relation to treatment outcomes in axSpA patients treated in clinical practice. AxSpA patients with high disease activity initiating or switching a biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (bDMARD) were eligible. The PDQ score (range: −1 to 38) was used to distinguish participants with nociceptive pain (NcP) mechanisms from participants with a mixed pain mechanism (MP). The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals achieving a 50% improvement of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI50) at 12 weeks, logistic regression analysis models were used to determine the prognostic value of the nociceptive pain phenotype. Changes in continuous outcomes such as the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) core outcome domains were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) was addressed using the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. During a period of 22 months, 49 axSpA patients were included. Twenty (41%) had an NcP phenotype according to the PDQ score. BASDAI50 responses were reported by 40% (8/20) and 28% (8/29) NcP and MP groups, respectively. However, a prognostic value was not found in relation to the primary outcome (crude odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.75 [0.52 to 5.87]). Across most of the secondary outcomes, axSpA NcP phenotype patients were reported having the most improvements in the HR-QoL measures. These data indicate the influence of personalized management strategies according to patients’ pain phenotypes for stratification of axSpA patients in randomized controlled trials.

Background/Aims Biologic treatment in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are currently limited to TNF and IL-17A inhibitors (IL-17Ai). It is unknown whether there are predictors of AS patients who only respond to 1 of these mechanisms of action or respond to switching from TNF-blocker to IL-17Ai. This post-hoc analysis evaluated whether patients who did not respond to TNF inhibitor adalimumab (ADA) but did subsequently respond to IL-17Ai ixekizumab (IXE) differed from those that responded to both ADA and subsequent IXE. Methods The analysis included patients from the phase-3 COAST-V trial in bio-naive patients with active AS (BASDAI≥4 and back pain≥4 on VAS of 0-10). There were 341 patients randomized 1/1/1/1 to IXE80mg/2weeks (wks) (Q2W), IXE 80mg/4wks (Q4W), ADA 40mg Q2W (reference arm), and placebo (PBO) for the 16-week blinded-treatment period. Of these, 329 entered the dose double-blind extended treatment period (wks16 to 52). Those who received PBO or ADA were re-randomized to receive IXE 80mg Q4W or Q2W. Patients were stratified as responders or non-responders based on their Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 response at wks16 and 52. Data for the 2 IXE dose groups were pooled. Results Overall, more patients responded to IXE than ADA at wk16. Based on ASAS40 response at wks16 and at wk52, 30.9% of patients responded to both initial ADA and subsequent IXE, 23.5% of patients did not respond to initial ADA but did respond to subsequent IXE, 45.9% of patients responded to IXE at both time points, and 12.3% of patients did not respond to IXE at wk16 but did so at wk52. Across the groups, patients were of similar age and predominantly males, though there were proportionally more women among those who did not respond to either ADA or IXE at wk16. However, ADA non-responders at wk16/IXE responders at wk52 had numerically lower baseline (mean[SD]) C-reactive protein (11.2 [11.2]), lower MRI Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scores of the spine (11.6 [12.1]), and lower MRI SPARCC score of the sacroiliac joints (1.1 [2.2]) than ADA responders at wk16/IXE responders at wk52 patients (16.0 [17.1], 24.6 [32.6], and 5.5 [9.8]), respectively. Conclusion In this analysis, patients who did not respond to ADA but subsequently responded to IXE exhibited overall lower levels of inflammation, as measured by CRP and MRI of the spine or sacroiliac joints, compared with patients who responded on ADA and also after switching to IXE. Along with comparative findings in patients who continuously received IXE and responded at both wks16 and 52 or wk52 only, these data indicate that IXE is efficacious in patients with active AS irrespective of inflammation level, assessed by CRP and MRI. Alternatively, lower baseline inflammation may be a predictor of delayed response. Disclosure X. Baraliakos: Consultancies; X. Baraliakos has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; X. Baraliakos has received research grants from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB Pharma. R. Bolce: Shareholder/stock ownership; R. Bolce is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. D. Sandoval Calderon: Shareholder/stock ownership; D. Sandoval Calderon is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. S. Liu Leage: Shareholder/stock ownership; S.L. League is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. V. Geneus: Shareholder/stock ownership; V. Geneus is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. D. Adams: Shareholder/stock ownership; D. Adams is a shareholder and employee of Eli Lilly and Company. A. Deodhar: Consultancies; A. Deodhar has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos NV, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; A. Deodhar has received grants from AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. J. Walsh: Consultancies; J. A. Walsh has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; J. A. Walsh has received grant/research support from AbbVie and Pfizer. J. Sieper: Consultancies; J. Sieper is a consultant for: AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Merck, Janssen, Pfizer. Other; J. Sieper has served as a speaker for: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, and UCB.

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of secukinumab on axial and peripheral enthesitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) using pooled data from randomized controlled phase III studies.MethodsIn this posthoc analysis, data were pooled from patients originally randomized to secukinumab 150 mg, 300 mg, or placebo (PBO) from phase III MEASURE 1–4 studies (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01358175, NCT01649375, NCT02008916, and NCT02159053). Maastricht AS Enthesitis Score (MASES) was used for assessments of enthesitis through Week 52. Efficacy outcomes were mean change in MASES score and complete resolution (MASES = 0) of enthesitis in patients with baseline MASES > 0.ResultsA total of 693 (71.5%) patients had enthesitis at baseline in secukinumab 300 mg, 150 mg, and PBO groups (58 [76.3%], 355 [70.4%], and 280 [72%], respectively) out of 969 patients pooled in this analysis. At Week 16, mean changes from baseline for overall MASES and enthesitis at axial MASES sites, respectively, were as follows: –2.9 (P < 0.01) and –2.9 (P < 0.01) for secukinumab 300 mg; –2.4 (P < 0.015) and –2.3 (P < 0.05) for secukinumab 150 mg; and –1.9 and –1.8 for PBO, with improvements seen through Week 52. More than one-third of secukinumab-treated patients (300 mg: 36.2%; 150 mg: 40.8%) achieved complete resolution of enthesitis at Week 16.ConclusionSecukinumab improved enthesitis at overall MASES and axial sites in patients with AS.

Objectives To evaluate the occurrence and progression of facet joint ankylosis in the whole spine using low-dose CT (ldCT) in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) and compare progression of facet joint ankylosis and syndesmophytes. Methods Patients with r-axSpA from the Sensitive Imaging in Ankylosing Spondylitis (SIAS) cohort underwent ldCT at baseline (n = 60) and 2 years (n = 53). Facet joints (right and left, levels C2-S1) were scored as ankylosed, not ankylosed or unable to assess. Joints that were frequently poorly visible (>15% missing), were excluded. Inter-reader reliability on the patient level was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Ankylosis was assessed at joint level and patient level for both timepoints. Syndesmophytes were assessed with CT syndesmophyte score. Results Levels C5-T2 were difficult to assess and excluded from all further analyses. Facet joint ICCs were good to excellent for status scores (0.72–0.93) and poor to excellent for progression scores (0.10–0.91). Facet joint ankylosis was detected at every level but most frequently in the thoracic joints. In total, 48% of patients showed 2-year progression. Most progression occurred in the thoracic segment. Using SDCs as cutoff, 18% of patients had progression of facet joint ankylosis only, whereas 20% of patients had progression of syndesmophytes only. Conclusion This is the first study evaluating facet joints in the whole spine by ldCT in r-axSpA. Facet joint ankylosis was detected most often in the thoracic spine. Assessing facet joints in addition to syndesmophytes detected substantially more patients with damage progression over two years.

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy/safety of tofacitinib in adult patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsThis phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with active AS, meeting the modified New York criteria, with centrally read radiographs, and an inadequate response or intolerance to ≥2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients were randomised 1:1 to receive tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day or placebo for 16 weeks. After week 16, all patients received open-label tofacitinib until week 48. The primary and key secondary endpoints were Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society ≥20% improvement (ASAS20) and ≥40% improvement (ASAS40) responses, respectively, at week 16. Safety was assessed throughout.Results269 patients were randomised and treated: tofacitinib, n=133; placebo, n=136. At week 16, the ASAS20 response rate was significantly (pConclusionsIn adults with active AS, tofacitinib demonstrated significantly greater efficacy versus placebo. No new potential safety risks were identified.Trial registration numberNCT03502616

Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH) is considered a metabolic condition, characterized by new bone formation affecting mainly at entheseal sites. Enthesitis and enthesopathies occur not only in the axial skeleton but also at some peripheral sites, and they resemble to some extent the enthesitis that is a cardinal feature in spondyloarthritis (SpA), which is an inflammatory disease. We review the possible non-metabolic mechanism such as inflammation that may also be involved at some stage and help promote new bone formation in DISH. We discuss supporting pathogenic mechanisms for a local inflammation at sites typically affected by this disease, and that is also supported by imaging studies that report some similarities between DISH and SpA. Local inflammation, either primary or secondary to metabolic derangements, may contribute to new bone formation in DISH. This new hypothesis is expected to stimulate further research in both the metabolic and inflammatory pathways in order to better understand the mechanisms that lead to new bone formation. This may lead to development of measures that will help in earlier detection and effective management before damage occurs.

IntroductionIn patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are recommended to those with inadequate response or contraindications to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In case of failure of the first bDMARD, a switch within the class or to other bDMARD is recommended. Despite these treatment options, there is no optimal treat-to-target (T2T) strategy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a T2T strategy in patients with axSpA, with secukinumab as a first-line bDMARD, compared with standard-of-care (SOC) treatment.Methods and analysesThis is a randomised, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre ongoing study in patients with axSpA who are naïve to bDMARD and who have had an inadequate response to NSAIDs. The study will include an 8-week screening period, a 36-week treatment period and a 20-week safety follow-up period. At baseline, patients will be randomised (1:1) to T2T or SOC group. In the T2T group, patients will be treated with secukinumab 150 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) weekly until week 4 and then at week 8. For non-responders (patients without Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] clinically important improvement; change from baseline ≥1.1) at week 12, dose will be escalated to 300 mg s.c. every 4 weeks until week 24. Non-responders at week 24 will be switched to adalimumab biosimilar 40 mg s.c. every 2 weeks until week 34. In the SOC group, patients will receive treatment at the discretion of the physician. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving an Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% (ASAS40) response at week 24.Ethics and disseminationThe study is being conducted as per the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and after approval from independent ethics committees/institutional review boards. The first results are expected to be published in early 2022.Trial registration numberThis study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03906136.

Introduction Achievement of remission is a key treatment goal for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). C-OPTIMISE assessed achievement of sustained clinical remission in patients with axSpA, including radiographic (r) and non-radiographic (nr) axSpA, during certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment, and subsequent maintenance of remission following CZP dose continuation, dose reduction or withdrawal. Here, we report outcomes from the first 48 weeks (induction period) of C-OPTIMISE, during which patients received open-label CZP. Methods C-OPTIMISE (NCT02505542) was a two-part, multicenter, phase 3b study in adult patients with early axSpA (r-/nr-axSpA), including a 48-week open-label induction period followed by a 48-week maintenance period. Patients with active adult-onset axSpA

International audience; Objectives MAXIMISE (Managing AXIal Manifestations in psorIatic arthritis with SEcukinumab) trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of secukinumab in the management of axial manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods This phase 3b, double-blind, placebocontrolled, multi-centre 52-week trial included patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with PsA and classified by ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, with spinal pain Visual Analogue Score ≥40/100 and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥4 despite use of at least two nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Patients were randomised (1:1:1) to secukinumab 300 mg, secukinumab 150 mg or placebo weekly for 4 weeks and every 4 weeks thereafter. At week 12, placebo patients were re-randomised to secukinumab 300/150 mg. Primary endpoint was ASAS20 (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society) response with secukinumab 300 mg at week 12. Results Patients were randomly assigned; 167 to secukinumab 300 mg, 165 to secukinumab 150 mg and 166 to placebo. Secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg significantly improved ASAS20 response versus placebo at week 12 (63% and 66% vs 31% placebo). The OR (95% CI) comparing secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg versus placebo, using a logistic regression model after multiple imputation, was 3.8 (2.4 and 6.1) and 4.4 (2.7 and 7.0; p

Background Enthesitis can be a debilitating extra-articular spondyloarthritis manifestation that causes considerable pain and reduced quality of life. We evaluated the effect of secukinumab on axial and peripheral enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with baseline enthesitis (BLE) across all MASES sites (N = 13), axial MASES sites (N = 11; 13 MASES minus Achilles tendons [AT] [AxS]), peripheral sites (N = 6; AT + lateral condyles of humerus/femur [PS]) and the AT (N = 2) at Weeks 16 and 52. Methods This post-hoc analysis pooled data across four AS studies (MEASURE 1-4) from patients originally randomised to secukinumab 150 mg (approved AS dose), 300 mg (MEASURE 3 only) or placebo with BLE (MASES >0). Evaluations included mean change from baseline in MASES score, complete resolution (CR; MASES=0) and improvement from baseline in MASES score ≥5 counts. Mixed-effect model repeat measurement analysis was performed on change from baseline in MASES score and non-responder imputation for resolution of enthesitis at Week 16; data are reported as observed at Week 52. Results 355 (70.4%), 58 (76.3%) and 280 (72%) patients had BLE in the 150 mg, 300 mg and placebo groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. At Week 16, mean change from baseline for overall MASES and at AxS was greater for secukinumab 150 mg (−2.4, −2.3) and 300 mg (−2.9, −2.9) vs placebo (−1.9, −1.8; P < 0.05, P < 0.01). At Week 16, patients treated with secukinumab 150 mg (40.8%, 42.7%) and 300 mg (36.2%, 42.1%) vs placebo (28.9%, 30.1%) achieved CR of enthesitis at overall MASES and AxS. Secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg were consistently associated with a higher mean change in MASES and CR of enthesitis at PS and AT vs placebo. More patients treated with secukinumab 150/300 mg vs placebo achieved a higher threshold of improvement (≥5 counts) in overall MASES at Week 16. Further improvements were observed for all endpoints at Week 52 (Table 1). Conclusion Secukinumab 150 mg and 300 mg were associated with a higher mean change in MASES and CR of enthesitis for overall MASES and at AxS vs placebo in AS patients at Week 16, which further improved through Week 52. Disclosures N. Barkham Grants/research support; Novartis, Eli Lilly, UCB, Celgene. G. Schett None. X. Baraliakos Consultancies; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen Biologics, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Galapagos. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Chugai, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Chugai, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB. F. van den Bosch Consultancies; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. A. Deodhar Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB. L.S. Gensler Consultancies; Novartis, Lilly, Janssen. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Amgen, UCB Pharma. M. Ǿstergaard Consultancies; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, UCB. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, Novartis. S. Agawane Other; Employee of: Novartis. A. Das Gupta Other; Employee of: Novartis. S. Mpofu Other; Employee of: Novartis. T. Fox Other; Employee of: Novartis. A. Winseck Other; Employee of: Novartis. A. Shete Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis. Other; Employee of: Novartis. B. Porter Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis. Other; Employee of: Novartis.

Objective To investigate whether spinal radiographic progression relates to structural damage at the sacroiliac level in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods Patients classified as nonradiographic (nr-) and radiographic (r-) axSpA in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort with radiographs performed every 2 years, scored according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS), were included. The relationship between classification status and spinal progression during 2 years was investigated using binomial generalized estimating equations models with adjustment for sex, ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment. Baseline spinal damage was considered an intermediate variable and included in sensitivity analyses. Results In total, 88 nr-axSpA and 418 r-axSpA patients contributed to data for 725 radiographic intervals. R-axSpA patients were more frequently male, had a longer disease duration and higher structural damage at baseline. Mean (SD) mSASSS change over 2 years was 0.16 (0.62) units in nr-axSpA and 0.92 (2.78) units in r-axSpA, p = 0.01. Nr-axSpA was associated with a significantly lower progression in 2 years (defined as an increase in ≥2 mSASSS units) in adjusted analyses (OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.13; 0.83), confirmed with progression defined as the formation of ≥1 syndesmophyte. Mediation analyses revealed that sacroiliitis exerted its effect on spinal progression indirectly by being associated with the appearance of a first syndesmophyte (OR 0.09, 95%CI 0.02; 0.36 for nr-axSpA vs r-axSpA). Baseline syndesmophytes were predictors of further progression. Conclusion Spinal structural damage is mainly restricted to patients with r-axSpA, leading to relevant prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Observational study [Abstract] Objective: To describe the radiographic phenotype of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) according to the presence of HLA-B27. Methods: An international collaboration compared the radiographic phenotype of axial SpA according to HLA-B27 status. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and axial psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were collected. Radiographs were read centrally, blinded to clinical details. The symmetry of the sacroiliac joints and lumbar syndesmophytes and the morphology of syndesmophytes (typical marginal versus atypical chunky), together with the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score and the Psoriatic Arthritis Spondylitis Radiographic Index, were recorded. Results: A total of 244 patients with PsA and 198 patients with AS were included. In PsA, 60 patients (25%) were HLA-B27 positive while in AS, 148 patients (75%) were HLA-B27 positive. Patients with HLA-B27 were younger and more often male and had a longer duration of disease. In multivariable logistic regression, HLA-B27 was significantly associated with syndesmophyte symmetry (odds ratio [OR] 3.02 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.38, 6.61]) and marginal syndesmophytes (OR 1.97 [95% CI 1.16, 3.36]) but not with sacroiliac symmetry. Mean radiographic scores were higher for patients with HLA-B27. Conclusion: Patients with axial SpA who are positive for HLA-B27 have more severe radiographic damage, more marginal syndesmophytes, and more frequent syndesmophyte symmetry compared to patients who are negative for HLA-B27.

BackgroundThe best strategy for maintaining clinical remission in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has not been defined. C-OPTIMISE compared dose continuation, reduction and withdrawal of the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor certolizumab pegol (CZP) following achievement of sustained remission in patients with early axSpA.MethodsC-OPTIMISE was a two-part, multicentre phase 3b study in adults with early active axSpA (radiographic or non-radiographic). During the 48-week open-label induction period, patients received CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W). At Week 48, patients in sustained remission (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) 3.5 at any time point) during the double-blind period.ResultsAt Week 48, 43.9% (323/736) patients achieved sustained remission, of whom 313 were randomised to CZP full maintenance dose, CZP reduced maintenance dose or placebo. During Weeks 48 to 96, 83.7% (87/104), 79.0% (83/105) and 20.2% (21/104) of patients receiving the full maintenance dose, reduced maintenance dose or placebo, respectively, were flare-free (pConclusionsPatients with early axSpA who achieve sustained remission at 48 weeks can reduce their CZP maintenance dose; however, treatment should not be completely discontinued due to the high risk of flare following CZP withdrawal.Trial registration numberNCT02505542, ClinicalTrials.gov.

The development of advanced treatment options such as biologic agents for axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has led to increased expectations for modification of clinical outcomes in the long-term course of the disease. In this review, we discuss the objective assessments of disease activity as well as progression and the possible role of the currently available treatment options for modification of the disease course. The modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) continues to be a reliable measure of disease progression. The role of continuous use of NSAIDs remains contentious. Reports have shown the disease-modifying nature of currently available therapies including the anti-TNF agents when used early in the disease course. The benefit has been shown to be evident after at least 4 years of treatment. The anti-IL 17 agents also hold promise for preventing radiographic progression. Newer therapies such as the oral JAK inhibitors need further evaluation. Disease modification in axial spondyloarthritis which has remained elusive despite clinical improvement with treatment now seems achievable as we start to understand the pathophysiology of this condition better.

Objectives Minimally important changes (MICs) for SPondyloArthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scores are ⩾2.5 for SI joint and ⩾5 for spine. This post hoc analysis assessed achievement of MIC in SPARCC scores in biologic-naïve patients with AS treated with tofacitinib or placebo, and correlation with clinical responses. Methods Adult AS patients in a 12-week phase 2 study (n = 207) were randomized 1: 1: 1: 1 to tofacitinib 2, 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo. MIC in SPARCC SI joint and spine scores were assessed for patients with available MRI data (N = 164; 79%). Clinical endpoints at week 12, including Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 20% improvement (ASAS20), were compared between patients achieving/not achieving MIC. Results A greater proportion of patients achieved MIC with tofacitinib 2, 5 and 10 mg BID vs placebo for SI joint (28.6, 38.6, 29.6 vs 11.8%) and spine scores (29.3, 36.4, 40.9 vs 11.8%). Generally, a greater proportion of patients treated with tofacitinib 2, 5 and 10 mg BID or placebo, respectively, who achieved MIC for SI joint and spine scores achieved ASAS20 (SI joint: 75.0, 88.2, 69.2, 75.0%; spine: 91.7, 85.7, 72.2, 75.0%) vs patients who did not achieve MIC (SI joint: 51.7, 84.0, 58.1, 48.3%; spine: 46.4, 85.7, 53.8, 48.3%). Numerically greater responses were seen in those patients achieving vs not achieving MIC across a range of other efficacy assessments. Conclusion Approximately one-third of tofacitinib-treated AS patients experienced clinically meaningful reductions in spinal MRI inflammation at week 12. Patients achieving MIC for MRI inflammation had greater clinical response.

ObjectivesTo report 4-year imaging outcomes in the RAPID-axSpA (NCT01087762) study of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA), treated with certolizumab pegol (CZP).MethodsThis phase III, randomised trial was placebo-controlled and double-blind to week 24, dose-blind to week 48 and open-label to week 204. Patients fulfilling the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) axSpA criteria with active disease were stratified (AS/nr-axSpA) according to the modified New York (mNY) criteria at randomisation. Spinal radiographs were assessed using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). MRI inflammation used the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) score for sacroiliac joints (SIJ) and the Berlin spinal score (remission defined as SPARCC ResultsMRI improvements from baseline (BL) to week 12 were maintained to week 204 (SPARCC BL: AS=8.5, nr-axSpA=7.5; SPARCC week 204: AS=1.3, nr-axSpA=2.4; Berlin BL: AS=7.4, nr-axSpA=4.4; Berlin week 204: AS=2.6, nr-axSpA=1.9). 66.7% of patients with AS and 69.6% of patients with nr-axSpA with BL SPARCC scores ≥2, and 65.4% of patients with AS and 57.3% of patients with nr-axSpA with BL Berlin score >2, achieved remission at week 204. Mean mSASSS change in AS from BL to week 204 was 0.98 (95% CI 0.34, 1.63); 0.67 (95% CI 0.21,1.13) from BL to week 96; and 0.31 (95% CI 0.02,0.60) from week 96 to week 204. Corresponding nr-axSpA changes were 0.06 (95% CI −0.17,0.28), –0.01 (95% CI −0.19,0.17) and 0.07 (95% CI −0.07,0.20). 4.5% of patients with nr-axSpA fulfilled the mNY criteria at week 204, while 4.3% of patients with AS no longer did so.ConclusionsIn patients with CZP-treated axSpA, rapid decreases in spinal and SIJ MRI inflammation were maintained to week 204. Overall, 4-year spinal progression was low, with less progression during years 2–4 than 0–2. Radiographic SIJ grading changes demonstrated limited progression.Trial registration numberNCT01087762; Post-results.

Introduction Focal 18F-Fluoride uptake on blood-pool phase PET represents regional hyperaemia, while it indicates osteoblastic activity on mineralization phase PET. This study investigates the link between regional hyperaemia and osteoblastic activity in inflammatory and chronic lesions of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) using dual-phase 18F-Fluoride PET/MRI. Methods Thirteen patients (six men, seven women, age: 37 ± 10 years) with active AS prospectively underwent dual-phase 18F-Fluoride PET/MRI. Blood-pool phase PET was acquired 6 min and mineralization phase PET 40 min after injection of 158 ± 8 MBq 18F-Fluoride. SIJ quadrants (SQ) were assessed regarding inflammatory lesions represented by bone marrow oedema (BME), chronic AS lesions such as erosion, fat deposition (FD), sclerosis and ankylosis on MRI, and regarding focal 18F-Fluoride uptake on both PET datasets. Image quality (IQ) of both PET datasets and MRI was evaluated using a 4-point Likert scale. Results Of 104 SQ, there were 63.4% SQ with FD, 42.3% SQ with BME, 26.9% SQ with erosions, 26% SQ with sclerosis and 10.6% SQ with ankylosis. BME alone was associated with focal 18F-Fluoride uptake in 63.6% SQ on blood-pool phase and 90.9% SQ on mineralization phase 18F-Fluoride PET/MRI. Instead, FD, erosion, sclerosis, ankylosis were not associated with focal 18F-Fluoride uptake on either blood-pool or mineralization phase 18F-Fluoride PET/MRI. SQ showing BME alone or a combination of BME and chronic AS lesions had a significantly higher percentage of focal 18F-Fluoride uptake on blood-pool phase and mineralization phase PET/MRI than SQ showing AS lesions without BME (P

Therapeutic targets have been defined for axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA) in 2012, but the evidence for these recommendations was only of indirect nature. These recommendations were re-evaluated in light of new insights. Based on the results of a systematic literature review and expert opinion, a task force of rheumatologists, dermatologists, patients and a health professional developed an update of the 2012 recommendations. These underwent intensive discussions, on site voting and subsequent anonymous electronic voting on levels of agreement with each item. A set of 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations were developed and voted on. Some items were present in the previous recommendations, while others were significantly changed or newly formulated. The 2017 task force arrived at a single set of recommendations for axial and peripheral SpA, including psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The most exhaustive discussions related to whether PsA should be assessed using unidimensional composite scores for its different domains or multidimensional scores that comprise multiple domains. This question was not resolved and constitutes an important research agenda. There was broad agreement, now better supported by data than in 2012, that remission/inactive disease and, alternatively, low/minimal disease activity are the principal targets for the treatment of PsA. As instruments to assess the patients on the path to the target, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) for axial SpA and the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) for PsA were recommended, although not supported by all. Shared decision-making between the clinician and the patient was seen as pivotal to the process. The task force defined the treatment target for SpA as remission or low disease activity and developed a large research agenda to further advance the field. orcid-numbers: Machado, Pedro/0000-0002-8411-7972 Inman, Robert/0000-0002-4750-1422 unique-id: ISI:000417778700007 ispartof: Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases vol:77 issue:1 pages:3-17 ispartof: location:England status: published

Background:Pain is a debilitating symptom of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and negatively impacts patient (pt) lives. Upadacitinib (UPA), a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor engineered for increased selectivity for JAK1 over JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2, 1 showed significant efficacy vs placebo (PBO) in the randomized phase 2/3 SELECT-AXIS 1 study in active AS.2Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy of UPA on multiple pain assessments through 64 weeks (wks).Methods:SELECT-AXIS 1 (NCT03178487) enrolled adults with active AS, who had an inadequate response, intolerance or contraindications to ≥2 NSAIDs, were biologic DMARD naive and met the modified New-York Criteria. Pts were randomized 1:1 to UPA 15 mg once daily (QD, n=93) or PBO (n=94) for 14 wks (Period 1), followed by open-label UPA 15 mg QD during 90-wk extension (Period 2); reported here are data through wk 64. Pain endpoints included the proportion of pts achieving ≥30%/≥50%/≥70% reduction in Pt’s Global Assessment (PGA) of pain on a 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS), minimal clinically important difference (MCID, defined as ≥1 point reduction or ≥15% reduction from baseline [BL]) in PGA of pain, and much better improvement (MBI, defined as ≥2 point reduction and ≥33% reduction from BL) in PGA of pain. In addition, mean change from baseline in PGA of pain, BASDAI questions 2 (neck/back/hip pain) and 3 (peripheral pain/swelling), and pt’s assessment of back pain and nocturnal back pain NRS scores (NRS 0–10) were assessed. Non-responder imputation (binary endpoints) and mixed-effects model for repeated measurements (continuous endpoints) were used for missing data/dropouts in Period 1; as-observed analysis was used for Period 2.Results:A significantly higher proportion of pts receiving UPA vs PBO achieved reductions in all PGA of pain assessments as early as wk 2 that was sustained at all time points in Period 1; the only exception was ≥70% reduction in PGA of pain that was significant at wk 4 and sustained thereafter (Figure 1). For ≥30%/≥50%/≥70% reduction and MBI, the response rate increased over time with UPA; the difference for UPA vs PBO also continued to increase over time for ≥50% and ≥70% reduction endpoints. For MCID, an increase from BL to wk 2 was observed and plateaued thereafter. The mean change from BL in PGA of pain, BASDAI Q2, back pain, and nocturnal back pain NRS scores were significantly greater for UPA vs PBO at all time points in Period 1; BASDAI Q3 was significant at wk 8 and 14 (Figure 1). The effect of UPA on pain reduction was sustained through wk 64. PBO pts who switched to open-label UPA at wk 14 generally reached the same level of pain reduction as those initially randomized to UPA (Figure 1).Conclusion:In pts with active AS and an inadequate response/contraindication to NSAIDs, a greater proportion of patients treated with UPA achieved rapid, significant, and clinically meaningful reductions in pain vs PBO through 14 wks across multiple pain assessments. The reductions in pain were sustained over time, and pts who switched from PBO to UPA reached the same level of improvement as the continuous UPA group.References:[1]Parmentier JM, et al. BMC Rheumatology. 2018;2(23).[2]van der Heijde D, et al. Lancet. 2019;394(10214):2108-2117.Acknowledgements:AbbVie funded this study and participated in the study design, research, analysis, data collection, interpretation of data, reviewing, and approval of the publication. All authors had access to relevant data and participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by M Hovenden and J Matsuura of ICON plc and was funded by AbbVie.Disclosure of Interests:Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, UCB Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Consultant of: Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, UCB Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, UCB Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Xenofon Baraliakos Consultant of: Novartis, Pfizer AbbVie, Eli Lilly, UCB Pharma, Galapagos Janssen, Celgene and Amgen, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer AbbVie, Eli Lilly, UCB Pharma, Galapagos Janssen, Celgene and Amgen, Iain McInnes Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Kurt de Vlam Speakers bureau: Celgene Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Novartis, and UCB, Consultant of: Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Novartis, and UCB, Grant/research support from: Celgene and Galapagos, Louis Bessette Speakers bureau: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, and Sanofi, Consultant of: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, Gilead, Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, and Gilead, anna maniccia Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Ralph Lippe Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Christopher Saffore Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Tianming Gao Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, In-Ho Song Shareholder of: AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Andrew Ostor Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Gilead, and Paradigm

Background:Axial, peripheral, and other disease manifestations often overlap between psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor under evaluation for the treatment of PsA and AS.Objectives:To describe and compare baseline characteristics and UPA efficacy across 4 subgroups of patients (pts) from clinical trials: active PsA (with/without axial involvement) and active AS (with/without peripheral involvement).Methods:Baseline characteristics and efficacy of UPA in reducing axial and peripheral signs and symptoms were assessed via an integrated analysis across the 4 pt subgroups from the SELECT-PsA 1,1 SELECT-PsA 2,2 and SELECT-AXIS3 studies. Analyses of baseline characteristics included pts in the UPA 15 mg once daily (QD), UPA 30 mg QD, and placebo (PBO) groups; efficacy analyses included pts in the UPA 15 mg QD group only. Axial involvement in PsA (axial PsA) was determined by investigator assessment. Peripheral involvement in AS was defined based on presence of tender or swollen joints (TJC68 >0 or SJC66 >0), or presence of enthesitis at baseline (Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score >0).Results:2102 pts (UPA 15 mg; UPA 30 mg; PBO) were evaluated across the 4 subgroups (PsA [with/without axial involvement]: 626/1289; AS [with/without peripheral involvement]: 135/52). 33% of pts with PsA had axial PsA; 72% of pts with AS had peripheral symptoms. Pts with axial PsA had higher peripheral joint (TJC68 and SJC66) and skin (psoriasis) burden than pts with AS with peripheral involvement (pTable 1.Baseline demographics, medical history, and disease characteristicsMean (SD), unless otherwise specifiedPsA with axial involvementn=626PsA without axial involvementn=1289AS with peripheral involvementn=135AS without peripheral involvementn=52p-value(PsA with axial involvement versus AS with peripheral involvement)Male, n (%)300 (47.9)583 (45.2)88 (65.2)44 (84.6)0.0003Age, years50.7 (12.6)52.0 (12.0)46.6 (12.7)42.2 (11.4)0.0008Body mass index, kg/m230.3 (7.1)30.7 (6.8)a26.7 (4.9)26.8 (5.2)*Duration of disease symptoms, years11.2 (9.3)b10.4 (9.5)a14.6 (10.9)14.0 (10.6)0.0009Duration of disease since diagnosis, years7.7 (8.0)7.3 (8.0)7.0 (9.2)6.8 (8.4)0.3738TJC6823.6 (16.4)20.6 (14.6)5.3 (8.2)0*SJC6611.9 (9.0)11.2 (8.2)1.5 (3.2)0*Psoriasis, n (%)616 (98.4)1269 (98.4)7 (5.2)0*Uveitis, n (%)1 (0.2)5 (0.4)3 (2.2)1 (1.9)0.0191Inflammatory bowel disease, n (%)10 (1.6)13 (1.0)2 (1.5)2 (3.8)1.0000PhGA6.7 (1.7)6.5 (1.7)6.7 (1.5)c6.9 (1.7)b0.6960Pain, VAS 0–106.3 (2.0)b6.1 (2.2)d6.9 (1.6)a6.8 (1.7)a0.0002ASDAS(CRP)3.4 (1.0)e3.1 (1.0)f3.5 (0.7)a3.7 (0.8)a0.0351BASDAI (Total score)6.0 (2.1)e5.5 (2.2)f6.4 (1.6)6.3 (1.8)a0.0076BASDAI Q2 (Back pain)6.1 (2.7)e4.8 (3.2)f7.2 (1.7)7.2 (1.6)a*BASDAI Q3 (Peripheral pain/ swelling)6.3 (2.4)e6.0 (2.6)f5.9 (2.4)5.5 (2.4)a0.0747BASDAI Q4 (Tenderness)5.8 (2.6)e5.6 (2.7)f6.1 (2.5)5.7 (2.4)a0.3196*pData missing for an=1, bn=3, cn=6, dn=11, en=4, fn=14Conclusion:Pts with PsA with axial involvement and pts with active AS showed some differences in baseline characteristics but similar improvements versus placebo with UPA 15 mg QD.References:[1]McInnes I, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79(Suppl 1):16–17; 2. Genovese MC, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79(Suppl 1):139; 3. van der Heijde D, et al. Lancet 2019;394:2108–17.Acknowledgements:AbbVie funded this study; contributed to its design; participated in data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and participated in the writing, review, and approval of the abstract. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by Grant Thomas Kirkpatrick, MSc, of 2 the Nth (Cheshire, UK), and was funded by AbbVie.Disclosure of Interests:Xenofon Baraliakos Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, R Ranza Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer, Simona Rednic: None declared, francesco ciccia Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Werfen, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene, Chugai, Pfizer, and UCB, Fabiana Ganz Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Tianming Gao Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Apinya Lertratanakul Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, In-Ho Song Shareholder of: May own stock or options in AbbVie, Employee of: AbbVie, Andrew Ostor Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, Laura C Coates: None declared.

Background:The oral Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib (FIL) significantly improved Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inflammation scores (bone marrow oedema) in the spine and sacroiliac joints vs placebo (PBO) in the Phase 2 TORTUGA trial (NCT03117270) in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).1Objectives:This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effects of FIL on Canada-Denmark (CANDEN) MRI measures of spinal inflammation and structural lesions in patients from the TORTUGA trial.Methods:TORTUGA was a PBO-controlled, multicentre, double-blind, randomised trial. Patients with active AS (as per modified New York classification criteria, with sacroiliitis confirmed by central reading) were treated with FIL 200 mg (n=58) or PBO (n=58) once daily for 12 weeks. MRI of the total spine was conducted at baseline and at treatment end. Scans were re-evaluated post-hoc by 2 independent experts (blinded to time point and assigned treatment) using the CANDEN method;2 inter-reader discrepancies were resolved by an independent adjudicator. Observed changes from baseline were evaluated using analysis of covariance, with factors for treatment, baseline value, and randomisation stratification by prior tumour necrosis factor inhibitor use. Least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline and between-group differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated; P values are nominal.Results:MRI scans from 88 patients (47 FIL, 41 PBO) with an evaluable scan at baseline and Week 12 (or early termination) were re-evaluated. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between patients with/without an MRI scan. Of those with MRI scans, mean total spine inflammation score (which ranges from 0–614) was higher, and mean ankylosis score (which ranges from 0–460) was lower, in the FIL vs PBO group at baseline. Total spine inflammation scores decreased from baseline with FIL but not with PBO (Figure and Table; P=0.0003 for between-group difference). Cumulative probability plots favoured FIL over PBO for change from baseline in subregion inflammation scores, including posterolateral elements (i.e. sum of lesions in ribs, transverse processes, spinous processes, soft tissue inflammation, and postero-lateral vertebral body), facet joint, and vertebral body. Total spine fat lesion scores numerically increased from baseline in the FIL but not PBO group (P=0.0878 for between-group difference; Table). There were no significant differences between groups for changes in erosion (P=0.1956) or ankylosis (P=0.3888) scores (Table).Table 1.Change from baseline at Week 12 in CANDEN total spine inflammation, total spine fat, total spine bone erosion, and ankylosis scoresTreatment groupnSample mean (SE)LS mean (SE)95% CI of treatment meanLS mean of group difference (SE)95% CI of group differenceBetween-group P valueTotal spine inflammation scoreFilgotinib47–4.98 (0.96)–4.40 (1.13)–6.65, –2.15–4.49 (1.21)–6.85, –2.120.0003Placebo410.29 (0.78)0.09 (1.13)–2.17, 2.34Total spine fat scoreFilgotinib471.01 (0.62)1.09 (0.66)–0.22, 2.401.18 (0.69)–0.18, 2.550.0878Placebo41–0.25 (0.19)–0.09 (0.66)–1.40, 1.21Total spine bone erosion scoreFilgotinib470.01 (0.02)0.07 (0.03)0.00, 0.140.05 (0.04)–0.02, 0.120.1956Placebo41–0.02 (0.03)0.02 (0.03)–0.04, 0.09Total ankylosis scoreFilgotinib470.30 (0.29)0.23 (0.31)–0.40, 0.850.28 (0.34)–0.37, 0.940.3888Placebo41–0.01 (0.08)–0.06 (0.31)–0.68, 0.56SE, standard errorConclusion:This is the first PBO-controlled trial to demonstrate a decrease in inflammatory activity with FIL, not only in the spinal vertebrae but also in the postero-lateral elements of the spine and facet joints. As expected in a 12-week study period, no changes in erosion or ankylosis were seen, while fat lesions showed a tendency to increase with FIL. Larger trials are needed to confirm these results.References:[1]van der Heijde D, et al. Lancet 2018;392:2378–87.[2]Krabbe S, et al. RMD Open 2019;5:e001057.Acknowledgements:The TORTUGA trial was sponsored by Galapagos NV (Mechelen, Belgium) and co-funded by Galapagos NV and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Foster City, CA, USA). Medical writing support was provided by Debbie Sherwood BSc, CMPP (Aspire Scientific Ltd, Bollington, UK), and funded by Galapagos NV.Disclosure of Interests:Xenofon Baraliakos Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis and UCB, Mikkel Østergaard Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck and Novartis, Robert B.M. Landewé Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen (formerly Centocor), Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Ablynx, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Schering, TiGenix and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen (formerly Centocor), Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering and UCB, Employee of: Director of Rheumatology Consultancy BV, William Barchuk Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Currently employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc.; and former employee of AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson, Ke Liu Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Employee of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Chantal Tasset Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Leen Gilles Employee of: Galapagos, Thijs Hendrikx Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Robin Besuyen Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Walter P Maksymowych Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Employee of: Chief Medical Officer of CARE Arthritis Limited

ObjectivesTo compare the CT Syndesmophyte Score (CTSS) for low-dose CT (ldCT) with the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) for conventional radiographs (CR) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsPatients with AS in the Sensitive Imaging in Ankylosing Spondylitis cohort had lateral cervical and lumbar spine CR and whole spine ldCT at baseline and 2 years. CR and ldCT images were scored by two readers, paired by patient, blinded to time order, per imaging modality. For the total score analysis, we used average scores of readers per corner on CR or quadrant on ldCT. For the syndesmophyte analysis we used individual reader and consensus scores, regarding new or growing syndesmophyte at the same corner/quadrant.Results50 patients were included in the syndesmophyte analysis and 37 in the total score analysis. Mean (SD) status scores for mSASSS (range 0–72) and CTSS (range 0–552) at baseline were 17.9 (13.8) and 161.6 (126.6), and mean progression was 2.4 (3.8) and 17.9 (22.1). Three times as many patients showed new or growing syndesmophytes at ≥3 quadrants on ldCT compared with ≥3 corners on CR for individual readers; for consensus this increased to five times. In 50 patients, 36 new or growing syndesmophytes are seen on CR compared with 151 on ldCT, most being found in the thoracic spine.ConclusionsldCT, covering the whole spine, detects more progression in the form of new and growing syndesmophytes in patients with AS compared with CR, which is limited to the cervical and lumbar spine. Most progression occurred in the thoracic spine.

Background The Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) definition for a ‘positive’ Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for sacroiliitis is well studied and validated in adults, but studies about the value of this definition in children are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the adult ASAS definition of a positive MRI of the sacroiliac joints can be applied to children with a clinical suspicion of Juvenile Spondyloarthritis (JSpA). Methods Two pediatric musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to clinical data independently retrospectively reviewed sacroiliac (SI) joint MRI in 109 children suspected of sacroiliitis. They recorded global impression (sacroiliitis yes/no) and whether the adult ASAS definition for sacroiliitis was met at each joint. This was compared to gold-standard clinical diagnosis of JSpA. Additionally, MRI were scored according to’adapted’ ASAS definitions including other features of sacroiliitis on MRI. Results JSpA was diagnosed clinically in 47/109 (43%) patients. On MRI, sacroiliitis was diagnosed by global assessment in 30/109 patients, of whom 14 also fulfilled ASAS criteria. No patients with negative global assessment for sacroiliitis fulfilled ASAS criteria. Sensitivity (SN) for JSpA was higher for global assessment (SN = 49%) than for ASAS definition (SN = 26%), but the ASAS definition was more specific (SP = 97% vs. 89%). Modifying adult ASAS criteria to allow bone marrow edema (BME) lesions seen on only one slice, synovitis or capsulitis, increased SN to 36%, 32% and 32% respectively, only slightly lowering SP. Including structural lesions increased SN to 28%, but lowered specificity to 95%. Conclusion The adult ASAS definition for sacroiliitis has low sensitivity in children. A pediatric-specific definition of MRI-positive sacroiliitis including BME lesions visible on one slice only, synovitis and/or capsulitis may improve diagnostic utility, and increase relevance of MRI in pediatric rheumatology practice.