Search

Purpose: To compare various parameters of the chamber angle in a pedigree with dominant goniodysgenesis and juvenile open-angle glaucoma linked to chromosome 1q, GLC1A, with those in patients with adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma, and in normal eyes., Methods: Ultrasound biomicroscopy was performed on 10 eyes with dominant goniodysgenesis and juvenile open-angle glaucoma, on 12 eyes with adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma, and 24 normal eyes. Eight parameters were measured., Results: The anterior chamber angle, angle opening distance 500 microm from the scleral spur, trabecular meshwork--iris distance, and trabecular meshwork--iris pigment epithelium distance were statistically significantly higher in the group with juvenile glaucoma., Conclusion: The wider chamber angle in dominant juvenile open-angle glaucoma could suggest a more complex anomaly with involvement of cornea and iris in addition to goniodysgenesis. The presence of goniodysgenesis in the dominant juvenile open-angle glaucoma patients could not be detected by ultrasound biomicroscopy, however.

Purpose: To evaluate intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements in images obtained by the 50 MHz Humphrey Ultrasound Biomicroscope., Methods: The first stored image of central cornea, central anterior chamber, and angle structures obtained at 50 examinations were measured twice by three observers. Nine different parameters were measured in angle images and two in images of central cornea and anterior chamber. Intraobserver reproducibility was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation and interobserver reproducibility by a two-ways ANOVA., Results: Intraobserver reproducibility was high for all measurements of central cornea thickness and anterior chamber depth with a coefficient of variation (%) < or = 3.8%. In angle images the intraobserver reproducibility of measurements was often lower (coefficient of variation (%) 1.3-52.6%). The lower reproducibility was most noticeable in measurements involving the less defined structures. Interobserver reproducibility was poor., Conclusions: Comparison of measurements are best done of well defined structures and by only one observer.