Search

Objectives: To examine differences in knee strength outcomes after ACL reconstruction according to quadriceps tendon (QT) or hamstring tendon (HT) autograft in adolescents., Design: Retrospective cohort., Methods: Surgical and clinical outcome data were collected. Analyses were conducted separately for female and male cohorts and grouped by graft type (HT or QT). A Mann-Whitney U test of independent samples was used to examine group differences according to graft type., Results: 107 females (age = 15.6 ± 1.5 years) and 94 males (age = 15.7 ± 1.5 years) were included. Mean time since surgery ranged from 7.2 to 7.9 months. Those with a QT autograft had decreased normalized isokinetic quadriceps peak torque on the involved limb compared to the HT group (p < 0.01, ES = 0.71-0.89). Normalized isometric hamstring peak torque was decreased for those with HT autograft in the female cohort (p = 0.02, ES = 0.57)., Conclusion: Normalized isokinetic quadriceps peak torque was reduced by 18-20% on the involved limb in those with a QT autograft. Normalized isometric hamstring peak torque was decreased by 13% for those with HT autograft in the female cohort. Method of strength testing may be an important consideration to fully appreciate strength deficits after ACL reconstruction according to graft type., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Dynamic limb valgus, particularly high knee abduction moments, is a known risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and may result from poor static anatomic limb alignment, faulty biomechanics, or a combination of both. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of static lower extremity anatomic alignment and dynamic kinematic/kinetic measures on knee abduction moments during sidestep cutting in adolescent athletes with recent ACL reconstruction., Methods: This retrospective study included 50 adolescents with recent unilateral ACL reconstruction (18/50 female, mean age = 15.8 yr, 7.6 months postsurgery). Frontal plane hip-to-ankle imaging was used to measure mechanical axis deviation and tibial-femoral angle. Three-dimensional motion capture provided lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during quiet standing and during the loading phase (initial contact to peak knee flexion) of an anticipated 45° sidestep cut. Imaging, static motion capture, and dynamic motion capture measures were investigated as potential predictors of average dynamic knee abduction moment using correlation and backward stepwise linear regression., Results: Dynamic knee abduction moment was best predicted by a combination of younger age and dynamic measures: trunk lean toward the planting limb, knee abduction and external rotation, and ankle inversion. Although static measures were correlated with dynamic knee abduction moment in univariate analysis, no static/anatomic variables entered the model once the dynamic measures were included., Conclusion: Knee abduction moments during sidestep cutting were related to dynamic factors reflecting frontal and transverse plane motion. Static (anatomic) lower limb alignment did not influence knee abduction moments once these dynamic factors were considered. Knee abduction moments and ACL injury risk are therefore not dictated by anatomic alignment and can be altered through neuromuscular/biomechanical training., (Copyright © 2021 by the American College of Sports Medicine.)

Motion analysis offers objective insight into biomechanics, rehabilitation progress and return to sport readiness. This study examined changes in three-dimensional movement patterns during drop jump landing between early and late stages of rehabilitation in adolescent athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Twenty-four athletes (58% female; mean age 15.4 years, SD 1.2) with unilateral ACLR underwent motion analysis testing 3-6 months and again 6-10 months post-operatively. Kinematics and kinetics were compared between visits and between limbs using repeated measures ANOVA. The operative side exhibited lower vertical ground reaction force, less energy absorption and lower sagittal external moments at the knee and ankle, and lower peak dorsiflexion angles compared with the non-operative side regardless of visit. Between visits, hip and knee flexion increased bilaterally, as well as hip flexion moments and energy absorption. During early rehabilitation following ACLR, adolescent athletes reduced flexion and loading of the knee and ankle on their operative limb. Motion and loading increased over time, particularly at the hip, but remained reduced at the knee and ankle 6-10 months post-operatively.

Background: Adolescent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) commonly utilizes hamstring (HT), patellar (PT) or quadriceps (QT) tendon autografts, but consensus is lacking regarding optimal graft choice. This study compared landing biomechanics and asymmetries among ACLR patients with HT, PT and QT grafts and uninjured controls., Methods: This retrospective study included 61 adolescents with unilateral ACLR (27 HT, 20 PT, 14 QT; four to 12 months post-surgery, mean 6.4; age 15.4, SD 1.4 years) and 27 controls (14.6, SD 0.9 years) who were evaluated during drop jump landings. Lower extremity 3D biomechanics and asymmetries were compared., Results: Compared to controls, all operative limbs exhibited 1) greater hip flexion and lower dorsiflexion angles; 2) higher hip and lower knee and ankle flexion moments; 3) higher energy absorption at the hip (HT and QT only) and lower at the knee and ankle; and 4) higher knee abduction moments. Asymmetries observed in all ACLR groups included 1) lower knee and ankle flexion angles; 2) lower knee and ankle flexion moments; 3) lower energy absorption at the knee and ankle; and 4) higher hip and knee abduction moments on the operative side. The PT and QT groups demonstrated greater asymmetry in hip and knee flexion moments compared to HT., Conclusions: While adolescent ACLR limbs offloaded the knee and ankle, patients with PT or QT grafts demonstrated greater deficiencies during rehabilitation than those reconstructed with HT. Graft choice in ACLR should remain patient-specific and aim to optimize biomechanics with the ultimate goal of minimizing graft re-tear and donor site morbidity., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The understanding and treatment of anterior cruciate ligament tears in skeletally immature patients continues to evolve. While conservative management was a mainstay of treatment, poor outcomes have led to several surgical techniques aimed at stabilizing the knee, optimizing outcome, and minimizing the chance of growth disturbance. Current techniques have, in large part, accomplished these goals but challenges remain. Looking to the future, different graft options, primary repair techniques, and rigorous prospective studies will help improve outcomes for this challenging patient population.

Background Return-to-sport protocols after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) often include assessment of hop distance symmetry. However, it is unclear whether movement deficits are present, regardless of hop symmetry. Objectives To assess biomechanics and symmetry of adolescent athletes following ACLR during a single-leg hop for distance. Methods Forty-six patients with ACLR (5-12 months post surgery; 27 female; mean ± SD age, 15.6 ± 1.7 years) were classified as asymmetric (operative-limb hop distance less than 90% that of nonoperative limb [n = 17]) or symmetric (n = 29) in this retrospective cohort. Lower extremity biomechanics were compared among operative and contralateral limbs and 24 symmetric controls (12 female; mean ± SD age, 14.7 ± 1.5 years) using analysis of variance. Results Compared to controls, asymmetric patients hopped a shorter distance on their operative limb (P<.001), while symmetric patients hopped an intermediate distance on both sides (P≥.12). During landing, the operative limb, regardless of hop distance, exhibited lower knee flexion moments compared to controls and the contralateral side (P≤.04), with lower knee energy absorption than the contralateral side (P≤.006). During takeoff, both symmetric and asymmetric patients had less hip extension and smaller ankle range of motion on the operative side compared with controls (P≤.05). Asymmetric patients also had lower hip range of motion on the operative, compared with the contralateral, side (P = .001). Conclusion Both symmetric and asymmetric patients offloaded the operative knee; symmetric patients achieved symmetry, in part, by hopping a shorter distance on the contralateral side. Therefore, hop distance symmetry may not be an adequate test of single-limb function and return-to-sport readiness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(8):622-629. Epub 30 Mar 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7817.