Search

Background: Both high body mass index (BMI) and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) independently influence knee osteoarthritis risk. Preliminary evidence shows the combination of these risk factors leads to poorer recovery and altered biomechanical outcomes after ACLR, but few studies have directly evaluated early changes in cartilage health between normal-BMI and high-BMI groups in this population. Purpose: To evaluate ultrasound-based measures of cartilage strain and compositional changes (via echo-intensity [EI]) in response to an incline walking stress test between normal-BMI and high-BMI individuals with ACLR. A secondary evaluation was conducted of associations between habitual walking biomechanics (ie, ground-reaction forces, sagittal knee kinetics and kinematics) and cartilage strain and EI outcomes. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Gait biomechanics and femoral trochlear ultrasound analyses were evaluated in 64 participants with ACLR who had normal BMI (BMI < 27.0; n = 40) and high BMI (BMI ≥ 27.0; n = 24). Ultrasound images were collected bilaterally before and after an incline treadmill walk, and medial and lateral trochlear strain and EI changes pre-post exercise were used to compare BMI groups and limbs. Gait outcomes included ground-reaction forces, peak sagittal plane knee moments, angles, and excursions and were used to determine associations with cartilage outcomes in the entire cohort. Results: High-BMI individuals with ACLR exhibited greater medial trochlear cartilage strain in the ACLR limb compared with normal-BMI individuals (approximately 6%; P <.01). In those with high BMI, the ACLR limb exhibited greater medial trochlear strain relative to non-ACLR limbs (approximately 4%; P <.05), but between-limb differences were not observed in the normal-BMI group (P >.05). Medial trochlear EI changes were greater bilaterally in those with high BMI compared with normal-BMI ACLR counterparts (approximately 10%; P <.01). Last, individuals who walked with greater peak knee flexion angles exhibited less medial cartilage strain (Δ R 2 = 0.06; P =.025). Conclusion: The data suggested that high BMI affects cartilage functional properties after ACLR, whereas smaller knee flexion angles were associated with larger medial cartilage strain. Clinical Relevance: High-BMI individuals with ACLR may represent a subset of patients exhibiting earlier declines in cartilage functional integrity in response to loading, necessitating additional or more targeted interventions to mitigate disease development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: High body mass index (BMI) is a strong predictor of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Altered gait mechanics are independently affected by BMI and ACLR, and influence OA risk. Yet, evidence directly assessing the impact of high BMI on gait or cartilage characteristics after ACLR are limited. Here, we evaluated if high BMI moderates associations between gait and trochlear cartilage structure in individuals with ACLR. Methods: Treadmill walking biomechanics were evaluated in 40 normal BMI and 24 high BMI participants with ACLR at self-selected speeds. Normalized and absolute peak and cumulative loads (i.e., impulse) were extracted for peak knee flexion and adduction moments (KFM, KAM) and vertical ground reaction force (GRF).Medial and lateral femoral cartilage thickness and medial/lateral thickness ratios were assessed via ultrasound. Results: Those with ACLR and high BMI walked with reduced normalized peak vertical GRFs, and greater absolute peak and cumulative loads compared with normal BMI individuals with ACLR. Those with ACLR and high BMI also exhibited thinner cartilage and greater medial/lateral ratios in ACLR limbs compared with contralateral limbs whereas norma lBMI individuals with ACLR exhibited thicker ACLR limb cartilage. Lastly, greater peak KAM and KAM cumulative load were associated with thicker lateral cartilage and lesser medial/lateral thickness ratios, but only in the high BMI group. Conclusions: We observed those with high BMI after ACLR exhibited trochlear cartilage structural alterations not observed in normal BMI patients, whereas differential associations between loading outcomes and cartilage thickness in ACLR knees were observed between groups. Those with high BMI after ACLR may require different therapeutic strategies to optimize joint health in this subset of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Abnormal gait is common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) which may influence osteoarthritis risk in this population. Yet few gait retraining options currently exist in ACLR rehabilitation. Cueing cadence changes is a simple, low-cost method that can alter walking mechanics in healthy adults, but few studies have tested its effectiveness in an ACLR population. Here, we evaluated the acute effects of altering cadence on knee mechanics in patients 9 to 12 months post ACLR. Hypothesis: Cueing larger steps will facilitate larger knee angles and moments, while cueing smaller steps would induce smaller knee angles and moments. Study Design: Randomized cross-sectional design. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with unilateral ACLR underwent gait assessments on a treadmill at preferred pace. Preferred walking gait was assessed first to obtain preferred cadence. Participants then completed trials while matching an audible beat set to 90% and 110% of preferred cadence in a randomized order. Three-dimensional sagittal and frontal plane biomechanics were evaluated bilaterally. Results: Compared with preferred cadence, cueing larger steps induced larger peak knee flexion moments (KFMs) and knee extension excursions bilaterally (P < 0.01), whereas cueing smaller steps only reduced knee flexion excursions (P < 0.01). Knee adduction moments remain unchanged across conditions and were similar between limbs (P > 0.05). Peak KFMs and excursions were smaller in the injured compared with uninjured limb (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Frontal plane gait outcomes were unchanged across conditions suggesting acute cadence manipulations result in mainly sagittal plane adaptations. Follow-up studies using a longitudinal cadence biofeedback paradigm may be warranted to elucidate the utility of this gait retraining strategy after ACLR. Clinical Relevance: Cueing changes in walking cadence can target sagittal plane knee loading and joint range of motion in ACLR participants. This strategy may offer high clinical translatability given it requires relatively minimal equipment (ie, free metronome app) outside of a treadmill. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose was to (1) compare the effect of a walking bout on femoral cartilage deformation between limbs with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and (2) examine the association between gait kinetics and the magnitude of cartilage deformation. A total of 30 individuals with primary unilateral ACLR completed this study [14 male, 16 female; age = 22.57 (3.78) years; body mass index (BMI) = 25.88 (5.68) kg/m2; time since ACLR = 61.00 (16.43) months]. Overground walking biomechanics were assessed on day 1, and a 30‐min walking bout or 30‐min resting bout (control) were completed on days 2 and 3 (counterbalanced order). Femoral cartilage thickness was measured using ultrasound before, immediately following, and 30‐min following each intervention. Linear mixed effects models compared the effect of walking on cartilage thickness between the ACLR and contralateral limbs after adjusting for sex, BMI, speed, and the number of steps. Stepwise regression examined the association between the external knee flexion and adduction moments and cartilage deformation following walking. There was a significant limb × time interaction for medial cartilage thickness. Post hoc analyses indicated that cartilage thickness decreased immediately following walking in the contralateral but not ACLR limb. Main effects of limb were observed for medial, central, and lateral cartilage thickness indicating thicker cartilage in the ACLR compared with contralateral limb. A higher knee adduction moment was associated with greater cartilage deformation in the ACLR limb. Femoral cartilage in the ACLR limb exhibited a less dynamic response to walking than the uninvolved limb, which may be due to habitual underloading during gait. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) generally exhibit limb underloading behaviors during walking, but most research focuses on per-step comparisons. Cumulative loading metrics offer unique insight into joint loading as magnitude, duration, and total steps are considered, but few studies have evaluated if cumulative loads are altered post-ACLR. Here, we evaluated if underloading behaviors are apparent in ACLR limbs when using cumulative load metrics and how load metrics change in response to walking speed modifications. Methods: Treadmill walking biomechanics were evaluated in 21 participants with ACLR at three speeds (self-selected (SS); 120% SS and 80% SS). Cumulative loads per step and per kilometer were calculated using knee flexion and adduction moment (KFM and KAM) and vertical ground reaction force (GRF) impulses. Traditional magnitude metrics for KFM, KAM, and GRF were also calculated. Results: The ACLR limb displayed smaller KFM and GRF in early and late stances, but larger KFM and GRF during midstance compared with the contralateral limb (P <0.01). Only GRF cumulative loads (per step and per kilometer) were reduced in the ACLR limb (P <0.01). In response to speed modifications, load magnitudes generally increased with speed. Conversely, cumulative load metrics (per step and per kilometer) decreased at faster speeds and increased at slow speeds (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Patients with ACLR underload their knee in the sagittal plane per step, but cumulatively over the course of many steps/distance, this underloading phenomenon was not apparent. Furthermore, cumulative load increased at slower speeds, opposite to what is identified with traditional single-step metrics. Assessing cumulative load metrics may offer additional insight into how load outcomes may be impacted in injured populations or in response to gait modifications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Body mass index (BMI) and history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) independently influence gait biomechanics and knee osteoarthritis risk, but the interaction between these factors is unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare gait biomechanics between individuals with and without ACLR, and with and without overweight/obesity. We examined 104 individuals divided into four groups: with and without ACLR, and with low or high BMI (n = 26 per group). Three‐dimensional gait biomechanics were evaluated at preferred speed. The peak vertical ground reaction force, knee flexion angle and excursion, external knee flexion moment, and external knee adduction moment were extracted for analysis. Gait features were compared between groups using 2 (with and without overweight/obesity) × 2 (with and without ACLR) analysis of variance. Primary findings indicated that those with ACLR and high BMI had a larger external knee adduction moment compared with those with low BMI and with (p = 0.004) and without ACLR (p = 0.005), and compared with those without ACLR and high BMI (p = 0.001). The main effects of ACLR and BMI group were found for the knee flexion moment, and those with ACLR and with high BMI had lower knee flexion moments compared with those without ACLR (p = 0.031) and with low BMI (p = 0.021), respectively. Data suggest that individuals with ACLR and high BMI may benefit from additional intervention targeting the knee adduction moment. Moreover, lower external knee flexion moments in those with high BMI and ACLR were consistent, but high BMI did not exacerbate deficits in the knee flexion moment in those with ACLR. [Correction added on 9 November 2022, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, for clarity, the words "reductions in the lower" was removed from the initial sentence to read "Moreover, lower external knee flexion moments".] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Electrically evoked torque at rest (i.e., the torque produced from supramaximal stimuli applied to a resting muscle) has been shown to be related to muscle size in healthy adults, but this relationship has not been evaluated in pathological populations where atrophy is present. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the electrically evoked torque at rest and vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Eighteen individuals with ACL reconstruction participated. Quadriceps electrically evoked torque at rest was elicited bilaterally via sex-specific, standardized supramaximal triplet stimulations. Vastus lateralis CSA was measured at 50% of thigh length using ultrasound. Pearson's r and partial correlations were used to evaluate associations between outcomes. Evoked torque at rest was positively associated with vastus lateralis CSA in the ACL reconstructed limb (r = 0.865, partial r = 0.816, P <.01), non-reconstructed limb (r = 0.628, partial r = 0.575, P <.05), and side-to-side ratios (r = 0.670, partial r = 0.659, P <.01). These results indicate that electrically evoked torque at rest may indirectly assess side-to-side differences in quadriceps muscle size after ACL reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous research suggests more biomechanically demanding tasks (e.g., stair descent, hopping) magnify biomechanical asymmetries compared with walking after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, it is unclear if modifying task‐specific constraints, like walking speed also elicits greater biomechanical asymmetries in this population. We examined the effects of manipulating walking speed on ground reaction force (GRF) asymmetries in individuals with ACL reconstruction and uninjured controls. Thirty individuals with ACL reconstruction (age = 20.6 ± 5.4 years, body mass index [BMI] = 23.9 ± 3.3 kg/m2) and 15 controls (age = 23.1 ± 4.5 years, BMI = 23.6 ± 2.7 kg/m2) were tested on an instrumented treadmill at three speeds (100%, 120%, and 80% self‐selected speed). Bilateral vertical and posterior‐anterior GRFs were recorded at each speed. GRF asymmetries were calculated by subtracting the uninjured from the injured limb at each percent of stance. Statistical parametric mapping was used to evaluate the effects of speed on GRF asymmetries across stance. We found vertical and posterior GRF asymmetries were exacerbated at faster speeds and reduced at slower speeds in ACL individuals but not controls (p <.05). No differences in anterior GRF asymmetries were observed between speeds in either group (p >.05). Our results suggest increasing walking speed magnifies GRF asymmetries in individuals with ACL reconstruction. Statement of Clinical Significance: Evaluating both preferred and fast walking speeds may aid in characterizing biomechanical asymmetries in individuals with ACL reconstruction which may be valuable in earlier rehabilitative time points when more difficult tasks like hopping and running are not feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Voluntary activation was consistently overestimated when using the central activation ratio compared with the percent activation derived from the interpolated twitch technique. • Constant current and constant voltage electrical stimulators yield similar estimates of voluntary activation in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. • Activation estimates derived using the central activation ratio are affected by the number of electrical pulses used during testing. • The interpolated twitch technique yields better estimates of voluntary activation and is less affected by pulse train conditions or stimulators used during the testing. Accurate quantification of voluntary activation is important for understanding the extent of quadriceps dysfunction in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Voluntary activation has been quantified using both percent activation derived from the interpolated twitch technique and central activation ratio (CAR) derived from the burst superimposition technique, as well as by using different types of electrical stimulators and pulse train conditions. However, it is unclear how these parameters affect voluntary activation estimates in individuals with ACLR. This study was performed to fill this important knowledge gap in the anterior cruciate ligament literature. Quadriceps strength and voluntary activation were examined in 18 ACLR participants (12 quadriceps/patellar tendon graft, 6 hamstring tendon graft; time since ACLR: 1.06 ± 0.82 years, mean ± SD) at 90° of knee flexion using 2 stimulators (Digitimer and Grass) and pulse train conditions (3-pulse and 10-pulse). Voluntary activation was quantified by calculating both CAR and percent activation. Results indicated that voluntary activation was significantly overestimated by CAR when compared with percent activation (p < 0.001). Voluntary activation estimates were not affected by pulse train conditions when using percent activation; however, 3-pulse stimuli resulted in greater overestimation than 10-pulse stimuli when using CAR (p = 0.003). Voluntary activation did not differ between stimulators (p > 0.05); however, the Digitimer evoked greater torque at rest than the Grass (p < 0.001). These results indicate that percent activation derived from the interpolated twitch technique provides superior estimates of voluntary activation than CAR derived from burst superimposition and is less affected by pulse train conditions or stimulators in individuals with ACLR. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Restoring quadriceps muscle strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may prevent the posttraumatic osteoarthritis that affects over 50% of knees with ACLR. However, a fundamental gap exists in our understanding of how to maximize muscle strength through rehabilitation. Neurological deficits and muscle atrophy are 2 of the leading mechanisms of muscle weakness after ACLR. High-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and eccentric exercise (ECC) have been shown to independently target these mechanisms. If delivered in succession, NMES and then ECC may be able to significantly improve strength recovery. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of NMES combined with ECC to restore quadriceps strength and biomechanical symmetry and maintain cartilage health at 9 and 18 months after ACLR. Methods This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center clinical trial conducted at the University of Michigan. A total of 112 participants between the ages of 14 and 45 years and with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to NMES combined with ECC or NMES placebo combined with ECC placebo. NMES or NMES placebo will be delivered 2 times per week for 8 weeks beginning 10 to 14 days postoperatively and will be directly followed by 8 weeks of ECC or ECC placebo delivered 2 times per week. The co-primary endpoints are change from baseline to 9 months and change from baseline to 18 months after ACLR in isokinetic quadriceps strength symmetry. Secondary outcome measures include isometric quadriceps strength, quadriceps activation, quadriceps muscle morphology (cross-sectional area), knee biomechanics (sagittal plane knee angles and moments), indexes of patient-reported function, and cartilage health (T1ρ and T2 relaxation time mapping on magnetic resonance imaging). Impact The findings from this study might identify an intervention capable of targeting the lingering quadriceps weakness after ACLR and in turn prevent deterioration in cartilage health after ACLR, thereby potentially improving function in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Reductions in muscle size are common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and may contribute to suboptimal patient outcomes. However, few studies have quantified postoperative alterations in muscle quality and evaluated its associations with patient-reported function.Hypotheses: Rectus femoris cross-sectional area (CSA) will decrease postoperatively but improve at return to activity (RTA), rectus femoris muscle quality (percentage fat [PF]) will increase postoperatively and be greater at RTA compared with preoperative values, and rectus femoris CSA and PF will be associated with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores at both postoperative time points.Study Design: Case series.Level Of Evidence: Level 4.Methods: A total of 26 individuals who sustained an ACL injury and underwent reconstructive surgery were evaluated preoperatively (T0), 9 weeks post-ACLR (T1), and at RTA. Rectus femoris CSA and PF were evaluated bilaterally via ultrasound imaging, and patient-reported function was assessed using the IKDC score.Results: Bilateral reductions in rectus femoris CSA were noted from T0 to T1 (P < 0.01). Only the uninvolved limb returned to preoperative CSA (P = 0.80), as the involved limb failed to return to preoperative levels at RTA (P = 0.04). No significant changes in rectus femoris PF were observed across time points (P > 0.05). Lesser PF (P < 0.01) but not CSA (P = 0.75) was associated with higher IKDC score at T1. Lesser PF (P = 0.04) and greater CSA (P = 0.05) was associated with higher IKDC score at RTA.Conclusion: Substantial atrophy occurs bilaterally after ACLR, and the involved limb does not return to preoperative muscle size despite the patient completing rehabilitation. Quadriceps muscle morphology is associated with patient-reported function and may be an important rehabilitation target after ACLR.Clinical Relevance: Quadriceps atrophy and poor muscle quality may contribute to suboptimal patient functioning and quadriceps dysfunction and may be important in RTA decision making. Assessing muscle morphology using ultrasound may be a feasible and clinically beneficial tool in patients after ACLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Ultrasound imaging provides a cost-effective method of measuring quadriceps morphology, which may be related to self-reported function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Objective: To compare quadriceps morphology and strength between limbs in individuals with ACLR and matched control limbs and determine their associations with self-reported function. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Forty-two individuals with ACLR (females = 66%; age = 21.8 6 2.6 years; time since ACLR = 50.5 6 29.4 months) and 37 controls (females = 73%; age = 21.7 6 1.2 years). Main Outcome Measure(s): Quadriceps peak torque (PT) and rate of torque development were assessed bilaterally. Ultrasonography was used to measure the cross-sectional area (CSA) and echo intensity (EI) of the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis (VL), and vastus medialis. Self-reported function was assessed via the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales. Paired-samples t tests were calculated to compare involved and uninvolved limbs. Independent t tests were conducted to compare groups (a = .05). Linear regression was performed to analyze associations between quadriceps function and self-reported function after accounting for time since ACLR, activity level, and sex, and models for EI added subcutaneous fat as a covariate. Results: Isometric PT did not differ between limbs or groups. Involved limbs had a lower rate of torque development compared with the control (P=.01) but not the uninvolved limbs (P = .08). Vastus lateralis CSA was smaller in the involved than in the uninvolved (P, .01) but not the control limbs (P = .10). Larger VL CSA (DR2 = 0.103) and lower VL EI (DR2 = 0.076) were associated with a higher IKDC score (P, .05). Larger VL CSA was associated with greater KOOS Symptoms (DR2 0.09, P = .043) and Sport and Recreation (DR2 = 0.125, P = .014) scores. Lower VL EI was associated with higher KOOS Symptoms (DR2 = 0.104, P = .03) and Quality of Life (DR2 = 0.113, P = .01) scores. Quadriceps PT and rate of torque development were not associated with IKDC or KOOS subscale scores. Conclusions: Quadriceps morphology was associated with self-reported function in individuals with ACLR and may provide unique assessments of quadriceps function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND; Following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), individuals have quadriceps muscle impairments that influence gait mechanics and may contribute to an elevated risk of knee osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVES: To compare running mechanics and quadriceps function between individuals who have undergone ACLR and those in a control group, and to evaluate the association between quadriceps function and running mechanics. METHODS: In this controlled, cross-sectional laboratory study, 38 individuals who previously underwent primary unilateral ACLR (mean + SD time since reconstruction, 48.0 ± 25.0 months) were matched to 38 control participants based on age, sex, and body mass index, and underwent assessments of quadriceps muscle performance and running biomechanics. Quadriceps muscle performance was assessed via isokinetic and isometric knee extension peak torque and rate of torque development (RTD) over 2 time frames; 0 to 100 milliseconds (RTDIOO) and 0 to 200 milliseconds (RTD200). Running evaluation included assessment of the knee flexion angle (KFA), knee extension moment (KEM), rate of knee extension moment (RKEM), vertical instantaneous loading rate, and vertical impact peak. RESULTS: On average, there was a smaller KFA (P = .016) in the involved limb compared to the uninvolved limb in the ACLR group. Compared to limbs in the control group, involved limbs in the ACLR group had lower RTDIOO (P = .015), lower peak torque at 60Vs (P = .007), lower peak torque at IBOVs (P =,015), smaller KFA (P<.001), lower KEM (P =,001), lower RKEM (P =,004), and higher vertical Instantaneous loading rate (P =,016), Compared to limbs in the control group, uninvolved limbs in the ACLR group had lower RTDIOO (P = .003), lower peak torque at 507s (P = .017), and smaller KFA (P = .01). For the involved limbs in the ACLR group, there was a low correlation between isokinetic peak torque at 1807s and RKEM (r = 0.38, P = .01), and a negligible correlation between RTDIOO and RKEM (r = 0.25, P<.05). No differences were found in isometric strength for any comparison, CONCLUSION; Individuals who have undergone ACLR have bilateral alterations in running mechanics that are weakly associated with diminished quadriceps muscle performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Walking biomechanics are commonly affected after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and differ compared to uninjured controls. Manipulating task difficulty has been shown to affect the magnitude of walking impairments in those early after knee surgery but it is unclear if patients in later phases post-op are similarly affected by differing task demands. Here, we evaluated the effects of manipulating walking speed on between-limb differences in ground reaction force and knee biomechanics in those with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. We recruited 28 individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 20 uninjured control participants to undergo walking assessments at three speeds (self-selected, 120%, and 80% self-selected speed). Main outcomes included sagittal plane knee moments, angles, excursions, and ground reaction forces (vertical and anterior-posterior). We observed walking speed differentially impacted force and knee-outcomes in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Between-limb differences increased at fast and decreased at slow speeds in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction while uninjured participants maintained between-limb differences regardless of speed (partial η2 = 0.13–0.33, p < 0.05). Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients underloaded the surgical limb relative to both the contralateral, and uninjured controls in GRFs and sagittal plane knee moments (partial η2 range = 0.13–0.25, p < 0.05). Overall, our findings highlight the persistence of walking impairments in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction despite completing formal rehabilitation. Further research should consider determining if those displaying larger changes in gait asymmetries in response to fast walking also exhibit poorer strength and/or joint health outcomes. • Those with ACLR show larger ground reaction force and knee between-limb differences when walking fast. • Healthy individuals maintain gait symmetry regardless of walk speed. • After ACLR, testing a range of speeds may help detect poor walk patterns after ACLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction often display abnormal gait mechanics reflective of a "stiff-knee" gait (i.e., reduced knee flexion angles and moments). However, dynamic knee stiffness, which is the dynamic relationship between the position of the knee and the moment acting on it, has not been directly examined during walking in individuals with ACL reconstruction. Here, we aimed to evaluate dynamic knee stiffness in the involved compared to the uninvolved limb during weight-acceptance and mid-stance phases of walking. Twenty-six individuals who underwent ACL reconstruction (Age: 20.2 ± 5.1 yrs., Time post-op: 7.2 ± 0.9 mo.) completed an overground walking assessment using a three-dimensional motion capture system and two force plates. Dynamic knee stiffness (Nm/°) was calculated as the slope of the regression line during weight-acceptance and midstance, obtained by plotting the sagittal plane knee angle versus knee moment. Paired t-tests with Bonferroni corrections were used to compare differences in dynamic stiffness, knee excursions, and moment ranges between limbs during both stance phases. Greater dynamic knee stiffness was found in the involved compared with the uninvolved limb during weight-acceptance and mid-stance (p < 0.01). Knee flexion and extension excursions were reduced in the involved limb during both weight-acceptance and mid-stance, respectively (p < 0.01). Sagittal plane knee moment ranges were not different between limbs during weight-acceptance (p = 0.1); however, the involved limb moment range was reduced relative to the uninvolved limb during mid-stance (p < 0.01). These results indicate that individuals with ACL reconstruction walk with a stiffer knee throughout stance, which may influence knee contact forces and could contribute to the high propensity for post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis development in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at greater risk for knee osteoarthritis, which may be in part due to altered gait biomechanics. Articular cartilage thickness is typically imaged using magnetic resonance imaging, which is costly and lacks portability. Ultrasonography may provide an alternative imaging method for articular cartilage. It is unclear if ultrasonographic measurements of cartilage thickness are associated with gait biomechanics in individuals with ACLR.Research Question: To evaluate the association between sagittal and frontal plane knee mechanics during gait and resting femoral cartilage thickness from ultrasonography.Methods: Twenty-five females with ACLR (age = 21.7 ± 2.6 years, time since ACLR = 60.6 ± 24.8 months) completed assessments of walking biomechanics and resting femoral cartilage thickness. Linear regression examined the association between gait biomechanics and cartilage thickness at the medial (MC) and lateral (LC) femoral condyles, and intercondylar notch (IC) after accounting for time since ACLR, meniscal injury, and gait speed.Results: In the ACLR limb, larger vertical ground reaction force (ΔR2 = 0.21, pΔ = 0.03), knee flexion angle (ΔR2 = 0.15, pΔ = 0.05), knee flexion excursion (KFE) (ΔR2 = 0.16, pΔ = 0.04), and knee flexion impulse (KFI) (ΔR2 = 0.23, pΔ = 0.02) were associated with thicker MC cartilage. A larger knee adduction angle (ΔR2 = 0.20, pΔ = 0.03) and knee adduction moment (KAM) (ΔR2 = 0.20, pΔ = 0.03) were associated with thinner MC thickness. Larger KFE (ΔR2 = 0.20, pΔ = 0.03) was associated with thicker LC cartilage. Gait biomechanics were not associated with IC cartilage thickness. After accounting for co-variates, the combination of KFI and KAM was predictive of MC thickness (ΔR2 = 0.37, pΔ = 0.01; Total R2 = 0.52, p = 0.02). Meniscal injury, KAM, and KFI were significant predictors in the model. In the contralateral limb, KFE was associated with thicker MC cartilage (ΔR2 = 0.16, pΔ = 0.05).Significance: Sagittal and frontal plane knee mechanics during gait are uniquely associated with ultrasonographic measurements of femoral cartilage thickness in individuals with ACLR. Furthermore, concomitant medial meniscal injury was associated with thinner MC cartilage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]