Search

The study aimed to describe the epidemiology of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among solid cancer (SC) patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment (IEAT) use and mortality trends over a 25-year period. All BSI occurrences in adult SC patients at a university hospital were analyzed across five distinct five-year intervals. MDR bacteria were classified as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL)-producing and/or Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) resistant to at least three antibiotic classes, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci . A multivariate regression model identified the risk factors for MDR BSI. Of 6,117 BSI episodes, Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) constituted 60.4% (3,695/6,117), being the most common are Escherichia coli with 26.8% (1,637/6,117), Klebsiella spp. with 12.4% (760/6,117), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 8.6% (525/6,117). MDR-GNB accounted for 644 episodes (84.8% of MDR or 644/759), predominantly ESBL-producing strains (71.1% or 540/759), which escalated significantly over time. IEAT was administered in 24.8% of episodes, mainly in MDR BSI, and was associated with higher mortality (22.9% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). Independent factors for MDR BSI were prior antibiotic use [odds ratio (OR) 2.93, confidence interval (CI) 2.34-3.67], BSI during antibiotic treatment (OR 1.46, CI 1.18-1.81), biliary (OR 1.84, CI 1.34-2.52) or urinary source (OR 1.86, CI 1.43-2.43), admission period (OR) 1.28, CI 1.18-1.38, and community-acquired infection (OR 0.57, CI 0.39-0.82). The study showed an increase in MDR-GNB among SC patients with BSI. A quarter received IEAT, which was linked to increased mortality. Improving risk assessment for MDR infections and the judicious prescription of empiric antibiotics are crucial for better outcomes., Importance: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria pose a global public health threat as they are more challenging to treat, and they are on the rise. Solid cancer patients are often immunocompromised due to their disease and cancer treatments, making them more susceptible to infections. Understanding the changes and trends in bloodstream infections in solid cancer patients is crucial, to help physicians make informed decisions about appropriate antibiotic therapies, manage infections in this vulnerable population, and prevent infection. Solid cancer patients often require intensive and prolonged treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Infections can complicate these treatments, leading to treatment delays, increased healthcare costs, and poorer patient outcomes. Investigating new strategies to combat MDR infections and researching novel antibiotics in these patients is of paramount importance to avoid these negative impacts., Competing Interests: C.G.-V. has received honoraria for talks on behalf of Gilead Sciences, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, and Lilly, as well as a grant from Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, and MSD. P.P.-A. has received honoraria for talks on behalf of Merck Sharp & Dohme, Gilead, Lilly, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences. A.S. has received honoraria for talks on behalf of Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Novartis, Angelini, Menarini, and Gilead Sciences, as well as grant support from Pfizer and Gilead Sciences. O.P. has received honoraria for talks on behalf of MSD, Qiagen, and expertise for Sanofi.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of oral colistin-neomycin in preventing multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales (MDR-E) infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients., Methods: Multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, controlled trial with balanced (1:1) randomization in five transplant units. SOT recipients were screened for MDR-E intestinal colonization (extended-spectrum β-lactamase or carbapenemase producing) before transplantation and +7 and + 14 days after transplantation and assigned 1:1 to receive treatment with colistin sulfate plus neomycin sulfate for 14 days (decolonization treatment (DT) group) or no treatment (no decolonization treatment (NDT) group). The primary outcome was diagnosis of an MDR-E infection. Safety outcomes were appearance of adverse effects, mainly diarrhoea, rash, nausea and vomiting. Patients were monitored weekly until 30 days after treatment. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed., Results: MDR-E rectal colonization was assessed in 768 SOT recipients; 105 colonized patients were included in the clinical trial, 53 receiving DT and 52 NDT. No significant decrease in the risk of infection by MDR-E was observed in the DT group (9.4%, 5/53) compared to the NDT group (13.5%, 7/52) (relative risk 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.24-2.08; p 0.517). Four patients (5.6%), three (5.6%) in the DT group and one (1.9%) in the NDT group, developed colistin resistance. Twelve patients (22.7%) in the DT group had diarrhoea, eight related to treatment (15.0%); one patient (1.8%) developed skin rash and another (1.8%) nausea and vomiting. Two patients (3.8%) in the NDT group developed diarrhoea., Conclusions: DT does not reduce MDR-E infections in SOT. Colistin resistance and adverse effects such as diarrhoea are a potential issue that must be taken seriously., (Copyright © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) has proven efficacious for treating infective endocarditis (IE). However, the 2001 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria for OPAT in IE are very restrictive. We aimed to compare the outcomes of OPAT with those of hospital-based antibiotic treatment (HBAT)., Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 2000 consecutive IE patients in 25 Spanish hospitals (2008-2012) was performed., Results: A total of 429 patients (21.5%) received OPAT, and only 21.7% fulfilled IDSA criteria. Males accounted for 70.5%, median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56-76), and 57% had native-valve IE. The most frequent causal microorganisms were viridans group streptococci (18.6%), Staphylococcus aureus (15.6%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (14.5%). Median length of antibiotic treatment was 42 days (IQR, 32-54), and 44% of patients underwent cardiac surgery. One-year mortality was 8% (42% for HBAT; P < .001), 1.4% of patients relapsed, and 10.9% were readmitted during the first 3 months after discharge (no significant differences compared with HBAT). Charlson score (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.42; P = .01) and cardiac surgery (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, .09-.63; P = .04) were associated with 1-year mortality, whereas aortic valve involvement (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, .22-.98; P = .007) was the only predictor of 1-year readmission. Failing to fulfill IDSA criteria was not a risk factor for mortality or readmission., Conclusions: OPAT provided excellent results despite the use of broader criteria than those recommended by IDSA. OPAT criteria should therefore be expanded., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Backgound: In recent years we have witnessed an increase in infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). In our setting, we have observed a dramatic increase in infections caused by extended-spectrum betalactamase-producing (ESBL) Enterobacteriaceae in KTR. In 2014 we changed surgical prophylaxis from Cefazolin 2 g to Ertapenem 1 g., Methods: We compared bacterial infections and their resistance phenotype during the first post-transplant month with an historical cohort collected during 2013 that had received Cefazolin., Results: During the study period 110 patients received prophylaxis with Cefazolin and 113 with Ertapenem. In the Ertapenem cohort we observed a non-statistically significant decrease in the percentage of early bacterial infection from 57 to 47%, with urine being the most frequent source in both. The frequency of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae spp. decreased from 64% in the Cefazolin cohort to 36% in the Ertapenem cohort (p = 0.005). In addition, percentage of ESBL-producing strains decreased from 21 to 8% of all Enterobacteriaceae isolated (p = 0.015). After adjusted in multivariate Cox regression analysis, male sex (HR 0.16, 95%CI: 0.03-0.75), cefazolin prophylaxis (HR 4.7, 95% CI: 1.1-22.6) and acute rejection (HR 14.5, 95% CI: 1.3-162) were associated to ESBL- producing Enterobacteriaceae infection., Conclusions: Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis with a single dose of Ertapenem in kidney transplant recipients reduced the incidence of early infections due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae without increasing the incidence of other multidrug-resistant microorganisms or C. difficile.

The aim of this study was to describe the etiology and outcome of short-term peripheral venous catheter (PVC)-related bloodstream infections (PVCRBSI) in a 25-year period (1992 to 2016) and to identify predictive factors of Gram-negative PVCRBSI. This was a prospective observational study including all episodes of PVCRBSI. A multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for calendar year was built to explore factors associated with a Gram-negative bacterial etiology. Over the study period, 711 episodes of PVCRBSI were identified. Incidence rate of PVCRBSI increased from 0.06 to 0.13 episodes/1,000 patient-days. A Gram-negative bacterial etiology was demonstrated in 162 (22.8%) episodes. There was a significant increase in the proportion of Gram-negative infections (22.6% in 1992 to 1996 versus 33.2% in 2012 to 2016). Independent predictive factors of Gram-negative PVCRBSI were the following: being in the hospital for more than 7 days with a catheter in situ for more than 3 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20 to 2.69), surgery in the previous month (aOR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.40 to 4.09), and antimicrobial treatment with beta-lactams (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.78). In conclusion, we reported an increase in the prevalence of Gram-negative PVCRBSI over the last 25 years. Factors associated with a Gram-negative bacterial etiology were being in the hospital for more than 7 days with a catheter in situ for more than 3 days, having undergone surgery, and having received antimicrobial treatment with beta-lactams., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.)

Introduction: Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) are a common clinical problem in kidney transplant recipients. Due to the complex urological anatomy derived from the implantation of the kidney graft, the spectrum of the disease and the broad underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Recurrent UTI worsen the quality of life, decrease the graft survival and increase the costs of kidney transplantation. Areas covered: In this review, we describe the definitions, clinical characteristics, pathophysiological mechanisms and microbiology of recurrent urinary tract infections in kidney transplantations. The actual published literature on the management of recurrent urinary tract infections is based on case series, observational cohorts and very few clinical trials. In this review, the available evidence is compiled to propose evidence-based strategies to manage these complex cases. Expert commentary: The management of recurrent urinary tract infections in kidney transplant patients requires a proper diagnosis of the underlying mechanism. Early identification of structural or functional urological abnormalities, potentially amenable for surgical correction, is crucial for a successful management. The use of antibiotics to prevent recurrent infections should be carefully evaluated to avoid side effects and emergence of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel fifth-generation cephalosporin β-lactamase combination with activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamases-producing enterobacteriaceae, and multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, clinical experience in real cases caused by these microorganisms is scarce. In this study, we describe three patients with severe infections caused by multidrug resistant and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa that were successfully treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam.

We sought to determine the frequency, risk factors, and clinical impact of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) in kidney transplant recipients. Of 867 patients who received a kidney transplant between 2003 and 2010, 174 (20%) presented at least one episode of UTI. Fifty-five patients presented a recurrent UTI (32%) and 78% of them could be also considered relapsing episodes. Recurrent UTI was caused by extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (31%), followed by non-ESBL producing Escherichia coli (15%), multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14%), and ESBL-producing E. coli (13%). The variables associated with a higher risk of recurrent UTI were a first or second episode of infection by MDR bacteria (OR 12; 95%CI 528), age >60 years (OR 2.2; 95%CI 1.15.1), and reoperation (OR 3; 95%CI 1.37.1). In addition, more relapses were recorded in patients with UTI caused by MDR organisms than in those with susceptible microorganisms. There were no differences in acute rejection, graft function, graft loss or 1 year mortality between groups. In conclusion, recurrent UTI is frequent among kidney recipients and associated with MDR organism. Classic risk factors for UTI (female gender and diabetes) are absent in kidney recipients, thus highlighting the relevance of uropathogens in this population., (© Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Purpose: Infection due to the six ESKAPE pathogens has recently been identified as a serious emerging problem. However, there is still a lack of information on bacteremia caused by these organisms in cancer patients. We aimed to assess the epidemiology, antibiotic therapy and outcomes of bacteremia due to drug-resistant ESKAPE pathogens (rESKAPE) in patients with cancer., Methods: All episodes of bacteremia prospectively documented in hospitalized adults with cancer from 2006 to 2011 were analyzed., Results: Of 1,148 episodes of bacteremia, 392 (34 %) were caused by ESKAPE pathogens. Fifty-four episodes (4.7 %) were due to rESKAPE strains (vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium 0, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 13, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESLB)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae 7, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii 4, carbapenem- and quinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa 18 and derepression chromosomic ß-lactam and ESBL-producing Enterobacter species 12. Risk factors independently associated with rESKAPE bacteremia were comorbidities, prior antibiotic therapy, urinary catheter and urinary tract source. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was more frequent in patients with rESKAPE bacteremia than in the other cases (55.6 % vs. 21.5 %, p < 0.001). Persistence of bacteremia (25 % vs. 9.7 %), septic metastasis (8 % vs. 4 %) and early case-fatality rate (23 % vs. 11 %) were more frequent in patients with rESKAPE bacteremia than in patients with other etiologies (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Bacteremia due to rESKAPE pathogens in cancer patients occurs mainly among those with comorbidities who have received prior antibiotic therapy and have a urinary tract source. These patients often receive inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy and have a poor outcome.