1. Repurposing TAK-285 as An Antibacterial Agent against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Targeting Cell Membrane.
- Author
-
Huang J, Xu Z, He P, Lin Z, Peng R, Yu Z, Li P, Deng Q, and Liu X
- Subjects
- Humans, Staphylococcus aureus drug effects, Staphylococcal Infections microbiology, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial drug effects, Anti-Bacterial Agents pharmacology, Biofilms drug effects, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus drug effects, Cell Membrane drug effects, Drug Repositioning
- Abstract
Infections and antimicrobial resistance are becoming serious global public health crises. Multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infections necessitate novel antimicrobial development. In this study, we demonstrated TAK-285, a novel dual HER2/EGFR inhibitor, exerted antibacterial activity against 17 clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 15 methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates in vitro, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 13.7 μg/mL. At 1 × MIC, TAK-285 completely inhibited the growth of S. aureus bacterial planktonic cells, and at 2 × MIC, it exhibited a superior inhibitory effect on intracellular S. aureus SA113-GFP compared to linezolid. Moreover, TAK-285 effectively inhibited biofilm formation at sub-MIC, eradicated mature biofilm and eliminated bacteria within biofilms, as confirmed by CLSM. Furthermore, the disruption of cell membrane permeability and potential was found by TAK-285 on S. aureus, suggesting its targeting of cell membrane integrity. Global proteomic analysis demonstrated that TAK-285 disturbed the metabolic processes of S. aureus, interfered with biofilm-related gene expression, and disrupted membrane-associated proteins. Conclusively, we repurposed TAK-285 as an antimicrobial with anti-biofilm properties against S. aureus by targeting cell membrane. This study provided strong evidence for the potential of TAK-285 as a promising antimicrobial agent against S. aureus., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethics Approval: The strain isolates used in this study were obtained from the hospital clinical laboratory, with no direct contact with any animals or humans. According to Chinese guidelines, the isolates were collected as part of routine clinical management, therefore ethical review or patient consent was not required. Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Consent to Publication: Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF