Search

Introduction: A short antibiotic regimen is recommended for the treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection. Nevertheless, the treatment to follow in other situations is not so clearly defined. When the person affected by lower urinary tract infection is not a young woman, it is recommended to treat at least 7 days, and quinolones or cotrimoxazole are the antibiotics most often used. However, because of the frequency of drug resistance in this type if infection, it is advisable to apply antibiotics with lower rates of resistance, such as fosfomycin trometamol, for longer treatment periods than the often-used single dose., Methods: Using the data on urinary elimination of fosfomycin after a single dose obtained in a prior study in healthy volunteers, we simulated the urinary concentrations of this antibiotic following administration of two doses. In addition, we calculated the interval of administration required to achieve urinary concentrations greater than 16 mg/L, the critical concentration of sensitivity for Escherichia coli, one of the most commonly implicated microorganisms in these infections., Results: Fosfomycin concentrations in urine persisted above the defined cut-off for 161 hours after administration of two 3-g doses of fosfomycin trometamol, 72 hours apart. This implied an efficacy time of 66% in a period of 7 days., Conclusion: From the pharmacokinetic viewpoint, the optimum dosage of fosfomycin trometamol to achieve appropriate urinary concentrations along 7 days is administration of two 3-g doses, 72 hours apart.

The in-vitro susceptibility of an organism and the pharmacokinetics of an antimicrobial agent are two basic factors on which the choice of standardised treatment regimens is based. However, the inter-individual variability of these factors, which modifies the exposure of bacteria to an antibiotic in terms of time and quantity, is not usually taken into account. In 87 patients treated with beta-lactams (ceftriaxone, cefepime or piperacillin), the probability of failure was greater when the infectious process was located in tissues with barriers to the distribution of beta-lactams. Mean MICs of piperacillin and cefepime, but not ceftriaxone, were below the breakpoints in cases of both recovery and failure, but organisms isolated from patients with a poor outcome had higher MICs. Therefore, the use of breakpoints to determine the susceptibility of microorganisms was not satisfactory in predicting the outcome for a large number of patients. If MICs are determined and plasma concentrations are monitored, dosages can be adjusted according to these parameters, thereby allowing antibiotic treatment to be individualised.

Antimicrobials with specific activity against Gram-positive cocci (glycopeptides, oxazolidinones and streptogramins) have pharmacokinetic differences that are important to know. Linezolid and teicoplanin can be administered extravascularly due to their good bioavailability, allowing their use as sequential therapy in patients requiring prolonged treatment. All of these antimicrobials have an adequate distribution in extracellular tissues, even teicoplanin, due to the balance between the fraction that is bound and unbound to plasma proteins and its long terminal half-life. As the elimination of glycopeptides is almost exclusively renal, it is necessary to perform a posology adjustment in patients with renal failure. Quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid are metabolized by the liver, but CYP450 is only involved in streptogramin elimination.